·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Debate #1... GO!
Debate #1... GO!Follow
#427Almalieque,
Posted: Oct 15 2012 at 4:29 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) 
How funny and ironic. Why dont you note your own ridicule and actually disprove it if you feel so confident.
How funny and ironic. Why dont you note your own ridicule and actually disprove it if you feel so confident.
Quoting really isn't all that difficult.
Donate. One day it could be your family.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
Uglysasquatch wrote:
Quoting really isn't all that difficult.
Q.E.D.
Says the person who got "to" and "too" mixed up.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Almalieque wrote:
Timelordwho wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Since we're talking about math.. I figured that I would bring up my favorite math post
[quote=Almalieque][quote=Kavek]Another word salad. Delightful.
Yes, and my point was that this was not the case, as anyone who takes you seriously enough as an intellectual to engage with you earnestly in debate is likely themselves stupid, because they can't recognise how pig thick you are. BT insults the general intelligence of this group by saying your intellect is average (median) within iy, which allows for specific individuals within that group being intelligent (and just having a particularly demanding sense of pity, say).
[quote=Almalieque][quote=Kavek]Another word salad. Delightful.
Yes, and my point was that this was not the case, as anyone who takes you seriously enough as an intellectual to engage with you earnestly in debate is likely themselves stupid, because they can't recognise how pig thick you are. BT insults the general intelligence of this group by saying your intellect is average (median) within iy, which allows for specific individuals within that group being intelligent (and just having a particularly demanding sense of pity, say).
Ok, let me prove it to you.
Suppose there are two groups of people, group A and group B.
Let intelligence be measured in a score from 1 to n
Assume that the lowest possible score considered to be human is n/2.
I was stated to have less than human intelligence, so let x represent the difference of intelligence that I e, n/2. Or in other words (n/2) - x.
Since I represent the median intelligence for group B, that makes the range of group B to be 1 to (n-2x)
Therefore, as x increases, the range for group B decreases.
So, there is potential for some intelligent people, but not much if I'm as dumb as you say I am. Group B starts off at a disadvantage and the dumber you claim me to be, the dumber you claim them to be.
Just do faulty premises, shaky inferences, falsified statistics and troubled fundamental operators, leaving the reader to wonder, "Wow, is this really the best this poor man can do?".
How funny and ironic. Why dont you note your own ridicule and actually disprove it if you feel so confident.Who said what again?
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
Allegory wrote:
It's nice that you're all so enthusiastic about math.
Yay math!
Day late and dollar short?
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
Quote:
Quoting really isn't all that difficult.
I was on my cell and all I did was "quote all" and replied.. Not sure why it turned out that way.
Leaked Debate Agreement Shows Both Obama and Romney are Sniveling Cowards
by John Cook
Time's Mark Halperin has made himself useful for once by obtaining, and publishing, a copy of the 21-page memorandum of understanding that the Obama and Romney campaigns negotiated with the Commission on Presidential Debates establishing the rules governing this month's presidential and vice presidential face-offs. The upshot: Both campaigns are terrified at anything even remotely spontaneous happening.
They aren't permitted to ask each other questions, propose pledges to each other, or walk outside a "predesignated area." And for the town-hall-style debate tomorrow night, the audience members posing questions aren't allowed to ask follow-ups (their mics will be cut off as soon as they get their questions out). Nor will moderator Candy Crowley. Rest of article
Full 21-page memorandum of understanding
Edited, Oct 15th 2012 7:09pm by jtftaru
by John Cook
Time's Mark Halperin has made himself useful for once by obtaining, and publishing, a copy of the 21-page memorandum of understanding that the Obama and Romney campaigns negotiated with the Commission on Presidential Debates establishing the rules governing this month's presidential and vice presidential face-offs. The upshot: Both campaigns are terrified at anything even remotely spontaneous happening.
They aren't permitted to ask each other questions, propose pledges to each other, or walk outside a "predesignated area." And for the town-hall-style debate tomorrow night, the audience members posing questions aren't allowed to ask follow-ups (their mics will be cut off as soon as they get their questions out). Nor will moderator Candy Crowley. Rest of article
Full 21-page memorandum of understanding
Edited, Oct 15th 2012 7:09pm by jtftaru
.
So it'll be like every other presidential debate?
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Well, probably not the ones before television and radio, though we'd have to ask Bijou about it.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
I thought tonight's debate was supposed to be a town hall type discussion with normal old (heavily screened) people asking their own (pre-edited and carefully balanced) questions of the two men.
I suppose that leaves a bit more room for non-scripted stuff to come up.
I suppose that leaves a bit more room for non-scripted stuff to come up.
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
And if you ask if they like pepperoni or sausage on their pizza, you can get a free pizza a week for thirty years from Pizza Hut.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
lolgaxe wrote:
And if you ask if they like pepperoni or sausage on their pizza, you can get a free pizza a week for thirty years from Pizza Hut.
I'd never have to go grocery shopping again!
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
TLW?
You're still working on the disproof?
You're still working on the disproof?
Almalieque wrote:
TLW?
You're still working on the disproof?
You're still working on the disproof?
Faulty premise: You have an intelligence quotient below the range of human, and based your measurement system off it >> part of set cannot be outside set
Shaky inference: Average determines range of value groups >> disconnected, which is why useful statistics have other tools to show degree of variance
Falsified statistics: You are of average intelligence out of this forum group >> Standard BT trolling, not something to base a mathematical proof
Troubled operators: more data points on one end of a spectrum swings a range such that median != midpoint, undefined group sets,
Faulty conclusions: All conclusions generated.
Just as Planned.
Your made up terminology is amusing. Therefore, I'm not taking your response seriously.
False: Barking Turtle referenced to a population and said I was the median, it's within the set. The part of me being "sub-human" is irrelevant to the said set. It's nothing more than a measurement. Try again.
I wasn't doing an "average" Try again.
What? You're reaching hard.. the range was defined with no gaps. Try again.
Which were? Either you don't know what the conclusion is and/or you're really dense.
TLW wrote:
Faulty premise: You have an intelligence quotient below the range of human, and based your measurement system off it >> part of set cannot be outside set
False: Barking Turtle referenced to a population and said I was the median, it's within the set. The part of me being "sub-human" is irrelevant to the said set. It's nothing more than a measurement. Try again.
TLW wrote:
Shaky inference: Average determines range of value groups >> disconnected, which is why useful statistics have other tools to show degree of variance
I wasn't doing an "average" Try again.
TLW wrote:
Troubled operators: more data points on one end of a spectrum swings a range such that median != midpoint, undefined group sets,
What?
You're reaching hard.. the range was defined with no gaps. Try again. TLW wrote:
Faulty conclusions: All conclusions generated.
Which were? Either you don't know what the conclusion is and/or you're really dense.
Unsurprisingly, you don't understand; even after a painfully clear explanation.
Just as Planned.
You obviously have nothing and just made up generic responses.. I just responded, like I'm doing now, for the +1.
The simple fact that you said "conclusions", is a dead give away. I feel better. I thought for a moment that I made a mistake. Thanks !
The simple fact that you said "conclusions", is a dead give away. I feel better. I thought for a moment that I made a mistake. Thanks !
Oh, I wouldn't say you made a mistake.
Oh, I wouldn't say you made a mistake.
Oh, I wouldn't say you made a mistake.
Oh, I wouldn't say you made a mistake.
Oh, I wouldn't say you made a mistake.
I have nothing to add to this conversation except a video, which probably makes more sense then some of the arguments in here.
Shaowstrike (Retired - FFXI)
91PUP/BLM 86SMN/BST 76DRK
Cooking/Fishing 100
"We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary."
— James D. Nicoll
91PUP/BLM 86SMN/BST 76DRK
Cooking/Fishing 100
"We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary."
— James D. Nicoll
This is one of my favorites
Might as well drop this here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=QlwilbVYvUg
Edited, Oct 16th 2012 7:24pm by BrownDuck
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=QlwilbVYvUg
Edited, Oct 16th 2012 7:24pm by BrownDuck
Lol, that is clever and funny
Almalieque wrote:
You obviously have nothing and just made up generic responses.. I just responded, like I'm doing now, for the +1.
The simple fact that you said "conclusions", is a dead give away. I feel better. I thought for a moment that I made a mistake. Thanks !
The simple fact that you said "conclusions", is a dead give away. I feel better. I thought for a moment that I made a mistake. Thanks !
Unsurprisingly, you still don't understand
Just as Planned.
Recent Visitors: 364
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (364)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Debate #1... GO!
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC