Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

This is what we are up against.Follow

#102 Sep 29 2012 at 12:56 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
No one said it was magic. You make ice cream within a fairly narrow range of temperatures because you want it cold enough to be ice cream but not so cold as to be ice cream that you need a hammer and pick to eat. Ice-cream machines are designed to provide this temperature. As you noted, if you replaced the sugar for salt, you'd have double the depression effect, thus keeping it from freezing within the temperatures used to make ice cream. That's not to say it'd never, ever freeze. It just probably wouldn't freeze in your ice cream machine.

It's entirely possible that there was just a very minimal amount of salt used because perhaps they didn't sweeten their ice cream with sugar much; I guess you can also use condensed milk for sweetness. But if there wasn't enough salt to make it unpalatable, that negates the whole "And he ate the WHOLE thing!" aspect of the story.

Edit: This is also a sterling example of the sort of dumb shit we're willing to argue on this forum Smiley: laugh

Edited, Sep 29th 2012 1:57pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#103 Sep 29 2012 at 1:14 PM Rating: Good
****
5,684 posts
Jophiel wrote:
No one said it was magic. You make ice cream within a fairly narrow range of temperatures because you want it cold enough to be ice cream but not so cold as to be ice cream that you need a hammer and pick to eat. Ice-cream machines are designed to provide this temperature. As you noted, if you replaced the sugar for salt, you'd have double the depression effect, thus keeping it from freezing within the temperatures used to make ice cream. That's not to say it'd never, ever freeze. It just probably wouldn't freeze in your ice cream machine.

It's entirely possible that there was just a very minimal amount of salt used because perhaps they didn't sweeten their ice cream with sugar much; I guess you can also use condensed milk for sweetness. But if there wasn't enough salt to make it unpalatable, that negates the whole "And he ate the WHOLE thing!" aspect of the story.

Edit: This is also a sterling example of the sort of dumb shit we're willing to argue on this forum Smiley: laugh

Edited, Sep 29th 2012 1:57pm by Jophiel
I wasn't implying that it was magic, just thought that it'd be nice to put the science behind it because there seemed to be some confusion.

I couldn't give two ***** about the Romneys and their ice cream fiasco
#104 Sep 29 2012 at 1:19 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
I don't think anyone is really stupid enough to think "salty stuff never ever freezes", or we'd have a hell of a time explaining oceanic glaciers.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#105 Sep 29 2012 at 2:34 PM Rating: Excellent
**
275 posts
Living on a farm, if you ***** up the ice cream you feed it to the pigs (which will pretty much eat anything). Then you get bacon!

Edited, Sep 29th 2012 4:14pm by FalkononTitan
#106 Sep 29 2012 at 11:19 PM Rating: Good
****
4,137 posts
ElneClare wrote:
Anyone want some vintage rick rack?


Is that an old school one of these?
____________________________
Dandruffshampoo wrote:
Curses, beaten by Professor stupidopo-opo.
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Stupidmonkey is more organized than a bag of raccoons.
#107 Oct 01 2012 at 8:11 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Back on topic, running the numbers for these Obama phones, they cost<$9 per month per phone, including device, service, shipping, program management etc.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#108 Oct 01 2012 at 8:23 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
If I can dredge out the stats, I'll try to backtrack some of those figures, to get a clearer picture on which part of the program is incurring the bulk of the cost.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#109 Oct 01 2012 at 8:25 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Does it play Angry Birds?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#110 Oct 01 2012 at 9:19 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Yeah, if you hurl it at them.

But I'd call that fowlplay.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#111 Oct 01 2012 at 10:51 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
This is why Obama is a failure. There aren't any pigs around where I live for me to throw my free Obama Phone at.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#112 Oct 01 2012 at 11:13 AM Rating: Decent
lolgaxe wrote:
This is why Obama is a failure. There aren't any pigs around where I live for me to throw my free Obama Phone at.


So now you're blaming Obama for the bacon shortage?
#113 Oct 01 2012 at 12:20 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
I don't see any other presidents to blame, so ya!
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#114 Oct 01 2012 at 12:27 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Taft ate it all.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#115 Oct 01 2012 at 12:42 PM Rating: Good
***
3,053 posts
I own a "Obama" phone and only game it comes with is Brick Attack. I try to see if I could pay for another game, and got message that I couldn't get other games for it. Which sucks as I'm more a Solitaire player then trying to move the paddle with very cheaply made Korean phone. Well I might make enough money selling jewelry that I could upgrade to a prepaid phone plan.
____________________________
In the place of a Dark Lord you would have a Queen! Not dark but beautiful and terrible as the Morn! Treacherous as the Seas! Stronger than the foundations of the Earth! All shall love me and despair! -ElneClare

This Post is written in Elnese, If it was an actual Post, it would make sense.
#116 Oct 01 2012 at 12:48 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
ElneClare wrote:
I own a "Obama" phone and only game it comes with is Brick Attack.

Which is the game where your phone randomly and irrevocably stops working.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#117 Oct 01 2012 at 12:52 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
I think I've got the high score on that one.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#118gbaji, Posted: Oct 01 2012 at 6:45 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) How is that the opposite of frugal? He's going to make ice cream. He messed up the first batch such that it didn't taste very good, didn't freeze fully, whatever. He's going to make another batch of ice cream. Hell, he's probably going to make several batches over the course of a hot summer. By saving and consuming the bad batch himself when he might otherwise eat some of each future batch, he's effectively saving the cost of the first batch. Which is being frugal.
#119 Oct 01 2012 at 7:05 PM Rating: Excellent
Well, you are the poster child for wacky partisanship, so you would know.
#120 Oct 01 2012 at 7:09 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
If someone said that watching my grandmother save hundreds of dry rotted rubber bands inspired them not to tolerate waste, I would happily mock them for it. That's exactly the sort of crap that should be thrown out.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#121 Oct 01 2012 at 7:51 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
As has already been pointed out, ice cream is not something anyone needs to eat. If he'd thrown it out and gone without ice cream so his kids could have the next good batch, that'd be a lesson. Eating salty, nasty, extraneous empty calories because they're there is not really a lesson I'd want my kids to take away.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#122 Oct 01 2012 at 11:08 PM Rating: Good
****
4,137 posts
Samira wrote:
As has already been pointed out, ice cream is not something anyone needs to eat. If he'd thrown it out and gone without ice cream so his kids could have the next good batch, that'd be a lesson. Eating salty, nasty, extraneous empty calories because they're there is not really a lesson I'd want my kids to take away.



I think you mean OUR kids Smiley: wink
____________________________
Dandruffshampoo wrote:
Curses, beaten by Professor stupidopo-opo.
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Stupidmonkey is more organized than a bag of raccoons.
#123 Oct 02 2012 at 5:40 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Is there something you're trying to tell me, Stupidmonkey?
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#124 Oct 02 2012 at 6:36 AM Rating: Good
****
4,137 posts
Samira wrote:
Is there something you're trying to tell me, Stupidmonkey?


The moment has passed, I am no longer in the mood Smiley: lol
____________________________
Dandruffshampoo wrote:
Curses, beaten by Professor stupidopo-opo.
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Stupidmonkey is more organized than a bag of raccoons.
#125 Oct 02 2012 at 6:45 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
gbaji wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Assuming he didn't make the children eat the salty ice cream, and instead made a new (presumably properly made) batch for the kids, his act of frugality makes a lot more sense.
Except for the part where that's the opposite of what frugal is, that makes sense.


How is that the opposite of frugal? He's going to make ice cream. He messed up the first batch such that it didn't taste very good, didn't freeze fully, whatever. He's going to make another batch of ice cream. Hell, he's probably going to make several batches over the course of a hot summer. By saving and consuming the bad batch himself when he might otherwise eat some of each future batch, he's effectively saving the cost of the first batch. Which is being frugal.

If he ate a whole batch of ice cream himself - because it tasted bad, was the wrong color or whatever, that is excessive. If he was highly frugal he's not be serving ice cream at all - there's no need for it.

If he was just a bit of a tightwad, he'd provide the kids their treat but if it flubbed up they'd have to eat it as is or skip it until next time.

Making the second batch, whether or not the first batch was eaten by himself or used as a fertilizer for Audrey 2, would be the wasteful part of this equation.



Edited, Oct 2nd 2012 2:45pm by Elinda
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#126 Oct 02 2012 at 6:58 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
gbaji wrote:
He's going to make another batch of ice cream.
If he were frugal he wouldn't. That's kind of the point of frugality.
gbaji wrote:
To me, the response is a pretty glaring example of partisanship gone to nutty ends.
You are going to ridiculous lengths to defend your assumption, so I guess we could give you this one.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 381 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (381)