Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

If the election happened today.Follow

#52 Sep 19 2012 at 9:50 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
15,952 posts
I don't know, It has a certain ring. Like Blue Sky Frog.

Duck Maverick Goose Jnr.
Duck Maverick Goose the Third.

Duck, Maverick & Goose, Attorneys at Law.
#53 Sep 19 2012 at 9:55 AM Rating: Good
**
457 posts
Aripyanfar wrote:
Duck, Maverick & Goose, Attorneys at Law.


Ok. That one would be fun to see on a bill board.
____________________________
lolgaxe wrote:
Thinking outside the box is fine, but the owner's manual is on the inside.
#54 Sep 19 2012 at 9:57 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Dewey, Cheetum, & Howe.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#55 Sep 19 2012 at 10:10 AM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
More good news for Romney:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/post-poll-tim-kaine-opens-first-lead-over-george-allen-in-va-senate-race/2012/09/19/4773acf8-01dd-11e2-9367-4e1bafb958db_story.html


Timothy M. Kaine has jumped ahead of George Allen for the first time in their U.S. Senate race, according to a new Washington Post poll in Virginia, changing the complexion of a nationally watched contest that could help determine which party controls the chamber.

Kaine (D) leads fellow former governor Allen (R) among likely voters by 51 percent to 43 percent in the poll, and Kaine is ahead among all registered voters by an identical margin in the hard-fought contest to succeed retiring Sen. James Webb (D).


What are the opposite of coattails? Oil slicks of incompetence? I'm sure the Washington Post is oversampling Tim Kaine supporters somehow.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#56 Sep 19 2012 at 10:17 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Political Wire wrote:
A WBUR poll in Massachusetts voters finds challenger Elizabeth Warren (D) leading Sen. Scott Brown (R) by five points among likely voters, 45% to 40%.

It's the fourth poll in four days showing Warren with the lead.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#57 Sep 19 2012 at 10:22 AM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

A WBUR poll in Massachusetts voters finds challenger Elizabeth Warren (D) leading Sen. Scott Brown (R) by five points among likely voters, 45% to 40%.


There's an obvious problem here, Joph. *Likely voters*. Brown voters are real hard working men and women who are smart enough to know they can't predict the future. When asked if they are "likely" to vote, they obviously give the only true answer possible: "Who can say, life is uncertain, I may be hit by a bus while rescuing puppies tomorrow. Happens all the time to us Brown supporters." Also, I suspect the poll question was phrased along the lines of "Would you vote for Warren if she were the only person alive other that you and you had to vote for someone not yourself or suffer a terribly painful death?" It seems pretty obvious that WBUR, an NPR affiliate (hello, bias?) would have phrased it this way. Landslide: Brown!
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#58 Sep 19 2012 at 11:56 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
I've heard that 20% of likely warren voters are zombies who will be turned away at the polls due to new voter registration laws, giving brown a solid 4% lead.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#59 Sep 19 2012 at 12:01 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Well, the voter law requiring holy symbols on all government ID is bound to be struck as unconstitutional.

Couple polls showing Baldwin ahead or tied in WI now; she was previously trailing.

Edited, Sep 19th 2012 1:02pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#60 Sep 19 2012 at 12:07 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
That just means now they're oversampling.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#61 Sep 19 2012 at 12:19 PM Rating: Excellent
****
6,471 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
That just means now they're oversampling.


Your mom was oversampled.
#62 Sep 19 2012 at 12:20 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Eske Esquire wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
That just means now they're oversampling.


Your mom was oversampled.


Took a few too many polls.

Edited, Sep 19th 2012 11:22am by someproteinguy
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#63 Sep 19 2012 at 1:38 PM Rating: Excellent
****
6,471 posts
someproteinguy wrote:
Eske Esquire wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
That just means now they're oversampling.


Your mom was oversampled.


Took a few too many polls.

Edited, Sep 19th 2012 11:22am by someproteinguy


Chads hanging off her everywhere.


More ''voting' than 'polling' on that one, but fuck it, it counts.

Edited, Sep 19th 2012 3:40pm by Eske
#64 Sep 19 2012 at 2:33 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

Huh? Didn't we just have a thread about this like a month or so ago where it was pointed out that a number of polls were oversampling (over weighting actually IIRC) Dem leaning people in their polls and their justification was precisely because of the voter turnout ratio from the 2008 election? Where the hell have you been? Hell. This was a big news story


Was it? I must have missed this "big story". Can you post a link to one of the articles discussing this "big story" where most polling firms admit they're oversampling Democratic voters based on 2008 turnout?


Your bar raising aside, it's not like it's hard to type "democrat oversampling" into a google search or anything. Where have you been living, under a rock?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#65 Sep 19 2012 at 2:54 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
gbaji wrote:
Your bar raising aside, it's not like it's hard to type "democrat oversampling" into a google search or anything. Where have you been living, under a rock?


I pushed the google button.

I found lots of webpages referencing the problem, saying that it happens, etc. but it's a bit harder to find anything demonstrating or showing numbers or anything. Such is the nature of the internet I suppose. Lots of this graph though.
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#66 Sep 19 2012 at 3:40 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
Your bar raising aside, it's not like it's hard to type "democrat oversampling" into a google search or anything. Where have you been living, under a rock?

Ironically, in the linked thread, you're whining and ******** about having to use Google because I didn't hold your hand Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#67 Sep 19 2012 at 3:46 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Your bar raising aside, it's not like it's hard to type "democrat oversampling" into a google search or anything. Where have you been living, under a rock?

Ironically, in the linked thread, you're whining and ******** about having to use Google because I didn't hold your hand Smiley: laugh


That's really what you're going to take away from this?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#68 Sep 19 2012 at 4:14 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Well, I'm sure a discussion about polling would be as enriching as it has been in previous cycles so... sure. I'll happily notice you failing to live up to your own standards.

Let me know when Romney makes California as competitive as McCain did.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#69 Sep 19 2012 at 4:53 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts


Your bar raising aside, it's not like it's hard to type "democrat oversampling" into a google search or anything. Where have you been living, under a rock?


Getting paid to use survey analysis to drive predictive algorithms. You?
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#70 Sep 19 2012 at 5:07 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Smasharoo wrote:
Getting paid to use survey analysis to drive predictive algorithms. You?

Christ, Smash. That'd make you an expert so now you're sure to be wrong. Only Gbaji's laser like man-on-the-street opinion can cut through your ivory tower elite book-learnin'.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#71 Sep 19 2012 at 5:33 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Yeah, Smash. Have you not learned yet that a good American hates and fears those who know more than he does?
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#72 Sep 19 2012 at 6:17 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Smasharoo wrote:


Your bar raising aside, it's not like it's hard to type "democrat oversampling" into a google search or anything. Where have you been living, under a rock?


Getting paid to use survey analysis to drive predictive algorithms.


There's a whole lot of issues with political party oversampling in surveys relating to medical devices? Who knew!

Quote:
You?


Getting paid to provide actual working solutions to real world problems that most people can't figure out because they're too busy listening to some idiot consultant who insists that his predictive model must be right even when it quite obviously isn't.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#73 Sep 19 2012 at 6:22 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
I have a friend that works for Frito-Lay that describes his job the exact same way.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#74 Sep 19 2012 at 6:23 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Today's state polling dump...
Quote:
Colorado: Obama 48%, Romney 47% (Quinnipiac/CBS News/NYT)

Florida: Obama 49%, Romney 44% (Fox News)

Ohio: Obama 49%, Romney 42% (Fox News)

Michigan: Obama 52%, Romney 44% (CNN/ORC)

Pennsylvania: Obama 50%, Romney 41% (Morning Call/Muhlenberg)

Virginia: Obama 50%, Romney 46% (Quinnipiac/CBS News/NYT)

Virginia: Obama 49%, Romney 46% (We Ask America)

Virginia: Obama 50%, Romney 43% (Fox News)

Wisconsin:Obama 51%, Romney 45% (Quinnipiac/CBS News/NYT)

Wisconsin: Obama 54%, Romney 40% (Marquette Law School)

Oversample! Oversample! ALL OF THEM OVERSAMPLES!!!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#75 Sep 19 2012 at 6:34 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Getting paid to provide actual working solutions to real world problems that most people can't figure out because they're too busy listening to some idiot consultant who insists that his predictive model must be right even when it quite obviously isn't.

Weird that they pay me so much more for something that clearly doesn't work. Oh well, I retired at 40. Hahahaha. Sorry, I have to go have a little umbrella drink now.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#76 Sep 19 2012 at 6:40 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Pennsylvania: Obama 50%, Romney 41% (Morning Call/Muhlenberg)


Read somewhere that Romney is abandoning Penn. Or at least ad buys there, which amounts to the same thing. I don't have cite, maybe it's wrong. If true, that's a sad state of affairs for the GOP. If Obamma doesn't have to defend Penn, a lot of the ground game stuff can shift to Ohio. Oh hai!, Oh...we're gonna win, huh?
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 278 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (278)