·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Embassy Attacks
Embassy AttacksFollow
So in related news, a Pakistani official has announced a $100,000 bounty on the head of the film maker. State sponsored terrorism? Can't wait to see the official (lack of) response on this one...
Obama is probably ready to throw this film-maker to the dogs. The guy is obviously in hiding. But is our government providing protection?
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
Elinda wrote:
Obama is probably ready to throw this film-maker to the dogs. The guy is obviously in hiding. But is our government providing protection?
We should compromise. Let Pakistan have Fred Phelps instead.
So in related news, a Pakistani official has announced a $100,000 bounty on the head of the film maker.
The US has hundreds of bounties for the death of capture of various state enemies. How is this different?
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Smasharoo wrote:
So in related news, a Pakistani official has announced a $100,000 bounty on the head of the film maker.
The US has hundreds of bounties for the death of capture of various state enemies. How is this different?
For making a film?
Edited, Sep 27th 2012 7:46am by BrownDuck
Smasharoo wrote:
The US has hundreds of bounties for the death of capture of various state enemies. How is this different?
We pay better.
Come to mention it, that's probably our $100k he's giving away
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
BrownDuck wrote:
We should compromise. Let Pakistan have Fred Phelps instead.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
lolgaxe wrote:
BrownDuck wrote:
We should compromise. Let Pakistan have Fred Phelps instead.
Won't work, he's a German citizen. Let give them the NFL replacement refs instead.
Shaowstrike (Retired - FFXI)
91PUP/BLM 86SMN/BST 76DRK
Cooking/Fishing 100
"We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary."
— James D. Nicoll
91PUP/BLM 86SMN/BST 76DRK
Cooking/Fishing 100
"We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary."
— James D. Nicoll
His movies ought to be considered war crimes. We've blown shit up for less.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Smasharoo wrote:
So in related news, a Pakistani official has announced a $100,000 bounty on the head of the film maker.
The US has hundreds of bounties for the death of capture of various state enemies. How is this different?
For a short list of availiable offers, Inquire within
Just as Planned.
crazylegz1975 wrote:
rdmcandie wrote:
crazylegz1975 wrote:
Obama spent more time talking about the video today than about irans nuclear capablility.
Bar none the worst president in our nations history
Bar none the worst president in our nations history
Why talk about something that doesn't exist, when you can address an issue that is evidently affecting the entirety of the Middle East, and Muslims around the world?
Liberals really don't think iran has a nuclear program? Really?
Not yet, they have no reason to pursue a weapon right now, in fact it would be counter productive to do so. Israel is looking like the horses *** on the worlds stage and that is a million times better than having a nuke. Id wager the fear of a nuke is Irans greatest weapon right now. Heck Israel is even losing support in NATO. Which I can only say it is about time, backing the wrong horse for 60 years hasn't worked out well for us.
And no I am not a liberal, but I will vote liberal in the next election because I don't like the Reformist Harper and his veil of secrecy.
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.
Not yet, they have no reason to pursue a weapon right now, in fact it would be counter productive to do so. Israel is looking like the horses *** on the worlds stage and that is a million times better than having a nuke
No, no it isn't. Being a nuclear power means total nation state security, and essentially removes all external threats. Or, to quote a movie you haven't seen it means "never having to say your sorry".
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Shaowstrike the Shady wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
BrownDuck wrote:
We should compromise. Let Pakistan have Fred Phelps instead.
Won't work, he's a German citizen. Let give them the NFL replacement refs instead.
I hear they've already been granted asylum by the Washington State government and are currently in a undisclosed location in a Seattle suburb.
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
crazylegz1975 wrote:
rdmcandie wrote:
crazylegz1975 wrote:
Obama spent more time talking about the video today than about irans nuclear capablility.
Bar none the worst president in our nations history
Bar none the worst president in our nations history
Why talk about something that doesn't exist, when you can address an issue that is evidently affecting the entirety of the Middle East, and Muslims around the world?
Liberals really don't think iran has a nuclear program? Really?
Iran's status with nuclear technology is not a liberal platform issue. Libs are not of a hive mind in all things.
rdm dosen't speak for me.
I'm of the opinion that Iran does have an active nuclear program - actually I think that much is pretty well confirmed. I have no idea of it's true purpose or how advanced it may be. Much of the publicly available evidence points to a civilian 'for energy' nuclear program.
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
Elinda wrote:
Quit showing your dumb.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
and we'd lose the opportunity to reply
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
crazylegz1975 wrote:
And when iran drops a nuke on israel what then.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
crazylegz1975 wrote:
And when iran drops a nuke on israel what then.
We'll finally get around to moving our embassy to Jerusalem?
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
Gaza.
Hah-hah! What are you going to do NOW, Iran??
Hah-hah! What are you going to do NOW, Iran??
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Jophiel wrote:
crazylegz1975 wrote:
And when iran drops a nuke on israel what then.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
crazylegz1975 wrote:
Elinda wrote:
crazylegz1975 wrote:
rdmcandie wrote:
crazylegz1975 wrote:
Obama spent more time talking about the video today than about irans nuclear capablility.
Bar none the worst president in our nations history
Bar none the worst president in our nations history
Why talk about something that doesn't exist, when you can address an issue that is evidently affecting the entirety of the Middle East, and Muslims around the world?
Liberals really don't think iran has a nuclear program? Really?
Iran's status with nuclear technology is not a liberal platform issue. Libs are not of a hive mind in all things.
rdm dosen't speak for me.
I'm of the opinion that Iran does have an active nuclear program - actually I think that much is pretty well confirmed. I have no idea of it's true purpose or how advanced it may be. Much of the publicly available evidence points to a civilian 'for energy' nuclear program.
And when iran drops a nuke on israel what then.
Then maybe Israel looks back and says "maybe we should have done something about it instead of pussing out and letting NATO solve our problems for us".
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.
crazylegz1975 wrote:
And when iran drops a nuke on israel what then.
Maybe the region gains a modicum of stability.
Server: Midgardsormr
Occupation: Reckless Red Mage
I think RDM's neurotic omniscience is sooooooo worth including in any alliance.
Occupation: Reckless Red Mage
IcookPizza wrote:
I think RDM's neurotic omniscience is sooooooo worth including in any alliance.
cidbahamut wrote:
crazylegz1975 wrote:
And when iran drops a nuke on israel what then.
Maybe the region gains a modicum of stability.
Thats my thoughts. We in the west have tried everything else, maybe its time to tell Israel to stop persecuting the Palestinians. Then again if Israel doesn't want Iran to have a nuke...maybe they should get rid of theirs as a sign of good faith.
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.
I think it laughable that the handful of countries that have nukes seem to be the ones going around telling other countries they can't have them. Or in Iran's case, they can't even have energy programs that might eventually enable them to create them.
Yay hypocrisy.
Yay hypocrisy.
Server: Midgardsormr
Occupation: Reckless Red Mage
I think RDM's neurotic omniscience is sooooooo worth including in any alliance.
Occupation: Reckless Red Mage
IcookPizza wrote:
I think RDM's neurotic omniscience is sooooooo worth including in any alliance.
Recent Visitors: 355
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (355)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Embassy Attacks
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC