Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

LBGT TerrorismFollow

#477 Sep 10 2012 at 5:37 PM Rating: Good
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Shaowstrike the Shady wrote:
Debalic wrote:
I think we just need to do away with any references to breeding or producing children because, hey, it's not like we have a population shortage or anything. Quite the opposite.


On that note I invite you all to join us at the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement.

Sorry, but I'm already a breeder. Though, taken out of context I can get behind this statement:

Crowded conditions and resource shortages will improve as we become less dense.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#478Almalieque, Posted: Sep 10 2012 at 5:37 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) To be fair, it isn't biologically THEIR child.
#479 Sep 10 2012 at 5:42 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Almalieque wrote:
I'm here on the weekends too!

Well, that alone puts you at a step above varus, who can only post on weekdays while sitting in the manager's office of daddy's insurance firm.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#480 Sep 10 2012 at 6:01 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
I got rained in today.... Smiley: frown
#481 Sep 10 2012 at 6:02 PM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
gbaji wrote:
Want to try again?
Cosa buona sarebbe che fare? Basta ripetere a te stesso più e più volte e spero di vincere attraverso attrito, non l'intelligenza di qualsiasi tipo. Se l'unica ragione per bloccare il matrimonio è la capacità di riprodursi, quindi le persone che sono sterili non dovrebbero essere consentite per entrambi. Urlando "homos non può riprodursi!" sopra e oltre ancora non realmente cambia che stanno cambiando l'argomento e credere che tu sia brillante in vostra astuzia.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#482 Sep 10 2012 at 7:18 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Want to try again?
Cosa buona sarebbe che fare? Basta ripetere a te stesso più e più volte e spero di vincere attraverso attrito, non l'intelligenza di qualsiasi tipo. Se l'unica ragione per bloccare il matrimonio è la capacità di riprodursi, quindi le persone che sono sterili non dovrebbero essere consentite per entrambi. Urlando "homos non può riprodursi!" sopra e oltre ancora non realmente cambia che stanno cambiando l'argomento e credere che tu sia brillante in vostra astuzia.


Simmer down with all that terrorist talk, this hur is 'Murikah!
#483 Sep 10 2012 at 11:23 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
15,952 posts
Cute. But you are still SO gay.
#484 Sep 11 2012 at 1:29 AM Rating: Excellent
He just doesn't understand that legalizing gay marriage won't turn him into a...

Screenshot

Unless he was one already.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#485 Sep 11 2012 at 7:22 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
Omegavegeta wrote:
He just doesn't understand that legalizing gay marriage won't turn him into a ...
Why not? Repeal of DADT did.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#486 Sep 11 2012 at 8:34 AM Rating: Good
Sage
****
4,042 posts
Is that a t-shirt somewhere? Because I might have to order 5 or 6.
#487 Sep 11 2012 at 9:54 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Is this thread about buttsex yet?
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#488 Sep 11 2012 at 9:56 AM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
someproteinguy wrote:
Is this thread about buttsex yet?


It's always been about it, deep down.
#489 Sep 11 2012 at 9:56 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I remember when it was about Chik-Fil-A and shootings at the FRC and stuff. Those were the days.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#490 Sep 11 2012 at 10:00 AM Rating: Good
*****
13,251 posts
Eske Esquire wrote:
someproteinguy wrote:
Is this thread about buttsex yet?


Just the tip, just for a little bit, just to see how it feels.
#491 Sep 11 2012 at 5:38 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Want to try again?
Cosa buona sarebbe che fare? Basta ripetere a te stesso più e più volte e spero di vincere attraverso attrito, non l'intelligenza di qualsiasi tipo. Se l'unica ragione per bloccare il matrimonio è la capacità di riprodursi, quindi le persone che sono sterili non dovrebbero essere consentite per entrambi. Urlando "homos non può riprodursi!" sopra e oltre ancora non realmente cambia che stanno cambiando l'argomento e credere che tu sia brillante in vostra astuzia.


And? I'm pretty sure I already countered this argument. You're making a great case for further narrowing who can marry, but not for expanding it to yet another group. The fact that not all couples consisting of an adult male and an adult female *will* procreate doesn't change the fact that no couple consisting of two males or two females will. So when we divide the sets, we have one group in which some statistical number will produce offspring (but we can't know without further examination which particular couples), and another set in which none of the couples will.

Seems like a pretty obvious point to make our legal dividing line, doesn't it?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#492 Sep 11 2012 at 6:07 PM Rating: Good
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Why is procreation still part of the equation?
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#493 Sep 11 2012 at 6:38 PM Rating: Excellent
****
4,135 posts
gbaji wrote:
And? I'm pretty sure I already countered this argument.


You may have spoken to that argument, but you in NO WAY countered it. But I don't expect you to understand that, because you actually believe the things you say are true, or at least make sense.

Pro-Tip: Neither of those is true!
____________________________
Dandruffshampoo wrote:
Curses, beaten by Professor stupidopo-opo.
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Stupidmonkey is more organized than a bag of raccoons.
#494 Sep 11 2012 at 11:18 PM Rating: Good
Guenny wrote:
Is that a t-shirt somewhere? Because I might have to order 5 or 6.


Yup.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#495 Sep 12 2012 at 12:00 AM Rating: Excellent
GBATE!! Never saw it coming
Avatar
****
9,957 posts
Debalic wrote:
Why is procreation still part of the equation?
Becaue garbaji has decided that procreation is the end-all and be-all of marriage.



For America!
____________________________
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.

#496 Sep 12 2012 at 6:42 AM Rating: Excellent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
gbaji wrote:
The fact that not all couples consisting of an adult male and an adult female *will* procreate doesn't change the fact that no couple consisting of two males or two females will.
Yes they do all the time. One bio parent and some donated stuff. They're still very much making the kid that they will raise.

Why is it so abhorrent to you that two like sexed people should choose each other to make a life-time commitment to one another, raise a family if they choose and not receive the same treatment by our government as two people of opposite sex?

I truly can't understand the blind self-righteous ignorance that would seek to keep homosexuals sad, dysfunctional and in the closet.

____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#497 Sep 12 2012 at 6:49 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Elinda wrote:
gbaji wrote:
The fact that not all couples consisting of an adult male and an adult female *will* procreate doesn't change the fact that no couple consisting of two males or two females will.
Yes they do all the time. One bio parent and some donated stuff. They're still very much making the kid that they will raise.

Those mewling unholy aberrations of nature don't count as human or worthy of a married family in the holy eyes of the GOP.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#498 Sep 12 2012 at 6:56 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Elinda wrote:
gbaji wrote:
The fact that not all couples consisting of an adult male and an adult female *will* procreate doesn't change the fact that no couple consisting of two males or two females will.
Yes they do all the time. One bio parent and some donated stuff. They're still very much making the kid that they will raise.

Those mewling unholy aberrations of nature don't count as human or worthy of a married family in the holy eyes of the GOP.
They should quit sticking needles in their eyes.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#499 Sep 12 2012 at 7:33 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
gbaji wrote:
I'm pretty sure I already countered this argument.
Hayır, hatalı bir görüş en iyi haberi. Aslında ve terim aslında bu gerçekliğe dayanan, senin büyük delik göz ardı ediyor ve kendinizi o edeceğiz aniden tekrar tutmak, bu doğru yapmak düşünüyorum anlamında kullanın. Olacak en hasta'almak bıkkın ve sadece size Düzeltmeyi Durdur ve bazı garip başarı duygusu ile bırakılmaması. Doğru olamaz, herkes yorgun, sanırım kadar agresif yanlış olması.

Aslında değişmez nasıl hilariously saydam, Transcend teoridir, ama. Eğer sürekli yinelenen, ya da daha gerçekçi, daha sağlam bir argüman yapmaz. Evlilik iki kişinin, bağlayıcı sözleşme üretilmesi ile ilgisi var.
Debalic wrote:
Why is procreation still part of the equation?
Because somebody, someday, somewhere, had said it was without actually thinking about it, so now it'll be brought up (without any real thought) every time. I mean, if they'd just think about it for even one second instead of just spouting it out every time, then it's lung collapsingly hilarious how little sense it makes.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#500Almalieque, Posted: Sep 12 2012 at 8:42 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) That same sex couple didn't procreate though. The male and female couple procreated and the same sex couple raised the child. There's a difference between the two. Take that however you want, but that's the difference that you're not understanding.
#501 Sep 12 2012 at 8:57 AM Rating: Excellent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Almalieque wrote:
Elinda wrote:
gbaji wrote:
The fact that not all couples consisting of an adult male and an adult female *will* procreate doesn't change the fact that no couple consisting of two males or two females will.
Yes they do all the time. One bio parent and some donated stuff. They're still very much making the kid that they will raise.

Why is it so abhorrent to you that two like sexed people should choose each other to make a life-time commitment to one another, raise a family if they choose and not receive the same treatment by our government as two people of opposite sex?

I truly can't understand the blind self-righteous ignorance that would seek to keep homosexuals sad, dysfunctional and in the closet.



That same sex couple didn't procreate though. The male and female couple procreated and the same sex couple raised the child. There's a difference between the two. Take that however you want, but that's the difference that you're not understanding.
Yeah, we know how babies are made Alma.

What you don't understand is how to simply live and let live.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 328 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (328)