Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

LBGT TerrorismFollow

#327Almalieque, Posted: Sep 01 2012 at 9:02 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Omega,
#328 Sep 01 2012 at 10:13 PM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Obligatory "Just when I thought Alma couldn't get more stupid" post.
#329 Sep 01 2012 at 10:42 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
I've been asking you for a consistent answer on how and why are these girls harmed any differently with an adult than any other child.


And I've consistently told you there is no difference if the girl is old/mature enough to consent (with parental approval where applicable). If she isn't mature/ old enough to consent, she's being taken advantage of by an adult whom is old/mature enough to know right from wrong or by another child whom isn't old/mature enough to know right from wrong. That's the difference.
Alma wrote:
You say that you support these relationships as long as that there are consent from the parents.


I'm saying I could. The only one that comes to mind is Courtney Stodden, I thought that one was odd. Dude is creepy (He may have been the 2nd creepiest thing on the X-Files, right after the inbred family), but I'm not going to fight to overturn all the parental consent laws in this country because I think their relationship is weird. I don't actually know them, I just know she's...transformed since her marriage.

Alma wrote:
You also say that consent doesn't equal maturity,


No, I'm telling you a sexually active 15 year old who wants you to fuck her isn't necessarily emotionally mature enough to legally consent, hence why we settle on an age of consent &/or parental consent to make those calls legal or not.

Alma wrote:
How can you measure "maturity" and consent?


Legally, by age or in the case of minors, by their parents judgement.
Alma wrote:

Are you proposing that the laws switch to measuring maturity for everyone or just maturity for minors?


No.

Alma wrote:
If the latter, then why go through the trouble if you're going to let immature 18 year olds get taken advantage of?
Do you not care about them?


Immature 18 year olds already have laws that protect them. Guess what happens if you @#%^ an 18 year old with the mind of a child?
Alma wrote:

Why do you care about consent if you said yourself that consent doesn't equal maturity? You say "depending on how young", please define that. What's the cut off? What's the ratio for young and consent?


I'm comfortable with most current laws regarding age of consent in regards to sex. I'm also comfortable with parental consent for minors as young as 15, but would like some sort of psychological exam be done & passed by both parties.

Alma wrote:
The civil rights movement wasn't a movement to make people like Black Americans. You do know that right?


The gay rights movement isn't to make people like Gay America. You do know that, right?

Alma wrote:
You also do realize that child lovers, bestiality, etc. are equally encouraged due to the whole gay rights movement in the same way right?


Nope. Gay Marriage is just about the last bastion left over from the Civil Rights era. Gay Rights are Civil Rights. Black people used to get arrested for @#%^ing white people, gay people used to get arrested for @#%^ing gay people. Neither are enforced anymore, but only one group still can't legally marry in some places.

There may child lovers, bestiality, etc. inspired by the gay rights movement but I'd argue they were just as inspired by the Civil Rights movement. Difference is neither of the two have made any gains by the Civil Rights movement, let alone the Gay Rights movement, & furthermore both were used as boogeyman by the opposition to both the Civil Rights & Gay RIghts movements.

Alma wrote:
The same way you would disagree with any other lifestyle. Homosexuality isn't any different.


Homosexuality happens whether you agree with it or not. I do wonder what it is that you don't approve of about it, though.

Alma wrote:
If I had a female friend or relative who was born promiscuous, I wouldn't agree with that either.


Sluts aren't always born that way. (I'd argue neither are gays, either, but thats another discussion.)

Alma wrote:
I don't know why you fight for equality but want special treatment.


Separate but equal, as it applies to Marriage Equality, isn't equal you cowardly ******.

Edited, Sep 2nd 2012 12:49am by Omegavegeta
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#330 Sep 01 2012 at 11:05 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
15,952 posts
Alma is SO gay.
#331 Sep 02 2012 at 1:16 AM Rating: Excellent
****
5,684 posts
Almalieque wrote:
If I had a female friend or relative who was born promiscuous, I wouldn't agree with that either.


1. You'll never have a female friend
2. Why did you specify female? Is it OK for men to be promiscuous but not women?
3. I'll stop here because I doubt you can count higher than three.
#332 Sep 02 2012 at 2:33 AM Rating: Excellent
******
27,272 posts
Nadenu wrote:
Obligatory "Just when I thought Alma couldn't get more stupid" post.
I've stopped thinking he can't get any more stupid. I'm just hoping that he'll get so stupid he forgets how to type or use the internet.
#333Almalieque, Posted: Sep 02 2012 at 7:37 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) This wasn't in reference to marriage equality, because marriage is already equal, just not fair. I was referring to personal acceptance. You're cool with people not agreeing with other forms of sexual conduct, but questions anyone who disagrees with homosexual conduct. If you're fighting for equality, then you must treat them no differently than anyone else.
#334 Sep 02 2012 at 8:06 AM Rating: Good
****
4,134 posts
HA HA, ALMA'S DUMB!
I wish stupid wasn't so long-winded and annoying, and blind to the fact that it is stupid, blind, and repetitive.
____________________________
Dandruffshampoo wrote:
Curses, beaten by Professor stupidopo-opo.
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Stupidmonkey is more organized than a bag of raccoons.
#335Almalieque, Posted: Sep 02 2012 at 9:00 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) 1. Even if that were true, that wouldn't take away from the statement.
#336 Sep 02 2012 at 9:35 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
It's times like this that I'm just content to know that Alma is on the losing side here and all his idiotic comparisons and complaints about SSM aren't going to stop it any more than his idiotic comparisons and complaints didn't stop the repeal of DADT.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#337Almalieque, Posted: Sep 02 2012 at 10:09 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I see that you're still butt hurt.. That's all I care about..
#338 Sep 02 2012 at 10:21 AM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Almalieque wrote:

I see that you're still butt hurt.. That's all I care about.

Sad, and quite telling.
#339Almalieque, Posted: Sep 02 2012 at 10:36 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Smiley: cool
#340 Sep 02 2012 at 10:42 AM Rating: Good
Almalieque wrote:
Nadenu wrote:
Almalieque wrote:

I see that you're still butt hurt.. That's all I care about.

Sad, and quite telling.


Smiley: cool

I picture Alma in my head as a stumpy retarded cousin of Steve Urkel. This post cemented it.
#341 Sep 02 2012 at 10:43 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Almalieque wrote:
I see that you're still butt hurt.. That's all I care about..

Secondly, how am I on the losing side?

Smiley: smile
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#342Almalieque, Posted: Sep 02 2012 at 10:53 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Smiley: clown
#343 Sep 02 2012 at 11:06 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
I see that you're still butt hurt.. That's all I care about..

Secondly, how am I on the losing side?

Because demographics.

____________________________
Just as Planned.
#344 Sep 02 2012 at 11:12 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Nadenu wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
I see that you're still butt hurt.. That's all I care about.
Sad, and quite telling.
I don't know. He's not much of a top.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#345 Sep 02 2012 at 11:17 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Voice of experience?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#346 Sep 02 2012 at 11:19 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
It's not gay if the lights are out. Smiley: schooled
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#347 Sep 02 2012 at 11:21 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I think it still is if you're on the receiving end.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#348 Sep 02 2012 at 11:24 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
Which cycles us all the way back to him not being a top.

Edited, Sep 2nd 2012 1:33pm by lolgaxe
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#349 Sep 02 2012 at 3:52 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#350 Sep 02 2012 at 4:02 PM Rating: Good
Message has high abuse count and will not be displayed.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#351 Sep 02 2012 at 4:18 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Omegavegeta wrote:
Alma wrote:
You're just trying to hide behind "maturity", when the age is low, but in reality, it's not about maturity at all, as you don't care about older immature people. The intent maybe "maturity", but the discrimination is "age".


While people whom want to @#%^ children are certainly "disenfranchised" by age of consent laws, the intent of the law is to protect children. Anti-Gay laws protect who?


The children as well. Smiley: schooled

____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 250 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (250)