Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Barry Intercepts the J!Follow

#52 May 28 2012 at 7:45 PM Rating: Good
****
4,137 posts
The question could also be; Has drug related crime gone down (aside from possession and selling); or, What has the revenue stream done for the economy; or, Where can I get some of those jalepeno flavored Cheetos.
____________________________
Dandruffshampoo wrote:
Curses, beaten by Professor stupidopo-opo.
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Stupidmonkey is more organized than a bag of raccoons.
#53 May 28 2012 at 7:47 PM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
PigtailsOfDoom wrote:
People are going to drive while stoned whether pot is illegal or not. I don't see the point in making that your bone of contention.

Unless you think the number of people smoking weed will remain constant whether it's legal or not, this is a perfectly valid point of contention.
Quote:
I just think it's stupid that it's illegal. It's actually less harmful for you than cigarettes are

This might potentially be a great reason to make cigarettes illegal. It's a terrible reason (by itself) to make pot legal.

Edited, May 28th 2012 12:19pm by Jophiel


I think that more people would probably smoke if it's legalized yeah. But the people that would wait to smoke it until its legal are going to be more likely to be responsible, and not drive while intoxicated in the first place. I don't think the ratio of people who drive while stoned vs. people who don't drive while stoned, would change all that much if pot was legal.

Comparing pot to cigarettes isn't the only reason I have for wanting pot to be legal, it's just the first one that usually pops in my head. There are plenty of drugs that are way worse for you than pot that are legal, and I don't like hypocrisy.

The amount of money we spend on the so called "drug war" is the most valid reason I can think of. Between the DEA, and people we put in prison for years for either possession or selling, we waste so much money. Plus Aeth makes a good point about how much money we could make by taxing it too. My only concern is that pot would then get taken over by corporations and get as much crap put in it as cigarettes.
#54 May 28 2012 at 7:58 PM Rating: Good
****
4,137 posts
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
But it's addictive in the same way that cracking your knuckles, biting your nails, or smoking cigarettes are. And I'm willing to bet that cigarettes have a much higher chance of destroying your life than pot does.


Cigarettes, or rather the nicotine in them, is physically addictive, and some researchers have claimed that it is harder to quit smoking cigarettes then it is to quit taking heroin Citation Needed
____________________________
Dandruffshampoo wrote:
Curses, beaten by Professor stupidopo-opo.
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Stupidmonkey is more organized than a bag of raccoons.
#55 May 28 2012 at 9:10 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Is it? I was under the impression it wasn't. Okay then.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#56 May 28 2012 at 9:18 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Professor stupidmonkey wrote:
The question could also be...

Not when discussing pot related traffic stops, no.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#57 May 28 2012 at 9:48 PM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Professor stupidmonkey wrote:
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
But it's addictive in the same way that cracking your knuckles, biting your nails, or smoking cigarettes are. And I'm willing to bet that cigarettes have a much higher chance of destroying your life than pot does.


Cigarettes, or rather the nicotine in them, is physically addictive, and some researchers have claimed that it is harder to quit smoking cigarettes then it is to quit taking heroin Citation Needed

I am currently trying to quit cigarettes. Yes, they are extremely physically addictive. And I am trying my hardest not to bum one off my sister or kill someone. Remembering that I have a heart murmur isn't helping either. I don't care. I want to die while smoking.

Smiley: mad Smiley: motz Smiley: mad
#58 May 29 2012 at 12:40 AM Rating: Good
Yeah, that's one of the reasons people have gotten so upset with the tobacco companies in the last 10-15 years. They've known all along that nicotine was addictive and dangerous, and tried to play dumb when people started dying of emphysema after smoking for their entire adult lives. It's one of the main reasons I've never even tried cigarettes. I have lots of friends who do, and it makes me sad. Especially when they didn't smoke in high school.
#59 May 29 2012 at 2:06 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
2,496 posts
Nadenu wrote:
Professor stupidmonkey wrote:
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
But it's addictive in the same way that cracking your knuckles, biting your nails, or smoking cigarettes are. And I'm willing to bet that cigarettes have a much higher chance of destroying your life than pot does.


Cigarettes, or rather the nicotine in them, is physically addictive, and some researchers have claimed that it is harder to quit smoking cigarettes then it is to quit taking heroin Citation Needed

I am currently trying to quit cigarettes. Yes, they are extremely physically addictive. And I am trying my hardest not to bum one off my sister or kill someone. Remembering that I have a heart murmur isn't helping either. I don't care. I want to die while smoking.

Smiley: mad Smiley: motz Smiley: mad


Commit lozenges. Not the big ones, the minis. I've tried gum, patches, cold turkey, the mini lozenges are the only thing that helped.

And I'm convinced the "Truth" advertisements are nothing more than legal cigarette ads for smokers. Nothing makes a smoker want a cigarette more than hearing someone talk about one or seeing one.
#60 May 29 2012 at 2:09 AM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Jophiel wrote:
The question would be whether it's lower in your country now than it was pre-legalization, not to compare your use to that in the US.
You're right and I've tried googling this but haven't found anything useful yet. Just skinmming what I've found on google seemed to suggest that it didn't have much impact on use. I certainly wouldn't mind seeing a quick and effective drug test that cops can use although I consider the decriminalization, quality control, tax income and the savings on prosecuting and jailing minor marijuana related offenses to be more important. Hell, use the money to provide free help to get clean for people addicted to drugs and you're hitting two birds with one stone.

Professor stupidmonkey wrote:
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
But it's addictive in the same way that cracking your knuckles, biting your nails, or smoking cigarettes are. And I'm willing to bet that cigarettes have a much higher chance of destroying your life than pot does.


Cigarettes, or rather the nicotine in them, is physically addictive, and some researchers have claimed that it is harder to quit smoking cigarettes then it is to quit taking heroin Citation Needed
I think that was not so much the physical addiction but a combination of the physical part, the habit and the fact that it's widely accepted and part of many social activities if your friends/colleagues smoke, there aren't as many downsides to it that can help you stop and it's that much easier to get back to it.
#61 May 29 2012 at 5:28 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
PigtailsOfDoom wrote:
Yeah, that's one of the reasons people have gotten so upset with the tobacco companies in the last 10-15 years. They've known all along that nicotine was addictive and dangerous, and tried to play dumb when people started dying of emphysema after smoking for their entire adult lives. It's one of the main reasons I've never even tried cigarettes. I have lots of friends who do, and it makes me sad. Especially when they didn't smoke in high school.



Well, the big controversy is that tobacco companies actively manipulated the amount of nicotine in cigarettes in order to make them more addictive, well after the harmful effects were well known.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#62 May 29 2012 at 5:47 AM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Well, I made it through last night (and the last two days) and no one is dead. Yet.

Maybe there's hope. I actually feel pretty good this morning. Of course, it's early.
#63 May 29 2012 at 5:58 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
You can do it!

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#64 May 29 2012 at 6:00 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
#65 May 29 2012 at 6:04 AM Rating: Good
****
4,137 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Professor stupidmonkey wrote:
The question could also be...

Not when discussing pot related traffic stops, no.


Yeah, but that doesn't lead to my punch line AT ALL! Smiley: lol

Also, I quit smoking cigarettes on September 17th, 2011, and I still brief moments where I would like to either have a cigarette, or poke somebody in the eye!
____________________________
Dandruffshampoo wrote:
Curses, beaten by Professor stupidopo-opo.
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Stupidmonkey is more organized than a bag of raccoons.
#66 May 29 2012 at 7:00 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
The problem with the "Drug war" argument is that it only really works on people who are already convinced that pot isn't "that bad". If you're someone sure that legalization will mean the nation will turn into a land of Lebowskis and Spicolis, the money spent stopping that decline is still money well spent. Maybe it could be more effectively spent stopping pot but the answer wouldn't ever be "Let's just call it a day".
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#67 May 29 2012 at 7:04 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
It would be pretty cool to get stoned with prez.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#68 May 29 2012 at 7:22 AM Rating: Good
Drunken English Bastard
*****
15,268 posts
I've not had a cigarette for about 7 days. Hospitals frown on that kind of thing. Not sure if I want to keep it up, though. The not smoking, I mean.

Kind of hard quitting as a student, it's one of the few vices I can afford!
____________________________
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
#69 May 29 2012 at 7:30 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Professor stupidmonkey wrote:
Also, I quit smoking cigarettes on September 17th, 2011, and I still brief moments where I would like to either have a cigarette, or poke somebody in the eye!
I don't smoke, and I have plenty of moments of wanting to jab people in the eye.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#70 May 29 2012 at 7:32 AM Rating: Good
Drunken English Bastard
*****
15,268 posts
That's because people are **********
____________________________
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
#71 May 29 2012 at 7:58 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Not always. I blame my exposure to the Three Stooges for my random urges to eye poke.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#72 May 29 2012 at 9:03 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
For those quitting (or trying to), I suggest e-cigarettes. Not the rip-off boxes that you can get in gas stations and such, but the ones you order online are better. I'm addicted to my e-cig now, but at least there's no tobacco involved - and I'm not even using any nicotine, either.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#73 May 29 2012 at 9:18 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
I thought jury was out on e-cigs. RE: Pot-Never had issue with the drug itself as much as the general laziness and personal hygiene of just about any pot smoker I've known. I would lean against it because on the whole, I've never met an active smoker that I thought "Now there's a productive human being" about, but like Joph, the whole subject is meh to me. Never drank to get wasted, never did any drugs, mostly because it's universally acknowledged by anyone who has ever met me that I bring the party stone cold sober.
#74 May 29 2012 at 9:20 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Atomicflea wrote:
I thought jury was out on e-cigs.
Health Canada advises against them, but it appears more to do with those that contain nicotine solutions, than the e-cigs themselves.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#75 May 29 2012 at 5:00 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Atomicflea wrote:
I thought jury was out on e-cigs. RE: Pot-Never had issue with the drug itself as much as the general laziness and personal hygiene of just about any pot smoker I've known. I would lean against it because on the whole, I've never met an active smoker that I thought "Now there's a productive human being" about, but like Joph, the whole subject is meh to me. Never drank to get wasted, never did any drugs, mostly because it's universally acknowledged by anyone who has ever met me that I bring the party stone cold sober.

Smiley: glare

I guess I should have showered after that first night in Boston.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#76 May 29 2012 at 5:31 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
13,251 posts
Atomicflea wrote:
RE: Pot-Never had issue with the drug itself as much as the general laziness and personal hygiene of just about any pot smoker I've known. I would lean against it because on the whole, I've never met an active smoker that I thought "Now there's a productive human being" about, [...]
To be fair, I'm sure there are any number of people you've thought are productive, or have good personal hygiene and motivation that you just never knew they smoked pot. I know several people who are successful in both the personal and professional aspects of their lives who still smoke pot. One friend in particular still smokes just about every day.

I'm not disagreeing that many pot smokers have poor hygiene and are lazy, but there are plenty of people out there who smoke recreationally and maintain successful lives, just as there are plenty of people who drink alcohol and manage to not be alcoholic slobs.

Edited, May 29th 2012 7:33pm by Spoonless
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 303 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (303)