Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Obama comes out in support of gay marriage...Follow

#127 May 11 2012 at 6:50 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I'm not sure what you think "*** hag" means...
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#128 May 11 2012 at 7:23 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
I'm not opposed to state's rights, generally...just not in this case.

Just not in the cases where you don't like the state law :).
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#129 May 11 2012 at 7:25 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I oppose all states' rights. And local government's rights. When the revolution comes, all shall live under one law: Joph's Law.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#130 May 11 2012 at 7:30 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
And Anne Marie Deacon, what about her rights?
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#131 May 11 2012 at 7:35 AM Rating: Excellent
****
6,471 posts
Jophiel wrote:
I oppose all states' rights. And local government's rights. When the revolution comes, all shall live under one law: Joph's Law.


Joph's law is like Joph's love: hard and fast.
#132 May 11 2012 at 7:40 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Eske Esquire wrote:
Joph's law is like Joph's love: short and unfair.

____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#133 May 11 2012 at 8:15 AM Rating: Excellent
Jophiel wrote:
Eske Esquire wrote:
Joph's law is like Joph's love: short and unfair.


Always leave them dreading more.
#134 May 11 2012 at 8:20 AM Rating: Excellent
So I was browsing Google News this morning and came across this article, which I just had to have a peek at.

http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/oreilly/2012/05/11/bill-oreilly-politics-gay-marriage

Typical O'Reilly drivel, really, but the "no spin poll" on the right really gave me a tickle.

http://imgur.com/mRA8a

#135 May 11 2012 at 8:22 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
BrownDuck wrote:
Typical O'Reilly drivel, really, but the "no spin poll" on the right really gave me a tickle.

http://imgur.com/mRA8a

*snrk*
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#136 May 11 2012 at 8:25 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
Bill O'Reilly wrote:
Most of the media will not even consider the traditional point of view on marriage.
That it was part of a business contract used to barter goods, land and power?
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#137 May 11 2012 at 8:28 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Romney has a car elevator installed: "How dare you comment on how someone spends their money! You're just jealous! OMG Class Warfare!!"

Celebrity spends $40k at fundraiser: "Pinheads!"
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#138 May 11 2012 at 8:39 AM Rating: Excellent
***
2,826 posts
Eske Esquire wrote:
gbaji wrote:
PigtailsOfDoom wrote:
Yup. I know in Oregon our measure passed back in 2004. Since then, we've legalized civil unions. To quote Dylan, "times they are a'changing." It might take another 10 or 20 years, but I have no doubt that sometime within my lifetime, gay marriage will be legal in this country.


And then what? Will your life feel complete or something? I'm honestly curious what people think will happen once they achieve those sorts of social goals. Do you stop and be happy? Or move on to the next thing? Ever consider that it's not really the goal, but the act of fighting for one that defines these things? In other words, you're being used.


Well, that might be the stupidest thing you've said this year.


You must have missed most of his other posts.
#139 May 11 2012 at 8:41 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
PW wrote:
Headline of the Day
"With ***** in, all 6 WA congressional Democrats favor repeal of gay-marriage ban"

-- Seattle Times, with a reference to Rep. Norm ***** (D-WA).
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#140 May 11 2012 at 8:44 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
You simply can't have a gay-marriage ban once ***** is in the issue.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#141 May 11 2012 at 8:48 AM Rating: Excellent
lolgaxe wrote:
You simply can't have a gay-marriage ban once ***** is in the issue House.

Seriously? Rarely have I seen a post in such dire need of a fix.
#142 May 11 2012 at 8:50 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
I'm not opposed to state's rights, generally...just not in this case.

Just not in the cases where you don't like the state law :).


Just not when there are federal consequences...then it needs to be federal. I don't care, for example, what states do about seatbelt laws, or helmet laws, or even what they do about deciding the age someone can be married...as long as there aren't federal consequences. If there are serious federal level ramifications to the denial of a status at the state level, then it's an issue that needs to be decided at the federal level.

Except in Kentucky...Kentucky shouldn't be able to make any laws for itself. Actually add Florida to that list...everyone in Florida is clearly mentally incompetent.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#143 May 11 2012 at 8:55 AM Rating: Good
Nexa wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:
I'm not opposed to state's rights, generally...just not in this case.

Just not in the cases where you don't like the state law :).


Just not when there are federal consequences...then it needs to be federal. I don't care, for example, what states do about seatbelt laws, or helmet laws, or even what they do about deciding the age someone can be married...as long as there aren't federal consequences. If there are serious federal level ramifications to the denial of a status at the state level, then it's an issue that needs to be decided at the federal level.

Except in Kentucky...Kentucky shouldn't be able to make any laws for itself. Actually add Florida to that list...everyone in Florida is clearly mentally incompetent.

Nexa

How about highway funding? Are you OK with the Federal government setting a de facto drinking age by withholding highway funds to states that have a lower age? Or speed limit? How about unfunded mandates to the states in Education? Healthcare?

States' rights on all matter extra-constitutional should be paramount. There should be competition between the states. It would insure a better standard of living for the vast majority of Americans.
#144 May 11 2012 at 9:07 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
MoebiusLord wrote:
How about highway funding? Are you OK with the Federal government setting a de facto drinking age by withholding highway funds to states that have a lower age? Or speed limit? How about unfunded mandates to the states in Education? Healthcare?

See? If we did away with states' rights, there would be no debate!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#145 May 11 2012 at 9:29 AM Rating: Excellent
Jophiel wrote:
MoebiusLord wrote:
How about highway funding? Are you OK with the Federal government setting a de facto drinking age by withholding highway funds to states that have a lower age? Or speed limit? How about unfunded mandates to the states in Education? Healthcare?

See? If we did away with states' rights, there would be no debate!

Nah, there would be plenty of debate, it would just resemble 1775 a lot more.
#146 May 11 2012 at 9:37 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Tri-corner hats? Sweet.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#147 May 11 2012 at 9:42 AM Rating: Excellent
Nah, ***** the hats, I'm all about the wigs.
#148 May 11 2012 at 10:20 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
You gotta do both or you'll just look crazy.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#149 May 11 2012 at 10:41 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Nonsense!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#150 May 11 2012 at 1:33 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
This is kinda nifty...

Interactive chart regarding gay rights by state & region.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#151 May 11 2012 at 1:48 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
TL:DR = don't be gay in Mississippi?
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 315 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (315)