Smasharoo wrote:
I'm not opposed to state's rights, generally...just not in this case.
Just not in the cases where you don't like the state law :).
Just not when there are federal consequences...then it needs to be federal. I don't care, for example, what states do about seatbelt laws, or helmet laws, or even what they do about deciding the age someone can be married...as long as there aren't federal consequences. If there are serious federal level ramifications to the denial of a status at the state level, then it's an issue that needs to be decided at the federal level.
Except in Kentucky...Kentucky shouldn't be able to make any laws for itself. Actually add Florida to that list...everyone in Florida is clearly mentally incompetent.
Nexa