Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Orwell vs HuxleyFollow

#1 Apr 20 2012 at 6:12 AM Rating: Excellent
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,289 posts
http://www.highexistence.com/amusing-ourselves-to-death-huxley-vs-orwell/

I often remark that the world is becoming more stupid all the time. Guess I'm a Huxleyist, Huxonian?

Oh, and Happy Friday, nerds. Yay!
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#2 Apr 20 2012 at 6:56 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,595 posts
Tare wrote:

I often remark that the world is becoming more stupid all the time. Guess I'm a Huxleyist, Huxonian?

So, if one were to maintain the same average level of general worldy understanding while the rest of the planetary peeps devolved, then one would become extraordinarily brilliant (by comparison) with little effort. I'm gonna try that.

TGIF.


____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#3 Apr 20 2012 at 7:01 AM Rating: Good
******
49,899 posts
Read it. Wasn't amused.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#4 Apr 20 2012 at 7:08 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
It loses some punch when followed up by:
Quote:
Hey, I'm the creator of HighExistence. I love inspiring others to follow their bliss, which in turn fulfills my own. I live for traveling, late-night conversations and moments of intense clarity or intoxication.

"Dude, the Man is trying to make us all passive through too much entertainment! I gotta smoke a blunt and blog about this!"

Edited, Apr 20th 2012 8:08am by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#5 Apr 20 2012 at 7:29 AM Rating: Good
******
20,020 posts
Spent some time browsing the site, but my eyes started to hurt from rolling them too hard at the stuff like this piece of crap.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#6 Apr 20 2012 at 7:31 AM Rating: Excellent
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,289 posts
Yeah, I saw it on another page but I couldn't link it here, because you had to log in to see it. So, Mr. Higher Existence had to do. You got something against late night conversations!? :/
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#7 Apr 20 2012 at 7:33 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I'm old and we're all in bed by eight.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#8 Apr 20 2012 at 7:34 AM Rating: Good
******
49,899 posts
Really not that interested in late night conversations that doesn't involve the phrase "You got it in my hair."
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#9 Apr 20 2012 at 7:49 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,595 posts
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
Spent some time browsing the site, but my eyes started to hurt from rolling them too hard at the stuff like this piece of crap.

I'll have to just arrange things so that when i talk to my plants my water can overhear.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#10 Apr 20 2012 at 7:51 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
The "Double Slit" experiment wasn't at all what I'd hoped Smiley: frown
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#11 Apr 20 2012 at 7:58 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,595 posts
Jophiel wrote:
The "Double Slit" experiment wasn't at all what I'd hoped Smiley: frown

[:dirtyoldman:]
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#12 Apr 20 2012 at 8:30 AM Rating: Good
Either way, it's been a helluuva ride. Wheeee!!!!
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#13 Apr 20 2012 at 1:23 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,518 posts
Elinda wrote:
Tare wrote:

I often remark that the world is becoming more stupid all the time. Guess I'm a Huxleyist, Huxonian?

So, if one were to maintain the same average level of general worldy understanding while the rest of the planetary peeps devolved, then one would become extraordinarily brilliant (by comparison) with little effort. I'm gonna try that.

Yeah, Mike Judge already did.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#14 Apr 20 2012 at 1:34 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Except the Flynn Effect states that intelligence testing scores have actually been steadily increasing over time, not decreasing.

Edited, Apr 20th 2012 2:36pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#15 Apr 20 2012 at 2:12 PM Rating: Good
Looks like they were both right to me, but Huxley more so.
____________________________
Proudmoore US server:
Popina, 100 Priest
Thelesis, 91 Mage
Necralita, 90 DK
Digits, 87 Shaman
Willowmei, 85 Druid
Shrika, 72 Warlock
Jaquelle, 54 Paladin
Grakine, 32 Hunter
The MMO-Zam's FB group. Please message me first so I know who you are.
#16 Apr 20 2012 at 2:17 PM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
Joph's link wrote:
Verbal intelligence has remained relatively flat, while non-verbal scores continue to rise.


Ah, so that explains how we're all internet physicists and lawyers, but are wholly incapable of phrasing a logical thought.

PS: It's frightening that "removal of lead paint" is cited a primary factor in the effect.
#17 Apr 20 2012 at 2:38 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Eske Esquire wrote:
PS: It's frightening that "removal of lead paint" is cited a primary factor in the effect.

Only on the lower end of the spectrum. In their potential explanation of why the smartest are getting smarter, they actually come up with a possibility somewhat counter to the OP...
Wired wrote:
The question, of course, is what this stimulation might consist of? It obviously has to be extremely widespread, since the IQ gains exist at the population level. One frequently cited factor is the increasing complexity of entertainment, which might enhance abstract problem solving skills. (As Flynn himself noted, “The very fact that children are better and better at IQ test problems logically entails that they have learned at least that kind of problem-solving skill better, and it must have been learned somewhere.”) This suggests that, because people are now forced to make sense of Lost or the Harry Potter series or World of Warcraft, they’re also better able to handle hard logic puzzles. (The effect is probably indirect, with the difficult forms of culture enhancing working memory and the allocation of attention.) As Steven Johnson argued, everything bad is good for us, especially when the bad stuff has lots of minor characters and subplots. HBO is a cognitive workout.

That said, environmental stimulation remains an incomplete explanation. Even for those on the right side of the curve, intelligence gains probably have many distinct causes, from the complexity of The Wire to the social multiplier effect, which is the tendency of smart people to hang out with other smart people. (In this sense, gifted programs in schools might help drive IQ gains among the top five percent. The Internet probably helps, too.) The question, of course, is whether such factors have really changed over time. Has it gotten easier for smart people to interact with each other? Are those on the right side of the IQ distribution now more likely to have children together? Would the Flynn effect be even larger if we did more of [fill in the blank]? These questions have no easy answers, but at least we now know that they need to be answered.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#18 Apr 20 2012 at 3:05 PM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Eske Esquire wrote:
PS: It's frightening that "removal of lead paint" is cited a primary factor in the effect.

Only on the lower end of the spectrum. In their potential explanation of why the smartest are getting smarter, they actually come up with a possibility somewhat counter to the OP...
Wired wrote:
The question, of course, is what this stimulation might consist of? It obviously has to be extremely widespread, since the IQ gains exist at the population level. One frequently cited factor is the increasing complexity of entertainment, which might enhance abstract problem solving skills. (As Flynn himself noted, “The very fact that children are better and better at IQ test problems logically entails that they have learned at least that kind of problem-solving skill better, and it must have been learned somewhere.”) This suggests that, because people are now forced to make sense of Lost or the Harry Potter series or World of Warcraft, they’re also better able to handle hard logic puzzles. (The effect is probably indirect, with the difficult forms of culture enhancing working memory and the allocation of attention.) As Steven Johnson argued, everything bad is good for us, especially when the bad stuff has lots of minor characters and subplots. HBO is a cognitive workout.

That said, environmental stimulation remains an incomplete explanation. Even for those on the right side of the curve, intelligence gains probably have many distinct causes, from the complexity of The Wire to the social multiplier effect, which is the tendency of smart people to hang out with other smart people. (In this sense, gifted programs in schools might help drive IQ gains among the top five percent. The Internet probably helps, too.) The question, of course, is whether such factors have really changed over time. Has it gotten easier for smart people to interact with each other? Are those on the right side of the IQ distribution now more likely to have children together? Would the Flynn effect be even larger if we did more of [fill in the blank]? These questions have no easy answers, but at least we now know that they need to be answered.


Interesting stuff. I can see it with video games, which definitely work your skills of association and spatial relationships. (Side note: I used to rock the memory section of those CAT tests they gave us as kids. A lep is a ball, motherfucker).

I can see the same for your The Wire's and your Game of Thrones' of the world. But what about your Real Houswife of Some Place's? Are they really beneficial as well? Do they improve some areas of your intelligence and ram others straight into the ground? They have many minor characters and subplots, but they're pretty much designed around a minimal level of attention. In fact, they actively bet on you not paying enough attention to notice how staged and illogical they are.

I could swear they're making my fiancee dumber, bless her heart. Those shows have gotten James Bond villian-level evil.

I suppose this is the debate that they have over kids' television, eh? Whether it's better to have shows which have a lot of stuff going on, to try to catch their ADHD-riddled eyes, or whether it's better to make them watch some Mr. Wizard reruns.
#19 Apr 21 2012 at 9:30 AM Rating: Decent
Sage
****
4,042 posts
I think there is an obvious contrast between shows like The Wire and shows like The Real Housewives. The only thing I think you could maybe learn from reality shows like that is social intelligence, maybe just fringe social intelligence even. They can be a guilty pleasure, but consuming too much of them is definitely detrimental. If smart people hanging out together increases intelligence, then stupid people being around other stupid people definitely increases stupidity.
#20 Apr 21 2012 at 11:15 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
But dumb TV isn't anything new. Is there an intellectual difference between Real Housewives and Three's Company?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#21 Apr 21 2012 at 11:20 AM Rating: Excellent
******
49,899 posts
Don Knotts.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#22 Apr 22 2012 at 1:37 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,010 posts
I think the missing link to the issue is that Huxley's future didn't necessarily require that the people became less intelligent. Quite the opposite (for the most part). It was that with sufficient diversions provided and priorities reinforced, the very intelligent would accept authoritarian rule, and even argue for it strongly and passionately.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#23 Apr 22 2012 at 3:45 PM Rating: Good
Needs More Smut
******
21,262 posts
gbaji wrote:
I think the missing link to the issue is that Huxley's future didn't necessarily require that the people became less intelligent. Quite the opposite (for the most part). It was that with sufficient diversions provided and priorities reinforced, the very intelligent would accept authoritarian rule, and even argue for it strongly and passionately.


Uh, it totally did in Brave New World. 75% of the population had deliberately induced Fetal Alcohol Syndrome to keep them as Gammas, Deltas, or Epsilon Semi-Morons. Only 25% of the population was allowed to stay "average" (betas) or above average (alphas and alpha plus.)
____________________________
FFXI: Catwho on Bismarck: Retired December 2014
Thayos wrote:
I can't understand anyone who skips the cutscenes of a Final Fantasy game. That's like going to Texas and not getting barbecue.

FFXIV: Katarh Mest and Taprara Rara on Lamia Server - Member of The Swarm
Curator of the XIV Wallpapers Tumblr and the XIV Fashion Tumblr
#24 Apr 22 2012 at 4:35 PM Rating: Good
Supreme Lionator
*****
14,174 posts
Wow, Catwho made a good point.
-
I don't really buy into Brave New World as a dystopia - I'm not sure the extent to which you're meant to - but I think it does a good job of showing how empty happiness is.
____________________________
“Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires.”
#25 Apr 22 2012 at 4:44 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
catwho wrote:
Uh, it totally did in Brave New World. 75% of the population had deliberately induced Fetal Alcohol Syndrome to keep them as Gammas, Deltas, or Epsilon Semi-Morons. Only 25% of the population was allowed to stay "average" (betas) or above average (alphas and alpha plus.)

He Cliff Noted it.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#26 Apr 22 2012 at 5:08 PM Rating: Good
Needs More Smut
******
21,262 posts
Kavekk wrote:
Wow, Catwho made a good point.
-
I don't really buy into Brave New World as a dystopia - I'm not sure the extent to which you're meant to - but I think it does a good job of showing how empty happiness is.


It took away free will to some extent (only Alpha Plus world controllers really had it, and the unstable Alpha Pluses that were exiled to islands.) It also dehumanized parenthood and families by making them distasteful to individuals ("mother" was a dirty word even without the epithet behind it). The replacement of religion with ***... well, that's arguable since the two have always been heavily intertwined.

It's pretty dystopian, just not in the "conform or Big Brother will kill you" way that Orwellian dystopias tend to be.
____________________________
FFXI: Catwho on Bismarck: Retired December 2014
Thayos wrote:
I can't understand anyone who skips the cutscenes of a Final Fantasy game. That's like going to Texas and not getting barbecue.

FFXIV: Katarh Mest and Taprara Rara on Lamia Server - Member of The Swarm
Curator of the XIV Wallpapers Tumblr and the XIV Fashion Tumblr
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 57 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (57)