Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Rosen vs Romney: That's what she saidFollow

#27 Apr 12 2012 at 9:51 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Gbaji wasn't rated up though. Maybe someone here just thinks you're cute.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#28 Apr 12 2012 at 9:57 PM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Maybe someone here just thinks you're cute.

Aren't you married?
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#29 Apr 12 2012 at 9:59 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
That wouldn't preclude me from thinking you're cute Smiley: mad

I don't, mind you, but then I didn't rate you up either, dirty fascist-GOP-apologist...
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#30 Apr 12 2012 at 9:59 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Demea wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
Maybe someone here just thinks you're cute.

Aren't you married?


Dirty Hippies Liberals believe in free love.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#31 Apr 13 2012 at 5:56 AM Rating: Excellent
****
6,471 posts
Demea wrote:
Also, I think there's some conservative lurkers running amok, because my posts are actually getting rated up. Usually when I play devil's advocate, I get carpet-bombed by the knee-jerk sandbox crowd.

STOP SENDING MIXED SIGNALS!


There definitely are, because I've been getting heavily downrated in every other gbaji thread. Usually when I lay on the snark or the expletives thick. Honestly, I don't think that's ever happened before.

I wish they'd post.

Edited, Apr 13th 2012 7:57am by Eske
#32 Apr 13 2012 at 6:02 AM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
They're there frequently. Not consistently mind you, but frequent enough. Personally, as someone who's conservative in many areas, I'm not sure how any other conservative can rate someone arguing with gbaji down since almost every argument is asinine.


Actually, there are two individuals I can think of who are polar to gbaji and are often as asinine as he is. You're not one of them though.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#33 Apr 13 2012 at 6:21 AM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
We have a lurker that has a gbaji crush!

Smiley: drool
#34 Apr 13 2012 at 6:35 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Uglysasquatch wrote:
Actually, there are two individuals I can think of who are polar to gbaji and are often as asinine as he is. You're not one of them though.

Shadowrelm!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#35 Apr 13 2012 at 7:19 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
That was a fun game.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#36 Apr 13 2012 at 2:39 PM Rating: Excellent
I watched a clip of what Rosen said, and I don't see what the big deal is. Perhaps she could have phrased it better, but her point is valid. She's a stay at home mom, while there's nothing wrong with that choice, she certainly isn't qualified to voice her opinion on economic matters when her husband has been bringing home the bacon their entire marriage. Maybe if they weren't multi-centi-millionaires, I'd be able to buy that she might have done some budgeting while raising those kids, and knew what it was like to clip coupons, but I highly doubt that.
#37 Apr 13 2012 at 2:52 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
PigtailsOfDoom wrote:
I watched a clip of what Rosen said, and I don't see what the big deal is. Perhaps she could have phrased it better, but her point is valid. She's a stay at home mom, while there's nothing wrong with that choice, she certainly isn't qualified to voice her opinion on economic matters when her husband has been bringing home the bacon their entire marriage. Maybe if they weren't multi-centi-millionaires, I'd be able to buy that she might have done some budgeting while raising those kids, and knew what it was like to clip coupons, but I highly doubt that.


Yeah, if you told my wife she wasn't qualified to voice her opinion on economic matters there'd be fireworks. She does most of the budgeting, couponing, paying bills, and stuff. She probably has a better grasp of all that economicy mumbo jumbo than the person who's actually bringing home the bacon in the relationship. Smiley: wink
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#38 Apr 13 2012 at 3:20 PM Rating: Excellent
Yeah, but you also don't have 200 million+ in your bank account and investments. Smiley: tongue Someone in your family has to do budgeting, and I wouldn't assume it was the breadwinner, since it could just as easily be the homemaker.

For someone who doesn't have to budget money, and has never worked a job (so they have no understanding of what it's like to know you make less than the guy next to you, just because he has a *****), to claim to have any sort of expertise when it comes to economic matters, is just ludicrous to me.

Not only that, I wonder how much choice is really involved there. Maybe I just don't know that many Mormons, but every single Mormon mother I have ever known, has been a stay at home mom except for one. And in that case, the dad wasn't in the picture anymore. I'm not sure if he died or if the parents got a divorce, but that particular mom was a nurse of some sort. Mormons are pretty conservative people, so I really wonder if there is in fact, a choice for the wives in whether they have a career or if they are stay at home mom's.
#39 Apr 13 2012 at 3:26 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
PigtailsOfDoom wrote:
Yeah, but you also don't have 200 million+ in your bank account and investments. Smiley: tongue Someone in your family has to do budgeting, and I wouldn't assume it was the breadwinner, since it could just as easily be the homemaker.


Coming from someone who's totally out of the loop here (I seriously know nothing about these people, ahhh blissful ignorance...). Does she manage their money, you know stuff like the investments or anything? Or do they just hire people to do that?
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#40 Apr 13 2012 at 4:08 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
I think you're missing the point in why it was a stupid thing to say pigtails.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#41 Apr 13 2012 at 4:24 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
PigtailsOfDoom wrote:
Yeah, but you also don't have 200 million+ in your bank account and investments.


Except Rosen's comment wasn't limited to the fact that the Romney's are wealthy, but that she had "never worked a day in her life". A choice which many married women have made. Even one's whose husbands are *not* multi-millionaires.

Quote:
For someone who doesn't have to budget money, and has never worked a job (so they have no understanding of what it's like to know you make less than the guy next to you, just because he has a *****), to claim to have any sort of expertise when it comes to economic matters, is just ludicrous to me.


So because someone doesn't earn money, they know nothing about budgeting money? Again, that's kind of offensive to millions of stay at home moms (and dads). Which is precisely the point. Ann Romney has no less a voice with regards to economic issues than all of those other women, yet Rosen just dismisses her (and by extension them) because they don't earn a salary.

It's one of the flaws in the Left's claim to be strong on women's issues (that all women are free to do what they want, as long as they make the kinds of choices that liberal women think they should), and Rosen stepped right into it.

Quote:
Not only that, I wonder how much choice is really involved there. Maybe I just don't know that many Mormons, but every single Mormon mother I have ever known, has been a stay at home mom except for one.


You don't know that many Mormons. Then again, I may know some a-typical ones too (California is not Arizona or Utah after all).
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#42 Apr 13 2012 at 5:01 PM Rating: Excellent
someproteinguy wrote:
PigtailsOfDoom wrote:
Yeah, but you also don't have 200 million+ in your bank account and investments. Smiley: tongue Someone in your family has to do budgeting, and I wouldn't assume it was the breadwinner, since it could just as easily be the homemaker.


Coming from someone who's totally out of the loop here (I seriously know nothing about these people, ahhh blissful ignorance...). Does she manage their money, you know stuff like the investments or anything? Or do they just hire people to do that?


From some of the comments Romney has made, I'm guessing they hire someone to manage their money. Given the fact that he has no idea what companies he has invested money in and all.

I get that Rosen's comments could be taken as insulting to all stay at home mom's, but she's not talking about all of them, she's talking about Ann Romney. She's hardly an example of your average stay at home mom. I just can't picture her sitting in the kitchen balancing a checkbook like a normal person, I guess. But like I said, I don't think you have to earn money to know how to handle it and budget correctly and all that. I just don't picture a family with that much wealth as needing to budget, so I don't follow how she would have experience in economic difficulties.
#43 Apr 14 2012 at 9:47 AM Rating: Excellent
Combined with the leaked Romney interview where he mentions off-handed that Ann's favorite hobby is dressage horse-riding, the known fact that they have many millions, and around live-in five servants.... yeah, Ann Romney doesn't really seem to "work" much at all.

It'd be different if she was involved in some charity organization or something. Generally, if one is a rich housewife and one is not working at all, it's expected that one is involved in a non-selfish hobby as a means of giving back to the community. Even if it was just being a cub scout mom or something.

Instead, her hobby is riding dressage horses. Not helping disabled kids go to horse camp or even running and managing her own horse stables or running a breeding line of the damn things. Nope, just riding them. Presumably handing the reins off to some poor stable boy when she's done and then going to take a shower after her "exhausting workout." (Note: Riding a horse is a bit of a workout, but the horse is the one really getting the exercise, not you.)
#44 Apr 14 2012 at 10:43 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
But you guys understand why it was a stupid thing to say right?
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#45 Apr 14 2012 at 12:41 PM Rating: Good
It was a stupid thing to say in that it did not help her party.

Doesn't dismiss the accuracy of the statement.

A friend of mine who is a SAHM by choice because whatever wages she could earn would be eaten up by childcare costs agrees 100% with Rosen.
#46 Apr 14 2012 at 1:21 PM Rating: Excellent
As someone else in this thread said, attacking a candidate's significant other is a bad move however you slice it. Keep the focus on the candidates, not on their families. It's not like Romney's wife is running for president.

That said, this comment has been taken completely out of context. For the GOP to spin this as "Democrats attacking stay-at-home moms" is laughable.

This is one person making a very ill-advised but ACCURATE comment that Anne Romney has never had to cope with the daily stresses and pressures that most Americans face every single day. Parenting is a difficult task, for sure... but it's not "work" in the sense of a 40+ hour per week job (in which you'll be fired, and your family up a creek, if you violate office politics or get on your boss' bad side). Being a parent has its own set of pressures, but parenting is apples and oranges when compared to not only working, but being the primary breadwinner of a household.

I work 60+ hours a week and never really get a day off. I'm a stepfather to a 14-year-old girl who is soon to be 15, and each day it's very difficult for me to carve out the time I wish I could spend with her... but I can't, because my family depends on me to work. I have to.

I WISH I could have the luxury of being a stay-at-home parent so I could spend more time with my step daughter! And I know there are thousands upon thousands of other working parents, mothers and fathers alike, who feel the same way.

Being financially stable enough to be a stay-at-home parent is a luxury most people will never have.

Yes, it's a luxury. The only time it's not a luxury is when one parent is forced to stay home because they can't afford daycare costs (like the person mentioned in the post above), but again, I'm certain that's never been a problem for the Romneys.



Edited, Apr 14th 2012 12:24pm by Thayos
____________________________
Thayos Redblade
Jormungandr
Hyperion
#47 Apr 14 2012 at 2:57 PM Rating: Excellent
This wasn't Rosen attacking the candidate's spouse unprovoked, it was Rosen attacking the person that the candidate claimed was his economic adviser representing women.

Once a candidate admits they take serious policy advice from a spouse, the spouse becomes fair game for criticism as a policy adviser.
#48 Apr 14 2012 at 3:56 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
They become fair game if you don't want to win maybe. They certainly don't become fair game politically.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#49 Apr 14 2012 at 4:23 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
catwho wrote:
Once a candidate admits they take serious policy advice from a spouse, the spouse becomes fair game for criticism as a policy adviser.


I remember Ann Coulter making a similar arguement back with Bush and the anti-war soldier wives...

Edit:
To be clear, I'm going for a "Do you want to be like them, or better?" type thing.

Edited, Apr 14th 2012 6:39pm by TirithRR
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#50 Apr 14 2012 at 5:18 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
Quote:
Once a candidate admits they take serious policy advice from a spouse, the spouse becomes fair game for criticism as a policy adviser.


Yeah, don't become a political advice giver. This is pretty much terrible advice no matter how you swing it Smiley: lol
#51 Apr 14 2012 at 11:30 PM Rating: Excellent
It might not be good advice, but I agree with her.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 405 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (405)