He used the holiday weekend to sign a ton of new laws! Actually, his underhandedness and backasswardness are firmly planted in the current Pubbie political handbook, but boy am I glad I don't live in WI.
Edited, Apr 10th 2012 10:55am by Atomicflea
·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- WI Gov. Walker GOES ROGUE
WI Gov. Walker GOES ROGUEFollow
Guess he doesn't expect to survive the recall. Internal polling must be looking bad for him.
Edited, Apr 10th 2012 11:00am by Jophiel
Edited, Apr 10th 2012 11:00am by Jophiel
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
What's sad is that this is only a very small addition to the number of reasons I'm happy I don't live in Wisconsin.
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people
lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
I like cheese! Go WI!
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
What the f*ck?
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.
LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
Tare wrote:
I like cheese! Go WI!
Yay!
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.
Atomicflea wrote:
WI Gov. Walker GOES ROGUE
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
lolgaxe wrote:
Atomicflea wrote:
WI Gov. Walker GOES ROGUE
Red Doctor, standing by.
Walker wrote:
“You could argue that money is more important for men,†he told Goldberg. “I think a guy in their first job, maybe because they expect to be a breadwinner someday, may be a little more money-conscious. To attribute everything to a so-called bias in the workplace is just not true.â€
Oh Walker...
I am curious how Romney will handle this situation and whether he will support Walker or distance himself. Should be funny if he supports Walker and still wants a shot at presidency.
Two more months... two more months... he can't possibly do that much damage between now and then, right!?
**** I hope all those criminal investigations catch up with him.
**** I hope all those criminal investigations catch up with him.
AldousCayo wrote:
Two more months... two more months... he can't possibly do that much damage between now and then, right!?
@#%^ I hope all those criminal investigations catch up with him.
@#%^ I hope all those criminal investigations catch up with him.
Well, he signed 51 bills in one day, sooo...
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people
lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
Quote:
Republicans insist the law will ensure women are not coerced into undergoing abortions and will prevent faulty physician consultations via a Web camera.
Wait, so all abortion consultations are going to be broadcast live now? Is this a free public service or pay per view? What about doctor / patient confidentiality?
Today the AZ House voted to ban all abortions after 20 weeks.
Meanwhile the GOP keeps saying that women will come around once they realize this Republican "War on Women" thing is all drummed up by the media.
Meanwhile the GOP keeps saying that women will come around once they realize this Republican "War on Women" thing is all drummed up by the media.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
BrownDuck wrote:
Quote:
Republicans insist the law will ensure women are not coerced into undergoing abortions and will prevent faulty physician consultations via a Web camera.
Wait, so all abortion consultations are going to be broadcast live now? Is this a free public service or pay per view? What about doctor / patient confidentiality?
Prevent.
This is to add another wall preventing women from having abortions, because it keeps them from consulting with their own doctors in cases where they cannot physically reach them. It's actually one of the more disgusting aspects of the bills, imo, because it only realistically applies to women in the most dire circumstances.
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people
lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
George Carlin was right, you people are circling the drain.
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.
LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
BrownDuck wrote:
Quote:
Republicans insist the law will ensure women are not coerced into undergoing abortions and will prevent faulty physician consultations via a Web camera.
Wait, so all abortion consultations are going to be broadcast live now? Is this a free public service or pay per view? What about doctor / patient confidentiality?
Prevent.
This is to add another wall preventing women from having abortions, because it keeps them from consulting with their own doctors in cases where they cannot physically reach them. It's actually one of the more disgusting aspects of the bills, imo, because it only realistically applies to women in the most dire circumstances.
If doctors are going to shame women into carrying their babies to term, it will be much more effective if they do it in person.
Duh.
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.
Wait! Let me see if I've got this straight. So a governor signed bills which the state legislature passed and this is somehow strange? OMG! Alert the media! Stop the presses. We've got to make sure everyone knows about this this new thing which has never happened before!
You're kidding right? Talk about false outrage. And abortion? War on Women? WI passes a law which does exactly what Obama insisted every state could do when claiming that Obamacare didn't provide funding for abortion. And this is wrong? Do I have to go back to posts from you guys in 2009 when you all stood in lockstep insisting that no one was arguing for taxpayer funded abortion?
And AZ changed the weeks at which you can't have an elective abortion from 24 to 20? OMG! That is shocking!
What happened to the oft-argued point about abortion that as medical science changes we can do things like adjust the exact dates for things like viability, late term pregnancies, etc? So all of that was just a lie? Shocking!
You're kidding right? Talk about false outrage. And abortion? War on Women? WI passes a law which does exactly what Obama insisted every state could do when claiming that Obamacare didn't provide funding for abortion. And this is wrong? Do I have to go back to posts from you guys in 2009 when you all stood in lockstep insisting that no one was arguing for taxpayer funded abortion?
And AZ changed the weeks at which you can't have an elective abortion from 24 to 20? OMG! That is shocking!
What happened to the oft-argued point about abortion that as medical science changes we can do things like adjust the exact dates for things like viability, late term pregnancies, etc? So all of that was just a lie? Shocking!
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
How can so much stupid fit into such a small square rectangle?
Edited, Apr 10th 2012 5:20pm by idiggory
Edited, Apr 10th 2012 5:20pm by idiggory
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people
lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
I'm also a bit confused at the issue with signing laws that have already passed. Isn't this what happens for most bills? It's not as if he's just writing laws and then signing them all on his own. Not to imply that the bills are awesome, or should be in place, but signing them seems to be pretty bland and normal.
Edited, Apr 10th 2012 4:26pm by Xsarus
Edited, Apr 10th 2012 4:26pm by Xsarus
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
Sir Xsarus wrote:
I'm also a bit confused at the issue with signing laws that have already passed. Isn't this what happens for most bills? It's not as if he's just writing laws and then signing them all on his own.
Republican majority in state congress. 'Nuff said.
BrownDuck wrote:
Sir Xsarus wrote:
I'm also a bit confused at the issue with signing laws that have already passed. Isn't this what happens for most bills? It's not as if he's just writing laws and then signing them all on his own.
Republican majority in state congress. 'Nuff said.
Yes, the voice of the majority of the people of the state of Wisonsin should obviously not be heard.
Amirite?
Bigdaddyjug wrote:
Yes, the voice of the majority of the people of the state of Wisonsin should obviously not be heard.
Amirite?
Amirite?
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Bigdaddyjug wrote:
BrownDuck wrote:
Sir Xsarus wrote:
I'm also a bit confused at the issue with signing laws that have already passed. Isn't this what happens for most bills? It's not as if he's just writing laws and then signing them all on his own.
Republican majority in state congress. 'Nuff said.
Yes, the voice of the majority of the people of the state of Wisonsin should obviously not be heard.
Amirite?
Are you arguing or agreeing with my comment? Or did you even understand what I was saying?
Xsarus asked why the outrage over simple signing of the bills. I attempted to convey tersely as possible that the origin of the bills did not represent the majority of the people, but merely the majority of the currently elected legislators, and therefore the signing was merely a symbolic gesture of ********** you" to the people of the state. I apologize if this point was not clear without me channeling Gbaji.
BrownDuck wrote:
Bigdaddyjug wrote:
BrownDuck wrote:
Sir Xsarus wrote:
I'm also a bit confused at the issue with signing laws that have already passed. Isn't this what happens for most bills? It's not as if he's just writing laws and then signing them all on his own.
Republican majority in state congress. 'Nuff said.
Yes, the voice of the majority of the people of the state of Wisonsin should obviously not be heard.
Amirite?
Are you arguing or agreeing with my comment? Or did you even understand what I was saying?
Xsarus asked why the outrage over simple signing of the bills. I attempted to convey tersely as possible that the origin of the bills did not represent the majority of the people, but merely the majority of the currently elected legislators, and therefore the signing was merely a symbolic gesture of "@#%^ you" to the people of the state. I apologize if this point was not clear without me channeling Gbaji.
See, our political system doesn't allow us to re-elect new reps every week. So when you elect that state rep to a 2 year term, you're kind of saying "I'm happy with whatever this guy passes for the next 2 years" (or however long state rep terms are in Wisconsin). I realize this is a hard concept to digest, but it's at the heart of a representative democracy.
That notwithstanding, I hardly doubt that the majority of the population disagrees with the governor's political views. Most states have recall requirements that require a far smaller percentage to initiate a recall. That said, until the recall election, he is signing into laws the bills that the democratically elected state house/senate passes.
Edit: just typos
Edited, Apr 10th 2012 5:20pm by Bigdaddyjug
Of course, if he'd have campaigned on giant corporate tax breaks, destroying unions and restricting abortions, would he have been elected in the first place?
Bigdaddyjug wrote:
See, our political system doesn't allow us to re-elect new reps every week. So when you elect that state rep to a 2 yar term, you're kind of saying "I'm happy with whatever this guy passes for the next 2 years" (or however long state rep terms are in Wisconsin). I realize this is a hard concept to digest, but it's at the heart of a representative democracy.
That notwithstanding, I hardly doubt that the majority of the population disagrees with the governor's political views. Most states have recall requirements that require a far smaller percentage to initiate a recall. That said, until the recall election, and he is signing into las the bills that the democratically elected state house/senate passes.
That notwithstanding, I hardly doubt that the majority of the population disagrees with the governor's political views. Most states have recall requirements that require a far smaller percentage to initiate a recall. That said, until the recall election, and he is signing into las the bills that the democratically elected state house/senate passes.
I'm not really sure you have a point that is relevant to me. The people complaining (whether they represent the majority of the state's population or not) are upset because these bills were passed by a republican controlled congress and signed by a republican governor, and in at least 2 cases, the bills in question directly negated previous legislation. I happen to think the items pointed out in the article suck and that the Gov. and his congress are probably ********** but I'm not a resident of the state, so I really couldn't care less atm.
Recent Visitors: 359
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (359)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- WI Gov. Walker GOES ROGUE
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC