Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »
Reply To Thread

The Hunger Games movie sucks bloated goat ***Follow

#177 Aug 16 2012 at 11:04 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
****
6,543 posts
Just watched the movie with my wife after reading the book.

I honestly thought Totem was trolling when he made this thread originally. I didn't think it would actually be THAT bad. Maybe I'm biased because I read the book first, which was pretty good, although the story could have been told better by a more experienced author. We both thought the movie was outright terrible... It was like a fan-made adaptation of the book made by a bunch of film school students to be posted on Youtube.

Edited, Aug 17th 2012 5:04am by Kuwoobie
____________________________
Galkaman wrote:
Kuwoobie will die crushed under the burden of his mediocrity.

#178 Aug 17 2012 at 2:36 AM Rating: Decent
@#%^ing DRK
*****
13,143 posts
Shaowstrike the Shady wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
And here's a song representing the "Wild West" era accurately.


You had the wrong song.


You had the wrong song.

Edited, Aug 17th 2012 3:36am by Paskil
#179 Aug 17 2012 at 6:47 AM Rating: Good
*****
13,251 posts
You guys are just being led by the mainstream media outlets. Can't just one of you have an original thought?!
#180 Aug 17 2012 at 6:57 AM Rating: Excellent
Gave Up The D
Avatar
*****
12,281 posts
Sheeple! I'm surrounded by Sheeple!!!
____________________________
Shaowstrike (Retired - FFXI)
91PUP/BLM 86SMN/BST 76DRK
Cooking/Fishing 100


"We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary."
— James D. Nicoll
#181 Aug 17 2012 at 6:58 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
Flock you.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#182 Aug 17 2012 at 7:29 AM Rating: Good
***
1,877 posts
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
Way bad choice of username for the record...


At least I wasn't the only one that thought that. Smiley: lol
#183 Aug 17 2012 at 8:29 AM Rating: Excellent
****
6,471 posts
Shaowstrike the Shady wrote:


Enhanced.
#184 Aug 19 2012 at 9:14 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Got around to seeing this movie this evening. As I'd guessed, some of you people thought way too hard about it.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#185 Aug 20 2012 at 6:21 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
Flock you.

Ewwwe.

I liked the Hunger Games movie. It was a disturbing subject for me to digest when I read the book. Watching it in movie form was much more entertaining. baa
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#186 Aug 20 2012 at 7:59 AM Rating: Excellent
****
6,471 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Got around to seeing this movie this evening. As I'd guessed, some of you people thought way too hard about it.


At the risk of treading somewhere in the realm of agreement with gbaji, this is something that I wonder about sometimes. People do the same sort of overanalysis with the Harry Potter books, too. I don't quite get the folks that read only the Hunger Games and Harry Potter, then mine for depth and nuance in them like they're writing a thesis. They're fine enough books, but poring over them is at odds with their nature.

If you're going to do that much thinking about a book, why not do it over one that can sustain that sort of analysis?

Edited, Aug 20th 2012 10:00am by Eske
#187 Aug 20 2012 at 8:18 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Eske Esquire wrote:
If you're going to do that much thinking about a book, why not do it over one that can sustain that sort of analysis?
I imagine it's because those books lacks the depth required for analysis, so it's easier to complain about the lack of depth and feel smart about it?
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#188 Aug 20 2012 at 9:15 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Eske Esquire wrote:
People do the same sort of overanalysis with the Harry Potter books, too. I don't quite get the folks that read only the Hunger Games and Harry Potter, then mine for depth and nuance in them like they're writing a thesis. They're fine enough books, but poring over them is at odds with their nature.

I don't necessarily disagree but I'd rank someone who tries to act smart by tearing down children's literature a bit lower than someone who over-analyzed children's literature. Someone who gets way into Harry Potter, be it analyzing themes in the book or trying to find a connection (beyond bad pseudo-latin) between the spells or chronicling the mythology or even writing fan fic is trying to extend a pleasant experience that ended in its official form. Even if I'm not into Harry Potter, I can "get" that and it's not hurting anything even if I personally find some of the efforts silly. Someone who is trying to tear down popular children's (or tween/teen) literature/film is just exercising self-aggrandizement by going after a ridiculously easy target. It's a lot harder to respect that. I mean, holy shit, really? You managed to find plot holes in Harry Potter or Twilight or The Hunger Games? You must be a genius.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#189 Aug 20 2012 at 9:46 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Jophiel wrote:
....self-aggrandizement by going after a ridiculously easy target.

Totem's specialty. Smiley: smile









Edited, Aug 20th 2012 5:56pm by Elinda
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#190 Aug 20 2012 at 10:45 AM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Eske Esquire wrote:
People do the same sort of overanalysis with the Harry Potter books, too. I don't quite get the folks that read only the Hunger Games and Harry Potter, then mine for depth and nuance in them like they're writing a thesis. They're fine enough books, but poring over them is at odds with their nature.

I don't necessarily disagree but I'd rank someone who tries to act smart by tearing down children's literature a bit lower than someone who over-analyzed children's literature. Someone who gets way into Harry Potter, be it analyzing themes in the book or trying to find a connection (beyond bad pseudo-latin) between the spells or chronicling the mythology or even writing fan fic is trying to extend a pleasant experience that ended in its official form. Even if I'm not into Harry Potter, I can "get" that and it's not hurting anything even if I personally find some of the efforts silly. Someone who is trying to tear down popular children's (or tween/teen) literature/film is just exercising self-aggrandizement by going after a ridiculously easy target. It's a lot harder to respect that. I mean, holy shit, really? You managed to find plot holes in Harry Potter or Twilight or The Hunger Games? You must be a genius.


Agreed on all points.

I should be honest here: I'm referring in part to my fiancee, who's endlessly impressed by the fact that the house elves in Harry Potter are a metaphor for real-life ethnic prejudices.

Smiley: facepalm

PS: Elves as the target of prejudice, that's a new one!

Edited, Aug 20th 2012 12:51pm by Eske
#191 Aug 21 2012 at 10:20 PM Rating: Decent
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Jophiel wrote:
We replaced Awaycomesock's regular instant coffee with pure crystal methamphetamine. Let's see if he notices the difference...



/oblig


____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#192 Aug 21 2012 at 10:26 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Grace Chetwin and Susan Cooper wrote way better series than Harry Potter any day for what its worth. That is all.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#193 Aug 22 2012 at 7:18 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
On the other hand, Dr. Seuss books were just pages and pages of plot holes and inconsistent characterizations, and that's not even counting the awful butchering of the English language. I have no idea how he even got published with that infantile writing.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 410 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (410)