Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

SCotUS to Look at Affirmative Action (Kind Of)Follow

#27 Feb 25 2012 at 10:33 AM Rating: Decent
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Atomic Flee wrote:
No one is saying that white skin equates success, but to close your eyes to the fact that being white (or male, for that matter) has no underlying contribution to any success you enjoy is living in a fantasy world.


This
#28 Feb 25 2012 at 10:53 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
I'm well aware that any scant success I may enjoy can be directly attributed to my status as a white, middle-class male.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#29 Feb 25 2012 at 11:01 AM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Atomicflea wrote:
No one is saying that white skin equates success, but to close your eyes to the fact that being white (or male, for that matter) has no underlying contribution to any success you enjoy is living in a fantasy world.


I'll contribute much of my success in school/college and by extension career to the subjects I enjoyed and how easily they came to me and my parents' willingness to sacrifice for the betterment of my future. But I don't think anyone is saying those qualities come with race or sex. Certainly not "a lot" of my success being contributed to my sex/race instead of earning it through work, as Omegavegeta stated..
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#30 Feb 25 2012 at 11:04 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Debalic wrote:
I'm well aware that any scant success I may enjoy can be directly attributed to my status as a white, middle-class male.

Well, for you, yeah.

Hippy.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#31 Feb 25 2012 at 11:19 AM Rating: Decent
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
TirithRR wrote:
Atomicflea wrote:
No one is saying that white skin equates success, but to close your eyes to the fact that being white (or male, for that matter) has no underlying contribution to any success you enjoy is living in a fantasy world.


I'll contribute much of my success in school/college and by extension career to the subjects I enjoyed and how easily they came to me and my parents' willingness to sacrifice for the betterment of my future. But I don't think anyone is saying those qualities come with race or sex. Certainly not "a lot" of my success being contributed to my sex/race instead of earning it through work, as Omegavegeta stated..


That's nice that you believe that, but it simply isn't true. Society has created gender roles for jobs and you're blind if you think otherwise.
#32 Feb 25 2012 at 11:30 AM Rating: Decent
Avatar
****
7,564 posts
********* I am not going to pretend that race and gender does not give a leg up, but it no way dictates what an individual can do. At one point women couldn't be in politics, yet after years of women getting better at politics, and building on foundations of other women, and studying politics to excel at it, we have women all over the world in politics, many nations with women as their Chief Politician.

While race and sex does have a slight impact, good work ethic, personal commitment, and a desire to achieve will always have a larger impact on success.
____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#33 Feb 25 2012 at 11:31 AM Rating: Good
Drunken English Bastard
*****
15,268 posts
Almalieque wrote:
TirithRR wrote:
Atomicflea wrote:
No one is saying that white skin equates success, but to close your eyes to the fact that being white (or male, for that matter) has no underlying contribution to any success you enjoy is living in a fantasy world.


I'll contribute much of my success in school/college and by extension career to the subjects I enjoyed and how easily they came to me and my parents' willingness to sacrifice for the betterment of my future. But I don't think anyone is saying those qualities come with race or sex. Certainly not "a lot" of my success being contributed to my sex/race instead of earning it through work, as Omegavegeta stated..


That's nice that you believe that, but it simply isn't true. Society has created gender roles for jobs and you're blind if you think otherwise.

The term "gender role" is so out dated. It's more of a "genitalia role". Smiley: nod
____________________________
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
#34 Feb 25 2012 at 11:34 AM Rating: Decent
Avatar
****
7,564 posts
Ya I know a few dudes (with penises) that are a lot more effeminate then women (with vaginas) I know . I totally agree with the above changes to the terminology.
____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#35 Feb 25 2012 at 11:37 AM Rating: Default
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Almalieque wrote:
TirithRR wrote:
Atomicflea wrote:
No one is saying that white skin equates success, but to close your eyes to the fact that being white (or male, for that matter) has no underlying contribution to any success you enjoy is living in a fantasy world.


I'll contribute much of my success in school/college and by extension career to the subjects I enjoyed and how easily they came to me and my parents' willingness to sacrifice for the betterment of my future. But I don't think anyone is saying those qualities come with race or sex. Certainly not "a lot" of my success being contributed to my sex/race instead of earning it through work, as Omegavegeta stated..


That's nice that you believe that, but it simply isn't true. Society has created gender roles for jobs and you're blind if you think otherwise.


Society may have influence in what paths are expected, but it didn't make me good at it or make me succeed. Just because society says Controls Engineers are supposed to be male didn't make the subject come easy to me. I enjoyed it and was good at it (Naturally good at it). Being male didn't make me good at it. Being male didn't make my parents willing to go without for so long so I could end up in a better position (I'm not from China).
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#36 Feb 25 2012 at 11:39 AM Rating: Decent
Avatar
****
7,564 posts
Huzzah fellow Controller!.
____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#37 Feb 25 2012 at 11:43 AM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
rdmcandie wrote:
Huzzah fellow Controller!.


I'm playing with a few robots with 15 inch saw blades right now. They are kicking my *** (Not fair though, they are well armed).
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#38 Feb 25 2012 at 11:43 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I'm amused at how "has no underlying contribution" has turned into "is the primary cause".
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#39 Feb 25 2012 at 11:45 AM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Jophiel wrote:
I'm amused at how "has no underlying contribution" has turned into "is the primary cause".


My comments are directly in response to Omegavegeta's quote in my first post.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#40 Feb 25 2012 at 11:54 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Well, I for one am happy that women have been able to overcome the handicap of having vaginas by taking some poli sci classes. That's just... neat.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#41 Feb 25 2012 at 12:42 PM Rating: Excellent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

I don't have a strong opinion either way. Affirmative Action isn't a real button issue with me.

I'm a bad liberal


Nah, most white liberals aren't that interested in affirmative action at this point. I mean, you voted for Obama, right? No more effort on race issues is required.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#42 Feb 25 2012 at 12:50 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Vindication!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#43 Feb 25 2012 at 1:31 PM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
I'm amused at how "has no underlying contribution" has turned into "is the primary cause".


Tirith's posts remind me of that guy who says 'SO MUCH FOR GLOBAL WARMING' every time it's even slightly cold.
#44 Feb 25 2012 at 1:36 PM Rating: Decent
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Kavekk wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
I'm amused at how "has no underlying contribution" has turned into "is the primary cause".


Tirith's posts remind me of that guy who says 'SO MUCH FOR GLOBAL WARMING' every time it's even slightly cold.


More like I was warning the guy who says "OMG GLOBAL WARMING" when it gets warm in the summer that "Hey that may not be the best way to go about getting support for your side."

Like I said, I was telling Omegavegeta that belittling hard work of a white person and saying they are there because they are white is not a good way to get people to agree with him.

Of course, Flea decided that me likening someone telling a white male they are there because they are white to someone telling a woman they are there because they are attractive without so much as a hint as to their origins was such horrible thing.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#45 Feb 25 2012 at 2:25 PM Rating: Excellent
****
6,471 posts
I'm of the mind that the goal should be to prop up everyone who's shut out by being too poor, or without the opportunity for education. There are plenty of disenfranchised whites out there, too. I don't think our approach should be "Ah, fuck 'em. They're white...they should be able to go it alone."
#46 Feb 25 2012 at 2:28 PM Rating: Excellent
GBATE!! Never saw it coming
Avatar
****
9,957 posts
Eske Esquire wrote:
I'm of the mind that the goal should be to prop up everyone who's shut out by being too poor, or without the opportunity for education. There are plenty of disenfranchised whites out there, too. I don't think our approach should be "Ah, fuck 'em. They're white...they should be able to go it alone."

____________________________
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.

#47 Feb 25 2012 at 3:01 PM Rating: Good
Friar Bijou wrote:
Eske Esquire wrote:
I'm of the mind that the goal should be to prop up everyone who's shut out by being too poor, or without the opportunity for education. There are plenty of disenfranchised whites out there, too. I don't think our approach should be "Ah, fuck 'em. They're white...they should be able to go it alone."



The real problem is those very disenfranchised whites are the most vocal opponents of any sort of help for anyone, anywhere, from the government. Even if many of them are already using that help.
#48 Feb 25 2012 at 3:06 PM Rating: Excellent
GBATE!! Never saw it coming
Avatar
****
9,957 posts
catwho wrote:
Friar Bijou wrote:
Eske Esquire wrote:
I'm of the mind that the goal should be to prop up everyone who's shut out by being too poor, or without the opportunity for education. There are plenty of disenfranchised whites out there, too. I don't think our approach should be "Ah, fuck 'em. They're white...they should be able to go it alone."


The real problem is those very disenfranchised whites are the most vocal opponents of any sort of help for anyone, anywhere, from the government. Even if many of them are already using that help.

That's an awfuly wide brush you're painting with, there.Smiley: dubious
____________________________
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.

#49 Feb 25 2012 at 10:37 PM Rating: Good
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
TirithRR wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
TirithRR wrote:
Atomicflea wrote:
No one is saying that white skin equates success, but to close your eyes to the fact that being white (or male, for that matter) has no underlying contribution to any success you enjoy is living in a fantasy world.


I'll contribute much of my success in school/college and by extension career to the subjects I enjoyed and how easily they came to me and my parents' willingness to sacrifice for the betterment of my future. But I don't think anyone is saying those qualities come with race or sex. Certainly not "a lot" of my success being contributed to my sex/race instead of earning it through work, as Omegavegeta stated..


That's nice that you believe that, but it simply isn't true. Society has created gender roles for jobs and you're blind if you think otherwise.


Society may have influence in what paths are expected, but it didn't make me good at it or make me succeed. Just because society says Controls Engineers are supposed to be male didn't make the subject come easy to me. I enjoyed it and was good at it (Naturally good at it). Being male didn't make me good at it. Being male didn't make my parents willing to go without for so long so I could end up in a better position (I'm not from China).


You're absolutely correct in that it didn't make you smarter or understand anything any easier. However, that's not what we're talking about. We're talking about you getting hired. When people think a specific job, people envision a certain person and that certain person is more likely to get the job than someone who doesn't fit that description. It isn't always intentional, but it's reality.

When I worked at McDonald's, people starting positions were determined first by sex, then my race then by attractiveness. All males tend to start in the back, all females tend to start up at the front or drive through. If it were two people of the same sex, then the white people would start up in the front/drive through window. If they were the same sex and race then the more "attractive" person would be up front.

Of course this wasn't official, but it was obvious. In the entire time that I worked there, every black male had started in the grill. I thought this was only at that store, but as you start looking at other jobs, you can see a similar pattern.
#50 Feb 26 2012 at 12:51 AM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
When Alma says that something was obvious to him, I naturally assume that he completely misjudged the situation.

I'd wager that was actually one of the most racially proactive McDonald's in the world.

Edited, Feb 26th 2012 1:51am by Eske
#51 Feb 26 2012 at 1:13 AM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Eske Esquire wrote:
When Alma says that something was obvious to him, I naturally assume that he completely misjudged the situation.

I'd wager that was actually one of the most racially proactive McDonald's in the world.

Edited, Feb 26th 2012 1:51am by Eske


Then that would make you a horrible wager.

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 328 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (328)