Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

New nuclear plants approvedFollow

#1 Feb 09 2012 at 12:55 PM Rating: Excellent
Homer Simpsons of the US, rejoice!

LA Times wrote:
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission on Thursday approved construction of the first new nuclear reactors to be built in the United States since 1978. The commission’s board approved the decision by a 4-1 vote, with its chairman Gregory B. Jaczko casting the dissenting vote.

The new reactors will be added to the Vogtle plant outside of Waynesboro, Ga., and operated by Southern Co. The reactors will use light water technology developed by Westinghouse. The new reactors could be in full operation by 2016, according to Southern. The reactors will together generate 2,200 MW, enough to power almost 1.8 million homes.


I know exactly where that is. Actually, it made me feel a bit nostalgiac; from a hill about a mile from my house when I was growing up, you could actually see the cooling towers of Plant Vogtle in the distance, two counties away. Burke County where it is located is also really wealthy because of all the nuclear engineers, and the high school there had the nickname "The Mall" because it was so cavernous on the inside.

Edited, Feb 9th 2012 2:02pm by catwho
#2 Feb 09 2012 at 1:00 PM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
This is Obama's fault.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#3 Feb 09 2012 at 1:00 PM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
I've always wanted to hunt for twelve point rabbits.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#4 Feb 09 2012 at 1:30 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
I've always wanted to hunt for twelve point rabbits.


In Nuclear Georgia rabbits hunt you.
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#5 Feb 09 2012 at 1:38 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Funny how every step of the process I say "Hey, look at that; just like Obama said he wanted to see done" and every step of the way the usual suspects stomp their feet and insist none of it is really happening.

Anyway, cue the usual suspects.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#6 Feb 09 2012 at 1:41 PM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Anyway, cue the usual suspects.
Too little. Not enough nukes.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#7 Feb 09 2012 at 1:54 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Obama's actually doing what he promised? The gall!
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#8 Feb 09 2012 at 2:00 PM Rating: Excellent
Right now, the latest crop of freshman engineering students from Georgia Tech is suddenly switching their major over to "nuclear studies."

#9 Feb 09 2012 at 2:08 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
From "Russian Literature Studies"?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#10 Feb 09 2012 at 2:16 PM Rating: Excellent
Jophiel wrote:
From "Russian Literature Studies"?


Silly Joph. GA Tech doesn't have any other majors besides "some flavor of engineering" and "football fan."
#11 Feb 09 2012 at 2:23 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Russian Literature Engineering?

Or Russian Engineering Literature! Learn to write tech manuals in Cyrillic!

Edited, Feb 9th 2012 2:24pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#12 Feb 09 2012 at 2:36 PM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
In haiku form, comrade.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#13 Feb 09 2012 at 4:00 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Funny how every step of the process I say "Hey, look at that; just like Obama said he wanted to see done" and every step of the way the usual suspects stomp their feet and insist none of it is really happening.


Never said that none of it *is* happening. I've always questioned the degree to which Obama is the cause of any outcomes with regard to building nuclear power plants. You love to point at this one pair of reactors on this one plant site, but the reality is that this specific site and plans were approved in 2008, set in motion back in 2006, under a consortium formed in 2004, and utilizing a DOE pro-nuclear energy program created in 2002. All Obama did was *not* block approval and construction on something that was already well under way by the time he took office.

Obama stuck to Bush's plan with regard to Iraq too. And he's kept open Guantanamo. I'm well aware that he's had to allow things he didn't like to go forward because trying to stop them would have been nearly impossible (and foolish). The reality is that his support for nuclear energy is tepid at best. It's why he typically buries anything related to that energy inside larger energy plans/reports/whatever. He knows that nuclear power is so unpopular by many of his supporters that he can't risk alienating them by appearing to give more than lip service to it.


Quote:
Anyway, cue the usual suspects.


Wouldn't want to disappoint you. Of course, I read the title of the thread and immediate thought: "Cue Joph making some broad pronouncement about how this means Obama really is pro-nuclear power after all". So you predicting me doing something in response to you doing a predictable action isn't exactly a shocker.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#14 Feb 09 2012 at 4:19 PM Rating: Default
Too bad Joph didn't make the thread doofus.
#15 Feb 09 2012 at 5:00 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Technogeek wrote:
Too bad Joph didn't make the thread doofus.


I didn't say he did. I said that he would post in it with his usual stock spiel. And he did.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#16 Feb 09 2012 at 5:03 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
I've always questioned the degree to which Obama is the cause of any outcomes with regard to building nuclear power plants. You love to point at this one pair of reactors on this one plant site, but the reality is that this specific site and plans were approved in 2008, set in motion back in 2006, under a consortium formed in 2004, and utilizing a DOE pro-nuclear energy program created in 2002.

Yeah, I discredited that little argument last time but good job parroting it again Smiley: laugh
Quote:
Wouldn't want to disappoint you

I wouldn't have been disappointed to not see you sitting on the GOP's shoulder and squawking. Shocked maybe. Not disappointed.

Edited, Feb 9th 2012 5:03pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#17 Feb 09 2012 at 5:27 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
Is this Uranium based technology, or Thorium? Because as far as I know, Thorium is safer to handle, much less hazardous all around, and can't produce weapon's grade material.
#18 Feb 09 2012 at 5:31 PM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
If it can't power a Flux Capacitor then I ain't interested.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#19 Feb 10 2012 at 3:45 AM Rating: Good
****
5,599 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
If it can't power a Flux Capacitor then I ain't interested.


Get six of these babies and we've got a 1.21 gigawatt ticket back to whenever DeLoreans were popular.
____________________________
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
I have a racist ****.

Steam: TuxedoFish
battle.net: Fishy #1649
GW2: Fishy.4129
#20 Feb 10 2012 at 4:16 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
If it can't power a Flux Capacitor then I ain't interested.


It can. 2200 MW > 1.21 GW
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#21 Feb 10 2012 at 5:07 AM Rating: Good
**
482 posts
IDrownFish wrote:
DeLoreans were popular


Hold the phone! When did this happen?
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
Pack your own lunch and bring nothing but Pixie Stix and Pop Rocks and get your liberty on.
#22 Feb 10 2012 at 5:26 AM Rating: Good
****
5,599 posts
klausneck wrote:
IDrownFish wrote:
DeLoreans were popular


Hold the phone! When did this happen?


Did it ever? I just kinda assumed.
____________________________
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
I have a racist ****.

Steam: TuxedoFish
battle.net: Fishy #1649
GW2: Fishy.4129
#23 Feb 10 2012 at 5:53 AM Rating: Good
****
5,550 posts
GA-tech (ME) friend of mine works for southern nuclear, and I'm most pleased for him at this development.


Also, look at those comments. People are still pants on head retarded about nuclear energy.
#24 Feb 10 2012 at 5:54 AM Rating: Excellent
****
5,599 posts
Your first mistake was reading the comments.
____________________________
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
I have a racist ****.

Steam: TuxedoFish
battle.net: Fishy #1649
GW2: Fishy.4129
#25 Feb 10 2012 at 5:56 AM Rating: Good
****
5,550 posts
I like that one guy arguing with everyone.

Go George Carlin, go.

Fight the stupid as other George Carlins have done before you.

Edited, Feb 10th 2012 5:01am by Tarub
#26 Feb 10 2012 at 8:33 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
gbaji wrote:



Quote:
Anyway, cue the usual suspects.


Wouldn't want to disappoint you. Of course, I read the title of the thread and immediate thought: "Cue Joph making some broad pronouncement about how this means Obama really is pro-nuclear power after all". So you predicting me doing something in response to you doing a predictable action isn't exactly a shocker.
lolz.....you two. Smiley: oyvey


____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 446 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (446)