·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Peeing on Afghans is A-OK by Perry.
Peeing on Afghans is A-OK by Perry.Follow
I should write a script to make all of Alma's posts appear as if they were written by the Swedish Chef from the Muppets.
Sir Spoonless wrote:
I should write a script to make all of Alma's posts appear as if they were written by the Swedish Chef from the Muppets.
Script not needed. That's as good a description as I've ever seen.
Wait, who's locking the thread?
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
Belkira wrote:
Sir Spoonless wrote:
I should write a script to make all of Alma's posts appear as if they were written by the Swedish Chef from the Muppets.
Script not needed. That's as good a description as I've ever seen.
I dunno, I've always gotten more of a "the teacher from Peanuts" vibe.
Almalieque wrote:
You said that you will maintain your old pay until your pay as a officer catches up. I countered to say that will never happen because your new pay as an officer WILL ALWAYS be more. So there will never a situation where you maintain your current pay until it catches up.
Wait! Um... But didn't this whole thing start because you claimed that NCOs sometimes (or even often) took a pay cut if they became commissioned officers? So if that will never happen, because the new pay as an officer will ALWAYS be more, then aren't we done here?
You aren't actually arguing that Lolgaxe is wrong because the method by which you're wrong differs from the one he originally stated? I mean, in the grand scheme of things, doesn't the fact that officer pay is always higher than NCO pay make you more wrong than his statement that if NCO pay were to be higher, he wouldn't take a pay cut, but would just freeze until his officer pay caught up? And in both cases, aren't you also still just wrong?
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
The answer to that is yes.
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
Eske Esquire wrote:
Belkira wrote:
Sir Spoonless wrote:
I should write a script to make all of Alma's posts appear as if they were written by the Swedish Chef from the Muppets.
Script not needed. That's as good a description as I've ever seen.
I dunno, I've always gotten more of a "the teacher from Peanuts" vibe.
The tones they used on the cartoon at least denoted some sort of authority. The Swedish Chef is just silly and obviously knows little of what he's gibbering about.
gbaji wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
You said that you will maintain your old pay until your pay as a officer catches up. I countered to say that will never happen because your new pay as an officer WILL ALWAYS be more. So there will never a situation where you maintain your current pay until it catches up.
Wait! Um... But didn't this whole thing start because you claimed that NCOs sometimes (or even often) took a pay cut if they became commissioned officers? So if that will never happen, because the new pay as an officer will ALWAYS be more, then aren't we done here?
You aren't actually arguing that Lolgaxe is wrong because the method by which you're wrong differs from the one he originally stated? I mean, in the grand scheme of things, doesn't the fact that officer pay is always higher than NCO pay make you more wrong than his statement that if NCO pay were to be higher, he wouldn't take a pay cut, but would just freeze until his officer pay caught up? And in both cases, aren't you also still just wrong?
<the asylum crowd>
Belkira wrote:
Eske Esquire wrote:
Belkira wrote:
Sir Spoonless wrote:
I should write a script to make all of Alma's posts appear as if they were written by the Swedish Chef from the Muppets.
Script not needed. That's as good a description as I've ever seen.
I dunno, I've always gotten more of a "the teacher from Peanuts" vibe.
The tones they used on the cartoon at least denoted some sort of authority. The Swedish Chef is just silly and obviously knows little of what he's gibbering about.
What about Beaker? I bet Alma makes the same noises when he's panicking.
Eske Esquire wrote:
Belkira wrote:
Eske Esquire wrote:
Belkira wrote:
Sir Spoonless wrote:
I should write a script to make all of Alma's posts appear as if they were written by the Swedish Chef from the Muppets.
Script not needed. That's as good a description as I've ever seen.
I dunno, I've always gotten more of a "the teacher from Peanuts" vibe.
The tones they used on the cartoon at least denoted some sort of authority. The Swedish Chef is just silly and obviously knows little of what he's gibbering about.
What about Beaker? I bet Alma makes the same noises when he's panicking.
Aww, I love Beaker! He's cute.
Yeah, let's not insult Beaker. He's never done anything to us.
But Eske could be on to something... none of us have ever seen Alma and Beaker together in the same room.
But Eske could be on to something... none of us have ever seen Alma and Beaker together in the same room.
Bunsen and Beaker were my second favorite Muppets duo.
Statler and Waldorf are still superior.
Statler and Waldorf are still superior.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
I saw the new Muppet movie this past weekend at the cheapo theater. It was good and a worthy addition to the franchise but needed more Rolf.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
lolgaxe wrote:
Bunsen and Beaker were my second favorite Muppets duo.
Statler and Waldorf are still superior.
Statler and Waldorf are still superior.
This. Then the Swedish Chef.
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.
LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
Nilatai wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
Bunsen and Beaker were my second favorite Muppets duo.
Statler and Waldorf are still superior.
Statler and Waldorf are still superior.
This. Then the Swedish Chef.
Fozzie is and always will be my favorite.
Gbaji wrote:
Wait! Um... But didn't this whole thing start because you claimed that NCOs sometimes (or even often) took a pay cut if they became commissioned officers? So if that will never happen, because the new pay as an officer will ALWAYS be more, then aren't we done here?
No, because that just means that I was wrong. That doesn't make him automatically right.
Gbaji wrote:
You aren't actually arguing that Lolgaxe is wrong because the method by which you're wrong differs from the one he originally stated? I mean, in the grand scheme of things, doesn't the fact that officer pay is always higher than NCO pay make you more wrong than his statement that if NCO pay were to be higher, he wouldn't take a pay cut, but would just freeze until his officer pay caught up? And in both cases, aren't you also still just wrong?
I know this is a new concept to Allakhazam, but I'M NOT IN ANY WAY TRYING TO DENY ANY ERROR ON MY PART. I WAS WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG. However, that doesn't justify his answer being incorrect.
This isn't about a method, he argued something that simply isn't true. There is no "more wrong". It's either right or wrong. He completely made up a scenario that will never exist and then made up a solution that isn't written anywhere to a scenario that will never occur. So, if you were to compare the percentage of wrong, he's at least the same as wrong as me.
ALma wrote:
This isn't about a method, he argued something that simply isn't true. There is no "more wrong". It's either right or wrong. He completely made up a scenario that will never exist and then made up a solution that isn't written anywhere to a scenario that will never occur. So, if you were to compare the percentage of wrong, he's at least the same as wrong as me.
Alma just Gbaji'd Gbaji.
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin
Omegavegeta wrote:
ALma wrote:
This isn't about a method, he argued something that simply isn't true. There is no "more wrong". It's either right or wrong. He completely made up a scenario that will never exist and then made up a solution that isn't written anywhere to a scenario that will never occur. So, if you were to compare the percentage of wrong, he's at least the same as wrong as me.
Alma just Gbaji'd Gbaji.
Also, Alma needs to adjust his flash cards.
Alma wrote:
There is no "more wrong". [...] So, if you were to compare the percentage of wrong, he's at least the same as wrong as me.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Is that in metric or Imperial units of wrong?
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Both gets you a new crater on Olympus Mons. Do we like Gbajilieque Crater, or Amalji?
Oh, man! I didn't check out this thread in a while. I didn't realize there was a Gbaji vs. Alma going on in here. I love those.
I kinda like the ring of Amalji.
Aripyanfar wrote:
Both gets you a new crater on Olympus Mons. Do we like Gbajilieque Crater, or Amalji?
I kinda like the ring of Amalji.
Dozer wrote:
Aripyanfar wrote:
Both gets you a new crater on Olympus Mons. Do we like Gbajilieque Crater, or Amalji?
I kinda like the ring of Amalji.
Reminds me of Jumanji, but without all the cool animals and stuff.
BrownDuck wrote:
Dozer wrote:
Aripyanfar wrote:
Both gets you a new crater on Olympus Mons. Do we like Gbajilieque Crater, or Amalji?
I kinda like the ring of Amalji.
Reminds me of Jumanji, but without all the cool animals and stuff.
Still have the monkey boy though.
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people
lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
That's not a nice thing to say about Robin Williams.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Recent Visitors: 400
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (400)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Peeing on Afghans is A-OK by Perry.
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC