Peeing on Afghans is A-OK by Perry.Follow

Well, he's right. Just not in the way he thinks.

Whatever helps you hide from reality.

He's not going to do your homework for you.

This isn't school and if it was, you'd be relegated to the Anime forum with the rest of the tards.

He doesn't even understand the situation, is asking the wrong questions, and was told where the answer to the right questions he should have asked are. Text book denial and avoidance.

You did, that's for sure.

None of which specifies an actual AR that states your claim. There you go again. You will spend a ton of time researching and referencing posts (only to keep the argument on in a circle) as opposed to just citing the regulation. Mainly, because that regulation doesn't exist.

What is the regulation? I can ctrl+f the reg to find your statement. When I find your statement within the reg, I will apologize and admit to my error.

He's asking for the regulation I told him about a while ago, but has decided to hide for whatever reason. I figure he's focusing on pretending I didn't because he needs to focus on something other than how sad it is that he's posting on forums while on vacation.

Edited, Feb 7th 2012 9:46am by lolgaxe

Maybe it's different in the Army (seriously doubt it though), we have this little concept called "Trust but Verify" in the Air Force. Whether it's an airman giving information to a NCO or an NCO doing the same for an officer, we use this concept. Certainly, Gaxe gave you the information you require. Him being an NCO, you should accept that information at face value. However, as a good officer would do, you would then look this up yourself. Why? For the simple fact that if YOU pass this information on to someone else (maybe one of your troops) and it does turn out to be wrong, YOU are the one that looks like an ***.

Crying "Well someone else told me, an NCO at that so it's their fault" makes you look like a bigger ***.

The reverse is also true. If I told my airmen to go clean the sh*tter and wax the Flight Chief's office floor, I would be damned if I didn't check up on them once in a while. It's not that I don't trust them to do the job. On the off chance they didn't do what I asked or did it poorly for whatever reason, I can correct the issue or (better even) be able to tell the Flight Chief with 100% accuracy that the job was done to our standards.

The same happens when we work on a jet. Certainly said airman is qualified to perform said task, but it takes 2 people to make the correction in the aircraft forms. Airman performs maintenance; supervisor (read NCO here) ensures it was done correctly. Jet flies on schedule, pilot lives another day.

See, that's how it works in the military. That concept can be and should be applied in every situation you would find yourself in.

Otherwise, you look like an ***.

I asked him for the reg. He did not provide me with any regulation.



I did look it up and I provided the pay chart. He is claiming that he has something that counters my evidence, so I'm asking him to provide his evidence. I've done my part by doing the research. I WAS WRONG. I ADMITTED that I WAS WRONG. After realizing my ERROR, I found the RIGHT answer, which is not the answer that LolGAXE has provided. It is now his turn to support his claim. That's how life works.



No one said that. I'm pretty sure that I've admitted to my error several times now.

You said that you will maintain your old pay until your pay as a officer catches up. I countered to say that will never happen because your new pay as an officer WILL ALWAYS be more. So there will never a situation where you maintain your current pay until it catches up.

So, I'm asking you to provide the AR that states that you will maintain your current pay until it "catches up" with your new supposed pay.

Your response should be less than 10 characters. I'll even give you the first 2 characters for you "AR". I understand that given the fact that you made it up, it might be hard to actually provide it.

Alma: Debating something else.