Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Headpigeons!Follow

#77gbaji, Posted: Jan 10 2012 at 5:26 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) If you like living in such crowded conditions, sure. Some of us don't see that as ideal living though.
#78 Jan 10 2012 at 5:59 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
gbaji wrote:
Quote:
Also lolgaxe is pretty much right about having the best of both worlds. I choose not to own a car, but lots of people here choose to have one AND live in a walkable neighbourhood. I don't see how having more options is a bad thing.


If you like living in such crowded conditions, sure. Some of us don't see that as ideal living though.


I personally enjoy stepping out into my yard, looking around, and seeing nothing but a forest. It's not because I could not afford to live anywhere else, or because this place is somehow "cheaper". My property and home is valued well above most homes available in town. I purchased the land around my home to stop people from building near it. I live 7 miles out of town, and it takes me 15 minutes to drive to work.

As far as Olorinus living 2 two blocks away and not hearing anything, he/she probably is used to the noise. I know when ever I go into town to my grandparent's places, it always sounds like someone is pulling into the driveway. But it's just someone driving by the house. The noise levels are completely different, and what Olorinus doesn't notice is very noticeable for someone who is used to a different amount of ambient noise.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#79 Jan 10 2012 at 6:12 PM Rating: Good
****
9,526 posts
gbaji wrote:


I also don't live 5 miles from the nearest convenience store. You picked the distance there skippy, not me.


wrong again.

Quote:
I only lived in the types of areas you like when I had to (ie: couldn't afford to live somewhere better).


Huh, here the cheaper places are all out in the suburbs...only people who live out there are people with big families who can't afford a house in a more central neighborhood. Maybe it is because we don't have the slums you're so afraid of in your community.

Quote:
So two blocks from the pub and you *never* hear anyone making noise? No one yelling out on the street in front of it? No drunken singing from folks at 2 am walking home from said pub? Really? I find that hard to believe.


Nope, never hear anyone making noise from the pub. I often go there and people simply behave themselves because if they didn't the place would be shut down. The most common "noise" I hear around my place is the horse and carriages clip clopping down the street and the drivers (what is the word for someone piloting a bike-cab) of bike cabs telling tourists about my neighborhood.

Quote:
If you like living in such crowded conditions, sure. Some of us don't see that as ideal living though.


"crowded conditions" really? Battery cage hens live in crowded conditions, calling the average north america city "crowded" is a little silly imo.

At any rate I'm from a small town. If I wanted to live somewhere less "crowded", I'd go back to my hometown of 12K people, which is the largest community for a 7 hour drive in any direction. And I'd still have a walkable neighborhood.

#80 Jan 10 2012 at 6:21 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,512 posts

Quote:

Huh, here the cheaper places are all out in the suburbs...only people who live out there are people with big families who can't afford a house in a more central neighborhood. Maybe it is because we don't have the slums you're so afraid of in your community.

Quote:

Nope, never hear anyone making noise from the pub. I often go there and people simply behave themselves because if they didn't the place would be shut down. The most common "noise" I hear around my place is the horse and carriages clip clopping down the street and the drivers (what is the word for someone piloting a bike-cab) of bike cabs telling tourists about my neighborhood.

Clueless white dude brags about living in expensive downtown tourist traps

Film at 11


Edited, Jan 10th 2012 6:21pm by Sweetums
#81 Jan 10 2012 at 6:24 PM Rating: Good
****
9,526 posts
TirithRR wrote:
The noise levels are completely different, and what Olorinus doesn't notice is very noticeable for someone who is used to a different amount of ambient noise.


I hear "noise" for sure (a lot of it is people driving, lol) but I don't hear noise from the pub. I live in a very quiet neighborhood. The horse and carriages make it an unattractive place for people to drive through.

As for liking to live out in the hinterlands, I totally get that. I grew up in a small town and loved visiting relatives who lived out of town (as well as just visiting places around)

Here, what wilderness there is is quite easily accessible by bike trail. If I lived in my hometown I would probably want more access to a car because the best part of that community is everything around it. Here that isn't the case.
#82 Jan 10 2012 at 6:29 PM Rating: Good
****
9,526 posts
Sweetums wrote:

Clueless white dude brags about living in expensive downtown tourist traps

Film at 11



I'm not a dude. I think it is funny that you accuse me of being privileged and gbaji accuses me of being poor, all because I choose to live in a walkable neighborhood.

The only way I'd get cheaper rent than where I live is to live somewhere where I would have to own a car, which would make it more expensive than where I live.

As for it being a tourist trap - the whole city is a tourist trap. It just happens to be where I found a decent job. There isn't anything I can do about that. It isn't like I'm the fool paying 100 bucks an hour to ride in a stinky carriage.


Edited, Jan 10th 2012 4:39pm by Olorinus
#83 Jan 10 2012 at 6:34 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
TirithRR wrote:
As far as Olorinus living 2 two blocks away and not hearing anything, he/she probably is used to the noise. I know when ever I go into town to my grandparent's places, it always sounds like someone is pulling into the driveway. But it's just someone driving by the house. The noise levels are completely different, and what Olorinus doesn't notice is very noticeable for someone who is used to a different amount of ambient noise.


Pretty much this. When I visit some friends of mine who live in North Park (a community pretty much like what Olorinus lives in), I constantly hear rattling from people moving through the alley out back, voices from people walking up and down the street a couple blocks away, shouts from folks "out on the town" at the local coffee shops, clubs, etc, and the occasional fights when drunks spill out onto the street from the bars (yes, also 2-3 blocks away). I'm always startled by the sounds, but they're like "Oh, that's just someone taking out the trash out back", or "that's just folks leaving the restaurant/club/bar/whatever down the hill being boisterous". And it's always followed with some reason why it's no big deal because it happens all the time, so pay it no mind.

And that's ignoring that I know for a fact that when we're sitting out on their porch, drinking beer and enjoying a nice summer night, that every neighbor within 50-80 feet (which is quite a few) can hear every word of our conversation through their open windows (because we can hear theirs). And I know that they can smell the smoke from anyone's cigarette who's smoking on that porch, because we can certainly smell it coming from anyone else nearby.


I'm not saying that the suburban neighborhood I live in is perfect in every regard, but it really is night and day how much less bothered you are by other people. I do agree that those who live in those types of neighborhoods just accept it and over time don't notice it, but it's really really noticeable to those who've gotten used to not hearing/smelling those things constantly.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#84 Jan 10 2012 at 6:34 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Looking up some quick statistics about the town I live outside of, I learned some pretty strange things.

Population of less than 8400 people, and in the last 10 years there have been two murders. But... there have been over 100 forcible rapes. So apparently my neighbors don't kill people, they just enjoy the surprise sex.

Strange thing is, I have read and heard about the murders, but have never heard anything about the forcible rapes before. I haven't heard anything on the news along those lines in the entire time I've lived here.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#85 Jan 10 2012 at 6:34 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,512 posts
That's mainly because in real cities there's either affordable, seedy downtown or ridiculously expensive downtown.

Didn't really have to guess which one you lived in.

Edited, Jan 10th 2012 6:37pm by Sweetums
#86 Jan 10 2012 at 6:39 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Sweetums wrote:
Posted Jan 10 2012 at 7:34 PM

Edited, Jan 10th 2012 6:37pm by Sweetums


You can time travel!
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#87 Jan 10 2012 at 6:42 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,512 posts
TirithRR wrote:
Sweetums wrote:
Posted Jan 10 2012 at 7:34 PM

Edited, Jan 10th 2012 6:37pm by Sweetums


You can time travel!
Central Time *******
#88 Jan 10 2012 at 6:51 PM Rating: Good
****
9,526 posts
Sweetums wrote:
That's mainly because in real cities there's either affordable, seedy downtown or ridiculously expensive downtown.

Didn't really have to guess which one you lived in.



what you're not getting is that where I live is not expensive (compared to other neighborhoods/suburbs) in the same urban area.

suburban: 2 bedroom suite, $1200

my neighbourhood: 2 bedroom apartment, 1030


Suburbs, another two bedroom suite for 1200

My neighborhood, 2 bedroom suite, $1100

$1150 for another 2 bedroom suite in my neighborhood

another suburban two bedroom suite for 1200


So... yeah. My supposedly super expensive neighborhood? Actually cheaper than living out where I would need a car (which also costs money)

So you can stop assuming that you know about me and where I live. It's an expensive city to live in, but there is no real cost savings of living out of town.

I understand you're trying to undermine my argument by portraying me as some snobby urbanite who can afford to live in an overpriced neighborhood. The truth is, I don't know anyone who is living on low wages who lives in the suburbs in this community because the cost of needing to own and maintain a vehicle is so much higher than any cost savings from rent.

The exception is esquimalt, which is near the army base - but that is about the same distance from downtown as I am, and it is probably the roughest area in the urban core. (And it is walkable too!)



Edited, Jan 10th 2012 4:59pm by Olorinus
#89 Jan 10 2012 at 6:53 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Freedom is about having options, and when your only option is a privately owned vehicle then no amount of pretty trees and roadkill between your home and civilization hides just how little freedom you really have.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#90 Jan 10 2012 at 6:59 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Olorinus wrote:
Huh, here the cheaper places are all out in the suburbs...only people who live out there are people with big families who can't afford a house in a more central neighborhood. Maybe it is because we don't have the slums you're so afraid of in your community.


Olorinus wrote:
The only way I'd get cheaper rent than where I live is to live somewhere where I would have to own a car, which would make it more expensive than where I live.


Wait? So in the town you live in, there are only two types of places to live? With it being "cheap" to live in the crowded "everything within walking distance" area, and even cheaper to live in the suburban areas where you'd need a car to get to stuff? Where the hell do you live?


Most cities have an expensive upscale downtown area, some cheap/crappy downtown areas, some surrounding relatively inexpensive communities like you're describing, some similarly inexpensive semi-suburban areas more like I'm describing (often older and run-down), some expensive very nice/quiet suburban areas even more like I'm describing, and then some rural areas that run from very exclusive/expensive, to very expensive but remote (like 15 miles down a mountain road remote).

Seems like you're missing something, or you live in an extremely atypical place.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#91 Jan 10 2012 at 6:59 PM Rating: Decent
*****
15,512 posts
I believe the key word was "real city." There are less than 100,000 people living in Victoria.
#92 Jan 10 2012 at 7:06 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Olorinus wrote:
So... yeah. My supposedly super expensive neighborhood? Actually cheaper than living out where I would need a car (which also costs money)


Um.... This is the exact opposite of what you originally claimed, which was that the less expensive places to live were in the suburbs. Zounds!

Quote:
So you can stop assuming that you know about me and where I live. It's an expensive city to live in, but there is no real cost savings of living out of town.


Except that for a couple hundred dollars more a month, you could live in an area that isn't an apartment complex with rows of other people's windows right in front of your "view". You get that right?


Quote:
The truth is, I don't know anyone who is living on low wages who lives in the suburbs in this community because the cost of needing to own and maintain a vehicle is so much higher than any cost savings from rent.


Yes. Thank you for making my point for me. Those who can afford to do so will choose to live in the suburbs, while those who can't will live in tenement style apartments elbow to elbow with their neighbors.


It's like you forgot your own argument halfway through or something.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#93 Jan 10 2012 at 7:07 PM Rating: Good
****
9,526 posts
Sweetums wrote:
I believe the key word was "real city." There are less than 100,000 people living in Victoria.


You're wrong. Even just counting Victoria (which would be silly) it is more than 100K

lolwiki wrote:
The Victoria Census Metropolitan Area, comprising thirteen municipalities informally referred to as Greater Victoria, has a population of 330,088 and is the largest urban area on Vancouver Island.[10] By population, Greater Victoria is the 15th largest metropolitan area in Canada. The Capital Regional District, which includes additional rural areas, has a total population of 345,164.


#94 Jan 10 2012 at 7:08 PM Rating: Good
****
9,526 posts
gbaji wrote:


Um.... This is the exact opposite of what you originally claimed, which was that the less expensive places to live were in the suburbs. Zounds!



For a family... with kids... who already own a car.
#95 Jan 10 2012 at 7:25 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Olorinus wrote:
gbaji wrote:


Um.... This is the exact opposite of what you originally claimed, which was that the less expensive places to live were in the suburbs. Zounds!



For a family... with kids... who already own a car.


That's not what you said at all:

Olorinus wrote:
Huh, here the cheaper places are all out in the suburbs...only people who live out there are people with big families who can't afford a house in a more central neighborhood. Maybe it is because we don't have the slums you're so afraid of in your community.



And frankly, if you meant what you just said, then what you said didn't contradict my statement you were responding to. I said that people move to the suburbs if they can afford to live there. The assumption being that it's more expensive to live in the suburbs than in the more urban areas you prefer (which may or may not include the cost of owning a car btw).


And given your examples, which included similarly sized homes (2 bedrooms, right?), your statement about having "big families" is misleading at best. The same sized home in the suburbs costs more than it does in your neighborhood, making your entire statement just plain false. A couple of roomates choosing a place to live would pay more to live in the suburbs. Your own data proves this and completely contradicts what you said earlier.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#96 Jan 10 2012 at 7:35 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
And just in case you forgot the context:

Olorinus wrote:
gbaji wrote:

I only lived in the types of areas you like when I had to (ie: couldn't afford to live somewhere better).


Huh, here the cheaper places are all out in the suburbs...only people who live out there are people with big families who can't afford a house in a more central neighborhood. Maybe it is because we don't have the slums you're so afraid of in your community.


I was speaking purely of the cost *for me* to live somewhere (me, not being a big family with kids). I was saying that it's more expensive to live in the suburbs, and that people who live in the suburbs choose to do so because they prefer it. They certainly don't do so because they're stuck doing so because they own cars. The ownership of a car gives them the freedom to choose a location and style of life which they prefer.


I'll freely admit that different people have different preferences, but then I wasn't the person wailing about folks owning cars.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#97 Jan 10 2012 at 7:35 PM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
gbaji wrote:
Your own data proves this and completely contradicts what you said earlier.
You never let that stop you.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#98 Jan 10 2012 at 7:39 PM Rating: Excellent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Your own data proves this and completely contradicts what you said earlier.
You never let that stop you.


Hush you! Smiley: clown
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#99 Jan 10 2012 at 7:41 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Hushing don't make my ***** postcount grow. Smiley: crymore
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#100 Jan 10 2012 at 8:02 PM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
I have no idea what this argument is about. gbaji's upset because someone doesn't drive? Smiley: confused
#101 Jan 10 2012 at 8:14 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Nadenu wrote:
I have no idea what this argument is about. gbaji's upset because someone doesn't drive? Smiley: confused


Anyone who doesn't drive is not to be trusted! Smiley: nod
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 351 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (351)