Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Headpigeons!Follow

#27 Jan 07 2012 at 3:38 AM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
.
#28 Jan 08 2012 at 6:13 PM Rating: Good
Shakespeare wrote:
What a piece of work is a man, how noble in reason, how
infinite in faculties, in form and moving how express and
admirable, in action how like an angel, in apprehension how like
a god! the beauty of the world, the paragon of animals.

We really get upset about a guy feeding birds because of some harmless bird ****?
#29 Jan 08 2012 at 7:09 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Duke Lubriderm wrote:
We really get upset about a guy feeding birds because of some harmless bird ****?
If by harmless you ignore that it causes things like ocular histoplasmosis, salmonella, E.coli, respiratory histoplasmosis, cryptococcosis, and meningitis then yeah, those people were wrong for wanting to get rid of those birds and that old man was totally in the right to continue feeding the birds.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#30 Jan 08 2012 at 11:09 PM Rating: Default
****
9,526 posts
I guess they shouldn't have cars then, since I would hazard a guess that the health costs of cars outweigh the health costs of bird poo by a wide margin. Hard to tell, I had a hard time finding any article that outlined the health costs of pigeons, but when I googled

The health cost of cars came up with:


There are lots of reasons to dislike cars - yet if this story was about neighbors harassing someone for owning a car, would people react the same way? Say the neighbors were in the right for bullying someone that had different values than they do?
#31 Jan 09 2012 at 1:05 AM Rating: Good
*****
15,512 posts
I'm ambivalent towards pigeons. You get used to the constant filth on the sidewalks. Avoid trees and your paint will be a-ok!

I fucking hate deer. Most skittish creatures known to man, but will still stop to make friends with your headlights.



PS: since I assume that lolgaxe comes from NYC, he probably does harass people who own cars
PPS: I thought this would be about mutated headcrabs, and got my crowbar for nothing

Edited, Jan 9th 2012 1:14am by Sweetums
#32 Jan 09 2012 at 3:28 AM Rating: Good
GBATE!! Never saw it coming
Avatar
****
9,957 posts
How this thread, with this title, isn't about NixNot and the avian hatred directed toward him - I'll never understand.
____________________________
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.

#33 Jan 09 2012 at 5:05 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Olorinus wrote:
There are lots of reasons to dislike cars - yet if this story was about neighbors harassing someone for owning a car, would people react the same way? Say the neighbors were in the right for bullying someone that had different values than they do?
What if they were rats and not pigeons?
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#34 Jan 09 2012 at 6:00 AM Rating: Default
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Uglysasquatch wrote:
Olorinus wrote:
There are lots of reasons to dislike cars - yet if this story was about neighbors harassing someone for owning a car, would people react the same way? Say the neighbors were in the right for bullying someone that had different values than they do?
What if they were rats and not pigeons?

Or if it had been a man in his twenties who decided to play music all night, every night, for years, within levels of local ordinances, but still loud enough to annoy his neighbors. Refusing to stop after being asked to do so by them.

In the end it doesn't matter how dangerous the actions were or how legal it was for the person to do it. What matters was the person was being stubborn and refused to change a very small thing they felt they needed to do that was a source of frustration for his neighbors. By doing so he left himself open to harassment from those in the neighborhood who may be less likely to just sit back and accept it.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#35 Jan 09 2012 at 6:04 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
In the end it doesn't matter how dangerous the actions were or how legal it was for the person to do it. What matters was the person was being stubborn and refused to change a very small thing they felt they needed to do that was a source of frustration for his neighbors. By doing so he left himself open to harassment from those in the neighborhood who may be less likely to just sit back and accept it.
This I agree with 100%. While person A may feed birds or play music to his heart's content, Persons B, C, and D have every right to openly criticize it. Actions have social consequences.
#36 Jan 09 2012 at 7:49 AM Rating: Good
Duke Lubriderm wrote:
Quote:
In the end it doesn't matter how dangerous the actions were or how legal it was for the person to do it. What matters was the person was being stubborn and refused to change a very small thing they felt they needed to do that was a source of frustration for his neighbors. By doing so he left himself open to harassment from those in the neighborhood who may be less likely to just sit back and accept it.
This I agree with 100%. While person A may feed birds or play music to his heart's content, Persons B, C, and D have every right to openly criticize it. Actions have social consequences.


Criticize, sure, but from the story told, it went beyond that, which is totally unacceptable. If the anti-pigeon people really wanted the lonely guy to stop feeding animals, that was not the way to go.

I've had lousy neighbours a while back, they annoyed the heck out of me, I never harrassed them about it, it's odd to allow an illegal response to something that is legal. Kind of the thing a normal person does not do.
#37 Jan 09 2012 at 7:54 AM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
Zieveraar wrote:
Duke Lubriderm wrote:
Quote:
In the end it doesn't matter how dangerous the actions were or how legal it was for the person to do it. What matters was the person was being stubborn and refused to change a very small thing they felt they needed to do that was a source of frustration for his neighbors. By doing so he left himself open to harassment from those in the neighborhood who may be less likely to just sit back and accept it.
This I agree with 100%. While person A may feed birds or play music to his heart's content, Persons B, C, and D have every right to openly criticize it. Actions have social consequences.


Criticize, sure, but from the story told, it went beyond that, which is totally unacceptable. If the anti-pigeon people really wanted the lonely guy to stop feeding animals, that was not the way to go.

I've had lousy neighbours a while back, they annoyed the heck out of me, I never harrassed them about it, it's odd to allow an illegal response to something that is legal. Kind of the thing a normal person does not do.
It may not have started as harassment. They may have started out by asking politely that he stop until frustration built and they got more insistent.
#38 Jan 09 2012 at 8:15 AM Rating: Good
The One and Only Poldaran wrote:
Zieveraar wrote:
Duke Lubriderm wrote:
Quote:
In the end it doesn't matter how dangerous the actions were or how legal it was for the person to do it. What matters was the person was being stubborn and refused to change a very small thing they felt they needed to do that was a source of frustration for his neighbors. By doing so he left himself open to harassment from those in the neighborhood who may be less likely to just sit back and accept it.
This I agree with 100%. While person A may feed birds or play music to his heart's content, Persons B, C, and D have every right to openly criticize it. Actions have social consequences.


Criticize, sure, but from the story told, it went beyond that, which is totally unacceptable. If the anti-pigeon people really wanted the lonely guy to stop feeding animals, that was not the way to go.

I've had lousy neighbours a while back, they annoyed the heck out of me, I never harrassed them about it, it's odd to allow an illegal response to something that is legal. Kind of the thing a normal person does not do.
It may not have started as harassment. They may have started out by asking politely that he stop until frustration built and they got more insistent.


Most likely, but it still doesn't excuse it though imo.
#39 Jan 09 2012 at 8:19 AM Rating: Decent
*******
50,767 posts
Sweetums wrote:
PS: since I assume that lolgaxe comes from NYC, he probably does harass people who own cars
Cars actually serve a purpose. Pigeons are nothing more than filthy disease infested flying rats. The only reasons to feed them are either to be an asshole or because you don't have any friends and pretend the birds give a damn you're feeding them.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#40 Jan 09 2012 at 8:34 AM Rating: Good
lolgaxe wrote:
Sweetums wrote:
PS: since I assume that lolgaxe comes from NYC, he probably does harass people who own cars
Cars actually serve a purpose. Pigeons are nothing more than filthy disease infested flying rats. The only reasons to feed them are either to be an asshole or because you don't have any friends and pretend the birds give a damn you're feeding them.


That's a myth, pigeons are no more diseased infested than any other animal. Granted, a huge group of pigeons can be a terrible nuisance, and it's illegal to feed them in several places nowadays.
#41 Jan 09 2012 at 9:32 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Zieveraar wrote:

That's a myth, pigeons are no more diseased infested than any other animal.
But other animals aren't pooping on windshields.

**** carries pathogens.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#42 Jan 09 2012 at 10:21 AM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Elinda wrote:
Zieveraar wrote:

That's a myth, pigeons are no more diseased infested than any other animal.
But other animals aren't pooping on windshields.

**** carries pathogens.
Seagulls **** on windshields just as much, if not more. You'd have to live close to the sea for those though.
#43 Jan 09 2012 at 10:34 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Elinda wrote:
Zieveraar wrote:

That's a myth, pigeons are no more diseased infested than any other animal.
But other animals aren't pooping on windshields.

**** carries pathogens.
Seagulls **** on windshields just as much, if not more. You'd have to live close to the sea for those though.
Yes, and if the neighborhood in question was a coastal location, and the old stubborn man insisted on feeding the seagulls, creating a situation where more than the average seagull was hanging around a particular neighborhood creating more, and more frequent windshield smearings, then this story would have been called Headseagulls.

Really people, red herrings will only draw in more doo-doo droppings.


____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#44 Jan 09 2012 at 10:47 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
10,802 posts
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Elinda wrote:
Zieveraar wrote:

That's a myth, pigeons are no more diseased infested than any other animal.
But other animals aren't pooping on windshields.

**** carries pathogens.
Seagulls **** on windshields just as much, if not more. You'd have to live close to the sea for those though.


I work a block from the beach. Seagulls ******* **** me off sometimes. When I hear a bunch of them outside, I know they are just taking target practice on the cars below.

I didn't mind hearing the seals at my old office location. That was just cute.
#45 Jan 09 2012 at 10:47 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
10,802 posts
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Elinda wrote:
Zieveraar wrote:

That's a myth, pigeons are no more diseased infested than any other animal.
But other animals aren't pooping on windshields.

**** carries pathogens.
Seagulls **** on windshields just as much, if not more. You'd have to live close to the sea for those though.


I work a block from the beach. Seagulls ******* **** me off sometimes. When I hear a bunch of them outside, I know they are just taking target practice on the cars below.

I didn't mind hearing the seals at my old office location. That was just cute.
#46 Jan 09 2012 at 11:20 AM Rating: Excellent
****
6,471 posts
#47 Jan 09 2012 at 11:24 AM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Elinda wrote:
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Elinda wrote:
Zieveraar wrote:

That's a myth, pigeons are no more diseased infested than any other animal.
But other animals aren't pooping on windshields.

**** carries pathogens.
Seagulls **** on windshields just as much, if not more. You'd have to live close to the sea for those though.
Yes, and if the neighborhood in question was a coastal location, and the old stubborn man insisted on feeding the seagulls, creating a situation where more than the average seagull was hanging around a particular neighborhood creating more, and more frequent windshield smearings, then this story would have been called Headseagulls.

Really people, red herrings will only draw in more doo-doo droppings.


I'm just saying that pigeons aren't the only windshield poopers out there.
#48 Jan 09 2012 at 11:58 AM Rating: Good
*****
15,512 posts
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Elinda wrote:
Zieveraar wrote:

That's a myth, pigeons are no more diseased infested than any other animal.
But other animals aren't pooping on windshields.

**** carries pathogens.
Seagulls **** on windshields just as much, if not more. You'd have to live close to the sea for those though.
People in coastal cities generally hate seagulls, too
#49 Jan 09 2012 at 2:17 PM Rating: Decent
Thumbelyna wrote:
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Elinda wrote:
Zieveraar wrote:

That's a myth, pigeons are no more diseased infested than any other animal.
But other animals aren't pooping on windshields.

**** carries pathogens.
Seagulls **** on windshields just as much, if not more. You'd have to live close to the sea for those though.


I work a block from the beach. Seagulls @#%^ing **** me off sometimes. When I hear a bunch of them outside, I know they are just taking target practice on the cars below.

I didn't mind hearing the seals at my old office location. That was just cute.


I'm more frightened of a flock of seagulls than pigeons. A fair amount actually, quite aggressive creatures.
#50 Jan 09 2012 at 3:14 PM Rating: Excellent
lolgaxe wrote:
Sweetums wrote:
PS: since I assume that lolgaxe comes from NYC, he probably does harass people who own cars
Cars actually serve a purpose. Pigeons are nothing more than filthy disease infested flying rats. The only reasons to feed them are either to be an asshole or because you don't have any friends and pretend the birds give a damn you're feeding them.


Yeah, **** nature. All it does is stick to your feet.

Let's delegitimise any benefit someone might conceivably receive from animal contact as lonely delusion. When we see a bird soar, all we should feel is the fear that it might **** on our new Honda.
#51 Jan 09 2012 at 3:47 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Finally, someone reasonable.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 465 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (465)