Duke Lubriderm wrote:
Quote:
In the end it doesn't matter how dangerous the actions were or how legal it was for the person to do it. What matters was the person was being stubborn and refused to change a very small thing they felt they needed to do that was a source of frustration for his neighbors. By doing so he left himself open to harassment from those in the neighborhood who may be less likely to just sit back and accept it.
This I agree with 100%. While person A may feed birds or play music to his heart's content, Persons B, C, and D have every right to openly criticize it. Actions have social consequences.
Criticize, sure, but from the story told, it went beyond that, which is totally unacceptable. If the anti-pigeon people really wanted the lonely guy to stop feeding animals, that was not the way to go.
I've had lousy neighbours a while back, they annoyed the heck out of me, I never harrassed them about it, it's odd to allow an illegal response to something that is legal. Kind of the thing a normal person does not do.