Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Omnibus GOP Primary ThreadFollow

#752 Feb 15 2012 at 4:32 AM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Pile on the *** jokes Smiley: lol
____________________________
Theophany wrote:
YOU'RE AN ELITIST @#%^ AETHIEN, NO WONDER YOU HAVE NO FRIENDS AND PEOPLE HATE YOU.
someproteinguy wrote:
Aethien you take more terrible pictures than a Japanese tourist.
Astarin wrote:
One day, Maz, you'll learn not to click on anything Aeth links.
#753 Feb 15 2012 at 5:00 AM Rating: Good
Repressed Memories
******
20,582 posts
Seemed like you were reaching around for that one Aethien.
#754 Feb 15 2012 at 6:33 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
12,004 posts
Samira wrote:
Quote:
I'm beginning to understand why Republicans all believe the zombie-Reagan lie: "Government is the problem."

They've all taken it to heart so much that they've made it come true, and it's started to affect how they even govern their own **** party.


Oh, it's so much worse than that. Did you read the NYT article about "conservatives" who hate taking money from the government, blame the government for giving it to them, but keep taking it because, well, they'd be broke without it?

That's some fine cognitive dissonance there, Lou.


Sorta.

There's a difference between optimal usage of collective goods and the discussion for whether they should be collective.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#755 Feb 15 2012 at 6:40 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
28,267 posts
Did you read the article?

Some people were saying, in one breath, that they don't need any **** gummint help, and when pressed, admitting that they'd be blind/homeless/dead without it.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#756 Feb 15 2012 at 7:02 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
12,004 posts
Samira wrote:
Did you read the article?

Some people were saying, in one breath, that they don't need any **** gummint help, and when pressed, admitting that they'd be blind/homeless/dead without it.



Yeah, most people have a difficult time planning for medical expenses (economically), since they're not a regular occurrence for a person, Government is better at planning, since for it, they are.

People also can't come to the conclusion that they are ****** at planning, since it's an admission of being dumb, which no proud person would do.

It's the same reason we have the Accredited investor laws.

Although it'd be tough to generate a syllogism without wrecking your tax base.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#757 Feb 15 2012 at 10:41 AM Rating: Excellent
Needs More Smut
Avatar
******
20,467 posts
In the case of the EIC, though, it's built into any decent free tax program. If H&R block says "Click this button for more money!" of course people are going to take it.

That's a lot more passive than, say, the school lunches, where the parents surely had to inquire about it and fill out the necessary forms.
____________________________
FFXI: Catwho on Bismarck. Once again a top bard on the server: Dardaubla 90 on 1/6/2014
Thayos wrote:
I can't understand anyone who skips the cutscenes of a Final Fantasy game. That's like going to Texas and not getting barbecue.

FFXIV: Katarh Mest on Lamia - Member of The Swarm and leader of Grammarian Tea House chat LS
#758 Feb 15 2012 at 2:27 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Texas, which is caught in some huge redistricting mess, is pushing its primary back to late May. Texas holds about 30% of the GOP pledged delegates (versus the ones "awarded" via caucuses) so this could easily drag the primary out unless one candidate takes a commanding lead.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#759 Feb 15 2012 at 2:36 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,065 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Texas, which is caught in some huge redistricting mess, is pushing its primary back to late May. Texas holds about 30% of the GOP pledged delegates (versus the ones "awarded" via caucuses) so this could easily drag the primary out unless one candidate takes a commanding lead.

I predict it will be drug out just because the republican party seems intent on sabotaging itself. Then when their lame-*** candidate that they finally settle on handily loses the election, gjabi can claim it was Obama's fault. Who else could be blamed really??




Edited, Feb 15th 2012 9:36pm by Elinda
____________________________
Alma wrote:
Post and be happy!
#760 Feb 15 2012 at 2:40 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
My afternoon drive-time radio host is becoming convinced that the GOP is deliberately throwing the election because they get more contributions and conservative media gets a wider audience when they have a Democrat in office to ***** about.

No, I don't believe it's true and don't believe he's saying it in any manner aside from tongue-in-cheek.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#761 Feb 15 2012 at 3:34 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
12,004 posts
Jophiel wrote:
My afternoon drive-time radio host is becoming convinced that the GOP is deliberately throwing the election because they get more contributions and conservative media gets a wider audience when they have a Democrat in office to ***** about.

No, I don't believe it's true and don't believe he's saying it in any manner aside from tongue-in-cheek.


So, I guess you could say they are under siege from a Conservative Conspiracy?
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#762 Feb 15 2012 at 4:55 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
31,767 posts
Samira wrote:
Quote:
I'm beginning to understand why Republicans all believe the zombie-Reagan lie: "Government is the problem."

They've all taken it to heart so much that they've made it come true, and it's started to affect how they even govern their own **** party.


Oh, it's so much worse than that. Did you read the NYT article about "conservatives" who hate taking money from the government, blame the government for giving it to them, but keep taking it because, well, they'd be broke without it?

That's some fine cognitive dissonance there, Lou.


Except that's not what the article actually says. Well, it says it, but the conservative they highlight don't:

Quote:
Their difficulties, Mr. Gulbranson said, have made it hard to imagine asking anyone to pay higher taxes.

“I don’t think most people could bear to pay more,” he said.

Instead, he said he would rather give up the earned-income credit the family now receives and start paying for school lunches for his children.



The consistent theme of those conservatives they interviewed is that it would be hard to make due with less, but that we should not raise taxes. The crying and whatnot is the problem though. It shows why it's so dangerous to extend those benefits too broadly in the first place. This is something I've talked about a lot (and even just recently). What the left has been doing over the last 40 years or so is not increasing benefits for poor people, but expanding the scope of the benefits so that they apply to more and more people (many of whom are not poor). Of course, once you give someone a benefit, they will be used to it and giving it up will be hard.

A whole article dedicated to showing just how hard that is doesn't disprove the broader argument that we should do it, and frankly should have avoided getting ourselves into that situation in the first place. It ties into my argument earlier this week (and last week) about the danger of increasing the percentage of the population which gets more directly back from the government than the spend. This is *why* you shouldn't do that. It puts those people in an incredibly difficult position and automatically skews their decisions.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#763 Feb 15 2012 at 5:04 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
31,767 posts
catwho wrote:
In the case of the EIC, though, it's built into any decent free tax program. If H&R block says "Click this button for more money!" of course people are going to take it.


Yup. Which is why the EIC is a terrible terrible tax policy in the first place. It's basically a "you make less than X, you get Y money free" thing. And as the article points out, its purpose is to reduce the burden of payroll taxes on low income folks (which is a dubious objective to begin with), but along the way it makes people well above the poverty line dependent on it. Political vote buying has driven this expansion far more than actual need.

Quote:
That's a lot more passive than, say, the school lunches, where the parents surely had to inquire about it and fill out the necessary forms.


Are you talking about a school lunch program though? I'm pretty sure the school makes sure the parents know about it. Most parents these days pay for some portion of the program anyway, so in the process of doing so the whole "if your income is less than X, you might get this free" wouldn't be so hard to spot.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#764 Feb 15 2012 at 5:07 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
29,435 posts

Yup. Which is why the EIC is a terrible terrible tax policy in the first place. It's basically a "you make less than X, you get Y money free" thing. And as the article points out, its purpose is to reduce the burden of payroll taxes on low income folks (which is a dubious objective to begin with), but along the way it makes people well above the poverty line dependent on it. Political vote buying has driven this expansion far more than actual need.


Exactly, it's like a smaller version of the home mortgage interest deduction. Politically motivated and creates a dependent subclass of welfare recipients who can't afford to buy a hours without it.

You know what I'm saying, huh?
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? ***. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#765 Feb 15 2012 at 5:19 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
31,767 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

Yup. Which is why the EIC is a terrible terrible tax policy in the first place. It's basically a "you make less than X, you get Y money free" thing. And as the article points out, its purpose is to reduce the burden of payroll taxes on low income folks (which is a dubious objective to begin with), but along the way it makes people well above the poverty line dependent on it. Political vote buying has driven this expansion far more than actual need.


Exactly, it's like a smaller version of the home mortgage interest deduction. Politically motivated and creates a dependent subclass of welfare recipients who can't afford to buy a hours without it.


Except that one is a deduction, which incentivizes/rewards people for doing something with money they've earned that is beneficial to their long term economic outlook (usually), while the other is a tax credit with rewards people for... um... not making much money?

And on top of that, because of the way the EIC is structured, it acts as a dissincentive for lower income couples to marry. And as the cut off for it has increased, that effect has expanded.


So other than those things, you're right! They're exactly alike.

Quote:
You know what I'm saying, huh?


Yes. I know that you will ignore all the ways things are different and zero in on the one thing they have in common and then declare them identical. When its serves a purpose that is.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#766 Feb 15 2012 at 6:16 PM Rating: Good
Needs More Smut
Avatar
******
20,467 posts
Yeah we lost our EIC this year. My husband whined at me about it, and I asked him if he'd like me to quit my job and the paltry $18K extra a year it brings in so he can get his extra $1500 back in taxes. Smiley: lol

For us, though, the insurance benefit of getting married was worth a lot more than the EIC. So if two young people are both working and getting health insurance through their jobs, then yes, they'll benefit more by staying unmarried and each getting the EIC.

However, a lot of couples are lopsided like we are, where one person works full time with benefits and the other one works part time without them because of school, in which case it's way better to be married with proper health insurance than merely cohabitating without.
____________________________
FFXI: Catwho on Bismarck. Once again a top bard on the server: Dardaubla 90 on 1/6/2014
Thayos wrote:
I can't understand anyone who skips the cutscenes of a Final Fantasy game. That's like going to Texas and not getting barbecue.

FFXIV: Katarh Mest on Lamia - Member of The Swarm and leader of Grammarian Tea House chat LS
#767 Feb 15 2012 at 7:23 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
*****
19,983 posts
gbaji wrote:
Except that one is a deduction, which incentivizes/rewards people for doing something with money they've earned that is beneficial to their long term economic outlook (usually), while the other is a tax credit with rewards people for... um... not making much money?

Well, someone's gotta make a living doing those minimum-wage jobs, unless you want them all being illegals paid under the table and not claiming ?
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#768 Feb 15 2012 at 8:20 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
28,267 posts
teh article wrote:
But the reality of life here is that Mr. Gulbranson and many of his neighbors continue to take as much help from the government as they can get. When pressed to choose between paying more and taking less, many people interviewed here hemmed and hawed and said they could not decide. Some were reduced to tears. It is much easier to promise future restraint than to deny present needs.

“How do you tell someone that you deserve to have heart surgery and you can’t?” Mr. Gulbranson said.

He paused.

“You have to help and have compassion as a people, because otherwise you have no society, but financially you can’t destroy yourself. And that is what we’re doing.”

He paused again, unable to resolve the dilemma.


Again, fine cognitive dissonance, there, Lou.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#769 Feb 15 2012 at 8:33 PM Rating: Decent
Avatar
****
7,473 posts
Looking forward to Santorum winning Michigan. Romney sucks!.
____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#770 Feb 15 2012 at 8:42 PM Rating: Excellent
Lunatic
******
29,435 posts

Except that one is a deduction, which incentivizes/rewards people for doing something with money they've earned that is beneficial to their long term economic outlook


Paying interest? Sorry, no, it's welfare, pure and simple. I mean, don't get me wrong, being able to write off a portion of the interest on my $700,000 loan for my summer home clearly has a much greater benefit to society than giving working families more money to raise their children.

The poors probably just buy more Ripple with it anyway, right? Or whatever those people do. My interest payments keep Chase a going concern!
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? ***. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#771 Feb 16 2012 at 1:11 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
A little bit of irony...
Quote:
Political Wire readers are very familiar with Rick Santorum's surge in the polls in Michigan, but Charles Franklin notes if you watched The Daily Rundown with Chuck Todd on MSNBC you wouldn't hear any of the evidence.

"NBC News standards force Todd to ignore the evidence of multiple polls from Michigan, and instead rely on one poll from a neighboring state. All to avoid saying the dread words: PPP, or ARG, or MRG or Rasmussen or Mitchell Research. Those polls all show Santorum leading Romney by from 3 to 15 points in Michigan."

"And yet NBC News standards won't allow these polls and this critically important result to be reported on the air. Why? Three are IVR ('robo-polls'), one isn't entirely clear about how interviews were conducted and one has been criticized for substantial 'house effects' in the 2008 primaries.

Guess I better stop using MSNBC for all my information that MSNBC isn't reporting! Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#772 Feb 16 2012 at 9:42 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
31,767 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

Except that one is a deduction, which incentivizes/rewards people for doing something with money they've earned that is beneficial to their long term economic outlook


Paying interest?


Yeah. Because it's just about paying interest. WTF?

How about "buying a home"? By making the interest deductible, it helps provide an incentive to buying a home. Or at the very least, offsets the cost difference a bit when compared to say, renting.

Quote:
Sorry, no, it's welfare, pure and simple. I mean, don't get me wrong, being able to write off a portion of the interest on my $700,000 loan for my summer home clearly has a much greater benefit to society than giving working families more money to raise their children.


Because no working families ever buy a home? I know that you envision a world in which everyone is either rich and doesn't need any deductions at all, or poor and unable to afford any of the financial actions which might qualify for them, but the reality is that a **** of a lot of people live well in between those extremes and something like the mortgage interest deduction can make a significant difference for them by allowing them to buy a home, which creates wealth for themselves and their children while still being able to afford to feed and clothe their children.


But you don't want those pesky working class folks to ever accumulate wealth, do you? How can you control them if you allow them to actually own things? Heaven forbid if their children actually start their own businesses or something. That would be a calamity!!!

Edited, Feb 16th 2012 7:44pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#773 Feb 16 2012 at 9:43 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
31,767 posts
Jophiel wrote:
A little bit of irony...
Quote:
Political Wire readers are very familiar with Rick Santorum's surge in the polls in Michigan, but Charles Franklin notes if you watched The Daily Rundown with Chuck Todd on MSNBC you wouldn't hear any of the evidence.

"NBC News standards force Todd to ignore the evidence of multiple polls from Michigan, and instead rely on one poll from a neighboring state. All to avoid saying the dread words: PPP, or ARG, or MRG or Rasmussen or Mitchell Research. Those polls all show Santorum leading Romney by from 3 to 15 points in Michigan."

"And yet NBC News standards won't allow these polls and this critically important result to be reported on the air. Why? Three are IVR ('robo-polls'), one isn't entirely clear about how interviews were conducted and one has been criticized for substantial 'house effects' in the 2008 primaries.

Guess I better stop using MSNBC for all my information that MSNBC isn't reporting! Smiley: laugh


Yeah. Because the only show on MSNBC where polling about the GOP primary race is ever mentioned is The Daily Rundown. You're kidding, right?

Edited, Feb 16th 2012 7:44pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#774 Feb 16 2012 at 9:45 PM Rating: Excellent
Needs More Smut
Avatar
******
20,467 posts
On topic, Santorum's first visiting in Georgia is the unfortunately named city of Cumming.
____________________________
FFXI: Catwho on Bismarck. Once again a top bard on the server: Dardaubla 90 on 1/6/2014
Thayos wrote:
I can't understand anyone who skips the cutscenes of a Final Fantasy game. That's like going to Texas and not getting barbecue.

FFXIV: Katarh Mest on Lamia - Member of The Swarm and leader of Grammarian Tea House chat LS
#775 Feb 16 2012 at 9:52 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
Yeah. Because the only show on MSNBC where polling about the GOP primary race is ever mentioned is The Daily Rundown. You're kidding, right?

Beats me. You seem a lot better versed in MSNBC than I.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#776 Feb 17 2012 at 7:25 AM Rating: Excellent
catwho wrote:
On topic, Santorum's first visiting in Georgia is the unfortunately named city of Cumming.
That will help his google search-ability.
____________________________
Edited, Mar 21st 2011 2:14pm by Darqflame Lock Thread: Because Lubriderm is silly... ~ de geso

Almalieque wrote:
I know what a glory hole is, but I wasn't sure what the business part was in reference to.

My Anime List
#777 Feb 17 2012 at 8:11 AM Rating: Good
******
44,002 posts
Santorum's surge is spreading.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#778 Feb 17 2012 at 10:20 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
My favorite part about that commercial is how pseduoRomeny looks both like Romney and like every stereotypical "rich evil corporate villain" from kid's movies or TV.

He also looks a little like the love child of Romney & John McCain when he makes his grimace face.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#779 Feb 17 2012 at 2:05 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quote:
Maine Republican Party chairman Charlie Webster "has admitted that the state party made numerous clerical errors in counting the state's caucus results -- even omitting some votes because emails reporting tallies 'went to spam' in an email account," Politico reports.

Webster insisted that the errors did not change the outcome, but the Portland Press Herald reports "he won't release the new totals until he talks to both the Romney and Paul campaigns."

Those Republicans sure know how to run an election, huh? Quick, cry about MSNBC, Gbaji!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#780 Feb 17 2012 at 2:39 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
31,767 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Quote:
Maine Republican Party chairman Charlie Webster "has admitted that the state party made numerous clerical errors in counting the state's caucus results -- even omitting some votes because emails reporting tallies 'went to spam' in an email account," Politico reports.

Webster insisted that the errors did not change the outcome, but the Portland Press Herald reports "he won't release the new totals until he talks to both the Romney and Paul campaigns."

Those Republicans sure know how to run an election, huh? Quick, cry about MSNBC, Gbaji!


I'm not sure why you think I'm that invested in how the folks in Maine handle their non-binding caucus Joph. No one usually cares about this caucus enough to bother. But the message this week was "GOP incompetence", so that's what you're hearing.

Next week will be about jello!
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#781 Feb 17 2012 at 2:45 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
I'm not sure why you think I'm that invested in how the folks in Maine handle their non-binding caucus Joph. No one usually cares about this caucus enough to bother. But the message this week was "GOP incompetence", so that's what you're hearing.

Yeah, that's one way of putting it.

The other, accurate, way would be that the GOP caucuses have been so comically inept and mismanaged that it's actually news worth reporting on.

But you've managed to come back time and again and stick out your lip and stamp your foot and huff that it's all because of the mean ole media so you keep on saying how little you care Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#782 Feb 18 2012 at 1:05 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Samira wrote:
Oh, it's so much worse than that. Did you read the NYT article about "conservatives" who hate taking money from the government, blame the government for giving it to them, but keep taking it because, well, they'd be broke without it?

Map of dependence on government assistance
Map of the "McCain Belt"; those counties who voted more Republican in 2008 than in 2004.

Let me know if anything jumps out at ya.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#783 Feb 18 2012 at 1:48 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
28,267 posts
Arkansas is full of poor fUckers, apparently.

Poor, stupid and voting Republican is no way to go through life, son.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#784 Feb 18 2012 at 1:52 PM Rating: Excellent
******
44,002 posts
People who like to graph stuff on maps like the color red.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#785 Feb 18 2012 at 10:35 PM Rating: Excellent
lolgaxe wrote:
Santorum's surge is spreading.
The cardboard cut outs of Santorum surrounded by brown, runny glops was a nice touch. Personally, were I on his campaign, I would have avoided that imagery.
____________________________
Edited, Mar 21st 2011 2:14pm by Darqflame Lock Thread: Because Lubriderm is silly... ~ de geso

Almalieque wrote:
I know what a glory hole is, but I wasn't sure what the business part was in reference to.

My Anime List
#786 Feb 18 2012 at 10:58 PM Rating: Decent
Avatar
****
7,473 posts
**** thats like 50% of their caucuses that have errors in reporting the votes. Also apparently 50% of traditional GOP states hate supporting themselves with government assistance.

That is 100% ****** up politics if you ask me.
____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#787 Feb 20 2012 at 10:21 AM Rating: Good
Needs More Smut
Avatar
******
20,467 posts
Latest lulz: Santorum Godwin's himself.

Here's another roundup of his special brand of crazy.
____________________________
FFXI: Catwho on Bismarck. Once again a top bard on the server: Dardaubla 90 on 1/6/2014
Thayos wrote:
I can't understand anyone who skips the cutscenes of a Final Fantasy game. That's like going to Texas and not getting barbecue.

FFXIV: Katarh Mest on Lamia - Member of The Swarm and leader of Grammarian Tea House chat LS
#788 Feb 20 2012 at 11:44 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
28,267 posts
teh article wrote:
In a freewheeling interview with conservative blog CaffeinatedThoughts.com last October, Candidate Rick spent a good deal of time rhapsodizing about what President Rick would do about contraception and sexual ethics. “One of the things I will talk about, that no president has talked about before, is I think the dangers of contraception in this country,” Santorum said. “Many of the Christian faith have said, well, that’s OK; contraception is OK. It’s not OK. It’s a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be.”


That's.... terrifying.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#789 Feb 20 2012 at 11:55 AM Rating: Excellent
Sniping Sweetpea
*****
18,461 posts
Samira wrote:
teh article wrote:
In a freewheeling interview with conservative blog CaffeinatedThoughts.com last October, Candidate Rick spent a good deal of time rhapsodizing about what President Rick would do about contraception and sexual ethics. “One of the things I will talk about, that no president has talked about before, is I think the dangers of contraception in this country,” Santorum said. “Many of the Christian faith have said, well, that’s OK; contraception is OK. It’s not OK. It’s a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be.”


That's.... terrifying.
Certainly makes me sympathize with poor Santorum's wife. There's gotta be cobwebs down there.
____________________________
That's the kind of dude
I was lookin' for
And yes you'll get slapped
if you're lookin', ho

#790 Feb 20 2012 at 2:41 PM Rating: Excellent
Needs More Smut
Avatar
******
20,467 posts
A Catholic friend of mine threw up her hands at that particular line. She uses the pill to space out her pregnancies since it isn't healthy to have babies too frequently.

According to Santorum, she should just stop having *** in between kids. Or something.
____________________________
FFXI: Catwho on Bismarck. Once again a top bard on the server: Dardaubla 90 on 1/6/2014
Thayos wrote:
I can't understand anyone who skips the cutscenes of a Final Fantasy game. That's like going to Texas and not getting barbecue.

FFXIV: Katarh Mest on Lamia - Member of The Swarm and leader of Grammarian Tea House chat LS
#791 Feb 20 2012 at 3:07 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
28,267 posts
Of course, it's not just Santorum.

I realize this is part and parcel of the whole "job 1 is to ensure Obama is a one-term President" mentality; but it ****** me off no end.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#792 Feb 20 2012 at 10:05 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
****
9,332 posts
Best headline ever:

http://www.accessnorthga.com/detail.php?n=245894

Quote:
Santorum blasts Obama during Cumming rally


If they change it - here is the screenshot: http://twitpic.com/8mnqu5/full

Edited, Feb 20th 2012 8:06pm by Olorinus
____________________________
lolgaxe wrote:
When it comes to sitting around not doing anything for long periods of time, only being active for short windows, and marginal changes and sidegrades I'd say FFXI players were the perfect choice for politicians.

clicky
#793 Feb 21 2012 at 6:36 AM Rating: Good
Needs More Smut
Avatar
******
20,467 posts
He's preaching to the choir in Cumming. They're rich white rednecks there. They do all the racist redneckey things, only they have money to match it. So when they go hunting in camo, it's on a private tract of land. My sister in law and her husband left because Forsythe county was too racist for them, and that's saying a lot...
____________________________
FFXI: Catwho on Bismarck. Once again a top bard on the server: Dardaubla 90 on 1/6/2014
Thayos wrote:
I can't understand anyone who skips the cutscenes of a Final Fantasy game. That's like going to Texas and not getting barbecue.

FFXIV: Katarh Mest on Lamia - Member of The Swarm and leader of Grammarian Tea House chat LS
#794 Feb 21 2012 at 8:00 AM Rating: Excellent
******
44,002 posts
catwho wrote:
They're rich white rednecks there.
What, like they have triple-wide trailers?
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#795 Feb 21 2012 at 8:05 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Romney is catching up with Santorum in MI and Santorum is catching up with Romney in AZ. Go go horse race!

Santorum also has a gigantic lead (like 20+ points) in Texas right now. Texas won't have their primary until nearly June but they hold about a third of the available pledged delegates. Assuming Santorum can do well enough until then to make it a race and assuming the polling doesn't swing wildly in TX, expect this race to last a while.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#796 Feb 21 2012 at 8:38 AM Rating: Excellent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,065 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
catwho wrote:
They're rich white rednecks there.
What, like they have triple-wide trailers?

With above ground swimming pools.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
Post and be happy!
#797 Feb 21 2012 at 8:42 AM Rating: Excellent
******
44,002 posts
Speaking of Romney and Michigan: This speech makes him sound like he's an autistic savant or something.

I like cars. Definitely cars. So many cars ...
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#798 Feb 21 2012 at 10:21 AM Rating: Excellent
******
27,272 posts
The latest threat to America according to Santorum: Crazed Euthanizing Dutch Doctors.

The blog, for those too lazy to click links wrote:
We previously listened to Rick Santorum as he suggested to religious college students that a vote for him might keep them from being devoured. Now it appears it may also protect you from being snatched up by crazed euthanizing Dutch doctors who will send you to the Nether Regions unless you are wearing a bracelet. He also appears to relish the good old days when abortions in America were regulated to “the shadows.”


Santorum told voters that (1) ten percent of all deaths in the Netherlands were by euthanasia, (2) people have to wear bracelets now to be sure not to be euthanized at hospitals, and (3) 50 percent of euthanasia is performed “involuntarily.”

Before any of our statisticians demand to be euthanized, let’s correct a few of these facts.

The bling-bling of death is hard to figure out. Clearly people can wear bracelets with their blood type or other instructions like do not resuscitate — as they do in this country. However, such bracelets are not needed in the Netherlands and Santorum’s comments appear to come as a surprise to people in that country.

The ten percent figure is a bit bizarre. While growing, the number of people choosing euthanasia remains small and less than 3%. In 2010, 136058 people died in the Netherlands and only 3136 did so through euthanasia. That is roughly 2.3% of the total deaths.

In 2009, the annual report on euthanasia showed 2,636 cases of euthanasia — or 2 percent of all Dutch deaths. Over 80 percent were cancer patients and more than 80 percent of the deaths occurred in the patient’s home — not in those bureaucratic hospitals dispatching everyone who comes in with a slight fever without their bracelet.

As for those 50% of cases dispatched against their will, the Dutch law is extremely strict. It now only requires consent but a waiting period. If a doctor dispatches someone without their consent or satisfying the tight controls, he is charged with murder.

The doctor must document that he or she confirmed that the patient requesting euthanasia or assisted suicide is making a voluntary and informed request. The record must also show that the patient was suffering unbearably and was fully informed about the prospects. Then a second doctor must examine the patient and supply a second written opinion on the satisfaction of the criteria. The government found only nine cases in 2009 of a doctor failing to complying with the strict criteria. There was no mention of a bracelet.

As for the claim that abortions were once forced to occur “in the shadows,” the part is entirely correct. It is just unclear why that is a positive image even for those who oppose the right to choose.

Putting aside these tiny factual disagreements, it is good to finally see a politician willing to take on our greatest threat: the Dutch. Dutch propagandists like Rembrandt, Vermeer and Van Gogh have already infiltrated our schools and museums. Our leaders (expect Santorum) are deaf to the growing sound of their wooden-shoe stomping, marzipan-eating hordes. I for one will be on the ramparts with Rick wearing my do not euthanize bracelet before I eat a single herring from the hands of our Dutch overlords.


I really can't do anyhing other than laugh at this. Santorum seems to have less of a clue on what being a president is about than I do and instead concerns himself with utter nonsense and people's *** lives...
____________________________
Theophany wrote:
YOU'RE AN ELITIST @#%^ AETHIEN, NO WONDER YOU HAVE NO FRIENDS AND PEOPLE HATE YOU.
someproteinguy wrote:
Aethien you take more terrible pictures than a Japanese tourist.
Astarin wrote:
One day, Maz, you'll learn not to click on anything Aeth links.
#799 Feb 21 2012 at 10:45 AM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
34,706 posts
The writer of that blog could really use a proof reader.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.
Need a hotel at a great rate? More hotels being added weekly.

An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#800 Feb 21 2012 at 10:49 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
11,896 posts
His Excellency Aethien wrote:

I really can't do anyhing other than laugh at this. Santorum The American public seems to have less of a clue on what being a president is about than I do and instead concerns himself themselves with utter nonsense and people's *** lives...

____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#801 Feb 21 2012 at 10:56 AM Rating: Excellent
******
27,272 posts
I'm still assuming that the crazies are in the minority here, even if one of them is trying to become president.
____________________________
Theophany wrote:
YOU'RE AN ELITIST @#%^ AETHIEN, NO WONDER YOU HAVE NO FRIENDS AND PEOPLE HATE YOU.
someproteinguy wrote:
Aethien you take more terrible pictures than a Japanese tourist.
Astarin wrote:
One day, Maz, you'll learn not to click on anything Aeth links.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 40 All times are in CDT
Almalieque, Anonymous Guests (39)