varusword75 wrote:
Obama's getting crushed in all the polls.
All of them except all of them. Good point.
·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Omnibus GOP Primary Thread
Omnibus GOP Primary ThreadFollow
All of them except all of them. Good point.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Jophiel wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
Obama's getting crushed in all the polls.
All of them except all of them. Good point.
That's obviously a liberal mainstream media propaganda site because I've never heard of it.
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
Majivo wrote:
Whoa, if you say it's an honest question, then that means it's anything but. Just what's your agenda, Bijou?
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.
Olorinus wrote:
this is shaping up to be one of the most hilarious and awesome political spectacles I've seen in awhile. I don't think the pubbies have a hope of defeating obama, honestly - even with the left wing disillusion.
Nah, it'll be Romney for the nomination. He has the network built up in the states and the money to run the operation (and to self fund if need be). Everyone else will be hurting for cash and staff by the time S. Carolina is over.
It may not be the quick win Romney would like but I'm confident that it'll ultimately be Romney.
It may not be the quick win Romney would like but I'm confident that it'll ultimately be Romney.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Friar Bijou wrote:
Majivo wrote:
Whoa, if you say it's an honest question, then that means it's anything but. Just what's your agenda, Bijou?
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Why would secular atheists let someone get away with instituting Sharia?
Usually it gets purged, if they are strong enough, if history is to be an indicator.
If they are lucky they just get "sent to Siberia".
Usually it gets purged, if they are strong enough, if history is to be an indicator.
If they are lucky they just get "sent to Siberia".
Just as Planned.
Paneloux0 wrote:
Timelordwho wrote:
Why would secular atheists let someone get away with instituting Sharia?
Usually it gets purged, if they are strong enough, if history is to be an indicator.
If they are lucky they just get "sent to Siberia".
Usually it gets purged, if they are strong enough, if history is to be an indicator.
If they are lucky they just get "sent to Siberia".
I'm afraid I've not explained it properly.
How'd you like an all expenses paid vacation to Siberia?
Just as Planned.
lolgaxe wrote:
Friar Bijou wrote:
Majivo wrote:
Whoa, if you say it's an honest question, then that means it's anything but. Just what's your agenda, Bijou?
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.
Friar Bijou wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
Friar Bijou wrote:
Majivo wrote:
Whoa, if you say it's an honest question, then that means it's anything but. Just what's your agenda, Bijou?
LOUD NOISES!!!
What are we doing?
Jophiel wrote:
Nah, it'll be Romney for the nomination. He has the network built up in the states and the money to run the operation (and to self fund if need be). Everyone else will be hurting for cash and staff by the time S. Carolina is over.
And, on that note, Gingrich failed to get enough signatures to make it onto the Virginia primary ballot. This is what a poorly staffed campaign will get you.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Jophiel wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
Nah, it'll be Romney for the nomination. He has the network built up in the states and the money to run the operation (and to self fund if need be). Everyone else will be hurting for cash and staff by the time S. Carolina is over.
And, on that note, Gingrich failed to get enough signatures to make it onto the Virginia primary ballot. This is what a poorly staffed campaign will get you.
Ouch. That's really fail.
Gingrich and Perry. How do you miss this incredibly easy mark? It's like they weren't even trying.
No one except Romney and Paul made it on but I find't mention the rest because they don't have a chance in hell anyway.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Romney would have a shot, but he's really got a long way to go to get the nomination.
Interesting point. The opposite is true, of course, and obvious from even a cursory examination of the simple mathematical process hurdles faced by any other candidate, but you ignored that and just made a wild ficking guess. God bless you, without snuggie buying payday loan procuring swinging ***** like you this country would be nothing.
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Anyone else find the GOP puts to much into Iwoa? I mean 3/6 notable names are more or less all in, and its the first primary. Its even funnier when the state has had less than notable turnout since well forever (for both parties.)
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.
It's just there for momentum, really. Win early, look like a winner, hope it's a self fulfilling prophecy, etc. Doesn't work every time, or even very often; but I suppose it's hard to ignore that first fight.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
makes sense i guess, but personally if I were running for office, Id ignore the place where less then 50% of my own party turns out on a regular basis. Even if I was leading in the polls with a 50% take, 65K "voters" hardly sounds worth the money some have dumped into this place. Especially considering my parties track record of having 3 people nominated in the last 50 years as a result of wining. Personally my money would be going to real caucuses like Carolina.
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.
Some candidates do, of course. Campaign strategy is like any other long-term operation. You try to balance resources spent against potential gain, including hampering your opponents or even giving temporary succor to one opponent in order to harm a stronger one. Like making a deal in Monopoly. 
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
That and Iowa is considered a swing state in the general election so there's more pandering going on than perhaps otherwise.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Smasharoo wrote:
Romney would have a shot, but he's really got a long way to go to get the nomination.
Interesting point. The opposite is true, of course, and obvious from even a cursory examination of the simple mathematical process hurdles faced by any other candidate, but you ignored that and just made a wild ficking guess. God bless you, without snuggie buying payday loan procuring swinging ***** like you this country would be nothing.
Newt Gingrich wrote:
Politics has become a really nasty, vicious, negative business and I think it's disgusting and I think it's dishonest
lulzirony
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Quote:
Gingrich sharply criticized Paul in an interview with CNN for what he said were "racist, anti-Semitic" comments in newsletters that carried Paul's name in the 1990s
Pot Kettle, Kettle Pot and all that. I so look forward to the spring/early summer when the real mud starts getting thrown around. I should buy Stock in Kleenex just in case, especially if Newt sticks around.
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.
Recent Visitors: 336
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (336)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Omnibus GOP Primary Thread
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC