Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

WikipediaFollow

#1 Nov 29 2011 at 2:38 PM Rating: Default
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,057 posts
Admin Edit: Kind of self explanitory here, but that particular link is verymuchso [NWS]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/******

LMFAO

Edited, Nov 29th 2011 10:59pm by Kaolian
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#2 Nov 29 2011 at 2:43 PM Rating: Good
Needs More Smut
******
21,262 posts
Reminds me of how when I was a little kid I had the "Health & Nutrition" volume of the children's Encyclopedia Brittanica hidden in the bathroom, along with pilfered National Geographics.

omg they had naked ******** and there was *gasp* an illustrated *****!

Edited, Nov 29th 2011 3:44pm by catwho
____________________________
FFXI: Catwho on Bismarck: Retired December 2014
Thayos wrote:
I can't understand anyone who skips the cutscenes of a Final Fantasy game. That's like going to Texas and not getting barbecue.

FFXIV: Katarh Mest and Taprara Rara on Lamia Server - Member of The Swarm
Curator of the XIV Wallpapers Tumblr and the XIV Fashion Tumblr
#3 Nov 29 2011 at 2:47 PM Rating: Good
Prodigal Son
******
20,518 posts
Whoa, a little NSFW would be appreciated.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#4 Nov 29 2011 at 2:50 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,431 posts
Debalic wrote:
Whoa, a little NSFW would be appreciated.


Some of us just assumed it wasn't work-safe. Smiley: wink
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#5 Nov 29 2011 at 3:39 PM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,057 posts
It's just Wikipedia, man!
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#6 Nov 29 2011 at 4:04 PM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
What's so funny?
____________________________
Theophany wrote:
YOU'RE AN ELITIST @#%^ AETHIEN, NO WONDER YOU HAVE NO FRIENDS AND PEOPLE HATE YOU.
someproteinguy wrote:
Aethien you take more terrible pictures than a Japanese tourist.
Astarin wrote:
One day, Maz, you'll learn not to click on anything Aeth links.
#7 Nov 29 2011 at 4:06 PM Rating: Good
Drunken English Bastard
*****
15,268 posts
The graphic? Iuno.
____________________________
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
#8 Nov 29 2011 at 4:27 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,877 posts
Aethien wrote:
What's so funny?


The immature thought of a ****** as hilarious. Similar how a kid thinks Billy running around class with his willy out is just as funny.

That is just a guess though. Nice to see actual anatomy up instead of a drawing.
____________________________
#swaggerjacker
#9 Nov 29 2011 at 4:34 PM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Criminy wrote:
Aethien wrote:
What's so funny?


The immature thought of a ****** as hilarious. Similar how a kid thinks Billy running around class with his willy out is just as funny.

That is just a guess though. Nice to see actual anatomy up instead of a drawing.
Oh.


That's kinda sad.
____________________________
Theophany wrote:
YOU'RE AN ELITIST @#%^ AETHIEN, NO WONDER YOU HAVE NO FRIENDS AND PEOPLE HATE YOU.
someproteinguy wrote:
Aethien you take more terrible pictures than a Japanese tourist.
Astarin wrote:
One day, Maz, you'll learn not to click on anything Aeth links.
#10 Nov 29 2011 at 4:41 PM Rating: Default
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,057 posts
Quote:
Nice to see actual anatomy up instead of a drawing.


You would rather your (hypothetical) 5 year old kid looking at someone spreading their snatch than an image that at least makes some minute effort to de-sexualize the image?

So when are they just going to start showing **** in ***-ed?

(oh and the "LMFAO" was meant to be ironic..morans)

Edited, Nov 29th 2011 5:43pm by Kelvyquayo
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#11 Nov 29 2011 at 4:45 PM Rating: Good
***
3,272 posts
Kelvyquayo wrote:
Quote:
Nice to see actual anatomy up instead of a drawing.


You would rather your (hypothetical) 5 year old kid looking at someone spreading their snatch than an image that at least makes some minute effort to de-sexualize the image?

So when are they just going to start showing **** in ***-ed?

(oh and the "LMFAO" was meant to be ironic..morans)

Edited, Nov 29th 2011 5:43pm by Kelvyquayo


Witnessed softcore **** in my freshman comp class when we went over expressionism. Dr. Godfrey was the best!

I like how at the bottom of the article it has a See Also: Cunnilingus.
____________________________

(V)(;,,;)(V) Why not Zoidberg?
#12 Nov 29 2011 at 4:46 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,152 posts
Sexual topics on wiki varies from real pics to drawings. It'll probably be changed to a drawing. Real pics are unnecessary in that type of website.
#13 Nov 29 2011 at 4:49 PM Rating: Default
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,057 posts
I think we're not that far off from this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDoQFcQEpOQ
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#14 Nov 29 2011 at 6:29 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,595 posts
If you look up '*****' on wiki the picture is animal wieners (non-human).
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#15Kelvyquayo, Posted: Nov 29 2011 at 6:37 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Now they are promoting bestiality!! ABOMINABLE!! O MORES! O TEMPORA!
#16 Nov 29 2011 at 6:37 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,877 posts
Kelvyquayo wrote:
Quote:
Nice to see actual anatomy up instead of a drawing.


You would rather your (hypothetical) 5 year old kid looking at someone spreading their snatch than an image that at least makes some minute effort to de-sexualize the image?

So when are they just going to start showing **** in ***-ed?

(oh and the "LMFAO" was meant to be ironic..morans)

Edited, Nov 29th 2011 5:43pm by Kelvyquayo


Well my hypothetical 5 year old would not be going to wikipedia in the first place due to the average intellectual level of a 5 year old. However, if my 5 year old was smart enough to understand what that article said then I wouldn't give a rats bottom that he/she was looking at someone's real ******. Besdies the ****** in the image is cleaning shaven and the model is not fornicating so I really don't see the issue with the image to begin with.

You seem to be hitting your slippery slope there awfully hard. with the **** question though. It is important to show actual anatomy to a mature audience and not an immature one. Which side are you on there Kelvy? The one that thinks an article about a ****** should show an actual ****** or one that feels our children need to be sheltered from basic human anatomy in an article concerning said anatomy.
____________________________
#swaggerjacker
#17 Nov 29 2011 at 6:49 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,877 posts
Elinda wrote:
If you look up '*****' on wiki the picture is animal wieners (non-human).


But look up 'human *****' it should quite a bit more than one ******. <copy Smiley: deadhorse and repeat as necessary>

____________________________
#swaggerjacker
#18Kelvyquayo, Posted: Nov 29 2011 at 7:00 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Smiley: oyvey
#19 Nov 29 2011 at 7:01 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,877 posts
The same can be said about people complaining about stuff for the mere fact that they can. Smiley: tongue
____________________________
#swaggerjacker
#20 Nov 29 2011 at 7:08 PM Rating: Default
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,057 posts
[quote]In a thousand years, there will be no men and women, just ***************
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#21 Nov 29 2011 at 7:10 PM Rating: Excellent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,595 posts
Criminy wrote:
Elinda wrote:
If you look up '*****' on wiki the picture is animal wieners (non-human).


But look up 'human *****' it should quite a bit more than one ******. <copy Smiley: deadhorse and repeat as necessary>


I wonder if a picture of an elephant ****** would illustrate all the little bits and pieces better?
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#22 Nov 29 2011 at 7:20 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
[quote=Kelvyquayo][quote]In a thousand years, there will be no men and women, just ***********************
Wikipedia will be there with an illustrated article showing me how to ****.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#23 Nov 29 2011 at 7:21 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,431 posts
Elinda wrote:
Criminy wrote:
Elinda wrote:
If you look up '*****' on wiki the picture is animal wieners (non-human).


But look up 'human *****' it should quite a bit more than one ******. <copy Smiley: deadhorse and repeat as necessary>


I wonder if a picture of an elephant ****** would illustrate all the little bits and pieces better?


I dunno, that was a pretty good view. Smiley: rolleyes
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#24 Nov 29 2011 at 8:51 PM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Kelvyquayo wrote:
Quote:
Nice to see actual anatomy up instead of a drawing.


You would rather your (hypothetical) 5 year old kid looking at someone spreading their snatch than an image that at least makes some minute effort to de-sexualize the image?

So when are they just going to start showing **** in ***-ed?

(oh and the "LMFAO" was meant to be ironic..morans)

Edited, Nov 29th 2011 5:43pm by Kelvyquayo

You're trying just a little too hard there, varus.
#25 Nov 29 2011 at 9:40 PM Rating: Excellent
******
49,884 posts
The most offensive part of the Wiki is that it perpetrates the myth of the G-Spot's existence.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#26Kelvyquayo, Posted: Nov 29 2011 at 11:32 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Would you people feel any different if the camera was panned out a few feet?
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 45 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (45)