Eske Esquire wrote:
There's no irony. There's no hypocrisy.
There's just you being a complete fucking idiot.
Why? For saying what you know is true but don't want said? For saying that all is not peaches and roses within the *** community? For saying that there are issues within said community (especially males) with regard to underage ***, coercive ***, and prostitution? For saying that there are cycles of such behavior in said community and that they do have some negative and destructive effects on members of said community?
Or are you most upset for correctly observing that there are many who, for what amount to political PR reasons, want very much for those things to not be made too public, and will actively dismiss any talk about them, ignore any data which might show a problem, and even attack those who dare to actually mention said problems (like you're doing right now btw)?
The irony is that the administrators, faculty, and god knows how many others at Penn State ignored/excused Sandusky for exactly the same reason you are attacking me
. They didn't want negative publicity towards an institution they cared about and so they pretended the problem didn't exist and attacked anyone who might raise any questions. You really don't see how those are similar?