Elinda wrote:
Debalic wrote:
What US interests are being threatened in Uganda? I didn't bother to read...
Zebras.
Zanzibaarian cosmetics
·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Lets invade Uganda!
Lets invade Uganda!Follow
Zebras.
Zanzibaarian cosmetics
Jophiel wrote:
Why would sending a handful of troops to assist the standing government in Uganda be "invading"?
It's frigging Uganda. 3 marines in a worn out truck with a BB gun could take it over. Maybe 4 if they need help pushing the truck up hills.
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
Olorinus wrote:
Majivo wrote:
Olorinus wrote:
So you believe American soldiers have never carried out atrocites?
I'm going to be generous and assume that it's alcohol and not simple retardation which led you to connect these two thoughts.
What a gloriously tolerant comment.
You seem to indicate that you believe that violence can solve violence. Is that the case?
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
Why would sending a handful of troops to assist the standing government in Uganda be "invading"?
You're focusing on the "handful of troops" and not the "assisting the standing government" part.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Rush Limbaugh: Obama invades Uganda, Targets Christians
Now I know where Pubbies get this stuff from. The best part is Rush spending the segment going on about how the Lord's Resistance Army is a bunch of Christians fighting against oppression and, at the end, says "Wait... These guys are accused of all sorts of atrocities? Well, maybe... OBAMA IS FIGHTING CHRISTIANS!"
Sadly, you can't make shit like that up.
Now I know where Pubbies get this stuff from. The best part is Rush spending the segment going on about how the Lord's Resistance Army is a bunch of Christians fighting against oppression and, at the end, says "Wait... These guys are accused of all sorts of atrocities? Well, maybe... OBAMA IS FIGHTING CHRISTIANS!"
Sadly, you can't make shit like that up.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Olorinus wrote:
Majivo wrote:
Olorinus wrote:
So you believe American soldiers have never carried out atrocites?
I'm going to be generous and assume that it's alcohol and not simple retardation which led you to connect these two thoughts.
What a gloriously tolerant comment.
You seem to indicate that you believe that violence can solve violence. Is that the case?
First, yes, sometimes this is the case.
Second, I called you a ****** because your comment about American atrocities was in no way connected to the conversation at hand.
Duke Lubriderm wrote:
Sometimes it is the case. Sometimes allowing the initial violence to go on is intolerable. Can an argument be made that we resort to it too much? Certainly. But it is absolutely naive to suggest we should never use violence against an aggressor.
Honestly, I think it is naive to believe that anyone outside of America would buy that America uses its soldiers to do anything but bolster American interests. Americans believe that but I somehow doubt the ordinary people in the countries you are invading feel like you are liberating them.
After you've been the playground bully for awhile it is hard to sell the story that you're beating people up in the yard to stop an aggressor.
Edited, Oct 15th 2011 9:04am by Olorinus
Majivo wrote:
I called you a ****** because your comment about American atrocities was in no way connected to the conversation at hand.
Anyone that uses that term as an insult has both a serious lack of compassion, and an inadequate vocabulary. Seriously. Go back to grade five and learn a few more words.
Are you ever going to make a comment relevant to the topic at hand, or are you just going to keep talking about how much you dislike America and how violence isn't the answer?
Olorinus wrote:
Honestly, I think it is naive to believe that anyone outside of America would buy that America uses its soldiers to do anything but bolster American interests. Americans believe that but I somehow doubt the ordinary people in the countries you are invading feel like you are liberating them.
Do you suppose the people of Kosovo feel that America did nothing for them but bolster American interests by getting involved militarily? How about the people in Libya?
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Jophiel wrote:
Olorinus wrote:
Honestly, I think it is naive to believe that anyone outside of America would buy that America uses its soldiers to do anything but bolster American interests. Americans believe that but I somehow doubt the ordinary people in the countries you are invading feel like you are liberating them.
Do you suppose the people of Kosovo feel that America did nothing for them but bolster American interests by getting involved militarily? How about the people in Libya?
I think it's already been made clear that the only thing she supposes is ignorance.
Donate. One day it could be your family.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
People in S. Korea are probably pissed that they're not living under ole Kimmy's regime to the north.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
I am. I don't like having to differentiate between the two. Should just be one country.
Donate. One day it could be your family.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
Jophiel wrote:
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
Why would sending a handful of troops to assist the standing government in Uganda be "invading"?
You're focusing on the "handful of troops" and not the "assisting the standing government" part.
Soooo, would that be the military dictatorship coup installed government, or the one that won the recent "election" by massive voter fraud. Oh wait, same guy. nevermind.
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
You're working unusually hard to avoid admitting this isn't any "invasion" but then you did the same with our "ally" in Pakistan. Weird, but whatever.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
"Lets go collaborate with the illegal military dictatorship election fraudsters" was a less interesting thread title.
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
As far as I know, the standing government of Uganda is the recognized government by the US and UN. The US enjoys pretty good relations these days with Uganda according to the State Department. So if they ask us to swing on by, it ain't invading.
Plus, it's a regional effort where the troops are being split among four different nations (Uganda, South Sudan, Central African Republic, & Democratic Republic of the Congo). Man, Rush totally missed a chance to praise Obama for saving the Christian people of South Sudan!
Plus, it's a regional effort where the troops are being split among four different nations (Uganda, South Sudan, Central African Republic, & Democratic Republic of the Congo). Man, Rush totally missed a chance to praise Obama for saving the Christian people of South Sudan!
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Sure, it isn't an invasion "yet". You have to wait for the suprise hostile takeover that will later be made into a for TV movie.
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
By the way, when did I claim we were invading Pakistan?
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
isn't it obvious.
(oh wait sorry wrong partisan talking point parrot.)
Edited, Oct 15th 2011 9:13pm by rdmcandie
(oh wait sorry wrong partisan talking point parrot.)
Edited, Oct 15th 2011 9:13pm by rdmcandie
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
By the way, when did I claim we were invading Pakistan?
Here
Edit: To be fair, the poorly written story used the word "invasion" even if Obama did not.
Edited, Oct 15th 2011 9:46pm by Jophiel
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
well since he was referencing that specific article, his use of invasion was applied to it. Then again I am not american so I don't have to take a polar approach to every bit of reading and talking I do. I guess thats a plus. See here in Canada I think all politicians are idiots, I also think all your politicians are idiots.
The object of an election is to weed out people to the point where the best of the worst is the winner. But in the end you are still electing and idiot, and it doesn't matter what color their banner is.
The object of an election is to weed out people to the point where the best of the worst is the winner. But in the end you are still electing and idiot, and it doesn't matter what color their banner is.
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.
rdmcandie wrote:
well since he was referencing that specific article, his use of invasion was applied to it. Then again I am not american so I don't have to take a polar approach to every bit of reading and talking I do. I guess thats a plus. See here in Canada I think all politicians are idiots, I also think all your politicians are idiots.
The object of an election is to weed out people to the point where the best of the worst is the winner. But in the end you are still electing and idiot, and it doesn't matter what color their banner is.
The object of an election is to weed out people to the point where the best of the worst is the winner. But in the end you are still electing and idiot, and it doesn't matter what color their banner is.
Duke Lubriderm wrote:
rdmcandie wrote:
well since he was referencing that specific article, his use of invasion was applied to it. Then again I am not american so I don't have to take a polar approach to every bit of reading and talking I do. I guess thats a plus. See here in Canada I think all politicians are idiots, I also think all your politicians are idiots.
The object of an election is to weed out people to the point where the best of the worst is the winner. But in the end you are still electing and idiot, and it doesn't matter what color their banner is.
The object of an election is to weed out people to the point where the best of the worst is the winner. But in the end you are still electing and idiot, and it doesn't matter what color their banner is.
actually I smoke my own weed, that I pay for in an illegal transaction. The canadian government might have some money in their because I often use my GST tax rebate and HST tax rebate checks to buy quantities of marijuana. Although this is technically money of mine I "loaned" them and am just getting it back.
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.
I thought in the past that you said it was covered by the govt. My bad, and I apologize. If you are spending your own money on it, then cheers!
Recent Visitors: 327
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (327)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Lets invade Uganda!
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC