·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Don't ask, don't tell, don't persue
Don't ask, don't tell, don't persueFollow
So it's a rule that's in place to use when you want to get someone in **** and is otherwise, typically ignored. Like showing up late at work. You turn a blind eye to it when someone good is late and raise hell when it's a stunned employee.
Donate. One day it could be your family.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
lolgaxe wrote:
Fraternization deals more with rank. As in, an officer and an enlisted dating or enlisted and junior enlisted and such. And it isn't that big a deal until one of them @#%^s up and abuses the situation. (IE: The officer commands the enlisted to date/sex them or the enlisted uses the relationship to advance themselves)
Ah, thanks.
Is this thread about mandatory buttsecks yet?
Bardalicious wrote:
Is this thread about mandatory buttsecks yet?
#206Almalieque,
Posted: Sep 26 2011 at 3:51 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) The reason why my post did not have details the way you wanted is because it was a conceptual argument. I was asked what I thought of it and I expressed my opinion. What I realized after finishing this post was that you all expected a different type of response. I responded to the question of how I feel with the conceptual argument of allowing overall ignorance making changes does more harm than good. My post wasn't intended to point fingers at any one thing, but to go over the conceptual errors. The concept of the "big picture" is two fold.
Alma wrote:
Homosexuals are now authorized to live together in the barracks, but not heterosexual couples.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
If joining the US military means that you are 'signing off' on some of your rights, how come an officer of said military is publicly criticizing its policies? Being an openly gay grunt is a problem but being an anti-establishment officer is a just fine?
Alma, you do about as much for morale as friendly fire.
Alma, you do about as much for morale as friendly fire.
Alma wrote:
I think gays are icky and I'll use every possible strawman I can think of so I won;t have to admit it.
#210Xsarus,
Posted: Sep 26 2011 at 4:57 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I see what you're saying here, but the thing is that this is the situation that currently exists. You've said and other sources have said that most of the time people know anyway, so all this changes is that people don't have to officially hide who they are. Since nothing else changes, it's not a good argument to keep DADT. If you think there are justifications for handling things differently you can explore those, but in a situation where it doesn't change anything functional it's not a justification for not changing DADT. You're also equating the situation between a man and a woman, and a man and a man, which I don't think is justified.
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
In short, consensual buttsex, even in the military, is not a crime.
Good to know, thanks.
Considering a career change?
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
I bet any amount of money that this exact argument happened back when (if you'll excuse the terminology) 'coloureds' were allowed to serve in the same companies as whites.
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.
LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
There can exist does not imply there does exist.
Xsarus, please rate yourself down for me for continuing any discussion with Alma.
Donate. One day it could be your family.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
Debalic wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
In short, consensual buttsex, even in the military, is not a crime.
Good to know, thanks.
Considering a career change?
I'm a chick. I don't do buttsex. I have other holes for that sort of thing.
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
Xsarus, please rate yourself down for me for continuing any discussion with Alma.
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Debalic wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
In short, consensual buttsex, even in the military, is not a crime.
Good to know, thanks.
Considering a career change?
I'm a chick. I don't do buttsex. I have other holes for that sort of thing.
D'oh, can't you just temporarily switch genders for the sake of my joke?
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
I'm going to say, since Alma hasn't targeted my post and explained how I'm dead wrong, I must've gotten his argument down pretty well.
Go me.
Go me.
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
I'm going to say, since Alma hasn't targeted my post and explained how I'm dead wrong, I must've gotten his argument down pretty well.
Go me.
Go me.
Don't taunt it, or the beast will turn it's gaze toward you. No sudden movements.
Just as Planned.
Australia is now the fourth nation in the world to have women serve in all combat/frontline jobs in the military, after Canada, New Zealand, and Israel.
They will, of course, have to pass the present physical and psychological tests, so the physical tests are expected to keep women in a minority.
Rats, I hope world war doesn't break out and conscription kicks in
They will, of course, have to pass the present physical and psychological tests, so the physical tests are expected to keep women in a minority.
Rats, I hope world war doesn't break out and conscription kicks in
The US will have to close its borders to all those Canadian draft-dodger broads.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
lolgaxe wrote:
Alma wrote:
Homosexuals are now authorized to live together in the barracks, but not heterosexual couples.
Correction, it's not that they CAN'T, but they wont. I had a Soldier who got married within in his last weeks in country. He got an exception to policy for his wife to live with him, but that is not the norm.
Duke Lubriderm wrote:
If joining the US military means that you are 'signing off' on some of your rights, how come an officer of said military is publicly criticizing its policies? Being an openly gay grunt is a problem but being an anti-establishment officer is a just fine?
Alma, you do about as much for morale as friendly fire.
Alma, you do about as much for morale as friendly fire.
Wait, does General McChrystal know about this?
Nilatai wrote:
I bet any amount of money that this exact argument happened back when (if you'll excuse the terminology) 'coloureds' were allowed to serve in the same companies as whites.
If it were, it was a poor argument given the fact that they are totally irrelevant.
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
I'm going to say, since Alma hasn't targeted my post and explained how I'm dead wrong, I must've gotten his argument down pretty well.
Go me.
Go me.
The main reason why I didn't respond was because the length of the last post. The second reason was that I figured with me explaining myself in the long post, that there wasn't a need to make any corrections in your explanation.
You weren't perfect, but relative to your "peers", you're light years above them. The fact that you were able to comprehend that much, proves the fact that it wasn't that hard to understand. This wasn't the first time that you have done so. This is how I can call the BS flag when people claim that they don't understand.
Quote:
The main reason why I didn't respond was because the length of the last post. The second reason was that I figured with me explaining myself in the long post, that there wasn't a need to make any corrections in your explanation.
Jophiel wrote:
The US will have to close its borders to all those Canadian draft-dodger broads.
Canada's not a pure war-mongering country. We don't need to draft.
Donate. One day it could be your family.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
Uglysasquatch wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
The US will have to close its borders to all those Canadian draft-dodger broads.
Canada's not a pure war-mongering country. We don't need to draft.
You guys do keep dragging us into ********** though.
Donate. One day it could be your family.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
Recent Visitors: 320
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (320)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Don't ask, don't tell, don't persue
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC