Forum Settings
       
1 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 102
Reply To Thread

Don't ask, don't tell, don't persueFollow

QuoteReply
#277 Sep 28 2011 at 10:01 AM Rating: Excellent
Jophiel
View User Forum
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
varusword75 wrote:
Quote:
it's "Should homosexuals be barred from military service?"
1000% wrong. It's "does the military have the right to exclude a subset of society from service".

They do. Few people would argue otherwise which is why we have various standards (age, physical condition, mental condition, past records, etc) for service. However, Congress has decided that they need a compelling argument for doing so which goes beyond "Oh, no! What if some guy looks at my junk!"

In absence of a compelling argument, they decided to repeal DADT.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#278 Sep 28 2011 at 10:12 AM Rating: Excellent
__DEL__1672618693847
View User Forum
Scholar
*****
15,787 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Belkira wrote:

I call'em like I see'em.


Then you should try a pair of glasses or a prescribe to a better prescription.


But you really are an idiot. Smiley: frown

I'm sorry that I'm the one to tell you. Don't shoot the messenger, kid.

Dude, I have been there and back with this fool. I have provided step by step proofs of how stupid he is. The message just never gets into his dense little skull. I've come to the conclusion that the best way to deal with him is to simply troll the ever living **** out of him whenever possible. You can do this by making bold assumptions like below.

You heard it here first: Almalique probably beats up gay people for fun.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#279 Sep 28 2011 at 3:29 PM Rating: Excellent
__DEL__1649636385462
Sage
*****
15,512 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Jophed,

Quote:
it's "Should homosexuals be barred from military service?"


1000% wrong. It's "does the military have the right to exclude a subset of society from service". Our govn excludes people based on race all the time, it's called affirmative action. Difference being the people the military are excluding act in ways that repulse most of the others trying to serve.

I know! I feel really bad when Asian people aren't admitted to colleges when there aren't enough white people, too.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#280 Sep 28 2011 at 5:34 PM Rating: Excellent
lolgaxe
View User Forum
+1
*******
50,767 posts
Sweetums wrote:
I know! I feel really bad when Asian people aren't admitted to colleges when there aren't enough white people, too.
How are all those white kids going to pass math without someone to copy off of?!
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
▲ Page top
#281gbaji, Posted: Sep 28 2011 at 7:01 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Isn't it?
QuoteReply
#282 Sep 28 2011 at 7:23 PM Rating: Excellent
lolgaxe
View User Forum
+1
*******
50,767 posts
Interesting pronoun usage.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#283 Sep 28 2011 at 8:44 PM Rating: Excellent
someproteinguy
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
gbaji wrote:
In order to allow homosexuals to openly serve in the military we must adopt the assumption that it's ok to have people quartered in the same rooms who may want to have sex with each other.


Both my parents both served for years, they lived together, and I have reason to believe they didn't abstain the whole time. Smiley: wink
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#284 Sep 28 2011 at 8:45 PM Rating: Excellent
__DEL__1649636385462
Sage
*****
15,512 posts
In that case, if I claim to be asexual, do I get my own room?
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#285 Sep 28 2011 at 8:51 PM Rating: Good
Debalic
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Sweetums wrote:
In that case, if I claim to be asexual, do I get my own room?

No, only if you're mysexual.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#286 Sep 28 2011 at 8:54 PM Rating: Excellent
someproteinguy
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
So if you're bi you're pretty much screwed then eh?
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#287 Sep 28 2011 at 9:01 PM Rating: Excellent
Jophiel
View User Forum
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
You twit this is precisely why women and men don't bunk together, BECAUSE OF THEIR SEXUALITY!
If it were this simple, housing would be divided by what gender you prefer to sleep with, not by what gender you are.
Isn't it?

No, it isn't. DADT revolved around the notion that they knew there'd be homosexuals in the military and they would continue to bunk with their gender.

I thought that was... obvious?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
▲ Page top
#288Almalieque, Posted: Sep 29 2011 at 4:53 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Don't have time now to reply all , I'll do so later..
QuoteReply
#289 Sep 29 2011 at 5:29 AM Rating: Excellent
Uglysasquatch
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Assholes. Now look at what you've done.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#290 Sep 29 2011 at 5:39 AM Rating: Excellent
Jophiel
View User Forum
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Uglysasquatch wrote:
Assholes. Now look at what you've done.
I may respond to this later.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#291 Sep 29 2011 at 6:27 AM Rating: Excellent
__DEL__1658708287938
View User Forum
Sage
****
9,507 posts
Almalieque wrote:
Don't have time now to reply all , I'll do so later..
Well, thanks for checking in, at least. We were all biting our nails out of worry until you gave us this little update.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#292 Sep 29 2011 at 6:37 AM Rating: Excellent
__DEL__1649636385462
Sage
*****
15,512 posts
If he learned how to be concise he wouldn't have this problem.

▲ Page top
#293REDACTED, Posted: Sep 29 2011 at 7:47 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Joph,
QuoteReply
#294 Sep 29 2011 at 7:55 AM Rating: Excellent
lolgaxe
View User Forum
+1
*******
50,767 posts
Gumbo Galahad wrote:
DADT was the radical liberals first step towards attaining this goal.
A policy, duly noted throughout this thread, that you agree with. No surprise you'd be for a closeted lifestyle.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#295 Sep 29 2011 at 7:57 AM Rating: Excellent
Jophiel
View User Forum
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
varusword75 wrote:
DADT was the radical liberals first step towards attaining this goal.

You'll be thrilled to know they repealed it! Score one for the anti-"radical liberals"!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#296 Sep 29 2011 at 8:01 AM Rating: Excellent
__DEL__1658708287938
View User Forum
Sage
****
9,507 posts
No use arguing any of this until the Captain checks back in.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#297 Sep 29 2011 at 8:10 AM Rating: Excellent
__DEL__1649636385462
Sage
*****
15,512 posts
As radical as Andy Rooney's rambling.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#298 Sep 29 2011 at 8:19 AM Rating: Good
Elinda
View User Forum
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Sweetums wrote:
As radical as Andy Rooney's rambling.

Andy's commentary this coming Sunday on 60-Minutes will be his last. Smiley: frown
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
▲ Page top
#299REDACTED, Posted: Sep 30 2011 at 8:13 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Next step in you liberals quest to destroy the military; transgenders in the military.
QuoteReply
#300 Sep 30 2011 at 8:33 AM Rating: Excellent
lolgaxe
View User Forum
+1
*******
50,767 posts
Gumbo Galahad wrote:
Next step in you liberals quest to destroy the military; transgenders in the military.
We're pretending they haven't been in for a long time, too? Smiley: laugh
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#301 Sep 30 2011 at 8:34 AM Rating: Excellent
__DEL__1649636385462
Sage
*****
15,512 posts
I'm pretty sure wasting soldiers by sending them into pointless conflicts is the most efficient way to go about literally destroying it Smiley: thumbsup
▲ Page top
1 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 102
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 319 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (319)
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC