Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Don't ask, don't tell, don't persueFollow

#427 Oct 04 2011 at 10:16 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Of course Jesus says that children are blameless and we must be like them before the eyes of God to enter Heaven.

So maybe Varus meant that we're all sinless innocents destined for Heaven Smiley: smile
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#428 Oct 04 2011 at 10:19 AM Rating: Excellent
Alma wrote:
That saying IS NOT THE REASON FOR DADT, my two posts are, but you're asking the difference stated above and I answered. If a janitor cleans a woman's locker room while women are in there only to later find out that the janitor is really a male, not a female, do you think the women would be like "oh, well, he's been here the whole time, so who cares?" I'm sure that they would be creeped out.


This analogy is appropriate. Alma's the girls in the shower, the gays are male janitors masquerading as female janitors.

Alma, the girl in the locker room, finds at Janny's secret, & is creeped out.

So DADT shouldn't have been repealed.



Edited, Oct 4th 2011 12:20pm by Omegavegeta
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#429 Oct 04 2011 at 10:27 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Nothing is making sense anymore... Smiley: glare

____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#430 Oct 04 2011 at 10:30 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Almalieque wrote:
Time is short, so I'll respond what I can when I can.
Please. You're a SIGNAL OFFICER in IRAQ. The only people with less to actually do are the people in charge of the people working at the MWRs.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#431 Oct 04 2011 at 10:39 AM Rating: Good
****
5,684 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
MWRs.
I read this as "Monday Wednesday Thursday"

Damn schedules.
#432 Oct 04 2011 at 10:51 AM Rating: Excellent
****
6,471 posts
Alma wrote:
Anyways, my two long posts clearly states why it is relevant to uphold the DADT.


Smiley: dubiousSmiley: dubiousSmiley: dubious

























Smiley: dubious
#433 Oct 04 2011 at 11:04 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Take it or leave it, buddy! Take it or leave it!

Actually, since DADT was already repealed and is now off the military books, I can safely leave it and not care about Alma's tortured complaints Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#434 Oct 04 2011 at 11:31 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Debo,

Quote:
By insulting them at every opportunity and trying to keep them oppressed?


Tough love. Spare the rod spoil the child.

Oppression and discrimination, for their own good? Yeah, that makes a ton of sense.

No, you're just a hateful bigot. I'm telling you this for your own good; it may be painful but people should understand what they really are.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#435 Oct 04 2011 at 12:03 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
15,512 posts
Almalieque wrote:
YOU GUYS JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND THE MILITARY

lolgaxe wrote:
Man, officers don't know **** about soldiers

Almalieque wrote:
SHUT UP WE'RE ALL MEN HERE
#436REDACTED, Posted: Oct 04 2011 at 12:03 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Debo,
#437 Oct 04 2011 at 12:04 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,512 posts
varusword75 wrote:


Is that what you tell your kid when he's doing something wrong and you correct his bad behaviour?

The simple fact is you hate anything that's not liberal and anyone who disagrees with you must be a racist, bigot, or whatever name you want to give your opponents.
Smiley: lol like the converse isn't true for you
#438REDACTED, Posted: Oct 04 2011 at 12:07 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Sweety,
#439 Oct 04 2011 at 12:12 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,512 posts
This spade isn't really a spade, guys
#440 Oct 04 2011 at 1:03 PM Rating: Excellent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
I just don't believe that homosexuality is wrong, or immoral. And I don't believe in forcing people to conform to what you believe is an "acceptable" lifestyle. Especially when it doesn't affect you.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#441 Oct 04 2011 at 1:07 PM Rating: Excellent
**
715 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Debo,

Quote:
Oppression and discrimination, for their own good?


Is that what you tell your kid when he's doing something wrong and you correct his bad behaviour?



These people aren't your children. They are you fellow Americans, who are not required to be Christian nor required to disagree with homosexuality.



varusword75 wrote:
Sweety,

I don't hate anyone. I also don't think our govn should be supporting immorality. The two aren't mutually exclusive despite what old barry tells you.



Immoral in your opinion, and even in most Christian's minds, but that is irrelevant. Why in the world would you think God wants people who do not believe in Him, and do not wish to follow His teachings to be subjugated by His law? The entire basis of Christianity is free will and faith. If you rob someone of that, you commit the ultimate sin.

You sound like those radical Muslims you always go on about, attempting to create your own Christian version of Sharia Law in America.

Edited, Oct 4th 2011 3:08pm by Dozer
#442 Oct 04 2011 at 1:10 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
Debalic wrote:
I just don't believe that homosexuality is wrong, or immoral. And I don't believe in forcing people to conform to what you believe is an "acceptable" lifestyle. Especially when it doesn't affect you.

Inb4:
"They cause diseases"
"It affects me because taxpayers need to pay for the result of their dangerous lifestyle"
#443 Oct 04 2011 at 1:13 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Gumbo Galahad wrote:
I also don't think our govn should be supporting immorality.
You know it is quite funny for everyone when you go on your morality rants one thread then how about your pretending to be Liberace gets you nailed by kids from college.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#444 Oct 04 2011 at 2:58 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Debo,
Quote:
By insulting them at every opportunity and trying to keep them oppressed?
Tough love. Spare the rod spoil the child.

You are a hate-mongering hypocrite Varus, even without the psychological dissonance of being a rempantly closeted bi or gay yourself.



Edited, Oct 4th 2011 5:03pm by Aripyanfar
#445Almalieque, Posted: Oct 04 2011 at 3:03 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Your ignorance is making the best of you...
#446 Oct 04 2011 at 3:13 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Jophiel wrote:
The batshit insane part of this is that people like Alma and Gbaji aren't arguing to expand or protect anyone's rights, they just want to "punish" everyone else.

No one has the "right" to look at your junk so they're not demanding co-ed facilities to expand the men's rights. They're not creating arguments for how co-ed facilities will benefit anyone. They're just engaging in some immature and petty fit of pique saying "If these guys are unhappy, YOU have to be unhappy!"

And they wonder why no one takes them seriously.


I have done neither of the above. I'm simply pointing out your favoritism. There's nothing necessarily wrong with "favoritism", because that's part of life. Just don't pretend that mothers aren't more than likely to receive custody of their children than fathers. Just man up to your arguments. You all act like homosexuals are so special, yet at the same time don't want them to be treated special.

Everyone else in the military has to conform/accept to stuff that isn't fair, balanced, logical, etc. yet when it mainly affects homosexuals NOOOOOOOO, it's wrong!!!

Sweetums wrote:
I couldn't really care less if a lesbian sees my snatch, anyway. I've just been catcalled (among other things) enough times by men with my clothes on that showering in front of them seems entirely unpalatable.

Dudes generally don't catcall other dudes.

Edited, Oct 3rd 2011 8:46am by Sweetums


What about a man? Why or why not? We're talking about men, not women. Men don't care about women seeing them naked either, lesbian or straight.
#447 Oct 04 2011 at 3:23 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Being allowed to speak openly about your sexuality, just as heterosexuals can do, is now being treated "special"?

So you're voting for Santorum, I take it?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#448 Oct 04 2011 at 3:25 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Aripyanfar wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
Debo,
Quote:
By insulting them at every opportunity and trying to keep them oppressed?
Tough love. Spare the rod spoil the child.

You are a hate-mongering hypocrite Varus, even without the psychological dissonance of being a rempantly closeted bi or gay yourself.

I wouldn't even give him that much credit; he's just not that deep or complicated.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#449 Oct 04 2011 at 3:32 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Almalieque wrote:
Sweetums wrote:
I couldn't really care less if a lesbian sees my snatch, anyway. I've just been catcalled (among other things) enough times by men with my clothes on that showering in front of them seems entirely unpalatable.

Dudes generally don't catcall other dudes.

Edited, Oct 3rd 2011 8:46am by Sweetums


What about a man? Why or why not? We're talking about men, not women. Men don't care about women seeing them naked either, lesbian or straight.


I'm all for talking about lesbians; especially after 9 pages of penile obsession.

Smiley: rolleyes
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#450 Oct 04 2011 at 9:33 PM Rating: Good
****
5,159 posts
Almalieque wrote:
Men don't care about women seeing them naked either, lesbian or straight.

Are you seriously suggesting this to be the case?
#451 Oct 04 2011 at 11:17 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
****
7,564 posts
Almalieque wrote:
Men don't care about women seeing them naked either, lesbian or straight.


Bullsh*t I have a small ***** and have to sex with the lights off because I am afraid a woman will make fun of me or laugh. I don't like being naked in front of women because god made my brain big and my junk suck. So @#%^ you you hater, you hate people with small ***** admit it. you @#%^ing poof.


Edited, Oct 5th 2011 1:17am by rdmcandie

yay quote fails ruining my fun.



Edited, Oct 5th 2011 1:18am by rdmcandie
____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 305 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (305)