They never pretended that they were doing anything other than deliberately getting arrested in order to raise awareness for their cause. Remember when I said I don't have a problem with people doing this as long as they are honest about what they're doing?
You're trying to pretend that he didn't deliberately create a scene so he could get arrested, so his buddies could film it and use it to try to get others to believe in their conspiracy theories, and that you didn't post it here as the end point in that series of actions. It's pretty transparent that this is exactly what he was doing, what his buddies were doing, and finally what you are doing.
Why be coy about it then? Why pretend that your only interest in this is one of protection of the right to free speech? If you want a debate about the truther theories, why not just freaking start one? It would be honest at least.
For the last time, I have no motive to talk about the truther debate here at this time. The reason for this is crystal clear. I don't have all my evidence lined up to present it for a formal discussion. I despise conspiracy theories, I only back theories that can be proven so will you please stop with the accusations. Now you might be right about this guy in the video. It could of been done for publicity, I don't know because it's not me. I've been 100% honest in my responses to you so I ask that you accept that. I can only speak for myself bud.
I like to add that my main reasoning for not buying the official 9/11 story is my distrust of the government. I began my military training in the RIP(Rangers) program after Airborne school in Fort Benning, GA. Later on as I picked up my security clearance, I was offered a shot with the Special Forces(Rambo guys aka Green beret) in which I was exposed to real world missions that replicate situations similar to the attack of 9/11. I'm talking about false flag attacks if you're familiar with that term. I'm sure you heard about Seal team 6 being blown up right after they supposedly killed Bin laden a few weeks prior. Coincidence, eh?
Um... They were. But not because of their expression of speech. MLK was not arrested for giving a speech at a venue dedicated to giving such speeches. He was arrested several times for various protests and marches though. You do see the difference, right? If you show up at someone else's event and start drowning out that event with your speech, you are going to be arrested. This is nothing new.
MLK was arrested at these protests and marches because his opinions weren't in line with the status quo. I understand your point, but you need to understand mine.
I'm glad you believe freedom of speech is more important than everyone's freedom of assembly. Unless you want to retract your previous claim that he wasn't there causing a disturbance to get attention.
No offense, but you're just looking to mess around with me. I'll research a response and you'll just respond with one sentence putting zero thought into a reply and offering nothing more than a soundbite. I don't know if this guy was there to cause a disturbance or not, I'm not him so I'll never know for certain. Regardless, he shouldn't of been arrested and that's my point. Edited, Sep 14th 2011 9:24pm by ShadowedgeFFXI