Man arrested at 9/11 memorial for speaking out. Follow

Look I'm not trying to be a jerk, but this is what you said.



I'm asking for names and I already gave you Ron Paul in my last post. You clearly said "there are a lot of people" and I'm wondering how many you can find though research.

Secondly you have no clue how Ron Paul thinks. Go to youtube and hear him speak over the past 30 years. Ron Paul isn't trying to get us out of the wars because of what voters think. He wants us out of them because they're against the Constitution and is causing this country to go bankrupt. Paul isn't pandering to his voter base. His voter base is pandering to his enforcement of the Constitution. All the other candidates don't have a clue about the Constitution including Obama who is supposed to be some type of lawyer for it.

People with high level security access always post suggestively on gaming forums.

He promised to take the troops out of Iraq and send more troops to Afghanistan where the real crime took place. As LOLGAXE said, we'll be in Iraq forever and sadly I can't disagree. If you add up all the things that appeal to liberal voters and GOP voters, you'll find that Obama has given more to the right than Bush. There were many policies that Obama signed that the GOP couldn't get though when Bush was in office. None of this stuff is hard to find.



Yeah, exactly. It applies to everyone though and their tolerance of the other viewpoint. It's a subjective term regardless.

I said lot of people on the right want out of the wars, yes. I didn't say lots of people running for President did.

Edited, Sep 19th 2011 2:36pm by Uglysasquatch

Okay, this is turning out better than I had anticipated.

If your statement were true, you'd have these now implemented policies right there in your head. In fact, if you didn't know about them or if they didn't exist there'd be no reason to make the statement that you made. Furthermore, if you made the statment as a point in fact you'd have added the examples as it would have just bolstered your argument. The only reason you have for not providing them is because you were just writing any old crap that you thought sounded good.

At least try and make it funny.



Edited, Sep 19th 2011 7:58pm by Elinda

Easier to just admit you can't. Using your unrelated side argument with Ugly to avoid being honest with me is pretty pathetic.

Edited, Sep 19th 2011 1:10pm by Jophiel

Well, that's one way to duck out when you can't back your stuff up.

Have fun offline, by yourself.

Edited, Sep 19th 2011 2:18pm by Eske

You threw down a pretty meaningless gauntlet though. Who would like to get us "out of the Middle East"? Um... Pretty much everyone. Who realizes that it's a lot more complicated than that and you can't just bail out? Pretty much everyone except Ron Paul.

Actually, to be more fair, I'm reasonably certain that Paul knows that what he's promising isn't possible in any sort of short term. The difference is that he's dishonest enough to promise it anyway. Well, him and Obama right up until he actually got elected I suppose.

Edited, Sep 19th 2011 3:56pm by gbaji