Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Reply To Thread

US Credit rating downgraded to AA+Follow

#1 Aug 05 2011 at 7:02 PM Rating: Good
Forbes has the formal announcement linked on someone's blog here:

Standard & Poor wrote:
– We have lowered our long-term sovereign credit rating on the United States of America to ‘AA+’ from ‘AAA’ and affirmed the ‘A-1+’ short-term rating.

– We have also removed both the short- and long-term ratings from CreditWatch negative.

– The downgrade reflects our opinion that the fiscal consolidation plan that Congress and the Administration recently agreed to falls short of what, in our view, would be necessary to stabilize the government’s medium-term debt dynamics.

– More broadly, the downgrade reflects our view that the effectiveness, stability, and predictability of American policymaking and political institutions have weakened at a time of ongoing fiscal and economic challenges to a degree more than we envisioned when we assigned a negative outlook to the rating on April 18, 2011.

– Since then, we have changed our view of the difficulties in bridging the gulf between the political parties over fiscal policy, which makes us pessimistic about the capacity of Congress and the Administration to be able to leverage their agreement this week into a broader fiscal consolidation plan that stabilizes the government’s debt dynamics any time soon.

– The outlook on the long-term rating is negative. We could lower the long-term rating to ‘AA’ within the next two years if we see that less reduction in spending than agreed to, higher interest rates, or new fiscal pressures during the period result in a higher general government debt trajectory than we currently assume in our base case.


Specifically, they are concerned about the GOP and Tea Party pledge to never ever under any circumstances no matter how @#%^ed the economy gets raise taxes. The "falling short" of the deal reached for the debt crisis resolution is half that it doesn't have any plans to raise additional revenues, i.e., it doesn't raise taxes, and half that the cuts to benefits programs like Social Security are too vague.

Edited, Aug 5th 2011 9:15pm by catwho
#2 Aug 05 2011 at 7:08 PM Rating: Default
Scholar
***
2,496 posts
Fox had a quick blurb up from an anonymous S&P spokesman about how they botched the model and it may actually go down to AA, not AA+. But it's gone now, so take it for what it's worth.
#3 Aug 05 2011 at 7:17 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Good thing Grover Norquist has more power over the GOP than the Speaker of the House or else they might have passed that "grand compromise" Boehner & Obama were discussing for $4 trillion and change like S&P was requiring to keep the nation's rating.

Cue Gbaji to start hollering about how such a "compromise" only ever existed on the "Far left liberal blogs!" because he never heard of it.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#4 Aug 05 2011 at 7:19 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
catwho wrote:
Specifically, they are concerned about the GOP and Tea Party pledge to never ever under any circumstances no matter how @#%^ed the economy gets raise taxes. The "falling short" of the deal reached for the debt crisis resolution is that it doesn't have any plans to raise additional revenues, i.e., it doesn't raise taxes.


That's a pretty exceptionally narrow interpretation of what they actually said. It certainly wasn't "specifically" what they said at all. What they did say was this:

Quote:
Standard & Poor’s takes no position on the mix of spending and revenue measures that Congress and the Administration might conclude is appropriate for putting the U.S.’s finances on a sustainable footing.


They include not allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire when calculating future revenue potential, but that's not the same as saying "We're downgrading you because you didn't raise taxes". The much bigger effect is spending, not taxes. Even if we did allow the Bush tax cuts to expire, not just on the rich, but on everyone, it would still not come close to fixing our current debt problems. Only spending cuts can do that.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#5 Aug 05 2011 at 7:29 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Good thing Grover Norquist has more power over the GOP than the Speaker of the House or else they might have passed that "grand compromise" Boehner & Obama were discussing for $4 trillion and change like S&P was requiring to keep the nation's rating.


You're kidding, right? The one where Obama presented something that the GOP would never agree to, and they... wait for it... didn't agree to it. WTF?

Quote:
Cue Gbaji to start hollering about how such a "compromise" only ever existed on the "Far left liberal blogs!" because he never heard of it.


I never said I never heard of it Joph. You and I discussed the damn thing over a month ago! What I said was that only people on far left liberal blogs thought this deal was something the GOP would or should consider. Isn't it strange that your side keeps doing this? You present some plan and then run around insisting that the GOP should love it because you've changed the labels on things to mean the exact opposite of what the GOP actually wants.


I mean, the Recovery act had as many tax cuts as spending increases, right? Why wouldn't the GOP vote for it!? Lol!
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#6 Aug 05 2011 at 7:43 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
huh. "A mathematical error discovered late Friday by Treasury Department officials has thrown into limbo — at least temporarily — plans by ratings firm Standard & Poor’s to downgrade the top-notch AAA credit rating the U.S. has held for 70 years, people familiar with the matter said. "
http://blogs.wsj.com/marketbeat/2011/08/05/u-s-debt-rating-in-limbo-as-treasury-finds-math-mistake-by-sp-in-downgrade-warning/
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#7 Aug 05 2011 at 7:44 PM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
They always forget to carry the one.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#8 Aug 05 2011 at 7:54 PM Rating: Good
gbaji wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
Good thing Grover Norquist has more power over the GOP than the Speaker of the House or else they might have passed that "grand compromise" Boehner & Obama were discussing for $4 trillion and change like S&P was requiring to keep the nation's rating.


You're kidding, right? The one where Obama presented something that the GOP would never agree to, and they... wait for it... didn't agree to it. WTF?

Quote:
Cue Gbaji to start hollering about how such a "compromise" only ever existed on the "Far left liberal blogs!" because he never heard of it.


I never said I never heard of it Joph. You and I discussed the damn thing over a month ago! What I said was that only people on far left liberal blogs thought this deal was something the GOP would or should consider. Isn't it strange that your side keeps doing this? You present some plan and then run around insisting that the GOP should love it because you've changed the labels on things to mean the exact opposite of what the GOP actually wants.


I mean, the Recovery act had as many tax cuts as spending increases, right? Why wouldn't the GOP vote for it!? Lol!


Actually, last week the dude on Hardball was talking with one of Reagan's and H.W.'s policy advisers, Bruce Bartlett, who was upset the GOP didn't take the deal. "The Republicans keep saying the tax cuts are the key to prosperity. The 2000s are evidence that that is not true. We had booming economies in the 1980s and ’90s. If we went back to those taxes, we would be better off. I don’t see think any question we would have positive economic effects if we went back to the tax rates.... I think at this point, there’s nothing that can pass the House of Representatives. I think a good chunk of the Republican caucus is either stupid, crazy, ignorant or craven cowards, who are desperately afraid of the tea party people, and rightly so."
#9 Aug 05 2011 at 8:36 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
A guy who was fired by Bush and then later wrote a book called "How George W. Bush Bankrupted America and Betrayed the Reagan Legacy" is to be taken as an authority on what the GOP should like or dislike?

Oh wait! Read more of his wiki page. Lol:

Quote:
In Bartlett's latest book, The New American Economy: The Failure of Reaganomics and a New Way Forward, he embraces Keynesian ideas, stating that while supply-side economics was appropriate for the 1970s and 1980s, supply side arguments do not fit contemporary conditions.



Classic case of an economist getting booted and then running to the other side and bashing his former bosses in order to sell some books and get appearances on TV shows (like Hardball). I love how he starts out saying that Bush betrayed the Reagan legacy and the progresses to saying that Reaganomics was a failure. Um... what?

I put about zero credibility on this guy, and even less if you're trying to suggest that he speaks in any way for what the GOP should or should not agree to politically.


Way to continue the trend of liberals trying to tell conservatives what they're supposed to believe though! Next you'll try to tell me that fiscal conservatism really means we should be willing to raise taxes to pay off our debts! Yay!!!



OH! And it's also really telling that this is what Hardball attempts to sell to its audience as a conservative viewpoint. Maybe you should stop watching MSNBC?

Edited, Aug 5th 2011 7:38pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#10 Aug 05 2011 at 8:47 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
You and I discussed the damn thing over a month ago!

Wrong agreement, shortcake Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#11 Aug 05 2011 at 9:02 PM Rating: Good
gbaji wrote:
A guy who was fired by Bush and then later wrote a book called "How George W. Bush Bankrupted America and Betrayed the Reagan Legacy" is to be taken as an authority on what the GOP should like or dislike?

Oh wait! Read more of his wiki page. Lol:

Quote:
In Bartlett's latest book, The New American Economy: The Failure of Reaganomics and a New Way Forward, he embraces Keynesian ideas, stating that while supply-side economics was appropriate for the 1970s and 1980s, supply side arguments do not fit contemporary conditions.



Classic case of an economist getting booted and then running to the other side and bashing his former bosses in order to sell some books and get appearances on TV shows (like Hardball). I love how he starts out saying that Bush betrayed the Reagan legacy and the progresses to saying that Reaganomics was a failure. Um... what?

I put about zero credibility on this guy, and even less if you're trying to suggest that he speaks in any way for what the GOP should or should not agree to politically.


Way to continue the trend of liberals trying to tell conservatives what they're supposed to believe though! Next you'll try to tell me that fiscal conservatism really means we should be willing to raise taxes to pay off our debts! Yay!!!



OH! And it's also really telling that this is what Hardball attempts to sell to its audience as a conservative viewpoint. Maybe you should stop watching MSNBC?

Edited, Aug 5th 2011 7:38pm by gbaji


I don't watch television. The news clip was linked to my FB page by someone.
#12 Aug 05 2011 at 9:19 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
catwho wrote:
I don't watch television. The news clip was linked to my FB page by someone.


Then tell your friends to watch more than just MSNBC. Or at least recognize that about 90% of people labeled as conservatives on that station (especially Matthew's show) are picked because they can be labeled as conservatives but are really going to say exactly what their liberal audience wants to hear.


It's just that I see this whole "liberals trying to say what conservatives should like" bit all the time. It's like one of their patented tricks that I'm surprised still works on anyone. You'd think that after a certain amount of time the supposedly educated and intelligent liberal audience would realize that maybe if nearly every single conservative they see on their favorite news sources who happen to be saying what they agree with disagree with every conservative they see everywhere else, instead of concluding that this one guy has his finger on the pulse about what it means to be conservative and everyone else is wrong, maybe it's really the other way around?


Just a thought to ponder. Kinda like Joph up there still insisting that the GOP should have agreed to some deal he thought was great. The very fact that a liberal is the one saying that conservatives should have agreed to it ought to be the first clue that something is amiss. At least an intelligent person would conclude that, right?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#13 Aug 05 2011 at 9:49 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
Kinda like Joph up there still insisting that the GOP should have agreed to some deal he thought was great.

I never said I thought it was great. I said Standards & Poors was demanding a deal for the same amount in order to avoid a downgrade and Boehner was unable to secure it because he's a weak and largely incompetent Speaker when it comes to leading his own party, allowing major things to be pushed off and rejected to appease some simple-minded screams about taxes and party purity.

Edited, Aug 5th 2011 10:50pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#14 Aug 05 2011 at 11:20 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
This might just be crazy, but it also makes more than a little sense to me: http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/07/is-standard-and-poor’s-manipulating-us-debt-rating-to-escape-liability-for-the-mortgage-crisis.html
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#15 Aug 06 2011 at 1:39 AM Rating: Excellent
****
9,526 posts
The only thing that is shocking to me is that the rating isn't lower.
#16 Aug 06 2011 at 1:46 AM Rating: Excellent
****
9,526 posts
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
This might just be crazy, but it also makes more than a little sense to me: http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/07/is-standard-and-poor’s-manipulating-us-debt-rating-to-escape-liability-for-the-mortgage-crisis.html


wow, that`s an interesting take on this.
#17 Aug 06 2011 at 2:11 AM Rating: Excellent
Ya, no one in the upper levels of management in either politics or economics appears to be competent.

How this is surprising to anyone outside of genuine "tea party" members is beyond me.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#18 Aug 06 2011 at 4:08 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
15,952 posts
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
This might just be crazy, but it also makes more than a little sense to me: http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/07/is-standard-and-poor’s-manipulating-us-debt-rating-to-escape-liability-for-the-mortgage-crisis.html

Some people here might want to sign the two online petitions in this article.
#19 Aug 06 2011 at 7:23 AM Rating: Good
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
Aripyanfar wrote:
Some people here might want to sign the two online petitions in this article.

I hate to be the downer Ari, but unfortunately online petitions are entirely worthless.
#20 Aug 06 2011 at 8:23 AM Rating: Default
Avatar
****
7,564 posts
apparently China is jumping all over this already.

(yes i know lolyahoo but its where my email is and was the first article I read today.)

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/u-loses-aaa-rating-g7-finance-ministers-meet-052230104.html
____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#21 Aug 06 2011 at 8:25 AM Rating: Decent
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
I don't see what the big fuss is all about, it's still an "A". Smiley: glare
#22 Aug 06 2011 at 9:05 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
13,251 posts
A++++ Would loan again!
#23 Aug 06 2011 at 9:08 AM Rating: Decent
Avatar
****
7,564 posts
Its like having a credit score go from 900 to 700, sure you still have fairly strong credit, but people see a 200 point drop and consider you being a liability, and with places like Canada, Australia, etc offering a more stable and prospective investment losing 200 points on a credit score could be a big deal as far as foreign investment is concerned. This will only get worse if the world economic leaders decide to use another currency as the standard in year to come. With the AUD CAD Euro Pound all making a strong case.

While it is to early to tell, with other competitive nations moving forward, and having alread large in part righted their "ships" following the recession, unless the US fixes its massive issues, this downgrade is only the start.

But hey you had a good 200 year run, and most empires peak and decline in this time frame, welcome to being UK V2.0.
____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#24 Aug 06 2011 at 10:05 AM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
rdmcandie wrote:
Its like having a credit score go from 900 to 700, sure you still have fairly strong credit, but people see a 200 point drop and consider you being a liability, and with places like Canada, Australia, etc offering a more stable and prospective investment losing 200 points on a credit score could be a big deal as far as foreign investment is concerned. This will only get worse if the world economic leaders decide to use another currency as the standard in year to come. With the AUD CAD Euro Pound all making a strong case.

While it is to early to tell, with other competitive nations moving forward, and having alread large in part righted their "ships" following the recession, unless the US fixes its massive issues, this downgrade is only the start.

But hey you had a good 200 year run, and most empires peak and decline in this time frame, welcome to being UK V2.0.



I know there's a difference.... wasn't completely serious..
#25 Aug 06 2011 at 10:27 AM Rating: Excellent
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
From USA to USB?

*******
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#26 Aug 06 2011 at 10:53 AM Rating: Good
Sage
****
4,042 posts
catwho wrote:
I don't watch television. The news clip was linked to my FB page by someone.


See, even catwho gets her news from somewhere!
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 466 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (466)