Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Obama so far: Weak and NaiveFollow

#52 Jul 28 2011 at 6:58 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,594 posts
Samira wrote:
I miss Rahm Emanuel.

As time goes on I think more and more that Obama would have been a great Cabinet member. I just don't know who, out of the field of viable candidates, would have been a more effective President. Clinton would, I think, have been even more divisive, if that's even possible.

Any democratic president, really any president of any party excepting republican would have been divisive. ****, a republican president would have divided the republican party. I don't think there is a human being that would have been able to lead this congress to any compromising policy on the big issues.

Hilary may have done a better job than Obama of simply flipping them all off and pushing forward with whatever tricks Bill could lend her.

I miss Rahm too.


Edited, Jul 28th 2011 3:00pm by Elinda
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#53 Jul 28 2011 at 7:22 AM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,152 posts
LockeColeMA wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Kavekk wrote:
Quote:
I just don't know who, out of the field of viable candidates, would have been a more effective President.


Nick Clegg?


I'm not a Obama hater, but he was definitely not the best candidate in 2008.

That would be... Ron Paul? I still think he was better than Clinton, McCain is pretty much hated by the Tea Party now so he would have been a total flop on both sides as a president... not sure who else was a big name, honestly.


You all seem more in the politics than I am.
Educate me... What makes you support Obama over Clinton?
#54 Jul 28 2011 at 7:42 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
For one thing, I thought Obama's path to health care was much more likely to pass than Clinton's insistence on a government-run universal program. For another, Clinton's campaign was a fiasco and made me rather skeptical of her ability to lead. I also assumed Clinton would be more divisive purely by virtue of her last name and the scorn Republicans have heaped upon her since 1992. I underestimated the amount of fanaticism the Right would whip up over Obama as well.

I disagree with a good bit of what Smash said but he's more liberal than I am so I imagine he was looking towards other goals. While Obama's presidency hasn't been perfect, he's largely done what I wanted him to do.

Samira should totally move to Chicago so she can hang with The Rahm.

Edited, Jul 28th 2011 8:44am by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#55varusword75, Posted: Jul 28 2011 at 7:44 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) You know things are bad in the Democrats world when Smashed is willing to talk sh*t about a black president.
#56 Jul 28 2011 at 7:45 AM Rating: Excellent
Annoying Ass
ZAM Administrator
Avatar
*****
12,049 posts
What Joph said. I also didn't agree with some of her personal views, such as blaming videogames for violence and calling for tighter restrictions on them. Obviously I'm biased, but we all choose candidates based on our biases, no?

Edit: Your turn. Who were the better candidates?

Edited, Jul 28th 2011 9:46am by LockeColeMA
____________________________
Retired News Writer for the ZAM Network
WoW - Aureliano the Insane - level 90 Druid on Sen'Jin
Nanaoki - level 90 Mage on Sen'Jin
#57varusword75, Posted: Jul 28 2011 at 7:46 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Jophed,
#58 Jul 28 2011 at 7:47 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
varusword75 wrote:
Quote:
I underestimated the amount of fanaticism the Right would whip up over Obama as well.

Because you're an idiot.

Could be. Next time I'll know just how simple-minded Republicans are Smiley: smile
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#59 Jul 28 2011 at 7:49 AM Rating: Excellent
Annoying Ass
ZAM Administrator
Avatar
*****
12,049 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Plus you had to realize there would be a tremendous backlash for the way you people treated W.

What "you people" are these? The GOP (esp. the Tea Party) hates W too, didn't you get the memo? He was a huge spender, which is anathema. While they're happy to blame Obama for most of the mistakes, they pull few punches when it comes to our last president... they just make sure to say "But we're new and improved, and Obama is worse!"
____________________________
Retired News Writer for the ZAM Network
WoW - Aureliano the Insane - level 90 Druid on Sen'Jin
Nanaoki - level 90 Mage on Sen'Jin
#60 Jul 28 2011 at 7:51 AM Rating: Excellent
******
49,731 posts
LockeColeMA wrote:
The GOP (esp. the Tea Party) hates W too, didn't you get the memo?
That would require reading.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#61varusword75, Posted: Jul 28 2011 at 7:51 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Jophed,
#62 Jul 28 2011 at 7:53 AM Rating: Excellent
******
49,731 posts
Just because people call you simple doesn't mean they're complimenting you.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#63 Jul 28 2011 at 7:54 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
varusword75 wrote:
Often the simplest solution is the best one.

Assume anyone from the Right is a rage-filled half-wit. Got it!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#64varusword75, Posted: Jul 28 2011 at 7:54 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Locked,
#65varusword75, Posted: Jul 28 2011 at 7:56 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Joph,
#66 Jul 28 2011 at 7:58 AM Rating: Excellent
Annoying Ass
ZAM Administrator
Avatar
*****
12,049 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Quote:
The GOP (esp. the Tea Party) hates W


No they don't. But I suspect you know this.

I suspect I know more than a guy who claims Beck is part of the MSM Smiley: lol Some days I'm not even sure you know who you agree with and whom you disagree with.
____________________________
Retired News Writer for the ZAM Network
WoW - Aureliano the Insane - level 90 Druid on Sen'Jin
Nanaoki - level 90 Mage on Sen'Jin
#67varusword75, Posted: Jul 28 2011 at 8:01 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Locked,
#68 Jul 28 2011 at 8:03 AM Rating: Excellent
Annoying Ass
ZAM Administrator
Avatar
*****
12,049 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Locked,

Please show me where i've ever said Beck is part of the MSM.


I know it was only yesterday, but please, try to keep up...
____________________________
Retired News Writer for the ZAM Network
WoW - Aureliano the Insane - level 90 Druid on Sen'Jin
Nanaoki - level 90 Mage on Sen'Jin
#69varusword75, Posted: Jul 28 2011 at 8:06 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Locked,
#70 Jul 28 2011 at 8:07 AM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,152 posts
LockeColeMA wrote:
What Joph said. I also didn't agree with some of her personal views, such as blaming videogames for violence and calling for tighter restrictions on them. Obviously I'm biased, but we all choose candidates based on our biases, no?

Edit: Your turn. Who were the better candidates?

Edited, Jul 28th 2011 9:46am by LockeColeMA



I thought Clinton was a far better candidate, but purely based on the debates. I watched all of the debates and for most of her answers, she responded with a plan that is either already in place from when she was in the white house as first lady or laid out on her website. Most of Obama's responses were thoughts of what he planned to do, which is good, but I thought the fact that Clinton had much of it already in action or had already done it made her a better suited candidate.

Now, I don't know specifics, that's why I asked you to see if I was missing something, but it doesn't seem that I did. It appears that your preferences lead you to Obama and that there wasn't a "Ron Paul" difference between the two.
#71 Jul 28 2011 at 8:09 AM Rating: Excellent
Annoying Ass
ZAM Administrator
Avatar
*****
12,049 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Locked,

Obviously you can't read for sh*t.

Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Retired News Writer for the ZAM Network
WoW - Aureliano the Insane - level 90 Druid on Sen'Jin
Nanaoki - level 90 Mage on Sen'Jin
#72 Jul 28 2011 at 8:10 AM Rating: Excellent
We Does Not Hugglez
*****
10,246 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Locked,

Obviously you can't read for sh*t.

Edited, Jul 28th 2011 10:07am by varusword75


Everyone here has a problem reading then, because everyone but you knows your comment calling a piece on the Blaze a MSM attack equates to you calling the Blaze part of the MSM.
____________________________
I had a very witty signature once, but apparently it offended the sensibilities of some of the frailer constitutions that frequent this particular internet message board.

[The rest of this message has been censored and I can't tell you what I actually think of you]
#73 Jul 28 2011 at 8:12 AM Rating: Excellent
******
49,731 posts
He's never been accused of being able to connect thoughts together.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#74varusword75, Posted: Jul 28 2011 at 8:14 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Moe,
#75 Jul 28 2011 at 8:19 AM Rating: Excellent
We Does Not Hugglez
*****
10,246 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Moe,
Quote:
because everyone but you knows your comment calling a piece on the Blaze a MSM attack equates to you calling the Blaze part of the MSM.


No it doesn't. Why do you assume it does?

Because I'm smart enough to tie my own shoes.
____________________________
I had a very witty signature once, but apparently it offended the sensibilities of some of the frailer constitutions that frequent this particular internet message board.

[The rest of this message has been censored and I can't tell you what I actually think of you]
#76 Jul 28 2011 at 8:37 AM Rating: Excellent
GBATE!! Never saw it coming
Avatar
****
9,296 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
LockeColeMA wrote:
The GOP (esp. the Tea Party) hates W too, didn't you get the memo?
That would require reading.

But...he doesn't get his news from anywhere, lolgaxe!


Oops, wrong fanatic.Smiley: grin
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
Last week, I saw a guy with an eyepatch and a gold monocle and pointed him out to Flea as one of the most awesome things I've seen, ever. If I had an eyepatch and a gold monocle, I'd always dress up as Mr. Peanut but with a hook hand and a parrot.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 70 All times are in CDT
Anonymous Guests (70)