Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Obama's support cop killersFollow

#52 May 12 2011 at 12:43 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Chavez always looks like someone just got him up off the couch.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#53 May 12 2011 at 12:57 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
I think its a rank thing. I see that happen to everyone that breaks the O6-O7 barrier.

Admittedly, I only know one person that did that. Poor Jorgensen.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#54 May 12 2011 at 1:07 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
It's the $25,000 a year salary they're pulling down.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#55 May 12 2011 at 2:12 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
The obvious solution is he get a part time job as a substitute teacher.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#56 May 12 2011 at 2:57 PM Rating: Good
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Alma,

Quote:
Now, if he invited Lil' Wayne or Soulja Boy Tell 'Em, I too would be offended, but Common Sense? Really?


It's not about the rapper it's about the political posititions they take. And when you take a political position you had better be ready to face the consequences.


I was referring to what they stand for. Common is not a positive rapper but a positive artist. Most songs in any genre is just about love, sex, drugs, fame, fortune, etc. You don't have many artists actively trying to help a community.

Ignorance is shown when people label him "gangsta".
#57REDACTED, Posted: May 12 2011 at 3:22 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Alma,
#58 May 12 2011 at 3:23 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Because obviously the black panthers are just a benevolent community group just trying to do the right thing.
Just like Saddam Hussein!
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#59REDACTED, Posted: May 12 2011 at 3:24 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) lolgax,
#60 May 12 2011 at 6:35 PM Rating: Good
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Alma,

Quote:
You don't have many artists actively trying to help a community.

Ignorance is shown when people label him "gangsta".


Because obviously the black panthers are just a benevolent community group just trying to do the right thing.




As I stated, ignorance is the only reason for labeling Common as a "gangsta rapper". That displays the lack of understanding of the term.
#61 May 12 2011 at 7:12 PM Rating: Good
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
I apologize for the "double post", but I think John Stewart says it the best. You really can't counter this...

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/jon-stewarts-epic-takedown-of-fox-news-for-pushing-rapper-commons-w-h-controversy/


Edit:

Actual performance of Common at the White House..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--mh_TpplI4&feature=player_embedded

Edited, May 13th 2011 3:40am by Almalieque
#62 May 12 2011 at 8:11 PM Rating: Decent
****
9,997 posts
I think you're on to something, Alma. It would do the world for your reputation here if you limited yourself to linking Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert to make your arguments for you.
#63 May 12 2011 at 8:36 PM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Kachi wrote:
I think you're on to something, Alma. It would do the world for your reputation here if you limited yourself to linking Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert to make your arguments for you.
If Alma hadn't already created the single greatest quotable statement ever, I'd add this to my sig.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#64 May 16 2011 at 3:09 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Don't forget to watch the debate tonight with John Stewart and Bill O'reilly tonight on the Factor.
#65 May 16 2011 at 6:36 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Giggle. Diverse opinions of Fox News.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#66 May 16 2011 at 6:55 PM Rating: Good
Drunken English Bastard
*****
15,268 posts
People really take Bill "tide goes in, tide goes out" O'Reilly seriously?
____________________________
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
#67 May 16 2011 at 7:57 PM Rating: Decent
****
9,997 posts
Nilatai wrote:
People really take Bill "tide goes in, tide goes out" O'Reilly seriously?


We have to pander to him a little out of respect for being one of the least crazy pundits on FOX.
#68 May 16 2011 at 8:04 PM Rating: Good
Drunken English Bastard
*****
15,268 posts
Kachi wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
People really take Bill "tide goes in, tide goes out" O'Reilly seriously?


We have to pander to him a little out of respect for being one of the least crazy pundits on FOX.
Least crazy?
____________________________
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
#69 May 16 2011 at 8:19 PM Rating: Decent
****
9,997 posts
Nilatai wrote:
Kachi wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
People really take Bill "tide goes in, tide goes out" O'Reilly seriously?


We have to pander to him a little out of respect for being one of the least crazy pundits on FOX.
Least crazy?


Sadly, yes. Though now that Beck is leaving the scale will surely teeter a bit the other way.
#70 May 16 2011 at 8:25 PM Rating: Good
Drunken English Bastard
*****
15,268 posts
Kachi wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
Kachi wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
People really take Bill "tide goes in, tide goes out" O'Reilly seriously?


We have to pander to him a little out of respect for being one of the least crazy pundits on FOX.
Least crazy?


Sadly, yes. Though now that Beck is leaving the scale will surely teeter a bit the other way.
Aw, maan. Glenn Beck is comedy gold! Gold I say!

I like to see how long he can go without saying the word "****".
____________________________
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
#71 May 16 2011 at 8:35 PM Rating: Decent
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
Nilatai wrote:
Kachi wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
People really take Bill "tide goes in, tide goes out" O'Reilly seriously?


We have to pander to him a little out of respect for being one of the least crazy pundits on FOX.
Least crazy?
I'd say Shepard Smith is the most moderate out of any of the hosts, but that's not exactly a tough competition.
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#72 May 16 2011 at 10:12 PM Rating: Decent
****
9,997 posts
bsphil wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
Kachi wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
People really take Bill "tide goes in, tide goes out" O'Reilly seriously?


We have to pander to him a little out of respect for being one of the least crazy pundits on FOX.
Least crazy?
I'd say Shepard Smith is the most moderate out of any of the hosts, but that's not exactly a tough competition.


I'm sure there have to be less crazy pundits, but O'Reilly is pretty phenomenally huge and takes more of a stance that liberalism is stupid, rather than evil. For that reason, he's actually (sadly) a pretty important source of moderation for the network, or at least that was the case when Beck was a dominating presence. I imagine Beck will remain in the spotlight, and absence from the network (e.g., Limbaugh) doesn't undermine the value of having someone who appeals to the crazies but occasionally acts as a voice of reason.

That is to say, I actually have the teeniest smidgen of respect for O'Reilly due to the likes of Beck, Limbaugh, and Hannity.
#73 May 16 2011 at 10:50 PM Rating: Decent
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
Kachi wrote:
bsphil wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
Kachi wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
People really take Bill "tide goes in, tide goes out" O'Reilly seriously?


We have to pander to him a little out of respect for being one of the least crazy pundits on FOX.
Least crazy?
I'd say Shepard Smith is the most moderate out of any of the hosts, but that's not exactly a tough competition.


I'm sure there have to be less crazy pundits, but O'Reilly is pretty phenomenally huge and takes more of a stance that liberalism is stupid, rather than evil. For that reason, he's actually (sadly) a pretty important source of moderation for the network, or at least that was the case when Beck was a dominating presence. I imagine Beck will remain in the spotlight, and absence from the network (e.g., Limbaugh) doesn't undermine the value of having someone who appeals to the crazies but occasionally acts as a voice of reason.

That is to say, I actually have the teeniest smidgen of respect for O'Reilly due to the likes of Beck, Limbaugh, and Hannity.
Oh don't get me wrong, I think that O'Reilly is more moderate than people give him credit for, he's just an egomaniac. I think Shepard Smith is a bit better about it though, which is probably why he's on during the dead hours. Or maybe just because he got pissed off and hit that woman with his car, idk.
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#74 May 16 2011 at 11:03 PM Rating: Decent
****
9,997 posts
Probably- I don't know much about Smith and to my knowledge he isn't so influential, but then I try not to keep too close a watch on conservative pundits. To do that, I'd have to actually, ick, watch them.
#75 May 17 2011 at 6:27 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
gbaji wrote:
rdmcandie wrote:
Have you actually ever heard the song?


Can't speak for anyone else, but I was curious, so I did. Have you?

Quote:
Now go listen to the song, or even just read the lyrics. The song is about prejudice in the judicial system, and within the police force, it is about another black person who was unjustly found guilty of a crime that they didn't commit. The song doesn't praise killing cops, it bags on the whole damn system at the time.


It's a song which perpetuates a lie in which a woman who committed numerous violent crimes is relabeled as innocent, mostly because of no reason other than a bunch of people insist that she was. She was *not* innocent and it's kinda sad to make a hero out of someone who was so casually violent. But sometimes you have to make such a big lie in order to cover the truth and so that no one looks too closely.

Quote:
Read the lyrics, then read the court case, then read the lyrics again....


Yeah. Read that. Also read a lot more about her than just that one case. What's wrong about the song is that it hypes and exaggerates claims about her mistreatment (many of which are just plain false like the claim that she was denied a lawyer), while utterly downplaying everything and anything which might cast her in a negative light:

Quote:
She untangled the chains and escaped the pain
How she broke out of prison I could never explain
And even to this day they try to get to her
but she's free with political asylum in Cuba.


Really? He could "never explain" how she broke out? Is that because he doesn't know? Or because he doesn't want to explain that 4 armed members of the black panthers used false IDs to sneak into the visitors section where she was held (and likely with some inside help since they were not searched when entering as they should have been), held multiple people at gunpoint, and broke her out. There's a whole lot of skipping over the details of just how many times she was involved in direct violent activities.

But if you mention that, then you have to explain how this "innocent" woman was so heavily connected with armed criminals that they'd pull off such a risky and dangerous plan to get her out. Why those guys must have all been good friends with spotless records themselves who decided to "do the right thing", right? Um... Wrong. The reality is that she was head deep in an ultra violent splinter group of the Black Panthers.


Quote:
(there is no proof that Assata was shot the cops, just a statement by a State Trooper, that he later said he had lied about and retracted it, that was the only thing linking her to killing the cops. The state trooper said he never saw her with a gun at all, and did not fire any shots.)

Quote:
Trooper Harper admitted to having lied in these reports and in his Grand Jury testimony about Trooper Foerster yelling and showing him an ammunition clip, about seeing Shakur holding a pocketbook or a gun inside the vehicle, and about Shakur shooting at him from the car. Trooper Harper retracted his previous statements and said that he had never seen Shakur with a gun, and that she did not shoot him


Yeah. What that account fails to clarify is that the parts he lied about had nothing to do with her guilt for the crimes she was convicted of. He made those admissions during cross-examination at her trial. She was convicted because there was overwhelming evidence of her guilt, not because one officer lied about some relatively minor aspects of the case. In the specific case, they only needed to prove she was an accomplice to the murder, not that she actually pulled the trigger. So the facts that are used to claim she was innocent were actually irrelevant to the case.


Donbayne wrote:
Never let the facts get in the way of a good story.


Or a good song apparently.
Turn all "her"s and "she"s into "his" and "he's" and this entire post was about Bob Dylan's Hurricane. Man, I love that song.
#76 May 17 2011 at 7:56 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Bob Dylan is different. No real reason, just cuz.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 496 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (496)