paulsol wrote:
What if he was being hidden by the Saudis?
·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- osama bin laden dead
osama bin laden deadFollow
What if he was being hidden by the Smurfs?
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
lolgaxe wrote:
paulsol wrote:
What if he was being hidden by the Saudis?
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
Serious question. Idiot answer.
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.
lolgaxe wrote:
paulsol wrote:
What if he was being hidden by the Saudis?
This
Edited, May 10th 2011 5:10pm by Jophiel
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
paulsol wrote:
Serious question. Idiot answer.
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
Part of the problem is that Pakistan's information agencies are severely compromised by the Taliban anyway. So there was no way they would have "found" him, even if the central gov't had wanted to.
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people
lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#508gbaji,
Posted: May 10 2011 at 5:32 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Remember that this is in the context of conservative criticism of Obama's statement about being willing to invade Pakistan to get to terrorists. Notice that the primary criticism is not about doing it, but saying that you'd do it. That is the "I'm not going there" response from McCain. He's showing an awareness that if he answers with a clear positive, it'll only **** off an already annoyed Pakistan over this same issue.
"I'm not going to go there, and here's why, because Pakistan is a sovereign nation."
Meaning, "I'm not going to invade Pakistan in order to take OBL because it would be violating the sovereignty of their nation."
Meaning, "I'm not going to invade Pakistan in order to take OBL because it would be violating the sovereignty of their nation."
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people
lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
paulsol wrote:
Serious question. Idiot answer.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
gbaji wrote:
So he says he wont answer, and then says that he'd get bin Laden "no matter what it takes". That's the correct political answer because...
...it's absolutely meaningless and doesn't commit him to anything and tools can read it as "He'd totally do whatever I think he should do!" without him having to agree to doing that.
Understood.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#512gbaji,
Posted: May 10 2011 at 7:46 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) No. It's "I'm not going to say what I'd do because Pakistan is a sovereign nation and it's freaking impolite to publicly state that you'll just run right over them and launch a military attack in their country".
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
So he says he wont answer, and then says that he'd get bin Laden "no matter what it takes". That's the correct political answer because...
...it's absolutely meaningless and doesn't commit him to anything and tools can read it as "He'd totally do whatever I think he should do!" without him having to agree to doing that.
And it also doesn't publicly embarrass a country we're trying to work with. What part of that is hard for any of you to understand?
Quote:
Understood.
Apparently not.
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
gbaji wrote:
And it also doesn't publicly embarrass a country we're trying to work with. What part of that is hard for any of you to understand?
I suppose the part where you **** yourself in fear while coddling an "ally" who was, frankly, a complete embarrassment until Obama came into office and changed the administration's tone towards their bullshit.
Quote:
Quote:
Understood.
No, trust me. It was understood.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Quote:
No. It's "I'm not going to say what I'd do because Pakistan is a sovereign nation and it's freaking impolite to publicly state that you'll just run right over them and launch a military attack in their country".
I know it's more fun for the left to spin this differently, but that is absolutely what he meant. Conservatives did not criticize Obama because he *would* go into Pakistan to get OBL. They criticized him for being dumb enough to actually say he'd do so ahead of time. You really have to buy a line of BS to think otherwise.
I know it's more fun for the left to spin this differently, but that is absolutely what he meant. Conservatives did not criticize Obama because he *would* go into Pakistan to get OBL. They criticized him for being dumb enough to actually say he'd do so ahead of time. You really have to buy a line of BS to think otherwise.
So you'd actually prefer a president who refuses to tell the people what he is and is not willing to do. You like ones who refuse to comment, so the people have no clue what direction the country is taking, until he just goes ahead and surprises everyone by making an aggressive intervention in a foreign, sovereign nation.
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people
lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
Recent Visitors: 404
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (404)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- osama bin laden dead
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC