Almalieque wrote:
I gave you a very simple answer and you chose not to accept it. That's your fault. I am strongly against anything going up anyone's **** for any sexual pleasure. I look how a male body is, how a female body is, how they correlate during sex and child reproduction. I look how none of that occurs with two people of the same sex. In my mind, the square block goes inside the square hole. That has nothing to do with religion, God or anything. If I were to lose my faith today in God, my opinion on homosexuality would not change. I don't care if a hidden verse reveals that it's ok to be gay.
You're saying, "People are uncomfortable with it," but you're not telling me
why. Why does it make you uncomfortable to think of something going up someone else's ****, when that person is a willing recipient? Who taught you that sex was only for reproduction? Why does it make you uncomfortable? I get that it makes you uncomfortable, but
why?
Almalieque wrote:
People like you just throw around religion as opposition because you know it holds no grounds in arguments. You're no better than the people who use religion as an excuse for their actions.
No, really. I can't see a reason why someone would be upset about this except that there has been religious ideology that has taught people from a very, very early age that homosexuals are yukky. I'm willing to keep an open mind here, but you're not really giving me any examples.
Almalieque wrote:
No, social science as comforting students that the changes that they maybe experience through puberty as taught in the class is normal. There is absolutely no reason for sexual orientation to have to come up. Doing so is your own personal agenda.
Sexual attraction is a part of puberty, genius.
Almalieque wrote:
I used 8th grade as an example. Ok, so let's say 6th grade. What good does it do if your kids are having sex in the 5th grade?
Most kids are going through puberty around the sixth grade. That's why that seems appropriate to me.
Almalieque wrote:
I imply that you were against parent involvement.
Then you're wrong.
Almalieque wrote:
You are simply arguing that teachers should have more authority than they should and parents have too much power. I'm arguing the opposite.
Wait. This makes no sense whatsoever. I have never said that parents have "too much power," that's idiotic. And how much authority "should" teachers have? Isn't that rather subjective? And who said anything about authority?? You're acting like I'm suggesting that a teacher should have to tell kids that they have to engage in homosexual behavior to get a good grade.
Sh
it like this is why people get frustrated with you. You make some crap up in your head then try to argue it when none of that is what we're talking about.
Almalieque wrote:
No one is terrified of sex. People are terrified of the outcomes of sex and the responsibility that comes along with it.
And heaven forbid that we have a sex-ed class that teaches them how to be responsible. Especially since a lot of these kids aren't getting this information at home, even when they should be. You want to stick your head in the sand and pretend that every parent everywhere is talking to their kid about sex and that simply isn't happening.
Edited, Apr 25th 2011 5:42pm by Belkira