Unfortunately I don't have time to watch that right now, but hopefully I'll get to it later. My understanding of the parallel universes theory (sorry-- "hypothesis" for the pedants) is that it differs significantly from theories about multiple universes on the same time/space dimension that we're on. But I'm certainly no astrophysicist/astronomer.
As it is impossible for science to create a logical explanation of something coming from nothing (because the very statement brings open another question mark), at one point of time, something supernatural had to occur. This makes it possible for a higher being.
Again, this assumes that something was created from nothing. Never in the history of science has this been witnessed-- in fact, we have scientific laws that say that it doesn't happen (e.g., conservation of matter, conservation of energy). Some scientists posit/support exceptions for the Big Bang-- others don't.
As best we can tell, the universe has always existed. The confusion for many people is that there's a difference between the universe and the universe as we know it
. For example, we know that the universe is expanding, but we have no basis for assuming that the expanding universe that we know of is all of the actual universe. What we think of as the universe could easily be only a tiny, isolated collection of cosmic masses and energies-- not even nearly everything. We have no reason to believe that other universes don't exist outside our limited powers of observation-- not even on some seemingly pseudoscientific quantum abstract fourth dimension-- just on the same temporal/spatial plane as what we think of as the universe. And do you know what might likely cause a Big Bang? Two "universes" colliding, which is an inevitability even if there are only two of them. Edited, Apr 29th 2011 1:57pm by Kachi
Ok, now we're going to get slash fiction of Wint x Kachi somehere... rule 34 and all...
Never confuse your inference as the listener for an implication of the speaker.
Good games are subjective like good food is subjective. You're not going to seriously tell me that there's not a psychological basis for why pizza is great and lutefisk is revolting. The thing about subjectivity is that, as subjects go, humans actually have a great deal in common.