·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Atheism or agnosticism?
Atheism or agnosticism?Follow
Oh snap, you sure got me!
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.
LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
Nilatai wrote:
Oh snap, you sure got me!
Ultimate burn.
Ailitardif wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
Oh snap, you sure got me!
Ultimate burn.
Remember kids, when in doubt, ad hominem.
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.
LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
#330Almalieque,
Posted: May 02 2011 at 1:36 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Given the fact I didn't say that, I stand by my statement. I'm not sure where you guys come up with this complete nonsense. Like I said, no wonder you think I'm so stupid. If I didn't restate my argument multiple times over, you would have a "by".
Almalieque wrote:
It wasn't planned and they were doing the "pull-out" method, so it wasn't completely careless.
This is a joke and I'm missing it, right? Please say yes.
Majivo wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
It wasn't planned and they were doing the "pull-out" method, so it wasn't completely careless.
This is a joke and I'm missing it, right? Please say yes.
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.
LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
Ailitardif wrote:
That wasn't you? Someone has been posting from your account then.
Or you just don't know what you're talking about. I've been the one arguing the difference between discriminating against one's sex/skin color (physical trait) vs a sexuality (personality trait). I spent pages arguing it, so I'm fairly confident in my claim.
Nilatai wrote:
The issue at hand is you wanting to put the decision of whether a woman has an abortion or not in the hands of a man.
Please quote me saying that or STFU.
Nilatai wrote:
The laws on child support exist because of people like you. Deadbeat dads.
How is taking care of kids that aren't even mine make me a "dead beat dad".. Dead beat dads FAVOR abortion, that way they don't have to be responsible for their actions. Nice try though...
Nilatai wrote:
Why would anyone have an abortion? A number of reasons, health issues, social pressures, economic factors. Why does it matter why someone wants one?
If the foetus was going to die any way, getting an abortion would be redundant. What's your point?
If the foetus was going to die any way, getting an abortion would be redundant. What's your point?
My point is that it has nothing to do with the fetus, but the child. You don't care about the "life" of the fetus, that isn't your concern, so don't pretend that abortion isn't about raising children, because that's exactly what it is. So, the two are together.
For the exception of health factors, which I differentiated, all of your reasons deal with raising children.
Nilatai wrote:
Majivo wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
It wasn't planned and they were doing the "pull-out" method, so it wasn't completely careless.
And my family wonders why I stopped.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Quote:
I think I'm being really reasonable here. I'm just against people having abortions all willy nilly.
Donate. One day it could be your family.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
Almalieque wrote:
Please quote me saying that or STFU.
Almalieque wrote:
How is taking care of kids that aren't even mine make me a "dead beat dad".. Dead beat dads FAVOR abortion, that way they don't have to be responsible for their actions. Nice try though...
Almalieque wrote:
My point is that it has nothing to do with the fetus, but the child. You don't care about the "life" of the fetus, that isn't your concern, so don't pretend that abortion isn't about raising children, because that's exactly what it is. So, the two are together.
For the exception of health factors, which I differentiated, all of your reasons deal with raising children.
For the exception of health factors, which I differentiated, all of your reasons deal with raising children.
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.
LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
lolgaxe wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
Majivo wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
It wasn't planned and they were doing the "pull-out" method, so it wasn't completely careless.
And my family wonders why I stopped.
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.
LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
lolgaxe wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
Majivo wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
It wasn't planned and they were doing the "pull-out" method, so it wasn't completely careless.
And my family wonders why I stopped.
... pulling out?
Nilatai wrote:
Oh! Duh. Rhythm method is the only form of contraception allowed by the Vatican. Although they do let you use condoms if there is significant risk of HIV/AIDS now, so I guess there's something.
Not true. The pope said that if you're already knowingly going to commit a sin, at least be as safe as possible when it comes to HIV/AIDS.
LockeColeMA wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
Majivo wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
It wasn't planned and they were doing the "pull-out" method, so it wasn't completely careless.
And my family wonders why I stopped.
Genesis 38 wrote:
9 And Onan knew that the seed should not be his; and it came to pass, when he went in unto his brother's wife, that he spilled [it] on the ground, lest that he should give seed to his brother. 10 And the thing which he did displeased the LORD: wherefore he slew him also.
Edited, May 2nd 2011 4:06pm by lolgaxe
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
lolgaxe wrote:
LockeColeMA wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
Majivo wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
It wasn't planned and they were doing the "pull-out" method, so it wasn't completely careless.
And my family wonders why I stopped.
Uglysasquatch wrote:
Quote:
I think I'm being really reasonable here. I'm just against people having abortions all willy nilly.
Edited, May 2nd 2011 3:08pm by bsphil
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
Bardalicious wrote:
is that the whole "better in a ***** than on the ground" thing?
bsphil wrote:
I don't think anyone is for having abortions be that casual of a decision.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
lolgaxe wrote:
LockeColeMA wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
Majivo wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
It wasn't planned and they were doing the "pull-out" method, so it wasn't completely careless.
And my family wonders why I stopped.
Genesis 38 wrote:
9 And Onan knew that the seed should not be his; and it came to pass, when he went in unto his brother's wife, that he spilled [it] on the ground, lest that he should give seed to his brother. 10 And the thing which he did displeased the LORD: wherefore he slew him also.
Edited, May 2nd 2011 4:06pm by lolgaxe
I meant to imply "and my family wonders why I stopped pulling out"
Darn interwebs, ruining my come-backs! Heh heh, "come-backs"
Man, god killed a lot of people in the old testament.
Also, is it incest to sleep with your daughter-in-law?
Also, is it incest to sleep with your daughter-in-law?
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
Almalieque wrote:
In this case, attending to the welfare of the child. Just because one woman has to do more work for her handicap child, it doesn't make her MORE responsible than a mother with a non-handicap child. No family is the same, so the amount of work will always differ. Being responsible is doing what you have to do to make ends meet. If that means that a man has to work two jobs, then so be it. That doesn't make him more or less responsible than a man who only works one job, but it does make him more responsible than a man who doesn't do anything. Even if the man is a stay home dad, as long as he is doing what is necessary for the welfare of the child, he is being equally as responsible as the guy who is working 2 jobs.
The mother attends to the welfare of the child far more than the man ever will. The burden of responsibility is never split evenly in this case, unless the child is adopted. I do have to laugh at you for your definition. A stay at home dad takes FAR more responsibility for the child than a dad who works 2 jobs. Both are admirable, no one is saying otherwise.
Almalieque wrote:
Fine, just don't go asking the man for any form of support for you or the child if he isn't going to have a say in the matter. It's YOUR choice and YOUR body.
Again, that dislike of women rears it's ugly head. It's starting to look like you don't like kids much, either. :(
Almalieque wrote:
What'spunishment to you isn't punishment to someone else.
Sure. And if a woman wants to have an abortion and you scream and yell because a man has no say in that, then you're trying to punish her by forcing her to carry a baby to term because a man wants it. Or you want her to bear the brunt of the responsibility for a mutual mistake and the kid has to suffer.
Almalieque wrote:
As I said, if this were some type of "disease" or your life were in danger, then you would have an argument of "punishment". In this case, the woman voluntarily chose to be placed in that situation. She isn't being "punished", she's undergoing a natural, normal and "moral" state that she accepted responsibility of when she decided to have sex.
Nope. Have to disagree with you there. Completely disagree, acutally.
Almalieque wrote:
My explanation is at the top of this post. Once again, you're arguing reactions as opposed to prevention. I'm not sure why you keep bringing up "having an abortion is a responsible decision" when I keep freakin telling you that I'm referencing to everything PRIOR to the pregnancy, i.e. sex. If you have an unwanted pregnancy, then chances are, you were already irresponsible.
No, I already pointed out to you that you aren't talking about anything prior to having sex.
Almalieque wrote:
But, to be fair, I can see where you are going.. So, give me scenarios where it would be "responsible" to have an abortion?
Any case where the child is not wanted. Having an abortion is a responsible course of action.
Almalieque wrote:
Given the fact I didn't say that, I stand by my statement. I'm not sure where you guys come up with this complete nonsense. Like I said, no wonder you think I'm so stupid. If I didn't restate my argument multiple times over, you would have a "by".
I don't know what a "by" is. You're saying that a couple should mutually decide if an abortion should take place. Well, what if the man wants to keep the baby and the woman doesn't want it? Following your logic, she should have to have the baby and hand it over to the man, then have her hands washed free of it, and not be forced to pay any support for said child. Right...? Otherwise, you can't claim that you're advocating completely equality here. I mean, you can't technically claim that anyway, but you seem to think you can.
varusword75 wrote:
belkira,
Why limit this course of action to a fetus? Murder is murder regardless of how you justify it in your tiny little brain.
Quote:
Any case where the child is not wanted. Having an abortion is a responsible course of action.
Why limit this course of action to a fetus? Murder is murder regardless of how you justify it in your tiny little brain.
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.
LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
Nadenu wrote:
My only question is why the fUck are we even discussing this?? Pro-lifers will never change their minds. Which is why I say we should send all unwanted children to them to raise.
Nadenu wrote:
Nadenu wrote:
My only question is why the fUck are we even discussing this?? Pro-lifers will never change their minds. Which is why I say we should send all unwanted children to them to raise.
Same reason we talk about anything around here, I 'spect. Boredom.
And I agree with sending unwanted kids to pro-lifers.
Recent Visitors: 338
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (338)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Atheism or agnosticism?
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC