Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 4 Next »
Reply To Thread

Food Inc.Follow

#77 Apr 22 2011 at 5:56 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Jophiel wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
Chicago is probably the only other city I'd voluntarily want to live in.

Are there cities you'd want to live in against your will?
Haven't we all dreamed of being jailed in SF?
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#78 Apr 22 2011 at 6:22 AM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
So why are cows fed corn anyway?
#79 Apr 22 2011 at 6:24 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Cheap and you can store/bring a pile of corn to them more easily than a pile of grass.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#80 Apr 22 2011 at 6:43 AM Rating: Good
***
2,069 posts
Nadenu wrote:
So why are cows fed corn anyway?


It has more to do with energy than price. Grass isn't expensive in itself, but corn has more energy which makes the cows grow faster to slaughter sooner. Grass feeding cows makes them grow slower which makes it more expensive in the long run. I think corn fed cows are slaughtered at 1.5 years and grass is around 4 years.
____________________________
http://www.marriageissogay.com/

Song of the day:
May 26, 2011 -- Transplants
#81 Apr 22 2011 at 6:49 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Nadenu wrote:
So why are cows fed corn anyway?
Some might say it's because the government subsidizes corn production. This presumably makes the price of corn less than it's actual production costs.

Also corn is a good filler. Puts lots of weight on cows fast.

A trick out here on the coast is fattening your clams and mussels by feeding them corn meal for a day before steaming. It supposedly causes them to **** out some of the gritty sea-ish mud from the tummy as well. Still, others will claim that without that mud in the clam tummy, the bi-valve isn't nearly as tasty.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#82 Apr 22 2011 at 6:51 AM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Ailitardif, Star Breaker wrote:
TirithRR the Eccentric wrote:
I'm crying for the cows.

Wait, no I'm not, I'm eating my nice thick, tasty, porterhouse steak.


If that steak was grass-fed, it would taste even better.


I buy whole/half cows from my Aunt. This last one was not fed much feed, instead foraging for it's own in the fields. Being that it was too expensive to buy grain for it. But usually the ones fed grain in the barns (I'm not a farmer, I don't know the details/terminology) are better tasting. Probably because they are fatter. She doesn't raise them on corn.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#83 Apr 22 2011 at 9:42 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
paulsol wrote:
Cows are completely unable to digest corn naturally. A diet of corn causes diarrhea, ulcers, bloat, liver disease and a general weakening of the immune system that leaves the cow open to everything from pneumonia to feedlot polio.

Is that why livestock farms smell so bad?
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#84 Apr 26 2011 at 11:11 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
So here's a new twist to the corporate food ishewww.

The public is getting educated. The demand for fresh local food goes up. Local entrepreneurial farmers attempting to meet that demand are, allegedly - at least around here, being stymied by federal and state regulation. The same regs that are purportedly NOT sufficient to keep our food and workers safe from the profit-hungry multi-nationals. STORY

What to do, what to do???
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#85 Apr 26 2011 at 12:14 PM Rating: Good
@#%^
*****
15,953 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
Chicago is probably the only other city I'd voluntarily want to live in.
Are there cities you'd want to live in against your will?
Tokyo would have to be against my will, because that's where my inlaws are. Smiley: mad


Well, that and the radiation.
____________________________
"I have lost my way
But I hear a tale
About a heaven in Alberta
Where they've got all hell for a basement"

#86 Apr 26 2011 at 1:35 PM Rating: Good
Elinda wrote:
So here's a new twist to the corporate food ishewww.

The public is getting educated. The demand for fresh local food goes up. Local entrepreneurial farmers attempting to meet that demand are, allegedly - at least around here, being stymied by federal and state regulation. The same regs that are purportedly NOT sufficient to keep our food and workers safe from the profit-hungry multi-nationals. STORY

What to do, what to do???

You mean over-regulation by "well-intentioned" liberals leads to unintended consequences?

Who'd have thought, what with nothing in the recent past showing "well-intentioned" liberals f'uck things up. You know what? They should totally get involved in the lending industry next. They should outlaw red-lining and force banks to make loans to people who can't pay them back.
1 2 3 4 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 357 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (357)