varusword75 wrote:
When I say pinko commy
·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Obama should give back his tax refund
Obama should give back his tax refundFollow
Urge to watch "Wait Til Your Father Gets Home."
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
varusword75 wrote:
bsphil,
When I say pinko commy it's phrases like this that validate that statement. It doesn't f*cking matter if a plan is good or bad for the people only if it's constitutional. Violating anothers right to own property because you like the plan infuriates people that actually work hard for obtaining the things they want/desire. You're denying a persons right to pursue happiness based on nothing more than your personal social whims on what you believe is good for most of the people.
If most of the people refuse to work do they still "deserve" public assistance? H*ll we already have half the population not paying federal income taxes (and don't kid yourself most of them are liberal democrats).
Edited, Apr 20th 2011 10:43am by varusword75
Quote:
Of course, I'm not going to be paying extra in taxes for what I believe is a good government program, because I'm not the person suggesting that. According to the rule, if you didn't want the plan you don't have to support it, right? lol
When I say pinko commy it's phrases like this that validate that statement. It doesn't f*cking matter if a plan is good or bad for the people only if it's constitutional. Violating anothers right to own property because you like the plan infuriates people that actually work hard for obtaining the things they want/desire. You're denying a persons right to pursue happiness based on nothing more than your personal social whims on what you believe is good for most of the people.
If most of the people refuse to work do they still "deserve" public assistance? H*ll we already have half the population not paying federal income taxes (and don't kid yourself most of them are liberal democrats).
Edited, Apr 20th 2011 10:43am by varusword75
Come on, you can't make statements like that and not back them up.
Example: no conservative has ever paid taxes.
See? I can say it, but it isn't true. Please give your sources when you make statements like that.
varusword75 wrote:
bsphil,
When I say pinko commy it's phrases like this that validate that statement. It doesn't f*cking matter if a plan is good or bad for the people only if it's constitutional. Violating anothers right to own property because you like the plan infuriates people that actually work hard for obtaining the things they want/desire. You're denying a persons right to pursue happiness based on nothing more than your personal social whims on what you believe is good for most of the people.
Quote:
Of course, I'm not going to be paying extra in taxes for what I believe is a good government program, because I'm not the person suggesting that. According to the rule, if you didn't want the plan you don't have to support it, right? lol
When I say pinko commy it's phrases like this that validate that statement. It doesn't f*cking matter if a plan is good or bad for the people only if it's constitutional. Violating anothers right to own property because you like the plan infuriates people that actually work hard for obtaining the things they want/desire. You're denying a persons right to pursue happiness based on nothing more than your personal social whims on what you believe is good for most of the people.
Oh please, don't start acting like you care about the constitution now.
Quote:
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States
Bam, done.
Edited, Apr 20th 2011 10:54am by LockeColeMA
varusword75 wrote:
bsphil,
When I say pinko commy it's phrases like this that validate that statement. It doesn't f*cking matter if a plan is good or bad for the people only if it's constitutional. Violating anothers right to own property because you like the plan infuriates people that actually work hard for obtaining the things they want/desire. You're denying a persons right to pursue happiness based on nothing more than your personal social whims on what you believe is good for most of the people.
If most of the people refuse to work do they still "deserve" public assistance? H*ll we already have half the population not paying federal income taxes (and don't kid yourself most of them are liberal democrats).
Quote:
Of course, I'm not going to be paying extra in taxes for what I believe is a good government program, because I'm not the person suggesting that. According to the rule, if you didn't want the plan you don't have to support it, right? lol
When I say pinko commy it's phrases like this that validate that statement. It doesn't f*cking matter if a plan is good or bad for the people only if it's constitutional. Violating anothers right to own property because you like the plan infuriates people that actually work hard for obtaining the things they want/desire. You're denying a persons right to pursue happiness based on nothing more than your personal social whims on what you believe is good for most of the people.
If most of the people refuse to work do they still "deserve" public assistance? H*ll we already have half the population not paying federal income taxes (and don't kid yourself most of them are liberal democrats).
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
bsphil wrote:
Belkira wrote:
TirithRR the Eccentric wrote:
Ailitardif, Star Breaker wrote:
Fox News, conservative company, paid only 6% in taxes.
Disney, liberal company, paid 31% in taxes.
Conservatives pay more? No, they pay as little as possible.
Disney, liberal company, paid 31% in taxes.
Conservatives pay more? No, they pay as little as possible.
Wait... Disney is liberal?
They employ gay people and had a "gay day" (or something) at the park. The Southern Baptists have been boycotting them ever since.
They also show women as a strong character in their princess movies more and more.
They also released Wall-E which was a pro-environmentalist movement type movie.
I have no idea if they're liberal or not, I was just throwing some stuff out there as to why someone might suggest they are.
Belkira wrote:
bsphil wrote:
Belkira wrote:
TirithRR the Eccentric wrote:
Ailitardif, Star Breaker wrote:
Fox News, conservative company, paid only 6% in taxes.
Disney, liberal company, paid 31% in taxes.
Conservatives pay more? No, they pay as little as possible.
Disney, liberal company, paid 31% in taxes.
Conservatives pay more? No, they pay as little as possible.
Wait... Disney is liberal?
They employ gay people and had a "gay day" (or something) at the park. The Southern Baptists have been boycotting them ever since.
They also show women as a strong character in their princess movies more and more.
They also released Wall-E which was a pro-environmentalist movement type movie.
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
bsphil wrote:
I don't really care whether they are or not, anyway.
Well, then.
LockeColeMA wrote:
Quote:
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States
The General Welfare Clause is what makes those little "Have to provide Constitutional justification!" rules symbolic at best. Everything just winds up with the clause tacked on to the bottom.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
bsphil wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
bsphil,
When I say pinko commy it's phrases like this that validate that statement. It doesn't f*cking matter if a plan is good or bad for the people only if it's constitutional. Violating anothers right to own property because you like the plan infuriates people that actually work hard for obtaining the things they want/desire. You're denying a persons right to pursue happiness based on nothing more than your personal social whims on what you believe is good for most of the people.
If most of the people refuse to work do they still "deserve" public assistance? H*ll we already have half the population not paying federal income taxes (and don't kid yourself most of them are liberal democrats).
Quote:
Of course, I'm not going to be paying extra in taxes for what I believe is a good government program, because I'm not the person suggesting that. According to the rule, if you didn't want the plan you don't have to support it, right? lol
When I say pinko commy it's phrases like this that validate that statement. It doesn't f*cking matter if a plan is good or bad for the people only if it's constitutional. Violating anothers right to own property because you like the plan infuriates people that actually work hard for obtaining the things they want/desire. You're denying a persons right to pursue happiness based on nothing more than your personal social whims on what you believe is good for most of the people.
If most of the people refuse to work do they still "deserve" public assistance? H*ll we already have half the population not paying federal income taxes (and don't kid yourself most of them are liberal democrats).
Good God, this video is making me pissed at some folks. Weiner is freaking awesome. I can see why he ticks off a lot of people - he's pedantic as all hell. But dammit, he's also right, and he's actually putting up a fight.
LockeColeMA wrote:
...he's pedantic as all hell. But dammit, he's also right, and he's actually putting up a fight.
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
varusword75 wrote:
Pinko commy.
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
varusword75 wrote:
Locked,
So in your opinion this allows the govn to pretty much take whatever it likes from it's citizens whenever and however it wants?
Pinko commy.
Quote:
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States
So in your opinion this allows the govn to pretty much take whatever it likes from it's citizens whenever and however it wants?
Pinko commy.
if he was really a commy, you wouldn't be posting here.
Quote:
You're denying a persons right to pursue happiness based on nothing more than your personal social whims on what you believe is good for most of the people.
Ya well you are denying a persons right to pursue happiness based on the conservative notion that people only find happiness in personal success. News flash some people find happiness in the success and well being of others. You commie ******* denying people the right to have others feel happy when others are being helped.
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.
bsphil wrote:
Belkira wrote:
TirithRR the Eccentric wrote:
Ailitardif, Star Breaker wrote:
Fox News, conservative company, paid only 6% in taxes.
Disney, liberal company, paid 31% in taxes.
Conservatives pay more? No, they pay as little as possible.
Disney, liberal company, paid 31% in taxes.
Conservatives pay more? No, they pay as little as possible.
Wait... Disney is liberal?
They employ gay people and had a "gay day" (or something) at the park. The Southern Baptists have been boycotting them ever since.
They also show women as a strong character in their princess movies more and more.
They also released Wall-E which was a pro-environmentalist movement type movie.
The headscarf is most certainly not a burqa, fyi.
varusword75 wrote:
r2d2,
wow! So by seeking personal success i'm denying another persons right to pursue happiness. Yep you definitly voted for Obama.
Quote:
you are denying a persons right to pursue happiness based on the conservative notion that people only find happiness in personal success.
wow! So by seeking personal success i'm denying another persons right to pursue happiness. Yep you definitly voted for Obama.
Donate. One day it could be your family.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
bsphil wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
Pinko commy.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
rdmcandie wrote:
Quote:
You're denying a persons right to pursue happiness based on nothing more than your personal social whims on what you believe is good for most of the people.
Ya well you are denying a persons right to pursue happiness based on the conservative notion that people only find happiness in personal success. News flash some people find happiness in the success and well being of others. You commie ******* denying people the right to have others feel happy when others are being helped.
No, no, no. We are the commies, they are *****.
Sweetums wrote:
bsphil wrote:
Belkira wrote:
TirithRR the Eccentric wrote:
Ailitardif, Star Breaker wrote:
Fox News, conservative company, paid only 6% in taxes.
Disney, liberal company, paid 31% in taxes.
Conservatives pay more? No, they pay as little as possible.
Disney, liberal company, paid 31% in taxes.
Conservatives pay more? No, they pay as little as possible.
Wait... Disney is liberal?
They employ gay people and had a "gay day" (or something) at the park. The Southern Baptists have been boycotting them ever since.
They also show women as a strong character in their princess movies more and more.
They also released Wall-E which was a pro-environmentalist movement type movie.
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
Dear Varus:
EG, you get a better chance at pursuing your own happiness when you live in a highly civil society where police, defence, education, healthcare and a welfare safety net for those who have fallen on hard times* is provided and paid for by taxes.
*So that in the absence of an employer who wants them or a physical ability to work at all, they do not have to turn to crime or prostitution
Wikipedia wrote:
Enlightened self-interest is a philosophy in ethics which states that persons who act to further the interests of others (or the interests of the group or groups to which they belong), ultimately serve their own self-interest.[1][2][3]
It has often been simply expressed by the belief that an individual, group, or even a commercial entity will "do well by doing good".[4][5]
It has often been simply expressed by the belief that an individual, group, or even a commercial entity will "do well by doing good".[4][5]
EG, you get a better chance at pursuing your own happiness when you live in a highly civil society where police, defence, education, healthcare and a welfare safety net for those who have fallen on hard times* is provided and paid for by taxes.
*So that in the absence of an employer who wants them or a physical ability to work at all, they do not have to turn to crime or prostitution
bsphil wrote:
My bad, don't know much about the variations of Islamic clothing.
varusword75 wrote:
Locked,
So in your opinion this allows the govn to pretty much take whatever it likes from it's citizens whenever and however it wants?
Pinko commy.
Quote:
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States
So in your opinion this allows the govn to pretty much take whatever it likes from it's citizens whenever and however it wants?
Pinko commy.
No, it's my opinion that you can't pick and choose what part of the Constitution to follow and claim it as your basis for an argument. Which is what you did. Heck, you yourself just said:
Quote:
It doesn't f*cking matter if a plan is good or bad for the people only if it's constitutional.
varusword75 wrote:
Paula,
This is where liberalism fails. All wars are not the same. Lybia and Iraq are different.
Quote:
That would have worked better if Obama wasn't so obviously following on from exactly where Dubya left off....
This is where liberalism fails. All wars are not the same. Lybia and Iraq are different.
Its true! You took 8 years to learn how to spell Iraq!
War. Teaching geography to Americans for 200 years....
Or did you mean 'labia'. In which case..well spotted Sir!
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.
Recent Visitors: 362
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (362)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Obama should give back his tax refund
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC