paulsol wrote:
And you dont say why you are so keen to help the Libyans, as opposed to the Bahrainis/Saudis/Burmese etc.
Sure I did. I noted that we had a much greater chance for success (well, did) in Libya. Then you started in with "Oh ho! You'll only help people when you think you might win!" because that's so much worse than refusing to help anyone at all.
Quote:
And your suggestion in bringing peace to an area is to use more weapons. Awesome logic.
Sure. You know, to disable the ones being used to kill the rebels? You know, how every report in the last week about the rebels losing ground attributed it to rocket and fighter attacks? The same ones that had Libyans begging for support? Silly me, they were probably asking for something
besides weapons!
Quote:
I guess there's some money to be made tho'. More jobs for the US?
Yup, me with my long record of war-mongering for the benefit of the military-industrial complex. You got me.
Quote:
Its not my fault you have no imagination.
It's your fault that you'd rather let them die though, so you have at least one area for improvement.