Noooo... you're not a homophobe at all!
Wow, you're a tool... so, now thinking that someone's *** make you a homophobe as well? I guess there's no limit to the stupidity of that word. Hmmmm. I think that you're white, does that make me racist?
You people need to grow up, this is life. I can talk about being black, white, man, woman, heterosexual, homosexual, Muslim, Jewish, etc. without any negative connotation.
Sir X wrote:
Oh, so the privacy isn't actually your argument then. I don't see the connection making the same as with women, please explain how this is.
No, I'm telling you it's a privacy issue and you want more detail than I can give. So, instead of me making stuff up, something that you all are so very use to doing, I'm telling you to ask a female. This is because the best response I can give is "it's the same privacy issue with women and men".
Sir X wrote:
If you didn't treat someone differently based on what you thought about them, why would what you thought being true or not change how you treat someone?
Dude, what part of ASSUMPTION don't you understand?
Have you seen the movie Crash? Sometimes your stereotyping is accurate, sometimes it isn't. You shouldn't just go around judging people based off stuff that you aren't sure on.
Besides, that's the beauty of DADT, even if an individual DID treat someone differently, that individual can't say "I don't want to room with him/her b/c s/he's ***" with no proof.