Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Senate Repeals DADTFollow

#27 Dec 19 2010 at 8:12 PM Rating: Excellent
****
5,684 posts
Nadenu wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Iddigory wrote:
And it's no different than if you showered at a gym.

And guess what, no one who isn't brain dead should care in the first place. Why? Because you are delusional if you think every *** guy wants to have *** with you.


Oh, yea that's right, *** men aren't attracted to men... what was I thinking.... o.O... I thought by now people would drop that stupid argument. So, I guess you think heterosexual men aren't attracted to lesbians?


Holy sh*t, this has got to be the most stupid argument from you ever. And that's saying a lot.

And don't fuCking ask me to explain.
As a *** man I must point out that I'm attracted to and want to **** anything even remotely manlike.

Watch out Ann Coulter, here I come.
____________________________
Almalieque wrote:
I admit that I was wrong

God bless Lili St. Cyr
#28 Dec 19 2010 at 8:16 PM Rating: Excellent
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,020 posts
Message has high abuse count and will not be displayed.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#29Almalieque, Posted: Dec 19 2010 at 8:25 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Idiggory,
#30 Dec 19 2010 at 8:26 PM Rating: Excellent
Sniping Sweetpea
*****
18,463 posts
Christ, this place attracts tards like lanterns do lightning bugs.
____________________________
That's the kind of dude
I was lookin' for
And yes you'll get slapped
if you're lookin', ho

#31 Dec 19 2010 at 8:31 PM Rating: Excellent
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,020 posts
Quote:
Idiggory,

I'm not going to waste any more time with you. You asked a question, I gave you the answer. If you don't like that answer or believe it's true, then that's a personal problem. It is what it is.

I never argued about the history of DADT and admitted that there are people who are ignorant, I responded based on my personal experience, because that's all I can go on.


Then don't claim that your antagonists are making stuff up to suit their needs, when you don't even have a fucking clue (ADMITTEDLY) and aren't even willing to educate yourself when someone GIVES YOU SOURCES. And PS, claiming that I was wrong regarding why people were opposing DADT is arguing about its history.

Because, guess what, you have NO personal experience in this matter. You chatting with a friend about it doesn't suddenly give you insight to some issue.

And, PS, not liking the answer to a question is only a personal problem if your answer is correct. Yours isn't. Goodbye.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#32Almalieque, Posted: Dec 19 2010 at 8:36 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I have faith that they will also. Like I said, it's all politics. If the big wigs in the military were really for repealing the DADT, then they would have done it a while back.
#33 Dec 19 2010 at 8:38 PM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Almalieque wrote:
Nadenu wrote:
Holy sh*t, this has got to be the most stupid argument from you ever. And that's saying a lot.

And don't @#%^ing ask me to explain.


There's nothing for you to explain as you just made up stuff to counter. Thanks for pointing that out and saving me the time from asking you to explain. Straight men don't suddenly think a beautiful lady isn't attractive after finding out that she's a *******. Women don't suddenly think a handsome guy isn't attractive after finding out that he's ***. What makes you think it would change between two people of the same ***? That biologically doesn't make sense.


None of this is the point. God, you're thick.
#34Almalieque, Posted: Dec 19 2010 at 8:40 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Didn't know being in the military with homosexuals didn't count as personal experience... This is why I'm not wasting my time debating your "logic". You're pulling up sources from the past and stuff and I'm talking about the present as I'm living it..
#35 Dec 19 2010 at 8:44 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,152 posts
Nadenu wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Nadenu wrote:
Holy sh*t, this has got to be the most stupid argument from you ever. And that's saying a lot.

And don't @#%^ing ask me to explain.


There's nothing for you to explain as you just made up stuff to counter. Thanks for pointing that out and saving me the time from asking you to explain. Straight men don't suddenly think a beautiful lady isn't attractive after finding out that she's a *******. Women don't suddenly think a handsome guy isn't attractive after finding out that he's ***. What makes you think it would change between two people of the same ***? That biologically doesn't make sense.


None of this is the point. God, you're thick.


Wait, wait, wait.. I make a statement, you respond back as that is the dumbest argument ever (haven't heard that before) I REPEAT what I said originally and you say that wasn't the point? HELLO!! I was the one who first made the point, if anyone here is thick, it's you...

Bard understood the point and interpreted your response the same way... so, I think you should try it again if you meant something else.
#36 Dec 19 2010 at 8:45 PM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
/facepalm
#37 Dec 19 2010 at 8:49 PM Rating: Excellent
Almalieque wrote:
1. The privacy issue is the exact same as having a man share close quarters with a woman.
What is the privacy issue that exists for a *** man that doesn't exist for a straight man? If you want to say it's the same as with a woman, explain the connection please.

Almalieque wrote:
2. Because they are assumptions. They aren't admitting that they are *** so you have nothing to argue against.
I don't see this as being a significant distinction. If you know someone is ***, then your attitude towards them shouldn't be different if they have explicitly admitted it. I don't buy that somehow them being allowed to admit it magically changes the way people think about a person.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#38 Dec 19 2010 at 8:50 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,020 posts
Message has high abuse count and will not be displayed.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#39 Dec 19 2010 at 8:52 PM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
I think Alma's upset that he's never been hit on by a *** man.

So sad.
#40 Dec 19 2010 at 8:54 PM Rating: Excellent
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,020 posts
If it wasn't alma, I'd volunteer to help. Maybe Bard will take one for the team.

Oh yeah, and @ alma, when the Pentagon released its report saying that the repeal of DADT would cause little to no immediate harm to the armed forces (and no extended harm), it also included a commentary on why the military SHOULDN'T segregate bathrooms.

Quote:
Though some troops suggested during the study that there should be separate bath and living facilities for gays, the report recommended against it because it would be a "logistical nightmare, expensive and impossible to administer."

Further, separate facilities would stigmatize gays and lesbians in the way that "separate but equal" facilities did to blacks before the 1960s, it said.


*cough*

Edited, Dec 19th 2010 10:01pm by idiggory
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#41Almalieque, Posted: Dec 19 2010 at 9:00 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Because you have no proof, you're just stereotyping. I would have bet $100 that this chick in my class was ***** with her friend and apparently I was wrong. I didn't treat her differently because I thought she was something. There's another guy who acts 120% flamming ***** besides talking to/about women. People still thinks he's a ****, but there isn't any proof to say otherwise. If you're spending that much time thinking about someone's sexuality, then you're wasting time.
#42 Dec 19 2010 at 9:06 PM Rating: Excellent
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,020 posts
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

A. You were SURE this girl in your class was a "*****" and you know another guy who's "flaming" and you think that people weren't treating them just as bad as if they had come out (even if they weren't?) Until my senior year, I was the *only* out kid in my school. Do you think I was the only one being mocked for being ***?

B. You are only showing how retarded you are if you refuse to read the rebuttles. I'm replying to what you said SPECIFICALLY. I completely understand WHAT you are saying--I'm telling you that you are wrong. The WISE thing to do is evaluate the opposition's argument and try to logically rebuttal. But I guess that basic skill is lost on you. That, or you just like maintaining ignorance.

Quote:
If you're spending that much time thinking about someone's sexuality, then you're wasting time.


That I agree on, which is precisely one of the reasons why I don't think segregated bathrooms matter.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#43 Dec 19 2010 at 9:11 PM Rating: Excellent
****
5,684 posts
idiggory wrote:
Maybe Bard will take one for the team.
I've already serviced a serviceman. Not sure what more you want me to do.
____________________________
Almalieque wrote:
I admit that I was wrong

God bless Lili St. Cyr
#44 Dec 19 2010 at 9:12 PM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Almalieque wrote:

Because you have no proof, you're just stereotyping. I would have bet $100 that this chick in my class was ***** with her friend and apparently I was wrong. I didn't treat her differently because I thought she was something. There's another guy who acts 120% flamming ***** besides talking to/about women. People still thinks he's a ****, but there isn't any proof to say otherwise. If you're spending that much time thinking about someone's sexuality, then you're wasting time.


Noooo... you're not a homophobe at all!
#45 Dec 19 2010 at 9:33 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,020 posts
My FAVORITE thing about the DADT repeal? How some Republican senators are so ****** off that it passed that they are now going to vote against the treaty with Russia out of spite. Lindsey Graham says she won't support it because she doesn't like democrats forcing votes on issues.

LOL WHAT? You are going to vote against a measure you originally supported because you are angry that the democratic congress is trying to vote on issues before we have a lame duck gov't on our hands?

Gotta love America.

:/
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#46 Dec 19 2010 at 10:10 PM Rating: Excellent
Almalieque wrote:
I made the connection by telling you it's the same as with women. If you want a better explanation, why don't you ask a woman who doesn't approve with showering with random men why she feels that way. I have no problem with that idea. Throw everybody together in the shower, I don't care...
Oh, so the privacy isn't actually your argument then. I don't see the connection making the same as with women, please explain how this is.

Almalieque wrote:
Sir X wrote:
I don't see this as being a significant distinction. If you know someone is ***, then your attitude towards them shouldn't be different if they have explicitly admitted it. I don't buy that somehow them being allowed to admit it magically changes the way people think about a person.
Because you have no proof, you're just stereotyping. I would have bet $100 that this chick in my class was ***** with her friend and apparently I was wrong. I didn't treat her differently because I thought she was something. There's another guy who acts 120% flamming ***** besides talking to/about women. People still thinks he's a ****, but there isn't any proof to say otherwise. If you're spending that much time thinking about someone's sexuality, then you're wasting time.
If you didn't treat someone differently based on what you thought about them, why would what you thought being true or not change how you treat someone?

Edited, Dec 19th 2010 10:10pm by Xsarus
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#47 Dec 19 2010 at 10:55 PM Rating: Decent
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
Good job lame duck session. Like de-segregation of the military, just one necessary step to take.
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#48 Dec 19 2010 at 10:59 PM Rating: Excellent
idiggory wrote:
Lindsey Graham says she won't support it because she doesn't like democrats forcing votes on issues.


Lindsey Graham's a dude. Granted, he has a girl's name, a southern accent, lacks ********** & fits the whole "christian conservative whom bangs male hookers but isn't really ***" profile so i can see how that would confuse you.

Screenshot


And Alma thinks gays are icky, which is fine as it is his right to do so. There is no need to "argue" with him about other reasons why he doesn't support DADT repeal, as the "Alma thinks Gays are icky" is the root cause & everything else is BS.

So please stop.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#49 Dec 20 2010 at 5:40 AM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Omegavegeta wrote:


And Alma thinks gays are icky, which is fine as it is his right to do so. There is no need to "argue" with him about other reasons why he doesn't support DADT repeal, as the "Alma thinks Gays are icky" is the root cause & everything else is BS.

So please stop.


Um, no.
#50 Dec 20 2010 at 5:46 AM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,373 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Canada, [...] ****, practically every other military on earth worth mentioning has figured out how to make it work. I'm sure we'll figure it out somehow.
Something's wrong with this.

Edited, Dec 20th 2010 8:19am by Uglysasquatch
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#51 Dec 20 2010 at 6:05 AM Rating: Excellent
Sniping Sweetpea
*****
18,463 posts
Omegavegeta wrote:


And Alma thinks gays are icky, which is fine as it is his right to do so. There is no need to "argue" with him about other reasons why he doesn't support DADT repeal, as the "Alma thinks Gays are icky" is the root cause & everything else is BS.

So please stop.


Whoa, sparklepony. Who died and made you Alla? I find it humorous that you are asking for a halt to upstanding debate (if you can call taunting a moran debate, which in here, you certainly can) when you yourself are sitting in the back of the metaphorical point bus.

The focus of his argument is the total lack of comprehension of what constitutes an enforceable policy or law vs. public ideology. Someone can think all day long that brown people are lawnmowing jobstealers who shoot out anchor babies like fireworks, but as long as they don't violate a policy or break a law by doing so, then I have jacksh*t to say about it. You can't regulate thought, so the fact that anyone thinks that gays are icky is FUCKING POINTLESS.

Suck it up, 'men'. Be happy that thinking some chick has a hot *** and you'd like to hit that won't get you accused of rape. Hooray, freedom from oppression.

Edit: @#%^ing filter



Edited, Dec 20th 2010 6:09am by Atomicflea
____________________________
That's the kind of dude
I was lookin' for
And yes you'll get slapped
if you're lookin', ho

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 79 All times are in CDT
Anonymous Guests (79)