Quote:
So I ask you, which is more damaging in the long run? Blatently playing the race card (to which the article in the OP lapped up with a spoon) or defending a ***** for doing what she does or giving a pass to a bunch of elitist pigs who should be excoriated for acting like the animals they are?
I'd say the worst damage will be the fresh re-opening of the wound that is our state of race relations, but maybe for not the reasons you might think. It's my belief that blacks are given carte blanc to make baseless accusations due to a historical fact and are their own worst enemy when it comes to ever correcting the wrongs that have been done them.
Her playing the race card, it will dilute the actual cases that hold merit. Prime example after I graduated my friend was shot and killed by an under cover police officer because he was Black and he said he had "stole" the car he was driving. One shot to the head, 5 witnesses in the car.
The officer had previous incidents, one where he punched a Black girl in the face cause her music was too loud in her car.
Now there was no NAACP, Jesse Jackson, or Al Sharpton coming to the aid of my friends family. Johnny Cochran did though, he worked as much as he could until his death. It took 3 yrs to get an indictment, and 2 to get him fired.
They are backing a suspicious incident, which to me doesn't hold merit. It which hurt us more than help. If Johnny Cochran had time to help, provided his service for free, you can't tell me no one else could have came. When we protested there was no one but the kids who we went to school with. And they back this girl with no DNA evidence, the only thing they have is she is Black and they are white, unbelievable. Like being raped by a Black guy would have made it better.(if it happened)
Edited, Tue Apr 18 16:09:10 2006 by kalaria Edited, Tue Apr 18 16:17:28 2006 by kalaria