Forum Settings
       
This thread is locked

KaolinFollow

#102 Apr 18 2006 at 9:09 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,677 posts
WHy do you call me RUDE?
That hurts ,and I think its very very mean :(
I think also you make me very angry ,so stop saying Im rude lol ;)
Don't be ashame if your a jealous ***** anyway Smiley: smile
#103 Apr 18 2006 at 9:11 AM Rating: Decent
Let me spell it for you :

JAWBOX IS A RUDE *******


Now sue me .
This is what YOU do all the time . Smiley: sly



____________________________
~**Meliana**~

#104 Apr 18 2006 at 9:12 AM Rating: Default
meliana the Meaningless wrote:
Let me spell it for you :

JAWBOX IS A RUDE *******


Now sue me .
This is what YOU do all the time . Smiley: sly


Stop ruining what was a pretty good read.
____________________________
The Statement Below is True
The Statement Above is False
#105 Apr 18 2006 at 9:14 AM Rating: Decent
Why on earth would i be jealous on YOU ?
Are you perhaps a chick in REAL LIFE too ?
Oh nos !!!!
I am soo scared right now ! Smiley: banghead
Chick or not ,i do NOT like it when people insult me .
That's all .
____________________________
~**Meliana**~

#106 Apr 18 2006 at 9:16 AM Rating: Good
****
5,677 posts
meliana the Meaningless wrote:
Let me spell it for you :

JAWBOX IS A RUDE *******


Now sue me .
This is what YOU do all the time . Smiley: sly




I dont think this is very nice ,because I never said anything mean to you :(
This thread is not about me being RUDE or somethjing ,so please just stop saying these things Smiley: mad
I think you are just being a jealous ***** ,and this is why you have to rate ppl down lol
#107 Apr 18 2006 at 9:18 AM Rating: Default
Quote:
I think you are just being a jealous ***** ,and this is why you have to rate ppl down lol


Do i have to spell it for you AGAIN ?
When did i rate people down ,except for Goldie over there ?
I rate them UP !
That's why YOU GUYS are rating me down all the time .
I do not care ,i care when people are being rude .
I thought you knew that by now Smiley: wink
____________________________
~**Meliana**~

#108 Apr 18 2006 at 9:25 AM Rating: Default
Don't you have anything better to do than complaining about other people's grammar mistakes and call people whores ?
And why do you continue saying that ?
Do you want me to rate you down ,so you can pretend you are crying ,is that it ?
Well ,im soo sorry ,but it wont happen.
I don't even bother to rate you down .
And fyi i am NOT a *****.
How many times do i have to say that ?

I am not a jealous ***** ,you are the only one being jealous right now.
You are jealous of me because i do NOT care about my karma ,because i actually have better things to do .
Right ? Smiley: sly

Edited, Tue Apr 18 10:28:15 2006 by meliana
____________________________
~**Meliana**~

#109 Apr 18 2006 at 9:25 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
meliana the Meaningless wrote:
Because i feel like everyone is complaining about her ,and i don't think that's fair .
Not at all.
I don't think it's fair that she slander an admin with lies just because she has a little girlie hard-on for him. Maybe the complaints about her are justified.

She still has yet to apologise for lying repeatedly about Kao and trying to paint him as a someone who violated child protection laws. Exactly what kind of "friends" do you keep?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#110 Apr 18 2006 at 9:37 AM Rating: Default
Internet Footsie Lawyer
*****
12,846 posts
Jophiel wrote:
meliana the Meaningless wrote:
Because i feel like everyone is complaining about her ,and i don't think that's fair .
Not at all.
I don't think it's fair that she slander an admin with lies just because she has a little girlie hard-on for him. Maybe the complaints about her are justified.

She still has yet to apologise for lying repeatedly about Kao and trying to paint him as a someone who violated child protection laws. Exactly what kind of "friends" do you keep?


Actually Jophial it hasnt been determined that he DIDNT violate a law - the only person here showing bad moral character would be yourself for defending him and for your friends who come here to terrorize people like Meliana.

I just asked a buddy who practicing criminal law in L.A. the question but I'm sure even hearing it from him wouldn't stop you from defending someone with such morally and legally corrupt behavior.

Edited, Tue Apr 18 10:40:21 2006 by niobia
____________________________
>.> heheheheh I am DF's sockpuppet.
rachelravage.us (somewhat NWS website)
http://www.guytalon.com/linger15.html My freeze Fetish DVD, on sale now! (WORK SAFE!)
http://venasevildolls.blogspot.com/ NWS
Niobia will establish a charity for orphaned mooses. (meese?) - Kao
ElneClare wrote:
So grow up folks and don't post anything you don't want your child to read. Doesn't matter if they are in diapers or adults, if it can upset them or you then it shouldn't be posted.
#111 Apr 18 2006 at 9:40 AM Rating: Default
Quote:
Exactly what kind of "friends" do you keep?


Friends that are there for me when i need it ?
Friends that do not say bad things about you ,and really cares about you ?
Yes i know this is only a god **** internet forum ,but i still see Nio as one of my friends here.
Yes i admit i don't know the whole story behind all this (again ,i know im a slacker) but all i see is that people keep saying these nasty ugly things about her.
No offense to you ,but these people YOU say Nio is lying about and talking **** about or whatever ,these are the same people rating ME down again and again and again.
These are the same people making fun of ME.
Tell me ,wouldn't you chose your friend also if you were me?

Again , i know there's nothing i can do about it.
So why bother ? *sigh* you are right tho Smiley: disappointed



____________________________
~**Meliana**~

#112 Apr 18 2006 at 9:43 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Again, although since you've repeatedly shown yourself to be willfully ignorant I have little hope in the matter, but the onus is on you, the accuser, to show that a law was violated. So far you tried a couple tacks and none of them have stood up.

One can not prove a negative. Asking someone to do so shows incredibly weak logic skills.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#113 Apr 18 2006 at 9:45 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
niobia the Fussy wrote:
I just asked a buddy who practicing criminal law in L.A. the question but I'm sure even hearing it from him wouldn't stop you from defending someone with such morally and legally corrupt behavior.
Sure. Have him cite the applicable law with Kao under its jurisdiction and previous precedent of the law being used to prosecute someone for a similar case.

Without those, you just have some anonymous voice on the net saying "It's a crime!" without any supporting evidence and we already have that in you.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#114niobia the Fussy, Posted: Apr 18 2006 at 9:46 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) The burden of evidence is on the accused to prove that they didn't violate the law - in the case of slander you would have to prove that Kaolian didn't intentionally reveal a childs I.P. address which does count as harassment and due to the user being a minor - CHild exploitation. Had the user not been a minor it would only be harassment (and that appears to go both ways)
#115 Apr 18 2006 at 9:50 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
niobia the Fussy wrote:
The burden of evidence is on the accused to prove that they didn't violate the law
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Oh my fu[Aqua][/Aqua]cking God, you are a retarded ignorant ****. Holy mother of God. That was... that was simply awesome. Congratulations, I almost never sig people but the breadth of your retardation made this just too good to pass up. Now I can get a good laugh from my sig after every time I post.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#116 Apr 18 2006 at 9:52 AM Rating: Good
Once again, the "child" does not have an IP address. Giving out the IP address is not illegal. If you have a modern PC, you can likely type nslookup on any PC name or domain name and get an ip addres. That can be freely given out.

I agree you will be laughed at if you try to go to court and claim that giving out the IP address of a PC is a breach of privacy laws.
#117 Apr 18 2006 at 9:52 AM Rating: Good
****
5,677 posts
I HEREBY ACCUSE MELIANA OF BEING A *****!

#118 Apr 18 2006 at 9:54 AM Rating: Default
Internet Footsie Lawyer
*****
12,846 posts
The One and Only Frakkor wrote:
Once again, the "child" does not have an IP address. Giving out the IP address is not illegal. If you have a modern PC, you can likely type nslookup on any PC name or domain name and get an ip addres. That can be freely given out.

I agree you will be laughed at if you try to go to court and claim that giving out the IP address of a PC is a breach of privacy laws.


The User was a child. thats like saying if you went on the internet to "chat up" minors to meet up for *** acts that it wasn't illegal because the account wasn't theirs.

Please refrain from foul language in the OOT jophiel, we at least have confirmed children that post here. I am sure a 50 year old gentleman such as yourself can find a more mature less abusive way to expressing himself and if you can't perhaps you may want to refrain from posting until you can learn a more appropriate way of speaking.

Edited, Tue Apr 18 11:02:04 2006 by niobia
____________________________
>.> heheheheh I am DF's sockpuppet.
rachelravage.us (somewhat NWS website)
http://www.guytalon.com/linger15.html My freeze Fetish DVD, on sale now! (WORK SAFE!)
http://venasevildolls.blogspot.com/ NWS
Niobia will establish a charity for orphaned mooses. (meese?) - Kao
ElneClare wrote:
So grow up folks and don't post anything you don't want your child to read. Doesn't matter if they are in diapers or adults, if it can upset them or you then it shouldn't be posted.
#119 Apr 18 2006 at 9:56 AM Rating: Good
*****
13,880 posts
Jophiel wrote:
niobia the Fussy wrote:
The burden of evidence is on the accused to prove that they didn't violate the law
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Oh my fu[Aqua][/Aqua]cking God, you are a retarded ignorant ****. Holy mother of God. That was... that was simply awesome. Congratulations, I almost never sig people but the breadth of your retardation made this just too good to pass up. Now I can get a good laugh from my sig after every time I post.
In soviet USA, you are guilty until proven innocent!
#120 Apr 18 2006 at 9:56 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quote:
I'm sure he will and since he practicies in California his information would reflect the laws that would affect the site in general since it is based out of L.A. - I did make sure to not give out the name of the site. He should be in court till about noon so I'm going to bet that when i return from Yoga I'll have a nice post for you (Shall I ask an FBI agent again?)
Given that Kao doesn't live in L.A. he couldn't have been breaking the local or state laws in California unless he was visiting at the time.

You keep mentioning the FBI so I assume you believe this violates a Federal statute. Feel free to cite it. I don't give a rat's *** who you ask, so long as they can cite law and (and precedent if the law isn't explicit about IP addresses).
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#121 Apr 18 2006 at 9:58 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
19,727 posts
Quote:
The same thrice banned for spamming Ragneros that also used to occasionally post from Florida State university library accounts?


Kids these days.
#122 Apr 18 2006 at 9:58 AM Rating: Default
Internet Footsie Lawyer
*****
12,846 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Quote:
I'm sure he will and since he practicies in California his information would reflect the laws that would affect the site in general since it is based out of L.A. - I did make sure to not give out the name of the site. He should be in court till about noon so I'm going to bet that when i return from Yoga I'll have a nice post for you (Shall I ask an FBI agent again?)
Given that Kao doesn't live in L.A. he couldn't have been breaking the local or state laws in California unless he was visiting at the time.

You keep mentioning the FBI so I assume you believe this violates a Federal statute. Feel free to cite it. I don't give a rat's *** who you ask, so long as they can cite law and (and precedent if the law isn't explicit about IP addresses).


The business is licensed in California therefor because Kaolian is a representative of Allakhazam, the website would be responsible for his actions since he was "on the job"

again please watch your language this is the OOT and we do have children here.
____________________________
>.> heheheheh I am DF's sockpuppet.
rachelravage.us (somewhat NWS website)
http://www.guytalon.com/linger15.html My freeze Fetish DVD, on sale now! (WORK SAFE!)
http://venasevildolls.blogspot.com/ NWS
Niobia will establish a charity for orphaned mooses. (meese?) - Kao
ElneClare wrote:
So grow up folks and don't post anything you don't want your child to read. Doesn't matter if they are in diapers or adults, if it can upset them or you then it shouldn't be posted.
#124 Apr 18 2006 at 10:01 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
The User was a child. thats like saying if you went on the internet to "chat up" minors to meet up for *** acts that it wasn't illegal because the account wasn't theirs.

Please refrain from foul language in the OOT jophiel, we at least have confirmed children that post here. I am sure a 50 year old gentleman such as yourself can find a more mature less abusive way to expressing himself and if you can't perhaps you may want to refrain from posting until you can learn a more appropriate way of speaking.


An IP address is something that the webserver you are browsing knows. DOes this webserver know your home address and phone number too? No, that would be fu[/Antiquewhite]cking ridiculous. Come back and talk about IP address and public domain when you get a fu[Antiquewhite]cking clue about how simple network communications work. Child or not, the IP address is known by any PC or web server you connect to on the internet. It does not give out any other information other that how to route packets to your given PC.

If you don't want people to have and give out your IP address, then I suggest that you disable DHCP on your network adapter, and manually set your IP address to 127.0.0.1. That will make all of our lives much quiter, and will remove most of the stupid that permeates this retarded fu[Antiquewhite][/Antiquewhite]cking forum
#125 Apr 18 2006 at 10:02 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I'll be waiting for those legal cites and court cases. And stop saying fu[Aqua][/Aqua]cking retarded things and I won't have to swear Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#126 Apr 18 2006 at 10:03 AM Rating: Default
Internet Footsie Lawyer
*****
12,846 posts
The One and Only Frakkor wrote:
Quote:
The User was a child. thats like saying if you went on the internet to "chat up" minors to meet up for *** acts that it wasn't illegal because the account wasn't theirs.

Please refrain from foul language in the OOT jophiel, we at least have confirmed children that post here. I am sure a 50 year old gentleman such as yourself can find a more mature less abusive way to expressing himself and if you can't perhaps you may want to refrain from posting until you can learn a more appropriate way of speaking.


An IP address is something that the webserver you are browsing knows. DOes this webserver know your home address and phone number too? No, that would be fu[/Antiquewhite]cking ridiculous. Come back and talk about IP address and public domain when you get a fu[Antiquewhite]cking clue about how simple network communications work. Child or not, the IP address is known by any PC or web server you connect to on the internet. It does not give out any other information other that how to route packets to your given PC.

If you don't want people to have and give out your IP address, then I suggest that you disable DHCP on your network adapter, and manually set your IP address to 127.0.0.1. That will make all of our lives much quiter, and will remove most of the stupid that permeates this retarded fu[Antiquewhite][/Antiquewhite]cking forum


It isn't my IP address that is up for debate it is Kaolians releasing of a childs I.P. address that is.

You have obviously not read your Admins warning about not cursing in the OOT forum and him applying penalties. We do have children here, you are all aware there is at least one 13 year old poster on here
____________________________
>.> heheheheh I am DF's sockpuppet.
rachelravage.us (somewhat NWS website)
http://www.guytalon.com/linger15.html My freeze Fetish DVD, on sale now! (WORK SAFE!)
http://venasevildolls.blogspot.com/ NWS
Niobia will establish a charity for orphaned mooses. (meese?) - Kao
ElneClare wrote:
So grow up folks and don't post anything you don't want your child to read. Doesn't matter if they are in diapers or adults, if it can upset them or you then it shouldn't be posted.
#127 Apr 18 2006 at 10:05 AM Rating: Good
Stop saying child's IP address. It make you look fu[Antiquewhite][/Antiquewhite]cking stupid.
#128 Apr 18 2006 at 10:07 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Aww... is that the 13 year old you say "**** ***!" around all the time?

Niobia's a pe[Aqua][/Aqua]dophile! Smiley: eek
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#129 Apr 18 2006 at 10:09 AM Rating: Good
What? I can't post a random collection of numbers that resemble IP addresses anymore?

My first admendment rights are being oppressed!

TEA PARTY!! TEA PARTY!!
Edited, Tue Apr 18 11:56:53 2006 by Illia

Edited, Tue Apr 18 12:26:44 2006 by Frakkor
#130 Apr 18 2006 at 10:09 AM Rating: Default
Internet Footsie Lawyer
*****
12,846 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Aww... is that the 13 year old you say "**** ***!" around all the time?

Niobia's a pe[Aqua][/Aqua]dophile! Smiley: eek

Nope. The kid in question came later after that.....everyone involved in that was 20 or older.

So do you think that because you post in the asylum you arn't applicable to the 'No Cursing int he OOT" rule setup by your admin kaolian?
____________________________
>.> heheheheh I am DF's sockpuppet.
rachelravage.us (somewhat NWS website)
http://www.guytalon.com/linger15.html My freeze Fetish DVD, on sale now! (WORK SAFE!)
http://venasevildolls.blogspot.com/ NWS
Niobia will establish a charity for orphaned mooses. (meese?) - Kao
ElneClare wrote:
So grow up folks and don't post anything you don't want your child to read. Doesn't matter if they are in diapers or adults, if it can upset them or you then it shouldn't be posted.
#132 Apr 18 2006 at 10:11 AM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
15,963 posts
Ioph: Polish Terrorist
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#133 Apr 18 2006 at 10:12 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
19,727 posts
Noobia wrote:
It isn't my IP address that is up for debate it is Kaolians releasing of a childs I.P. address that is.



Yesterday, Kaolian wrote:
The same thrice banned for spamming Ragneros that also used to occasionally post from Florida State university library accounts?


Oh yeah, I just posted that a moment ago, as well. How many kids are left to run rampant on the campus of state univerisity? Only the most awesome ones, I suspect. Now make the argument that Ragneros is the child of the Florida State librarian.
#134 Apr 18 2006 at 10:14 AM Rating: Default
Internet Footsie Lawyer
*****
12,846 posts
he could be with his babysitter. Mine user to take me with her to UConn's library when she was doing papers (I was 10) Alot of larger colleges also have programs for children - teen camps...
____________________________
>.> heheheheh I am DF's sockpuppet.
rachelravage.us (somewhat NWS website)
http://www.guytalon.com/linger15.html My freeze Fetish DVD, on sale now! (WORK SAFE!)
http://venasevildolls.blogspot.com/ NWS
Niobia will establish a charity for orphaned mooses. (meese?) - Kao
ElneClare wrote:
So grow up folks and don't post anything you don't want your child to read. Doesn't matter if they are in diapers or adults, if it can upset them or you then it shouldn't be posted.
#136 Apr 18 2006 at 10:17 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
niobia the Fussy wrote:
Nope. The kid in question came later after that.....everyone involved in that was 20 or older.
You think he can't read it now? Do his eyes fall out if he browses older threads?

You should go back and edit out every reference you've ever made to ***, you sicko.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#137 Apr 18 2006 at 10:17 AM Rating: Default
Internet Footsie Lawyer
*****
12,846 posts
WarMaverick the Tulip wrote:
niobia the Fussy wrote:
he could be with his babysitter. Mine user to take me with her to UConn's library when she was doing papers (I was 10) Alot of larger colleges also have programs for children - teen camps...


I mean, you lost before... but now, you REALLY lose.


I can't prove that Kaolian isn't lying about where the IP came from. Revealing someones IP address does constitute as Cyber Harassment and if the person being harassed is a child then it counts as Child exploitation.
____________________________
>.> heheheheh I am DF's sockpuppet.
rachelravage.us (somewhat NWS website)
http://www.guytalon.com/linger15.html My freeze Fetish DVD, on sale now! (WORK SAFE!)
http://venasevildolls.blogspot.com/ NWS
Niobia will establish a charity for orphaned mooses. (meese?) - Kao
ElneClare wrote:
So grow up folks and don't post anything you don't want your child to read. Doesn't matter if they are in diapers or adults, if it can upset them or you then it shouldn't be posted.
#138 Apr 18 2006 at 10:17 AM Rating: Good
I highly doubt that teen camps, or childcare services allow unsupervised access to the Internet. If they do, then they will have to be aware of the fact that the IP address of that PC will be used on the Internet.

It's simple network communications really. Every single site you visit collects your IP address.

#139 Apr 18 2006 at 10:18 AM Rating: Default
Internet Footsie Lawyer
*****
12,846 posts
Jophiel wrote:
niobia the Fussy wrote:
Nope. The kid in question came later after that.....everyone involved in that was 20 or older.
You think he can't read it now? Do his eyes fall out if he browses older threads?

You should go back and edit out every reference you've ever made to ***, you sicko.


You should've quit cussing, why is it so important to you for a child to see you using foul language?
____________________________
>.> heheheheh I am DF's sockpuppet.
rachelravage.us (somewhat NWS website)
http://www.guytalon.com/linger15.html My freeze Fetish DVD, on sale now! (WORK SAFE!)
http://venasevildolls.blogspot.com/ NWS
Niobia will establish a charity for orphaned mooses. (meese?) - Kao
ElneClare wrote:
So grow up folks and don't post anything you don't want your child to read. Doesn't matter if they are in diapers or adults, if it can upset them or you then it shouldn't be posted.
#140 Apr 18 2006 at 10:18 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
If it was a child brought by a babysitter to a campus library, then Kao didn't post THE CHILD'S IP, now did he?

******.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#141 Apr 18 2006 at 10:19 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
Revealing someones IP address does constitute as Cyber Harassment and if the person being harassed is a child then it counts as Child exploitation.


What the fu[Azure][/Azure]ck? ZOMG!! Every domain resoulution request is violating Cyber Harassment laws??? How dumb can one person be?
#142 Apr 18 2006 at 10:19 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
19,727 posts
Stating that things are possible does not make them probable. Then again, I guess it is up to Kao to prove that this isn't some pleasent little day-camper or the innocent babysat child spamming the forums with Suck My Balls and making with the dirty PM's, right?
#143 Apr 18 2006 at 10:21 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
niobia the Fussy wrote:
Revealing someones IP address does constitute as Cyber Harassment
No it doesn't.
niobia the child ****-*** enticer wrote:
You should've quit cussing, why is it so important to you for a child to see you using foul language?
Makes me feel like a big man! Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#144 Apr 18 2006 at 10:22 AM Rating: Default
Internet Footsie Lawyer
*****
12,846 posts
Had kao acted appropriatly and within his legal jurisdiction he would have banned the child without so much as a pause- now here we are today with you Asylum folks defending his "right" to harass and terrorize minors.

____________________________
>.> heheheheh I am DF's sockpuppet.
rachelravage.us (somewhat NWS website)
http://www.guytalon.com/linger15.html My freeze Fetish DVD, on sale now! (WORK SAFE!)
http://venasevildolls.blogspot.com/ NWS
Niobia will establish a charity for orphaned mooses. (meese?) - Kao
ElneClare wrote:
So grow up folks and don't post anything you don't want your child to read. Doesn't matter if they are in diapers or adults, if it can upset them or you then it shouldn't be posted.
#145 Apr 18 2006 at 10:23 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
19,727 posts
He banned him three times. I'm not here defending him, I'm here to play with the retards.
#146 Apr 18 2006 at 10:24 AM Rating: Good
Holy sh[Aliceblue][/Aliceblue]it. It is not possible that you are that dumb all by yourself.

How many dumb people use your account anyway?
#147 Apr 18 2006 at 10:24 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Except you haven't shown it to be (a) a minor, (b) harassment nor (c) terrorism.

You really suck at this. I bet your lawyer laughs his *** off at you. Show him this thread. Please. Do it.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#148 Apr 18 2006 at 10:25 AM Rating: Default
Internet Footsie Lawyer
*****
12,846 posts
Barkingturtle wrote:
He banned him three times. I'm not here defending him, I'm here to play with the retards.


No, you are defending..nay authorizing him to harass, stalk and violate users that arn't of age.

So he was allegedly banned 3 times, that still doesn't equate to posting his IP address and encouraging a forum to harass him

(don't think I forgot about you either Frakkor)
____________________________
>.> heheheheh I am DF's sockpuppet.
rachelravage.us (somewhat NWS website)
http://www.guytalon.com/linger15.html My freeze Fetish DVD, on sale now! (WORK SAFE!)
http://venasevildolls.blogspot.com/ NWS
Niobia will establish a charity for orphaned mooses. (meese?) - Kao
ElneClare wrote:
So grow up folks and don't post anything you don't want your child to read. Doesn't matter if they are in diapers or adults, if it can upset them or you then it shouldn't be posted.
#149 Apr 18 2006 at 10:25 AM Rating: Excellent
Her lawyer is Mark Markum (hello), of McDonalds fame. I've seen him.

He's balls hard.
#150 Apr 18 2006 at 10:25 AM Rating: Good
*****
19,727 posts
And "legal jurisdiction"? Kao's and admin, not a law officer. You are just bizzaro stupid.
#151 Apr 18 2006 at 10:26 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I beg of you, show him this thread.

Give me his name and I'll call him and give him the URL. Or is that "cyber harassment"?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
This thread is locked
You cannot post in a locked topic!
Recent Visitors: 46 All times are in CDT
DSD, Elinda, ElneClare, Poldaran, Smasharoo, TirithRR, Anonymous Guests (40)