Forum Settings
       
This thread is locked

KaolinFollow

#127 Apr 18 2006 at 10:05 AM Rating: Good
Stop saying child's IP address. It make you look fu[Antiquewhite][/Antiquewhite]cking stupid.
#128 Apr 18 2006 at 10:07 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Aww... is that the 13 year old you say "Butt sex!" around all the time?

Niobia's a pe[Aqua][/Aqua]dophile! Smiley: eek
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#129 Apr 18 2006 at 10:09 AM Rating: Good
What? I can't post a random collection of numbers that resemble IP addresses anymore?

My first admendment rights are being oppressed!

TEA PARTY!! TEA PARTY!!
Edited, Tue Apr 18 11:56:53 2006 by Illia

Edited, Tue Apr 18 12:26:44 2006 by Frakkor
#130 Apr 18 2006 at 10:09 AM Rating: Default
*****
12,846 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Aww... is that the 13 year old you say "Butt sex!" around all the time?

Niobia's a pe[Aqua][/Aqua]dophile! Smiley: eek

Nope. The kid in question came later after that.....everyone involved in that was 20 or older.

So do you think that because you post in the asylum you arn't applicable to the 'No Cursing int he OOT" rule setup by your admin kaolian?
#132 Apr 18 2006 at 10:11 AM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Ioph: Polish Terrorist
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#133 Apr 18 2006 at 10:12 AM Rating: Excellent
Noobia wrote:
It isn't my IP address that is up for debate it is Kaolians releasing of a childs I.P. address that is.



Yesterday, Kaolian wrote:
The same thrice banned for spamming Ragneros that also used to occasionally post from Florida State university library accounts?


Oh yeah, I just posted that a moment ago, as well. How many kids are left to run rampant on the campus of state univerisity? Only the most awesome ones, I suspect. Now make the argument that Ragneros is the child of the Florida State librarian.
#134 Apr 18 2006 at 10:14 AM Rating: Default
*****
12,846 posts
he could be with his babysitter. Mine user to take me with her to UConn's library when she was doing papers (I was 10) Alot of larger colleges also have programs for children - teen camps...
#136 Apr 18 2006 at 10:17 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
niobia the Fussy wrote:
Nope. The kid in question came later after that.....everyone involved in that was 20 or older.
You think he can't read it now? Do his eyes fall out if he browses older threads?

You should go back and edit out every reference you've ever made to sex, you sicko.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#137 Apr 18 2006 at 10:17 AM Rating: Default
*****
12,846 posts
WarMaverick the Tulip wrote:
niobia the Fussy wrote:
he could be with his babysitter. Mine user to take me with her to UConn's library when she was doing papers (I was 10) Alot of larger colleges also have programs for children - teen camps...


I mean, you lost before... but now, you REALLY lose.


I can't prove that Kaolian isn't lying about where the IP came from. Revealing someones IP address does constitute as Cyber Harassment and if the person being harassed is a child then it counts as Child exploitation.
#138 Apr 18 2006 at 10:17 AM Rating: Good
I highly doubt that teen camps, or childcare services allow unsupervised access to the Internet. If they do, then they will have to be aware of the fact that the IP address of that PC will be used on the Internet.

It's simple network communications really. Every single site you visit collects your IP address.

#139 Apr 18 2006 at 10:18 AM Rating: Default
*****
12,846 posts
Jophiel wrote:
niobia the Fussy wrote:
Nope. The kid in question came later after that.....everyone involved in that was 20 or older.
You think he can't read it now? Do his eyes fall out if he browses older threads?

You should go back and edit out every reference you've ever made to sex, you sicko.


You should've quit cussing, why is it so important to you for a child to see you using foul language?
#140 Apr 18 2006 at 10:18 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
If it was a child brought by a babysitter to a campus library, then Kao didn't post THE CHILD'S IP, now did he?

******.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#141 Apr 18 2006 at 10:19 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
Revealing someones IP address does constitute as Cyber Harassment and if the person being harassed is a child then it counts as Child exploitation.


What the fu[Azure][/Azure]ck? ZOMG!! Every domain resoulution request is violating Cyber Harassment laws??? How dumb can one person be?
#142 Apr 18 2006 at 10:19 AM Rating: Excellent
Stating that things are possible does not make them probable. Then again, I guess it is up to Kao to prove that this isn't some pleasent little day-camper or the innocent babysat child spamming the forums with Suck My Balls and making with the dirty PM's, right?
#143 Apr 18 2006 at 10:21 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
niobia the Fussy wrote:
Revealing someones IP address does constitute as Cyber Harassment
No it doesn't.
niobia the child butt-sex enticer wrote:
You should've quit cussing, why is it so important to you for a child to see you using foul language?
Makes me feel like a big man! Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#144 Apr 18 2006 at 10:22 AM Rating: Default
*****
12,846 posts
Had kao acted appropriatly and within his legal jurisdiction he would have banned the child without so much as a pause- now here we are today with you Asylum folks defending his "right" to harass and terrorize minors.

#145 Apr 18 2006 at 10:23 AM Rating: Excellent
He banned him three times. I'm not here defending him, I'm here to play with the retards.
#146 Apr 18 2006 at 10:24 AM Rating: Good
Holy sh[Aliceblue][/Aliceblue]it. It is not possible that you are that dumb all by yourself.

How many dumb people use your account anyway?
#147 Apr 18 2006 at 10:24 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Except you haven't shown it to be (a) a minor, (b) harassment nor (c) terrorism.

You really suck at this. I bet your lawyer laughs his *** off at you. Show him this thread. Please. Do it.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#148 Apr 18 2006 at 10:25 AM Rating: Default
*****
12,846 posts
Barkingturtle wrote:
He banned him three times. I'm not here defending him, I'm here to play with the retards.


No, you are defending..nay authorizing him to harass, stalk and violate users that arn't of age.

So he was allegedly banned 3 times, that still doesn't equate to posting his IP address and encouraging a forum to harass him

(don't think I forgot about you either Frakkor)
#149 Apr 18 2006 at 10:25 AM Rating: Excellent
Her lawyer is Mark Markum (hello), of McDonalds fame. I've seen him.

He's balls hard.
#150 Apr 18 2006 at 10:25 AM Rating: Good
And "legal jurisdiction"? Kao's and admin, not a law officer. You are just bizzaro stupid.
#151 Apr 18 2006 at 10:26 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I beg of you, show him this thread.

Give me his name and I'll call him and give him the URL. Or is that "cyber harassment"?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
This thread is locked
You cannot post in a locked topic!
Recent Visitors: 426 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (426)