Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Mindless fun brought to you by...Follow

#1 Apr 12 2006 at 10:17 AM Rating: Default
**
937 posts
the most mindless man

http://www.planetdan.net/pics/misc/georgie.htm
#2 Apr 12 2006 at 10:20 AM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
he got stuck. I left him there and laughed.
#3 Apr 12 2006 at 11:48 AM Rating: Decent
This was posted earlier this week and hasn't even made it half way down the page yet. You lose at teh interwebs.

Link
#4 Apr 12 2006 at 11:56 AM Rating: Good
This version is less fun to pose sexually and then tug about repetitively. Also, the balls do not seem as greasy.
#5 Apr 12 2006 at 12:02 PM Rating: Decent
This version was added by some nobody in that thread. It sucked then and still sucks. Now, if the balls were lubed up ******** we'd be talking.
#6 Apr 12 2006 at 12:28 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,101 posts
Elderon the Wise wrote:
This version was added by some nobody in that thread. It sucked then and still sucks. Now, if the balls were lubed up ******** we'd be talking.


Then it would be Clinton.
#7 Apr 12 2006 at 12:41 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
OMG KKKlinton joke!

Added for Tot
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#8 Apr 12 2006 at 1:27 PM Rating: Default
**
937 posts
Elderon the Wise wrote:
This was posted earlier this week and hasn't even made it half way down the page yet. You lose at teh interwebs.

Link


guess I should have kept reading after I determined that following that thread was pointless since it was about content that may or may not get me fired for viewing it on a workplace computer.

woops
#9 Apr 12 2006 at 1:38 PM Rating: Good
Ferrish wrote:
Elderon the Wise wrote:
This was posted earlier this week and hasn't even made it half way down the page yet. You lose at teh interwebs.

Link


guess I should have kept reading after I determined that following that thread was pointless since it was about content that may or may not get me fired for viewing it on a workplace computer.

woops
Hypocrasy at it's finest. Playing games on company time surely is acceptable! Wow, how could I have missed that one. Smiley: rolleyes

******.
#10 Apr 12 2006 at 2:20 PM Rating: Default
**
937 posts
Elderon the Wise wrote:
Ferrish wrote:
Elderon the Wise wrote:
This was posted earlier this week and hasn't even made it half way down the page yet. You lose at teh interwebs.

Link


guess I should have kept reading after I determined that following that thread was pointless since it was about content that may or may not get me fired for viewing it on a workplace computer.

woops
Hypocrasy at it's finest. Playing games on company time surely is acceptable! Wow, how could I have missed that one. Smiley: rolleyes

******.


games, especially on ones lunch break is one thing. Games that involve what was described as possibly NSFW content involving a woman in a bikini in the thread you linked is another.

been in an office setting lately?
#11 Apr 12 2006 at 2:34 PM Rating: Decent
Ferrish wrote:

games, especially on ones lunch break is one thing. Games that involve what was described as possibly NSFW content involving a woman in a bikini in the thread you linked is another.

been in an office setting lately?


Yes actually, I am in a "C" position for the firm I work for. I'd fire your *** for using company resources for personal reasons if I looking for a reason to let you go. Bikini clad women or GWB makes no difference. However, bikini clad women can also earn you a sexual harassment suit. Wanna dance punk?
#12 Apr 12 2006 at 2:46 PM Rating: Default
**
937 posts
Elderon the Wise wrote:
Ferrish wrote:

games, especially on ones lunch break is one thing. Games that involve what was described as possibly NSFW content involving a woman in a bikini in the thread you linked is another.

been in an office setting lately?


Yes actually, I am in a "C" position for the firm I work for. I'd fire your *** for using company resources for personal reasons if I looking for a reason to let you go. Bikini clad women or GWB makes no difference. However, bikini clad women can also earn you a sexual harassment suit. Wanna dance punk?


thus why I avoided that thread. It said "possibly NSFW", I avoided it, thus didn't know that the GWD was already posted.

as for being fired for misusing corporate resources, It doesn't take much at all to dismiss someone. However, if playing with something like that for a few minutes was all it took, then none of us in this forum would have a job.

hell, stand up an look around, I bet you can spot 5 people with the internet open for reasons other than work right now.

#13 Apr 12 2006 at 3:29 PM Rating: Good
Ferrish wrote:
thus why I avoided that thread. It said "possibly NSFW", I avoided it, thus didn't know that the GWD was already posted.

as for being fired for misusing corporate resources, It doesn't take much at all to dismiss someone. However, if playing with something like that for a few minutes was all it took, then none of us in this forum would have a job.
My point is that this forum is text only. There was nothing in that thread that would be any less work safe then the link you provided. If you had said that you didn't follow the links due to fear of the targets being NWS, that would be different. What a web of lies we weave.





Edited, Wed Apr 12 16:36:43 2006 by Elderon
#14 Apr 12 2006 at 4:27 PM Rating: Default
**
937 posts
Elderon the Wise wrote:
Ferrish wrote:
thus why I avoided that thread. It said "possibly NSFW", I avoided it, thus didn't know that the GWD was already posted.

as for being fired for misusing corporate resources, It doesn't take much at all to dismiss someone. However, if playing with something like that for a few minutes was all it took, then none of us in this forum would have a job.
My point is that this forum is text only. There was nothing in that thread that would be any less work safe then the link you provided. If you had said that you didn't follow the links due to fear of the targets being NWS, that would be different. What a web of lies we weave.
Edited, Wed Apr 12 16:36:43 2006 by Elderon


Ferrish wrote:

guess I should have kept reading after I determined that following that thread was pointless since it was about content that may or may not get me fired for viewing it on a workplace computer.


did that not clearly state that I stopped reading that thread because I thought it was about NSFW content?

I'm sorry you had to view the same content twice. At least you manage to stay entertained by berating me about it.
#15 Apr 12 2006 at 4:32 PM Rating: Good
Ferrish wrote:
At least you manage to stay entertained by berating me about it.
That's the first correct thing you've said all day. Here's a Smiley: cookie
#16 Apr 12 2006 at 4:59 PM Rating: Good
Smiley: laugh Who uses the internet at work? Smiley: sly
#17 Apr 12 2006 at 5:33 PM Rating: Default
**
937 posts
Elderon the Wise wrote:
Ferrish wrote:
At least you manage to stay entertained by berating me about it.
That's the first correct thing you've said all day. Here's a Smiley: cookie


then I guess I achieved my goal after all, someone got to see something they hadn't before (DSD), and at least one person was entertained (you, even if it wasn't how I planned).

In future I'll try to be more clear in my posts. I realize now that if I had better stated that I didn't know it was already posted, then none of this would have happened. Then again, had it not happened, then neither of us would have had something to occupy us until 5pm. Well, aside from actual work.
#18 Apr 12 2006 at 5:44 PM Rating: Good
Ferrish wrote:
However, if playing with something like that for a few minutes was all it took, then none of us in this forum would have a job.



As Richard Dawson would say:

XXX

Wrong. I have not opened a broswer t work to connect to anything other than pages on the company intranet since my employment began last year.

You suck. I'd fire you for being a slacker, and one who measures the world using his own slacker standards at that.
#19 Apr 12 2006 at 6:23 PM Rating: Default
**
937 posts
TStephens wrote:
You suck. I'd fire you for being a slacker, and one who measures the world using his own slacker standards at that.


Well it's a good thing your not my boss.

I've got 75 channels of cable TV at my desk, internet use (covered by acceptable use policy of course), and since all my work gets done correctly, on time, and better than any other tool can provide, they keep paying me.

Oh, my job is government funded by tax dollars, I'm union protected, and I got a raise a few days ago.

you suck.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 339 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (339)