Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

PatriotismFollow

#1 Apr 02 2006 at 2:25 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
I'm a Patriot. I'm patriotic. I'm proud of being an Englishman, a European, a Lancastrian.

It doesn't make me any better than anyone else; just something that I hold dear.

But Nationalism - that "My country, Right or Wrong" mentality - well that's what fuelled the 3rd Reich (pre-emptive Godwins call), invaded the Falklands and was used to tru to justify the rape of the 3rd world by various western regimes (from the British Empire to the Coalition Oil-Rush in the Gulf).

I despise Nationalism.

So where's the line in the sand? What's the difference between Patriotism and Nationalism?

Who should I feel OK to be proud of being English, but not proud of being White? Neither were choices within my control?

Why should I despise UK and US immigration policy as elitist and xenophobic?

Discuss.

Dance monkeys! Dance!
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#2 Apr 02 2006 at 3:26 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
If you are using your patriotism to justify something that is usually a bad sign.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#3 Apr 02 2006 at 3:29 PM Rating: Good
****
5,135 posts
This is exactly why I enjoy the company on goats.

#4 Apr 02 2006 at 3:49 PM Rating: Good
***
3,128 posts
We need a Quota on Goat Immigration. Those horny bastards are after our women.
#6 Apr 02 2006 at 11:27 PM Rating: Good
**
811 posts
Patriotism I think is generally being proud of your country, while nationalism is being blinded by your pride in your country.

Though I'm not sure about some of the immigration policies various countries hold are such a bad idea, considering if someone is working illegally in the country they may be likely to not be getting a legal wage or be paying taxes to really be able to help with supporting the country they reside in.

Generally illegal immigrants will probably gravitate towards low skill and low paying jobs, and so having people not even getting payed minimum wage probably helps to keep wages down accross the board for such jobs which generally just seems a bit sad. I know Canada already seems to have some guest worker programs operating that seem to do alright so it's not as though there isn't an example to emulate.

Considering some of the cultural conflicts surrounding illegal mexican immigrants in the US, people may feel like Mexicans should try to become more a part of the US and learn english and such given most people in the US probably come from families that came to this country long in the past and losing much all connection to any older languages or cultures they possessed (in my case, I doubt many are all that familiar with Moravia even existing).
#8 Apr 03 2006 at 9:19 AM Rating: Good
My question is how long will it take the US to pull out of the UN and seize it's land in the states for a better revenue producing land use?
#9 Apr 03 2006 at 9:27 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Youshutup wrote:
Ideology brings togethor people who truly believe something, who will always act according to their beliefs.

Patriotism brings togethor people who lack belief but need a purpose.

Seems pretty simple to me.

Everything does when you're 12.
#10 Apr 03 2006 at 9:34 AM Rating: Good
****
4,596 posts
Quote:
Who should I feel OK to be proud of being English


Why shouldn't you? It makes you second best!
____________________________
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere

Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
#11 Apr 03 2006 at 10:05 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
I don't see patriotism as having anything to do with pride. It's humility, at its heart - a realization that one has a long way to go to measure up to the best one's country has to offer, coupled with a sense of how much has already been offered over the years. A patriot sees problems and wants to fix them, because he loves his country and wants it to always be the best possible.

Nationalism is jingoism, in my mind's definition. It's flag waving and refusal to admit problems. It's denying that other countries have any rational reason to fear or hate one's own. It's selective blindness.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#12 Apr 03 2006 at 10:24 AM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
"Apart from the Kingdom of the Lord there is not on this earth any nation that is superior to any other. Should it happen that a strong Government finds it may with impunity destroy a weak people, then the hour strikes for that weak people to appeal to the League of Nations to give its judgment in all freedom. God and history will remember your judgment." –Emperor Haile Selassie I(Address to the League of Nations, 1936 )
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#13 Apr 03 2006 at 10:35 AM Rating: Good
Maybe you should think about what it means to be "proud" of something.

Can you really be proud of something that is completely out of your control? The fact you were born in England, that you are from Lancashire, that are you are white, that you are male, that you have two arms... You did not achieve any of these things. They happened to you, purely by a mixture of coincideneces and luck.

So what is there to be "proud" about?

I think "pride" comes from a sense of personal achievement. not from something over which you have absolutely no control.

Would you be less proud had you been born in Spain? In Italy? Probably not.

To me, none of this "pride", just affiliation. You find the "good" things about England, and associate with them as though they were your own. But, really, they are not. Thjey are other's people's achievment. The fact you were born in England gives you a right to have something in common with these people (you were born on the same island), but apart from that? Not much...

To me, patriotism and nationalism are exactly the same thing. People who don't want to appear violent and war-mongering use "patriotism", but it's the same. It's associating with something bigger than you, and feeling "part of it" for one reason or another. It's the same as white supremacists. All they have in common in the fact they are white. What is there to be "proud" about? Nothing...

I'm obviously not saying that it's exactly the same (white supremacist bring other races into the equation), but conceptually, it is the same need to belong to something bigger than you, to find a common point with a bunch of other people. "We're white", "we're English", "We're Europeans", "We're ******* fans". But deep down, there is nothing more to it than that.

SO, IMO, you are not wrong to be happy you are English, it would've been worse had you been Zimbabwean. But "proud" is just not the right word, I dont think...

Just my 2 Euros...
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#15 Apr 03 2006 at 1:52 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
I think most of you are mis-defining nationalism. Not your mistake, since Nobby started with a very narrow (and IMO "wrong") definition himself.

Nationalism is simply a recognition among a group of people as being a part of a "nation". This can mean anything. A commmon language, a common culture, a common history, anything. There's nothing inherently good or bad about nationalism by itself.

I think what Nobby was trying to aim at is the difference between patriotism and blind patriotism. Neither have *anything* to do with nationalism, since both can exist whether one is a member of a nation state or not. If anything, one can argue that nationalism tends to reduce the occurance of blind patiotism. A soldier in the employ of a king, but with no sense of national identity would owe his allegence only to his king, and perhaps to some small amount to his local town (presumably under control of that king). He'd have absolutely no compunctions about indiscriminantly killing random people in another city on behalf of that king if so ordered. Contrast that to the difficulty to get modern soldiers to kill people they identify with as part of their nation.

While you can counter that nationalism can allow for things like ethnic cleansing (when a group of people living locally are not identified with the "nation" and therefore become subject to massive killing), I think it's absurd to argue that this didn't happen just as often without nationalism being involved. If we're to take biblical accounts of the results of battle as even vaguely indicative of the norm, then it would seem that razing of homes, mass killing of men and boy children, rape and enslavement of women, salting of earth, etc, were all things that were done to "outsiders" when conquered. I certainly don't think nationalism was involved in those cases...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#16 Apr 03 2006 at 1:56 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
gbaji wrote:
I think most of you are mis-defining nationalism. Not your mistake, since Nobby started with a very narrow (and IMO "wrong") definition himself.



Fu[Aliceblue][/Aliceblue]ck off ****.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#17 Apr 03 2006 at 1:58 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Quote:
Nationalism is simply a recognition among a group of people as being a part of a "nation".

And you get this from where?

#18 Apr 03 2006 at 2:00 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
trickybeck wrote:
Quote:
Nationalism is simply a recognition among a group of people as being a part of a "nation".

And you get this from where?


His own ***.

Its amazing how much can be pulled out of it, even more amazing how much is already stored within.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#19 Apr 03 2006 at 2:07 PM Rating: Good
Jesus, Gbaji. Context is wonderful thing to understand. Talk about missing the mark. Your definition of nationalism takes us back to the 14th century. And your characterization of nationalism as "simply" anything is about as far from accurate as you can get. Usually people have to try to f'uck it up that bad.

Join the rest of us in a conversation about 21st century nationalism, won't you? And quit typing just to fill a pre-requisite.
#20 Apr 03 2006 at 3:51 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
gbaji wrote:
I think most of you are mis-defining nationalism. Not your mistake, since Nobby started with a very narrow (and IMO "wrong") definition himself.

Nationalism is simply a recognition among a group of people as being a part of a "nation". This can mean anything. A commmon language, a common culture, a common history, anything. There's nothing inherently good or bad about nationalism by itself.

I think what Nobby was trying to aim at is the difference between patriotism and blind patriotism. Neither have *anything* to do with nationalism, since both can exist whether one is a member of a nation state or not. If anything, one can argue that nationalism tends to reduce the occurance of blind patiotism. A soldier in the employ of a king, but with no sense of national identity would owe his allegence only to his king, and perhaps to some small amount to his local town (presumably under control of that king). He'd have absolutely no compunctions about indiscriminantly killing random people in another city on behalf of that king if so ordered. Contrast that to the difficulty to get modern soldiers to kill people they identify with as part of their nation.
Was your Mom smoking Aids-Pole while she breast-fed you, di[Azure][/Azure]ck-wad?

Nationalism by any connotation implies an assumed superiority of a nation or race. (Quick! Go scuttle off to a dictionary and find some denotation that to your simplistic mind argues against this. You know the difference between denotation and connotation, right?)

I feel a swell in my chest when I see the Union Jack flying over Buckingham Palace, when I see our soldiers marching immaculately in line at the trooping of the coloUr or a state event, or see an Olympian weeping as their nation's flag is held above them when their national anthem acknowledges their victory.

I also acknowledge that if my Pakisatan-born neighbour sees the white crescent on a green flag he feels the same. He can feel a warm reminder of where his ancestors are from that made him the man he is. We're both happy citizens of a country that allows us to celebrate our heritage.

I was touched to see Amir Khan (A devout Moslem with a broad Lancashire Accent) hold up his Athens Gold Medal draped in two flags that mean a lot to him; the Union Jack and the Pakistani Flag. A Great Englishman indeed.

But when I see the Union Jack waved by neo-*****, the bile rises in my throat, just as it does when I see the Palestinian Flag wrapped around Suicide Bombers, or the Stars'n'Stripes waved by pointy-hatted cross burners.

I hear Moe getting all misty-eyed and Viking about some scandinavian who uprooted a few generations back, Joph waxing lyrical about the former glories of Poland, and Flea'lo expounding the joys of Peruvian cuisine and culture. That's cool.

As Ian Anderson sang: "Everyone is from somewhere, Even if they've never been there". I know what he means.

But flag-waving jingoistic bastards who can justify torture, invasion and subjugation under the "my flag pwns your flag" rule make me wanna blow chunks.

Once again, you've missed the point entirely and proved yourself to be the Arsylum's Global Village Idiot.

Your *** is my plaything, simpleton!
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#21 Apr 03 2006 at 4:03 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Gbaji sees a post that supports patriotism and attacks nationalism and sniffs out how the thread is going down. Being the devout apologist and defender of the faith, he uses an old ploy, arbitrarily redefining words to affect or muddy the argument.


Kind of like how making a guy stay up for 48 hours straight then beating him with a sack full of pissed on Korans is no longer "torture" it is now 'abuse'.

Edited, Mon Apr 3 17:07:44 2006 by bodhisattva
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#22 Apr 03 2006 at 4:06 PM Rating: Excellent
Extremisn of any form breeds unacceptable consequences. Nationalism is just one of those.

What I see is that nationalists gain power due to the current situation of missrepresentation of goverment in places like the EU where the peoples wishes are not adhered to. The brussels beaurocracy telling the populace what they should want, so arrogant it beggars belief. That gives rise to nationalism, the opposite of the Eurocrat dream, what I see as a natural reaction. People need their voice, and if not heard by their governments, they will make their voices known ....

#23 Apr 03 2006 at 4:10 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
bodhisattva wrote:
Kind of like how making a guy stay up for 48 hours straight then beating him with a sack full of pissed on Korans is no longer "torture" it is now 'abuse'.
My all time favorite being Theresienstadt didn't really count as a concentration camp.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#24 Apr 03 2006 at 4:12 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Jophiel wrote:
bodhisattva wrote:
Kind of like how making a guy stay up for 48 hours straight then beating him with a sack full of pissed on Korans is no longer "torture" it is now 'abuse'.
My all time favorite being Theresienstadt didn't really count as a concentration camp.
"The only good Pole is a Deed Pole"

/runs and hides
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#25 Apr 03 2006 at 4:26 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
bodhisattva wrote:
Gbaji sees a post that supports patriotism and attacks nationalism and sniffs out how the thread is going down. Being the devout apologist and defender of the faith, he uses an old ploy, arbitrarily redefining words to affect or muddy the argument.


I'm just curious when using the correct definition of a word became "redefining" it?

Let's see: Wiki's entry for Nationalism has a pretty complete description of the whole business. Including the following bits:

Nationalism is an ideology that holds that (ethnically or culturally defined) nations are the "fundamental units" for human social life, and makes certain cultural and political claims based upon that belief; in particular, the claim that the nation is "the only legitimate basis for the state", and that "each nation is entitled to its own state."

and

Nationalists define individual nations on the basis of certain criteria, which distinguish one nation from another; and also determine "who is a member of each nation". These criteria might include a shared language, a shared culture, and/or shared values; but the most important is probably now ethnicity, the belonging to or membership of an ethnic group. National identity refers both to these defining criteria, and to the "sense of belonging" to that group. Nationalists see membership of nation as exclusive and involuntary, meaning that you cannot simply "join it", like any other association.


A quick perusal of other sites show similar descriptions. While fascism is often considered to be an outgrowth of nationalism, it's not the entire definition of nationalism. That would be like saying that cars are devices designed to kill people because lots of people die in car crashes. Nationalism really is just a collection of people who find some common "thing" that they choose to define themselves by. This could be good, or it could be bad. But nationalism itself is not inherently so.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#26 Apr 03 2006 at 4:28 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
gbaji wrote:
Once again I missed the fu[Azure][/Azure]cking point but quoted web references out of context to make me look like I'm not as dumb as I really am
Fair point
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
« Previous 1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 289 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (289)