·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Ding threads are gay
Ding threads are gayFollow
Saying something is gay as your way of doing said thing is super extra-gay #12 with a side of pipin' hot ghey sauce.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
I agree totally.
But you you can clearly see I wasen't doing that. I was just pointing out that they are in fact gay.
But you you can clearly see I wasen't doing that. I was just pointing out that they are in fact gay.
Congratulations on 4k.
I have to mention that I find your company worse than an angry rabid flesh eating hippopotamus.
I have to mention that I find your company worse than an angry rabid flesh eating hippopotamus.
Quote:
I have to mention that I find your company worse than an angry rabid flesh eating hippopotamus.
/golfclap
New rule Coddy, no more posing in threads I create.
Patiently awaiting Blue to hit 10k
Patiently awaiting Blue to hit 10k
This thread is gay.
"I have lost my way
But I hear a tale
About a heaven in Alberta
Where they've got all hell for a basement"
But I hear a tale
About a heaven in Alberta
Where they've got all hell for a basement"
Grats joo.
Nice work thar
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
n00b
Last
"RACK Molish and RACKITY-RACK-RACK-RACK*Twiztid! - Totem
You're a fucking ***. Fuck you and the fucktruck you fucked in on. - RIP PicklePrince
So I guess that while God says that the meek shall inherit the earth, the fucking stupid are screwed? - Althrun
You're a fucking ***. Fuck you and the fucktruck you fucked in on. - RIP PicklePrince
So I guess that while God says that the meek shall inherit the earth, the fucking stupid are screwed? - Althrun
Gay? As in the thread has sex with other threads that are of the same sex. I don't even think thats possible.
I'm pretty sure ding threads have no sexual organs to be placed in the catagory of male and female. Threads are actually created by people.
If anything, the originator of the post might possibly be gay. Yet, I still wouldn't call the OP of a ding thread gay, I might look as someone who made a "ding threads are gay" thread as the more likely gay culprit.
I'm pretty sure ding threads have no sexual organs to be placed in the catagory of male and female. Threads are actually created by people.
If anything, the originator of the post might possibly be gay. Yet, I still wouldn't call the OP of a ding thread gay, I might look as someone who made a "ding threads are gay" thread as the more likely gay culprit.
People who don't get it and make asinine comments regarding topics beyond their comprehension are ghey.
Quote:
People who don't get it and make asinine comments regarding topics beyond their comprehension are ghey.
Oh, I guess this is what they call a "flame."
Well done, I have been put in my place. Upon closer inspection I do see I misunderstood what was meant by "ding thread."
People who equate "don't get it" with "unable to comprehend" are ghey. I'm sure somewhere around post 10 of 1684 there was a piece of jargon you didn't get at first. Y'know back before your soul died and you started posting spiteful replies to innocent errors?
Smart people lurk when they are at post #10.
Quote:
Smart people lurk when they are at post #10.
You have a point I suppose. But if that were the case, we'd all be at post 10 wouldn't we?
Wow, this thing still going on?
I rule
I rule
Aegis wrote:
Wow, this thing still going on?
I rule
I rule
You suck.
Quote:
Oh, I guess this is what they call a "flame."
Well done, I have been put in my place. Upon closer inspection I do see I misunderstood what was meant by "ding thread."
People who equate "don't get it" with "unable to comprehend" are ghey. I'm sure somewhere around post 10 of 1684 there was a piece of jargon you didn't get at first. Y'know back before your soul died and you started posting spiteful replies to innocent errors?
Well done, I have been put in my place. Upon closer inspection I do see I misunderstood what was meant by "ding thread."
People who equate "don't get it" with "unable to comprehend" are ghey. I'm sure somewhere around post 10 of 1684 there was a piece of jargon you didn't get at first. Y'know back before your soul died and you started posting spiteful replies to innocent errors?
You're not too bright, are ya son? That is not a flame, merely an observation of idiocy. It also wasn't directed at you, which amuses me considering you seem to have failed understanding on two seperate occasions in the same thread.
There was no equating the two situations either. They are distinct and unique in and of themselves, though not mutually exclusive as you've so adequately shown. Not getting it = you don't understand the OP. Topic beyond your comprehension = Reading comprehension is not your friend. You've shown that you either don't have the mental capacity to grasp what is being discussed from the context of the posts or that you don't bother reading the replies in a thread before you add your ignant two pence.
Back when I had 10 posts, if there was something I didn't understand I'd either ask or find out on my own. Hell, there are still things I don't get the true meaning of. The difference between you and I is that I don't make a point to make an *** of myself by joining in conversations dealing with information I'm not privy to.
Now kindly **** off before I MPK you.
PS. My soul died at birth.
Instead I'm filled with hatred, spite, and rasberry jam.
Edited, Fri Mar 24 13:07:44 2006 by Jacobsdeception
Recent Visitors: 253
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (253)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Ding threads are gay
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC