Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Charges dropped in teacher sex scandalFollow

#52 Mar 24 2006 at 3:07 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
fenderputy the Shady wrote:
Show me an 18 year old girl that wants to date a 16 year old boy.
My "under AoC daughter" remark was flippant anyway so I'm not too worried about defending any double standards it may imply Smiley: smile
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#53 Mar 24 2006 at 3:11 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Jophiel wrote:
So either she's had a birthday since the encounters or else the mere fact that he was a teacher at her school made it a criminal sexual assault charge.
Seperate article answered my question:
The Trib, in a different story, wrote:
Duncantell was charged with criminal sexual assault because he is a teacher in a position of authority over the student, Krecker said.


Mystery solved!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#54 Mar 24 2006 at 3:28 PM Rating: Default
Jophiel wrote:

And, not that it is ever permissible for an educator to have a sexual relationship with a student at their school


I could not agree more. Someone in a position of authority should never engage in a sexual relationship with a student.

Mentalfrog, you asked when when I think it would be ok. Put yourself in the shoes of a 16 yr old boy in the 10th grade. Your girlfriend is 15 (and will be 16 soon) and also in the 10th grade. You are sexually active with her and her parents find out. They press charges against you and a judge sentences you to 6 months in juvi hall. Do you think that is right? Now, the 16 yr old boy loses six months of his life, must register as a sex offender and is labeled for life. How many people at the age of 16 really knew about the age of consent laws. I didn't...

BTW, please stop rating me down, I thought this was a civil conversation. I acted like an ahole on a previous thread and deserved it. Now, I am trying to be civil.




Edited, Fri Mar 24 15:33:10 2006 by shadomen
#55 Mar 24 2006 at 3:42 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
TheBlix, Defender of Justice wrote:
2) A 15 year old male can overpower a 25 year old female in most circumstances, where as a 15 year old girl most likely cannot overpower a 25 year old man.
That's not really relevent. If force is a factor, it's a plain ole, garden variety rape trial. They might throw a statutory charge in there as an added gimme for more jail time if the assailant was over AoC and the victim under but the primary cause of the trial is not AoC laws.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#56 Mar 24 2006 at 3:44 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
10,802 posts
Nexa wrote:
Thumbelyna the Hand wrote:

I think so. I'd do her and blond white girls aren't my type.


That's not what you were sayin' last night.

Nexa


Don't you remember the wig I slapped on your head?
#57 Mar 24 2006 at 4:03 PM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
shadomen the Irrelevant wrote:

Mentalfrog, you asked when when I think it would be ok. Put yourself in the shoes of a 16 yr old boy in the 10th grade. Your girlfriend is 15 (and will be 16 soon) and also in the 10th grade. You are sexually active with her and her parents find out. They press charges against you and a judge sentences you to 6 months in juvi hall. Do you think that is right? Now, the 16 yr old boy loses six months of his life, must register as a sex offender and is labeled for life. How many people at the age of 16 really knew about the age of consent laws. I didn't...


You didn't answer my question.

Edited, Fri Mar 24 16:07:47 2006 by MentalFrog
#58 Mar 24 2006 at 4:17 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,817 posts
I think most of you are straying from the point I was trying to make (or something.) Allow me to attempt to steer back in the right direction:
_____________________________________________

Oh, wow, man, I said Wait a second, man
What do you think the teacher's gonna look like this year?
F[Aliceblue][/Aliceblue]uck man!

Uh! Oh yeah!

T-T-teacher stop that screamin'
Teacher don't you see?
Don't wanna be no uptown fool
Maybe I should go to hell
But I am doing well
Teacher needs to see me after school

I think of all the education that I've missed
But then my homework was never quite like this!

Ow! Got it bad, Got it bad, Got it bad, I'm hot for teacher! I've got it bad, so bad I'm hot for teacher!

Hey, I heard you missed us
We're back! (Hey!)
I brought my pencil
Give me something to write on, man!
Whoa Uh! Ooo-oo-ooo

I heard about your lessons
but lessons are so cold
I didn't know about this school
Little girl from Cherry Lawn
How can you be so bold?
How did you know that golden rule?

I think of all the education that I've missed
But then my homework was never quite like this!

Whoa! Got it bad, Got it bad, Got it bad, I'm hot for teacher! I've got it bad, so bad I'm hot for teacher!

Whoa! (Guitar Solo)

Oh man, I think the clock is slow
(What are you doin' this weekend?) I don't feel tardy
Class dismissed! Ooh-yeah!

I've got it bad, Got it bad, Got it bad, I'm hot for teacher!
I've got it bad, Got it bad, Got it bad, I'm hot for teacher!

Whoa! Oh! Ooh, yes I'm hot Wow!
Whoa! Oh! Ooh, yes I'm hot Wow!
Oh my God! Woo!
#59 Mar 24 2006 at 4:19 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
If force is a factor, it's a plain ole, garden variety rape trial.


Only if she has visible injuries!
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#60 Mar 24 2006 at 4:19 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Baron von Fhqwghads wrote:
I think most of you are straying from the point I was trying to make (or something.) Allow me to attempt to steer back in the right direction:
You should have made it a couple years ago when this was news Smiley: wink2
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#61 Mar 24 2006 at 4:21 PM Rating: Decent
MentalFrog wrote:
shadomen the Irrelevant wrote:

Mentalfrog, you asked when when I think it would be ok. Put yourself in the shoes of a 16 yr old boy in the 10th grade. Your girlfriend is 15 (and will be 16 soon) and also in the 10th grade. You are sexually active with her and her parents find out. They press charges against you and a judge sentences you to 6 months in juvi hall. Do you think that is right? Now, the 16 yr old boy loses six months of his life, must register as a sex offender and is labeled for life. How many people at the age of 16 really knew about the age of consent laws. I didn't...


You didn't answer my question.

Edited, Fri Mar 24 16:07:47 2006 by MentalFrog


Being a proud father of a 13 month old baby girl, I say that it is not OK. Being the father of a baby girl makes me bias though.

Trying to have an unbiased opinion though, the situation I described above would be acceptable to me if I was a judge. Acceptable is not the same as OK though. I would not sentence this poor kid to jail. I would scold him for his actions but not put him in jail.

Also, after researching this whole age of consent issue, I learned something. Being 16 and not knowing about age of consent is not a leagl defense. Ignorance of the law is never a defense.
#62 Mar 24 2006 at 4:26 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Ms. Geisel is not only more attractive in my eyes but apparently lets you come over with your buddy and switch off on her.

Edit: Even better, when your friend calls, she comes over to you and lets you take turns. h4wt

And she's a Catholic school teacher, so there's that to consider as well.

Edited, Fri Mar 24 16:32:16 2006 by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#63 Mar 24 2006 at 4:31 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,101 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Ms. Geisel is not only more attractive in my eyes but apparently lets you come over with your buddy and switch off on her.


She's hotter.

Does it really matter? Isn't the appeal for the 14 year old boy related more to her older age than beauty? I guess I'm just speculating though.
#64 Mar 24 2006 at 4:33 PM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
Quote:
o·kay
n. pl. OK's or o·kays
Approval; agreement:
adj.
Agreeable; acceptable


They are the same. I know what you're trying to say though. But there needs to be punishments for breaking the laws.

Personally I think they should set the same age of consent for both sexes and have a 2 year leeway between consenting individuals. If the age of consent is 16 they could date a 14 year old and vice versa.

I also think parents need to talk to their kids about age of consent laws when they talk to them about sex. I think if kids were more informed things like this wouldn't happen as much.

Edited, Fri Mar 24 16:37:27 2006 by MentalFrog
#65 Mar 24 2006 at 4:36 PM Rating: Decent
fenderputy the Shady wrote:
Does it really matter? Isn't the appeal for the 14 year old boy related more to her older age than beauty? I guess I'm just speculating though.


Well, she's older than the other teacher too! Double-win!
#66 Mar 24 2006 at 4:42 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Yeah, Geisel is in the nymphomanic, biological-clock-final-alarm 40's. Score!!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#67 Mar 24 2006 at 4:48 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,101 posts
MentalFrog wrote:


I also think parents need to talk to their kids about age of consent laws when they talk to them about sex. I think if kids were more informed things like this wouldn't happen as much.



I agree with you, but feel as though we are moving in the wrong direction. Parents would rather their child not even know what sex is than educate them about it. Not only is it easier but, then they can blame the media/government for their faults later. Anyone here been to a HS that gave out condoms instead of implementing celibacy programs?
#68 Mar 24 2006 at 4:53 PM Rating: Good
fenderputy the Shady wrote:
Anyone here been to a HS that gave out condoms instead of implementing celibacy programs?
Yup.
#69 Mar 24 2006 at 6:21 PM Rating: Decent
fenderputy the Shady wrote:
Anyone here been to a HS that gave out condoms instead of implementing celibacy programs?


If you went to the school nurse and asked for condoms, she would give you condoms as well as information about safe sex and abstinence.
#70 Mar 24 2006 at 6:31 PM Rating: Good
***
1,863 posts
It's been a decade since high school, but I couldn't remember any from back then that gave out condoms instead of teaching a celibacy program. All the high schools I attended (four of them) taught celibacy as the 100% fool-proof way to avoid pregnancy, then also covered common birth control methods, failure rates, STDs, all the other usual stuff.
#71 Mar 24 2006 at 6:47 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
According to a text I own:

69% of public school districts have a districtwide policy to teach sexual education. Of those...
  • 14% have a comprehensive policy that treats abstinence as one option for adolescents in a broader sex ed. program
  • 51% teach abstinence as the preferred option but also permit discussion about contraception as an effective means of preventing pregnacies and STDs (i.e. "abstinence plus")
  • 35% teach abstinence as the only option outside of marriage with discussion of contraception either prohibited or only to discuss its shortcomings

  • ...that was per a 1999 study of sex ed. programs in the U.S.

    Busting out my calculator, that works out to:
  • 31% of total districts lack a districtwide policy
  • 10% of total districts teach a 'fully comprehensive' program (my term)
  • 35% of total districts teach 'abstinence plus'
  • 24% of total districts teach 'abstinence only'

  • No real point there -- just some numbers.

    Edit to fix a number typo

    Edited, Fri Mar 24 18:53:11 2006 by Jophiel
    ____________________________
    Belkira wrote:
    Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
    #72 Mar 24 2006 at 8:00 PM Rating: Decent
    Jophiel wrote:
    TheBlix, Defender of Justice wrote:
    2) A 15 year old male can overpower a 25 year old female in most circumstances, where as a 15 year old girl most likely cannot overpower a 25 year old man.
    That's not really relevent. If force is a factor, it's a plain ole, garden variety rape trial. They might throw a statutory charge in there as an added gimme for more jail time if the assailant was over AoC and the victim under but the primary cause of the trial is not AoC laws.


    True, I posted before I read the transcripts.

    ~Blix
    #73 Mar 24 2006 at 9:27 PM Rating: Default
    **
    836 posts
    Quote:
    It's actually a double standard for quite a few reasons.

    1) A 14-year-old male who is attracted to women would not regret this having happen.

    2) A 15 year old male can overpower a 25 year old female in most circumstances, where as a 15 year old girl most likely cannot overpower a 25 year old man.

    Also, why do you think god (Higher power, whatever you believe, I don't care) gave men and women the ability to reproduce at the age of 11~14? They are physically ready for it, so it's not "nasty", though a bad idea in most cases. Most people at the age they gain the ability to have children aren't mentally ready to deal with it in our world, mainly because of social stigmas.

    You say it's nasty now but what about 200 years ago? Perfectly acceptable for a 30 year old man to be with a 13 year old girl, and no one found it strange.

    What makes you say it's "nasty" now? Social stigmas, nothing else, create your anxieties on this subject. If our society accepted it you probably wouldn’t care.

    Also there is the fact that everyone is different. Who’s to say that all 13-year olds aren’t physically and mentally ready to have sex?


    So, you think that having sex with a child is acceptable?. 13 yrs old are no where near ready to accept the responsibilty of a child if she where to get pregnant. 2 kids that are both between the ages of 14-17 having sex is a different story. Parents need to educate their children on safe sex, and talk to them about the possibility of them having kids because they chose to have sex.

    I am talking about Adults, that is just common sense. Social stigmas? What! So you wouldnt care about your 14 yr old daughter having sex with a grown man? Just because biologically a girl can have babies around the age of 10-12, does not mean that they are ready to have sex. Sex is an emotional thing to get into. Adults should not have sex with CHILDREN point blank.

    She was his teacher, and she was 25 yrs. old. Double standards are wrong, that is the main reason why, some girls get wild as hell when they leave their parents house. Because their mother/father didnt let them do anything, but let their son date sooner or Dads praising their son for getting laid.

    In no situation should an Adult man or woman have sex with a child. So what you are saying does not make any sense. Just because a man can most likely over power a woman, means that a man/boy can't be raped or physically molested? He was a willing sex partner, but he is a child, she was an Adult. SHE is supposed to know better, besides the fact that there are laws against having sex with minors. This case had has nothing to do with a teenage couple having sex with eachother. This is about Adults having sex with kids, it is never in anyway acceptable.
    #74 Mar 24 2006 at 11:06 PM Rating: Decent
    Oy, I had hoped you'd understand; yet obviously you do not.

    --
    So, you think that having sex with a child is acceptable? 13 yrs old are nowhere near ready to accept the responsibility of a child if she where to get pregnant. 2 kids that are both between the ages of 14-17 having sex is a different story. Parents need to educate their children on safe sex, and talk to them about the possibility of them having kids because they chose to have sex.
    --

    Why is it different for 14-17 with a 14-17 year old? Are they less likely to have children than a 40 year old and a 14 year old? Tell me they are, do it, tell me.

    Two 14-17 year olds having sex is just as likely, possibly more due to less experience on average, of becoming pregnant.

    If they WERE to have a child then one of them is even experienced and capable of taking care of the child, most likely.

    I don't know where you live, but 99.9% of 14-17 year olds know that you can have children by having sex, by the way. Smiley: dubious

    --
    I am talking about Adults, that is just common sense. Social stigmas? What! So you wouldn’t care about your 14 yr old daughter having sex with a grown man? Just because biologically a girl can have babies around the age of 10-12, does not mean that they are ready to have sex. Sex is an emotional thing to get into. Adults should not have sex with CHILDREN point blank.
    --

    I would care, only because in today’s world that, usually, won’t be a good thing in any way. Again, 200 years ago I probably would’ve been the one having set it up! It’s about how society is at the time.

    I could retort with the same thing as you moved towards my point.

    When a girl is biologically ready to have babies around the age of 10-12, she quite possibly can be ready to have a sex and a child.

    You see it depends on the individual. Some woman could easily take care of a baby at 14, as they did years ago mind you. Girls today could even do it, ever heard of a babysitter?

    14-17 year olds quite possibly may be emotionally ready for sex.



    --
    She was his teacher, and she was 25 yrs. old. Double standards are wrong, that is the main reason why, some girls get wild as hell when they leave their parents house. Because their mother/father didn’t let them do anything, but let their son date sooner or Dads praising their son for getting laid.
    --

    I’m only going to tell you to think about why this is a double standard.

    --
    In no situation should an Adult man or woman have sex with a child. So what you are saying does not make any sense. Just because a man can most likely over power a woman, means that a man/boy can't be raped or physically molested? He was a willing sex partner, but he is a child, she was an Adult. SHE is supposed to know better, besides the fact that there are laws against having sex with minors. This case had has nothing to do with a teenage couple having sex with each other. [b]This is about Adults having sex with kids; it is never in anyway acceptable.
    --

    Why shouldn’t they? You do realize in many countries besides America this is a completely acceptable practice, don’t you?

    ~

    Take note that I use words like usually, probably and more than likely et cetera throughout my post. This means 99% of the time, not always.

    I am not saying release every man who was put into jail for having sex with a teenager here either, exactly. I don’t find the fact, however, that you are saying it’s wrong, no questions asked.

    Ok now I have another thing to point out. An adult is legally 18, correct? What if, per say, a guy’s girlfriend is 17-years old and he just turned 18. He is legally an adult, while she is still a child, legally. They have sex. This act is illegal, right?

    It’s about the individual, not their age.

    C

    ~Blix
    #75 Mar 24 2006 at 11:34 PM Rating: Excellent
    Liberal Conspiracy
    *******
    TILT
    TheBlix, Defender of Justice wrote:
    Ok now I have another thing to point out. An adult is legally 18, correct? What if, per say, a guy’s girlfriend is 17-years old and he just turned 18. He is legally an adult, while she is still a child, legally. They have sex. This act is illegal, right?
    Depending on the state it may or may not be. I'll assume though you're giving the usual "What if one party is at AoC and the other is two days shy of their AoC birthday?" argument.
    Quote:
    It’s about the individual, not their age.
    Unfortunately, we can't tailor-write a set of laws for every individual. You have to set and hold to a cut-off point somewhere. Like the other examples I pointed out of age related legal statutes, a twenty year old may be able to drink responsibly, but it's still illegal for me to sell them beer. A sixteen year old may be sharp as a tack but if I enter into a contract with them, they're still not legally bound to it.

    Part of having a just set of laws for the masses is that everyone is treated equally under the law. If you're this old, you can do this (or others can do it to you). But giving a minor the ability to waive the protection of AoC laws contridicts the entire point; any number of kids think they're mature and worldly well before they have any legitimate claim to either term.

    Also, keep in mind again that the minor is not responsible under AoC laws. You can enter into a consentual sexual relationship with a fifteen year old and have sex all month long and the law will not place any judgement on her (or his) shoulders but rather come after you. This again takes the "but I'm old enough!" argument out of the hands of the minor -- the law isn't preventing the minor from fu[/Aqua]cking, it's preventing anyone older from fu[Aqua]cking the minor.
    ____________________________
    Belkira wrote:
    Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
    #76 Mar 25 2006 at 12:34 AM Rating: Default
    **
    836 posts
    Quote:
    Why is it different for 14-17 with a 14-17 year old? Are they less likely to have children than a 40 year old and a 14 year old? Tell me they are, do it, tell me.


    Of course either parties are at risk for pregnancy. The big difference is an Adult should NOT be having sex with a minor there is no discussion about that.

    Thats why there is a difference between Adults and children. It's not that hard to understand.

    Quote:
    Why shouldn’t they? You do realize in many countries besides America this is a completely acceptable practice, don’t you?


    We aren't taliking about other countries, we are talking about America.

    Quote:
    Ok now I have another thing to point out. An adult is legally 18, correct? What if, per say, a guy’s girlfriend is 17-years old and he just turned 18. He is legally an adult, while she is still a child, legally. They have sex. This act is illegal, right?

    It’s about the individual, not their age


    An 18 yr old is still a teenager, even though they are legally an adult. Just because a person turns 18 doesn't magically make them mature. She was 25 and he was 15! You don't see the problem there?. Besides him being a child, that is a 10 yr. difference, she was his teacher. He is at an age were an Adults influence can affect him greater than if he was the same age as her. If it's not about their age, then why do people get arrested for child molestation?. If it was about the person, all a 10 yr would have to say is "But I'm grown up!" and they wouldn't prosecute anyone. If it wasn't about their age any Adult could have sex with a child regardless of age without worrying about jail time.

    An 18 yr old has a 1 yr difference on a 17 yr. old, so if the parents of that 17 yr. old wanted to press charges, as stupid as it is they could probably try.

    Yes, there are teens that can take care of themselves and are very mature at their age. But, you have to have laws like the ones we have, because everyone that is underage is most times are not mature enough to make the correct decisions, so there have to be laws to protect them from "child predators" that seek out children they can influence. That's why it is called growing up. I don't think the same I did when I was 14, just like when I'm 35, I will have gained some life experience and think differently about some things then the age I am now.

    Of course some people never grow up, because they choose not to.

    Quote:
    You see it depends on the individual. Some woman could easily take care of a baby at 14, as they did years ago mind you. Girls today could even do it, ever heard of a babysitter?


    omg, that is crazy! I can't believe you would even let that enter your mind. A 14 yr. old, seriously?. The point is a 14 yr. old is not a woman she is a child, a little girl. Even if the 14yr old's parents are millionare's it would be stupid of her to have a baby. Who pay's the bills? Her parentsWho buys her clothes, shoes, provides her essential needs?. Her parents.
    Easy to take care of a baby? You must not have any children, cause any one that has raised a child or takes care of their child would not say anything like that.

    I'm about to be 22yrs old, and it is hard to take care of child. They need you 24/7/365 for the rest of your life if you want to be a good/loving parent. A babysitter? Yeah, right it's just that easy to take care of a child. You have a child of your own and get back to me on that. A 14yr old is a child herself, to say different is ridiculous. It take money and time, what 14 yrs old make enough money to take care of a baby, or has the life experience..none.

    If a 14yr old was to get pregnant and keep the baby, it will be hard as hell even if she has her family there. If she does not it will be even harder, god forbid the baby's father is absent that adds on to it. She hasn't even experienced her life yet, she is a child. There is a reason why people wait to have kids. There is a reason why they call it "kids having kids", which describes teenagers having their own babies.
    Reply To Thread

    Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

     

    Recent Visitors: 273 All times are in CST
    Anonymous Guests (273)