Charges dropped in teacher sex scandalFollow

Who was that guy in the eighties that was a computer image.... Blond, squarish head?

Yes, she is smoking hot. In Canada that would have been all legal. Too bad she wasn't my teacher.

I've had her.

She was shi[Azure][/Azure]te.

Move on.

Re-Fixed.

Oh, she's getting off alright!

/kneeslap

[:cough:]

What I find sad is that she got off, #1 she is a beautiful woman, #2 She had sex with a boy who was 14 yrs old. I know that is prolly every young guys dream. I think she got off because of how she looks. But, what the hell is wrong with adults wanting to have sex with a child? That is nasty as hell. If it had been a 25 yr old male having sex with a 14 yr old girl, he would be in jail no questions asked.

Here in Ga this 30 something teacher had started having sex with her son's friend when he was 15 yrs. old, when he turned 16 they got married, now she is pregnant and is facing jail time. The woman to me is no that pretty. I know that no Dad wants to hear about their little girl banging a 25 yr old. But, it is a double standard. Which shouldn't matter because grown people should not be having sex with children.

That woman is fine enough to get someone her own age to bang her, why she chose a 14 yr old, just means she as f'cking problems. (Unless she didnt know he was 14, and he didnt look 14, Im not sure if she knew, but if she did know shame on her.)

Edited, Wed Mar 22 00:05:58 2006 by kalaria

that b'tch! Her grown azz should have know better.

She's 25; her life is hardly over. Maybe she'll make something useful of herself as a journalist.

She's got a long time to get over being "that hot teacher that banged that kid". Eichmann was doing fine in Argentina and a hell of a lot more people were upset with him.

Were I the kid, I'd have faked anxiety to have the charges dropped too.

Jail = Inaccessible

3yrs House arrest = 24-7 available booty call

I think the kid just had a date with his Biology teacher later and wanted to run home and wash the sheets.

After a student's parents, his instructors are typically the primary authority figure in a student's life with a superior-subordinate hierarchy established from kindergarten onward. The concept of loco parentis comes from the idea that, for around 6-8 hours of the day, a student's instructors are acting in the role of guardian to the child. For a teacher to abuse that power and relationship for sexual contact with a student is somewhat akin to incest. Idle daydreams and normal pubescent fantasies aside, I can see where the reality of such a relationship would leave a student, who is normally at the age where one is testing the waters of emotional/physical relationships with his female peers, feeling a bit disturbed inside and with a feeling that it was, at a gut level, "wrong".

Yes, yes... tee-hee! He had sex with a hot teacher! Giggle! And I'm not saying every student would feel anxiety or trauma over the relationship. But it's perfectly understandable in my mind that this particular student claims to have felt those thing.

eh? At the end of the day, we're still talking about statutory rape though. They call it "statutory" for a reason. It's because we've decided (somewhat arbitrarily) on a legal "age of consent", below which the teen is not legally able to give consent to sex. In most states it's an elective charge. The parents get to decide whether to charge someone with the crime (because legally, they hold the consent just as parents hold many of a minor's rights until they reach an age sufficient to hold them themselves).

In this case, the harm is the emotional effect that having sex with an adult (especially one in a position of authority) might have on a 14 year old. The whole point of prosecuting the crime for the parents is to protect their son from this harm. If the parent(s) decide that the emotional harm of going through a trial is greater then the harm done by the adult in this case, then it's certainly their right to choose to drop the charges.


A parent has many rights with regard to raising their children. This choice is one of them. Given the specifics of this case, I really can't blame them. Ultimately, it's going to come down to exactly how harmed they feel their son is as a result of all of this. So yeah. Justice in cases like this may not be equal and it may not seem fair. But the specifics are not always the same either. Whether we like it or not, in our society, we tend to view a female teen as more of a sexual victim then a male teen. That's just a fact. And because we do, we often make it so. I don't find it wrong for parents in cases like this to react based on those social rules we all put in place.


I'd love to live in a world where we don't assume that women are always sexual victims. But we don't. Not yet anyway...