Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

KatieFollow

#1 Jun 13 2004 at 8:43 PM Rating: Decent
So Katie, when are you going to post a RECENT pic?

I took that picture of Flea just today then posted it, you see, she looks good now, has looked good in the past, and will always look good. You however, took that picture of yours what, 3 years ago? I've seen that same picture everytime somebody brings up what a fat ***** you must be ever since the old UBB forums.

You should have told people in the recent contest to take into consideration that since that photo was taken, you've had two husbands, and God knows how many abortions/miscarriages.

Just askin' is all.

Feel free to keep being a sissy using out dated pictures to pretend you're still decent looking.

#2 Jun 13 2004 at 8:48 PM Rating: Default
Actually that pic is less than a year old. I could link my albulm so you could see Katie as she has been while posting on Allahs. http://photos.yahoo.com/amandey20 there you go hun, those are the ones. I will get a new one up ASAP as well.
#3 Jun 13 2004 at 9:12 PM Rating: Decent
The Walking Syphilis wrote:
Actually that pic is less than a year old.


You've got to be more fu[/i]cking retarded than we thought. According to your photo album, that pic ain't even a [i]day old.


Hmmm...I smell something fishy.
And it's not her ****.































That smells like sulpher from what I hear.
#4 Jun 13 2004 at 9:23 PM Rating: Good
****
6,730 posts
WHAT?! No dirty pics? WTF! For someone who is supposed to sleep around you sure have a tame album. >:<
#5 Jun 13 2004 at 9:28 PM Rating: Decent
Hey Katie, I need a favor from you.

You see, my buddies and I want to play basketball tomorrow, but we don't have a ball.

Can we borrow your fugly round *** head?

Thanks in advance.
#6 Jun 13 2004 at 9:28 PM Rating: Good
****
4,396 posts
Forgive my seeming like the dork with the encyclopedic memory, but I have to break in and give a little "pictures of Katie" history lesson to you relative newbies.

The picture of Katielynn that was first aired in the allakhazam forum is no where to be seen in on her yahoo site.

Initially Katie and I were verbally sparring over one thing or another...given this was back when it was usually just me vs. Katie as opposed to Allakhazam's entire forum vs. Katie. Anyhow...I had make some sort of comment about her most likely being a cow. She retorted that she was of course not, and said I could check her yahoo page if I did not believe her.

Now the picture that was posted at this point was a shot of Katie and this really country looking goober that she was married to at that point. (Yes she is 21 and twice married...) This guy made Katielynn look like a total winner in comparison as he was decked out in full red gear, including bollo and cowboy hat. Imagine the stereotype country line dancer in every movie that has a country bar scene and you get my meaning.

So...the picture really did not show much of Ms. Katie's figure and I commented on that, and of course my opinion about her pick-up truck sweetie. This picture was yanked in favor of the one where she is showing off her itty-bitties and sporting the "do" from the cover of "trailer part wives." This picture remained up about 2 days, much to the merriment of the forum as a whole.


My unending ridicule was only highlighted when Katie displayed the hideous sweaty head shot that has the title "puppies" under it on her page now.

Well, as can be seen, this picture was no jewel either. It did not show all that much, and in reality gave much credence to my "fat chick" theory. After a goodly amount of ridiculing Katie was once again forced to remove that picture in favor of the current one.

Now I will admit when I am wrong, and if Katie always looks like the girl in the current picture, then she is pretty attractive. But I would really be loathe to go to sleep next to that girl and wake up to the one entitled "puppies."

So which is the real thing? Was "puppies" a bad moment in time followed by an even worse moment entailing the display of such a picture...or is the other thing the real deal? If the first is closer to reality then the photographer of the second picture is deserving of a pulitzer for his work.

Any questions?

Tacosid





Edited, Sun Jun 13 22:35:40 2004 by Tacosid
____________________________
I voted for the other guy.
#7 Jun 13 2004 at 9:28 PM Rating: Default
Wouldnt be that I had removed them all, and had to put them back up to appease someone....
#8 Jun 13 2004 at 9:38 PM Rating: Good
****
4,396 posts
You know what baffles me the most though? The simple fact that I could make a sock puppet, post a picture of a heinously deformed girl sporting a mustache and someone on this forum would go...

/drool!

In short, I would like to say that the vast majority of you humps are totally pathetic.

Tacosid
____________________________
I voted for the other guy.
#9 Jun 13 2004 at 9:39 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Taco, none of the girls that posted pictures were ugly...
#10 Jun 13 2004 at 9:49 PM Rating: Good
****
4,396 posts
This is only the first time you have seen such a thread. I have now seen about 10 or so. The first few I would post a picture or link my dojo's website...but after about a dozen times it gets redundant.

I have seen some damn hideous chicks post their pictures on this forum.

To be honest, none of the pictures posted were of ugly women. But to be honest I do not find any of them to be drop dead gorgeous either.

The ones I have looked at...

Katie- My comments above.

Flea- You look like you would be cute. The reaction of the rubes on this forum to it was undeserved though. If you disagree with me, then you have a right to your opinion.

Nexa- The current picture of nexa is not as good as one of the other ones that she has posted in the past, but I believe it is the first one, and it gives her the "sweet girl I have known since 2nd grade look." She is good looking.

The girl with the face crap is nothing to write home about.

Tare is too skinny looking.

The other girl, the one with that posted the picture that looks like it was taken in school was pretty good looking.

But none of these girls warranted the 160ish responses they got.

Tacosid
____________________________
I voted for the other guy.
#11 Jun 13 2004 at 9:55 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
At least none of their faces do this.
#12 Jun 13 2004 at 9:57 PM Rating: Good
****
4,396 posts
When you turn eighty I want you to take your digital camera with you as you jump out of a plane. We'll see how you look.

I hope to still be able to get to the bathroom in time when I am that age.

Tacosid
____________________________
I voted for the other guy.
#13 Jun 13 2004 at 10:01 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Hm. So much for comedy. Of course when I'm eighty my face won't be tight as a drum. No need to be didactic, since I wasn't being serious.
#14 Jun 13 2004 at 10:04 PM Rating: Good
****
4,396 posts
My comedic retort was missed I suppose.

I was more commenting on the condition of the 80 year old ex-president than the future condition of your jowls.

Tacosid
____________________________
I voted for the other guy.
#16 Jun 13 2004 at 10:55 PM Rating: Good
****
6,730 posts
Quote:
To be honest, none of the pictures posted were of ugly women. But to be honest I do not find any of them to be drop dead gorgeous either.


This from a man who posted a pic of his wife and I had to wonder if it was his mother.

No one really gives a **** about your nasty, obnoxious, self centered pinions Taco. You are one of the last people to be able to talk about bueaty.
#17 Jun 13 2004 at 10:59 PM Rating: Good
****
4,396 posts
Because I was asked nicely.

This is me.

https://everquest.allakhazam.com/uf/Tacosid/brensei.jpg

This is my wife whom Gitslayer just described...

https://everquest.allakhazam.com/uf/Tacosid/Hanchee.jpg

This last one is a low resolution picture but the only one I had handy that showed myself, Chinto and Lamprey (for the old FoS people here...) Left to right...my wife, Chinto, Myself, Lamprey and some dude you guys have no reason to care about.

https://everquest.allakhazam.com/uf/Tacosid/carpet2.jpg

Tacosid
____________________________
I voted for the other guy.
#19 Jun 14 2004 at 2:30 AM Rating: Good
****
6,730 posts
Appologies to your wife Taco, she isn't as bad as I thought but then that wasn't the pic I remember you posting of her. Get her drunk did you?
#20 Jun 14 2004 at 6:29 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,453 posts
Quote:
This is Bill Gates whom Gitslayer just described...


FTFY
#21 Jun 14 2004 at 9:47 AM Rating: Good
****
4,396 posts
The picture posted of my wife about two years ago on this forum was taken immediately after a really tough workout. Her hair was a mess and I told everyone to look mean.

She was dissatisfied to find out I had posted that picture.

Tacosid
____________________________
I voted for the other guy.
#22 Jun 14 2004 at 9:47 AM Rating: Good
****
4,396 posts
Quote:
Not bad. You're no Goalkeeper, but not bad.
Thanks hon ;)


Bah. Goalkeeper is a toothpick. Real men weigh in excess of 220 lbs.

Tacosid
____________________________
I voted for the other guy.
#23 Jun 14 2004 at 10:00 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
She was dissatisfied to find out I had posted that picture.


That speaks.... volumes.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#24 Jun 14 2004 at 11:22 AM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,291 posts
Tacosid wrote:
Tare is too skinny looking.


Yeah, right. I would have posted a picture of my beer gut if I wasn't pregnant. It's hot stuff.

And according to Katie I have to wear a "training bra" too. Katie must have 40DDs, if I have small boobs. Smiley: lol
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#25 Jun 14 2004 at 11:23 AM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Only one way to settle this. Post a pic of your boobs.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#26 Jun 14 2004 at 11:25 AM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,291 posts
I knew you were going to say that, Jophiel! Lol.

Nah, it wouldn't be fair because now I have pregnant boobs. Hardly an accurate representation of my regular jugs.

____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
« Previous 1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 283 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (283)