Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Because of the horrible inadequacies of the GOP posters...Follow

#1 May 28 2004 at 2:45 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
I will be arguing positions from the right for the balance of the day.

Specifically, I will argue in favor of the following:

1. Pro-Life
2. Free Markets
3. Supply Side Economics in General
4. The War in Iraq
5. The Superb Performance of the following people in relation to their service to the United States: George W Bush, John Ashcroft; SCOTUS Justices Scalia, Rhenquist, and Thomas, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Cheney, and their collective staffs.
6. Drug Policy
7. Tax Cuts, specifically the benefit of reducing the highest marginal income tax rates for individuals and corporations.
8. The fact that Christ was the son of God who died for all of our sins allowing salvation only to those who accept him into their harts as their personal savior.
9. et all as it appears on the forum.

Fire away.

I will also screen my posts for spelling errors.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#2 May 28 2004 at 2:47 PM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Let's get Moe in here! It'll be like Bizarro world!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#3 May 28 2004 at 2:47 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
I will also screen my posts for spelling errors.

I call bull ****.
#4 May 28 2004 at 2:54 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Quote:
I call bull sh*t.


I’m afraid not. There’s nothing worse than arguing a position I believe in fervently against horribly poor opposition. As a proud believer in the importance of the order and structure of things, including language, it would be foolish of me to attempt to argue against liberal chaos and disarray while exercising a personal anarchy in regard to the rules of spelling which anyone with little effort and education can adhere to, as[b][/b]shole. It’s only the most basic level of courtesy to offer to my fellow posters.


Edited, Fri May 28 17:33:59 2004 by Smasharoo
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#5 May 28 2004 at 2:58 PM Rating: Good
/stands up and claps.

yew rok, budy.
#6 May 28 2004 at 3:21 PM Rating: Decent
Best watch it Smash or you will end up with 30 paragraphs of Gbaji taking the oposite position =P
#7 May 28 2004 at 3:24 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Quote:

Best watch it Smash or you will end up with 30 paragraphs of Gbaji taking the oposite position =P

One, I’m not certain he could argue it, or anything else effectively. Two, why would he or anyone else want to argue the opposing side when anyone with any sort of moral compass or understanding of right and wrong would clearly see how flawed of a position it was? Gbaji’s heart is in the right place, at least. That’s the important thing.


https://everquest.allakhazam.com/forum.html?forum=4&mid=1085773425270178718&num=3
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#8 May 28 2004 at 4:12 PM Rating: Default
make sure you add who you are quoting. it looks better, and I call that a grammatical error. but thats just me.
#9 May 28 2004 at 4:18 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
make sure you add who you are quoting. it looks better, and I call that a grammatical error. but thats just me.


You might want to turn on your subtlety chip, TrollBot.

Eb

#10 May 28 2004 at 4:18 PM Rating: Decent
So do we pick a topic from the list to argue, or do we wait to hear your stance on an issue? Any rules you want to make clear? Im not a master debater so I don't know if I'd be able to contribute much, but I'm all for it.
#11 May 28 2004 at 4:20 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
master debater


Must.....resist.....innuendo.....tooo strong.....must.....not.... FTFH *gasp*

Eb

Will power.
#12 May 28 2004 at 4:23 PM Rating: Decent
I left myself wide open for that one.
#13 May 28 2004 at 4:28 PM Rating: Decent
http://www.canoe.ca/TelevisionShowsE/edthesock.html

Eb

*****
#14 May 28 2004 at 4:31 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
"...the rules of spelling which anyone with little effort and education can adhere to." --the new and (some what) improved Smasharoo

You ended your sentence with a preposition. That's a grammatical no-no.*

Totem

*I know he refered only to spelling, but grammar must play a part as well if he is going to be the consumate right-winger.
#15 May 28 2004 at 4:34 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Quote:

So do we pick a topic from the list to argue, or do we wait to hear your stance on an issue? Any rules you want to make clear? Im not a master debater so I don't know if I'd be able to contribute much, but I'm all for it.

By all means. I'm rather weak in the rhetorical arts myself.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#16 May 28 2004 at 4:35 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
*I know he refered only to spelling, but grammar must play a part as well if he is going to be the consummate right-winger.


If only that were the case with the Righties here.

Eb
#17 May 28 2004 at 4:36 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Thank you, Totem. I have corrected my error.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#18 May 28 2004 at 4:37 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Thank you, Totem. I have corrected my error.


This is not very Righty of you, Smash.

Eb

Admitting mistakes? Pshaw!
#19 May 28 2004 at 4:38 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
I think you may want to review the correction, dear Pickle.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#20 May 28 2004 at 4:41 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
*gasp!*

He's channeling Newt Gingrich!

Totem
#21 May 28 2004 at 4:41 PM Rating: Default
If there's always the free market concept, where do you think it will leave the country in the future. If "future" is too broad, approximate and give a date. I think it will be more like Russia than anything else, so... conservative, why do you think this country will live with a free market. please and thank you.
#22 May 28 2004 at 4:44 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
I think you may want to review the correction, dear Pickle.


Touche, Smash

My good tickets have turned me into Speedy Gonzales.

Eb

My bad.
#23 May 28 2004 at 4:45 PM Rating: Decent
Lol, now I know how Moeb felt seeing the flag upside down in your posts that new one makes me wanna puke.

Whats worse is looking at that pic and reading old posts by the communist sympathizer.
#24 May 28 2004 at 5:13 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Well, firstly I think this administration has done a simply remarkable job in deploying a military that was decimated by foolhardy Clinton era budget cuts and troop reductions that clearly placed both the best interests and security of this great nation in grave peril. One should of course, never advocate for war, but when negotiating with foreign states it is imperative to do so from a position of strength. Presidents Regan and Bush the elder proved this to you and I, and indeed, the world by causing the collapse of Soviet Communism in the face of a vastly superior United States Military.

While I applaud the current administration for it’s brilliant campaign in Iraq, I would argue that the best course for the nation would be to dramatically increase defense spending and troop strength. There are multiple reasons this would benefit us a nation. Allow me to segregate them into three categories, which I will address forthwith. Strategic, Economic, and Technological.

Strategic – Let me begin by first countering a common left wing argument that an increase in standing troop strength could be perceived as a threat by other nation states. While in a situation of relative equity among war powers between states this could be the case, the Unites States is clearly not in such a position. Even our current military strength should be viewed essentially as an absolute in a strategic sense. It would seem apparent that any nation who would be significantly threatened by an increase in troop strength would be in a superior position relative to our own strategic interest. To simplify somewhat, nations already held in check strategically by stand off nuclear options will not perceive increased ground troop strength as a significant increase in danger to them over what they perceive presently. China will not fear an invasion if we increased the standing army to even one million troops. States that harbor terrorists, however, may. In no way can I conceptualize of that being detrimental to our interests. In my mind states that harbor terrorists should be terrified of us as barbarian nations were of Rome under Augustus.

Economic – Defense spending cannot but help the economy. It’s impossible that it shouldn’t as it directly creates jobs, often well paying jobs, in critical industrial sectors that use the increased revenue to reinvest in the communities surrounding them. Witness the economic miracles in places like Groton CT when defense spending is appropriately applied to needed programs. Unlike spending this money on wasteful entitlements which generate nothing for the economy but a permanent underclass of poor citizens who fall prey to a culture or dependence without contribution, using it to create high paying jobs offers opportunity as opposed to a handout which is what America is all about. Give a man a fish as the great philosopher once said.

Technological – Without increased military spending the United States is in real danger of losing it’s edge in technology and innovation. More scientific breakthroughs than can be listed have been the result of defense spending. Not only big ticket technologies, either. For every Manhattan Project or Radar there are literally thousands of smaller breakthroughs that impact all of our daily lives. Velcro, for instance, and of course this very Internet we use to communicate at this moment. Inovation of course feeds the economy, which feeds innovation and it becomes a pleasant cycle perpetually lifting the United States to its rightful place as sole superpower on the globe.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#25 May 28 2004 at 5:24 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
I made an error and posted my free market and defense spending arguments on the opposite threads. My apologies.

Other argument is here:

https://everquest.allakhazam.com/forum.html?forum=4&mid=108570986350533944&num=32
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#26 May 28 2004 at 6:10 PM Rating: Default
edited to correct the thread flow. I almost replied to that here.

I shouldn't open my mouth, as your sig. so applies, but I can't help it.
Thank you for the wonderful explanation of this "intricate latticework" we call a free market. I whole heartedly think that it is the miracle of the modern age. However the explanation caused me a little pain when you wrote

Quote:
Saving and investment can then develop capital goods and increase the productivity and wages of workers..


What chaps my *** is where it all heads. I may be just another Forest Gump, but what happens if anti-trust balances were not around? Are you saying that the eventual merger (all i can visualize is a pyramid, everything merging into one entity) will be a "healthy" thing? Sorry, the only example I get to see day to day is Walmart's revenue figures, and the disgruntled people that work for the company. ?? I hope you understand my worry, I'm not the most educated lad on the planet..

ps if and when that overall merger happens, what position does that leave our gov't in? if i have all the money, who's gonna control what i do?


Edited, Fri May 28 19:18:39 2004 by DeanoTyler
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 198 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (198)