Quote:
It's not coldness or callousness when I say that what we are doing in Iraq is well worth the cost we are paying. Sure. We should certainly attept to minimize our casualties. But to suggest that we shouldn't be there at all? Or that the goals we have are bad ones? I simply don't agree with that at all. We will never know how many US citizens we will save by taking this action. I think that's better then having another 9/11, don't you?[
and thats just the problem too many think that attacking Iraq was about more then greed. It simply beyond any reasonable doubt was not about terroism, or WMD. It was about oil and the need for those in power to accumulate more wealth. Be honest with yourself, erm nm forgot who I was speaking too. North Korea presented more of a threat and continues to present more of a threat. Iraq simply doesnt, but they represent the intrests of the Saudi Arabians whom the Bushes have accepted so much money from that the rest of us cant even comprehend the numbers.
I was wrong about Bush losing the election, you are right the only thing that protects as things currently stand is the 8 year rule. Bush and his cronnies will steal the election as the did before. They will unveil Bin Laden in October and wouldnt be suprised if they ammended the Constitution so he could be President for more then 8 years. The corruption of the current administration knows no bounds and is only perpetuated by the rich, ignorant, and lottery winners like yourself.
Bottom line is we should have never gone to Iraq now that we are there we must finish it in our favour. I sincerely doubt this will happen unless the current administration and its supporters are replaced by people who can think outside of their pocketbook.
